Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

UNISOC T618

► remove from comparison  T618

The Unisoc Tiger T618 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 2 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4x-1866 memory controller and an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. AI acceleration is handled by a visual digital signal processor (VDSP) clocked at up to 936 MHz.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelUNISOC T618Qualcomm Snapdragon 660Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Series Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Kryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 « 2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6061.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock2000 - 2000 MHz2200 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm14 nm11 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISPAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T618
0.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
22763 Points (19%)
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
min: 2526     avg: 2954     median: 3004.5 (35%)     max: 3202 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
min: 2611     avg: 2910     median: 2961 (34%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T618 +
min: 365     avg: 380.2     median: 382 (16%)     max: 393 Points
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T618 +
min: 1229     avg: 1332     median: 1325.5 (2%)     max: 1461 Points
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T618 +
1911 Points (19%)
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T618 +
5744 Points (6%)
4938 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T618 +
min: 2762     avg: 2962     median: 2874.2 (3%)     max: 3432 ms
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T618 +
min: 10787     avg: 12599     median: 12356.5 (11%)     max: 14722 Points
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T618 +
58 Points (17%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T618 +
min: 68     avg: 75.7     median: 74.5 (16%)     max: 93 Points
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
T618 +
min: 38514     avg: 46604     median: 40597 (34%)     max: 60702 Points
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
T618 +
min: 31976     avg: 38448     median: 40494 (33%)     max: 42875 Points
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
T618 +
min: 32932     avg: 39187     median: 40289 (7%)     max: 44339 Points
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
T618 +
min: 62476     avg: 65538     median: 66592 (24%)     max: 67546 Points
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T618 +
min: 173051     avg: 189777     median: 192320 (19%)     max: 203961 Points
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 201310     avg: 218309     median: 213115 (13%)     max: 240502 Points
93%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 67085     avg: 69141     median: 68306 (19%)     max: 72033 Points
97%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 9058     avg: 10105     median: 10105 (16%)     max: 11152 Points
106%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
T618 +
min: 7404     avg: 7980     median: 8273 (38%)     max: 8414 Points
6514 Points (30%)
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
T618 +
5739 Points (30%)
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T618 +
min: 82     avg: 3510     median: 3509.5 (23%)     max: 6937 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
T618 +
12638 Points (63%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T618 +
min: 359     avg: 372.3     median: 372.5 (14%)     max: 385 Points
88%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T618 +
min: 4.22     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.22 Watt
101%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T618 +
min: 1.179     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T618 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 90% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 87% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 01:08:37

#0 checking url part for id 12997 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.06s ... 0.061s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12997 +0.014s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 12997 +0.025s ... 0.1s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.012s ... 0.112s

#10 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.037s ... 0.149s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.01s ... 0.159s

#12 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.039s ... 0.198s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.198s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.193s ... 0.391s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.423s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.423s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)