Samsung Galaxy A Series

Graphics Adapter: unknown, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, Imagination PowerVR GE8100, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 618, Qualcomm Adreno 619, Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Display: 6.40 inch, 6.50 inch, 6.60 inch, 6.70 inch
Weight: 0.179kg, 0.181kg, 0.185kg, 0.186kg, 0.189kg, 0.193kg, 0.195kg, 0.196kg, 0.197kg, 0.203kg, 0.205kg, 0.206kg, 0.211kg
Price: 110, 120, 160, 165, 169, 170, 179, 189, 229, 299, 369, 409, 429, 449, 469, 600 euro
Average of 806 scores (from 1807 reviews)
Samsung Galaxy A71
Samsung has decided to launch two of its mid-rangers in 2020, the Samsung Galaxy A51 and A71. While both come with awesome flat Full-HD+ Super AMOLED Infinity O screens, they do differ in terms of the screen size. The Galaxy A71 has an extensive 6.7-inch screen as compared to 6.5 inches of the Galaxy A51. Despite its large screen size, the Samsung Galaxy A71’s smooth and elegantly curved-edge screen design will be a beautiful and comfortable fit in any user’s hand. While the A71 and the A51 have their differences, both cater for sharper and good viewing angles. It is definitely an undeniably worthy experience for users with these models, as they do come with OLED’s patented pop of contrast and vibrance. Some are of the opinion that the Galaxy A71 is largely aimed at the younger generation which spends most of their time online while consuming and creating high volumes of video contents.
While the display is worth pondering on, the cameras of the Galaxy A71 definitely deserve attention. This model incorporates a 64MP main camera, a 123-degree 12MP Ultra-Wide camera, a 5MP Macro camera and also a 5MP Depth camera. The Ultra-Wide camera caters for a wider field of vision, as it typically acts like the human eyesight. On the other hand, the Macro camera brings tiny details into the spotlight for a premium user experience. Whether it is for a close-up or an ultra-wide shot, the A71 has it all under control with its array of cameras. Even the need for an artistic Bokeh blur or a night-time shot would not be an issue anymore with the Samsung Galaxy A71. The super-steady shots give extremely smooth live videos, even when the journey is all about hardcore adventure. Apart from its camera, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is obviously a bit of a star when it comes to battery life. While the well-known Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus and Galaxy Note 10 Plus sported 4100 mAh and 4300 mAh respectively, the Galaxy A71 has incorporated a larger 4500mAh battery.
The Samsung Galaxy A71, with its premium gloss finish, makes it easier to be handled, and the rhythmical pattern adds a touch of unique personality to its colourful editions. The A71 comes in three color variations, namely Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver and Prism Crush Blue. The Galaxy A71 also comes with a fingerprint scanner, which has been embedded nicely into the display for user convenience. In addition, this model also provides the option of using face recognition to unlock the phone instead. However, it is worth noting that the Galaxy A71 model is not water resistant, which might not be happy news for all the water-sport junkies out there. The Galaxy A71 also does not support wireless charging. Despite having both sides of the coin in terms of its pros and cons, the Samsung Galaxy A71 still has its own unique way of presentation in the overall market.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 730
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.179kg
Price: 469 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
A 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, an octa-core Snapdragon 730 SoC and quad rear-facing cameras with a 64 MP main shooter all make the Galaxy A71 sound good on paper. Samsung's new mid-range smartphone packs plenty of other features into its large case too, but our tests will show whether it is enough to trouble the established order.
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im opening up a Samsung Galaxy A71 that has been Water Damaged, at this point i dont have a fix for it but i give some pointers on what to look for and also what you might be able to fix up to get it going again
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 07/22/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im opening up a Samsung Galaxy A71 that has been Water Damaged, at this point i dont have a fix for it but i give some pointers on what to look for and also what you might be able to fix up to get it going again
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 07/22/2022
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find today.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find today.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 700%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 700%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Ausdroid

If that’s above your budget and you were considering the A51 instead, don’t. I tried the A51 for a day and the A70/A71 are much more responsive, smooth and speedy to use compared to A51 model. The A70/A71 also have a vastly better in screen fingerprint reader than the A51. Australian stock of the Samsung A70 is still being sold by Mobileciti for $549.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: Ausdroid

If that’s above your budget and you were considering the A51 instead, don’t. I tried the A51 for a day and the A70/A71 are much more responsive, smooth and speedy to use compared to A51 model. The A70/A71 also have a vastly better in screen fingerprint reader than the A51. Australian stock of the Samsung A70 is still being sold by Mobileciti for $549.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A71 offers most of what's great about flagship Samsung phones for a lower price. Unless top-of-the-line features and specs are absolutely needed, this is arguably the perfect Android smartphone for most people, as it should check the necessary boxes for all but the most hardcore Android users. It offers solid performance, long battery life, plenty of camera options and even a headphone jack, while possible downsides for some may be its plastic back, mediocre single speaker and its tall screen aspect ratio.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A71 offers most of what's great about flagship Samsung phones for a lower price. Unless top-of-the-line features and specs are absolutely needed, this is arguably the perfect Android smartphone for most people, as it should check the necessary boxes for all but the most hardcore Android users. It offers solid performance, long battery life, plenty of camera options and even a headphone jack, while possible downsides for some may be its plastic back, mediocre single speaker and its tall screen aspect ratio.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A71 was a solid smartphone that offers a top-tier performance, especially considering it’s a mid-range handset. While my current favourite smartphone on the market is the S20+, the A71 delivered an experience that Is strikingly similar for a fraction of the cost.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A71 was a solid smartphone that offers a top-tier performance, especially considering it’s a mid-range handset. While my current favourite smartphone on the market is the S20+, the A71 delivered an experience that Is strikingly similar for a fraction of the cost.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A71 builds on the success of last year's A70 with upgraded internals and a new 64MP camera that takes great photos. The design has been refreshed for 2020, you get incredible battery life with 25W fast charging, and the 6.7-inch AMOLED panel is one of the best in this category. As an overall package, the Galaxy A71 is one of the best mid-range phones you'll find in 2020.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A71’s front camera is capable of capturing decent selfie images and video in most conditions. Its single-lens fixed-focus camera is not quite on the same level as current high-end devices with autofocus-systems and more efficient stabilization, but the Samsung is one of the better mid-rangers we have tested under our Selfie protocol. This said, if you are after top-end front camera performance in a mid-range device, the Huawei nova 6 5G currently remains your best option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2020
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A71’s front camera is capable of capturing decent selfie images and video in most conditions. Its single-lens fixed-focus camera is not quite on the same level as current high-end devices with autofocus-systems and more efficient stabilization, but the Samsung is one of the better mid-rangers we have tested under our Selfie protocol. This said, if you are after top-end front camera performance in a mid-range device, the Huawei nova 6 5G currently remains your best option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2020
Source: DxOMark

While Samsung’s mid-range A-series devices aren’t meant to rival the manufacturer’s excellent photography of its flagship models, the new A71 doesn’t really improve on the A9 we tested a year ago. From both the main and ultra-wide cameras you can expect well-exposed images in good light, excellent dynamic range and well-saturated color, but blue color casts can also make outdoor images disappointing.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2020
Source: DxOMark

While Samsung’s mid-range A-series devices aren’t meant to rival the manufacturer’s excellent photography of its flagship models, the new A71 doesn’t really improve on the A9 we tested a year ago. From both the main and ultra-wide cameras you can expect well-exposed images in good light, excellent dynamic range and well-saturated color, but blue color casts can also make outdoor images disappointing.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/10/2020
Source: Tech Nave

For RM1799, I think the Galaxy A71 is one of the better mid-range devices for mobile gaming. Hardcore mobile gamers are always looking for the best tech specs for the glory of graphics and this phone is no exception. Let me just say this - as a PC gamer and a big fan of mobile gaming phones, I was genuinely impressed with how the Galaxy A71 handled mobile gaming, so it might do the same for you too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: Tech Nave

For RM1799, I think the Galaxy A71 is one of the better mid-range devices for mobile gaming. Hardcore mobile gamers are always looking for the best tech specs for the glory of graphics and this phone is no exception. Let me just say this - as a PC gamer and a big fan of mobile gaming phones, I was genuinely impressed with how the Galaxy A71 handled mobile gaming, so it might do the same for you too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: Sam Mobile

We loved the Galaxy A70, and the Galaxy A71 brings some neat upgrades. Its performance is notably better thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip, the display has been upgraded to an Infinity-O panel, there’s a higher-resolution main camera and a macro camera at the back, and you get Android 10 and One UI 2.0 out of the box. The A71’s design is excellent, and there’s not a lot it doesn’t do well.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Source: Sam Mobile

We loved the Galaxy A70, and the Galaxy A71 brings some neat upgrades. Its performance is notably better thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip, the display has been upgraded to an Infinity-O panel, there’s a higher-resolution main camera and a macro camera at the back, and you get Android 10 and One UI 2.0 out of the box. The A71’s design is excellent, and there’s not a lot it doesn’t do well.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A71 is an excellent overall smartphone with touches of what makes Samsung flagships great. It’s a gorgeous device with some of the best mid-range hardware plus a set of decent shooters to boot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Source: Gogi.in

Samsung Galaxy A71 is another mid-premium smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 octa core processor and packed with quad cameras (64MP Primary), 4500 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support and priced at Rs. 29,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A71 is an excellent overall smartphone with touches of what makes Samsung flagships great. It’s a gorgeous device with some of the best mid-range hardware plus a set of decent shooters to boot.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Source: Gogi.in

Samsung Galaxy A71 is another mid-premium smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 octa core processor and packed with quad cameras (64MP Primary), 4500 mAh battery with 25W fast charging support and priced at Rs. 29,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: NLT

All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2020
Source: NLT

All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2020
Source: GSM Arena

With Xiaomi and Realme aggressively launching phones with flagship-grade specs, it's a tough job being a mid-ranger these days. We do believe the A71 has a bright future though, as its price will soon go down, while many carriers will subsidize it enough to make it an attractive purchase.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

With Xiaomi and Realme aggressively launching phones with flagship-grade specs, it's a tough job being a mid-ranger these days. We do believe the A71 has a bright future though, as its price will soon go down, while many carriers will subsidize it enough to make it an attractive purchase.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Yugatech

Samsung launched its newest mid-range device, The Galaxy A71, in-line with that we did our quick hands-on video a couple of days ago. After spending some quality time with this device we are now ready to give our full thoughts on the Galaxy A71.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/13/2020
Source: Yugatech

Samsung launched its newest mid-range device, The Galaxy A71, in-line with that we did our quick hands-on video a couple of days ago. After spending some quality time with this device we are now ready to give our full thoughts on the Galaxy A71.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/13/2020
Source: Yugatech

The panel is bright and offers vivid colors, performance is pretty smooth, the battery life is impressive, and it produces decent photos with both the rear and front cameras. With its price tag of PHP 22,990, you might want to consider this competent mid-range smartphone in your options.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Source: Yugatech

The panel is bright and offers vivid colors, performance is pretty smooth, the battery life is impressive, and it produces decent photos with both the rear and front cameras. With its price tag of PHP 22,990, you might want to consider this competent mid-range smartphone in your options.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Source: Unbox

Before the highly-anticipated launch of the Galaxy S20 series and Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung brought its next-generation Galaxy A series to the Philippines first. The Galaxy A71 is our first look at Samsung’s new design language for its phones, retaining the Galaxy A70’s big screen while adding better hardware in the form of a new camera module and processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2020
Source: Unbox

Before the highly-anticipated launch of the Galaxy S20 series and Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung brought its next-generation Galaxy A series to the Philippines first. The Galaxy A71 is our first look at Samsung’s new design language for its phones, retaining the Galaxy A70’s big screen while adding better hardware in the form of a new camera module and processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2020
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A71 compares favourably against other midrange phones and brings a lot to the table, offering a massive and vibrant Super AMOLED display, a good rear quad camera, expandable memory, an audio jack and above all, superb battery life, all at a price under RM1,800.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A71 compares favourably against other midrange phones and brings a lot to the table, offering a massive and vibrant Super AMOLED display, a good rear quad camera, expandable memory, an audio jack and above all, superb battery life, all at a price under RM1,800.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Hitech Century

Our test unit lacked the box and any other accessories that would typically come with it so we can’t comment on how much extra value you get but for its intended asking price at about under RM2,000, the Galaxy A71 is a good looking midranger indeed.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2020
Source: Hitech Century

Our test unit lacked the box and any other accessories that would typically come with it so we can’t comment on how much extra value you get but for its intended asking price at about under RM2,000, the Galaxy A71 is a good looking midranger indeed.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2020
Source: Hitech Century

Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2020
Source: Hitech Century

Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews

This is a mid-range phone that is really trying to outmuscle its £420 price and go big. It’s got a large 6.7-inch display, fast 25w charging for a big battery and a 64MP main camera. It’s not the prettiest phone around, but if you’re into watching media on the go and shooting video then you’ll find a lot to like here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews

This is a mid-range phone that is really trying to outmuscle its £420 price and go big. It’s got a large 6.7-inch display, fast 25w charging for a big battery and a 64MP main camera. It’s not the prettiest phone around, but if you’re into watching media on the go and shooting video then you’ll find a lot to like here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2020
Source: Tech Advisor

The A71’s appeal will depend heavily on price, but if it’s similar to the A70 then Samsung will be onto a winner. The core spec here is really solid, and the compromises - plastic back, HD display, no wireless charging or waterproofing - are all on points that are less important to most users. If you can ignore the appeal of the S-series branding on the S10 Lite, the A71 looks like the phone to beat in Samsung’s mid-tier offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2020
Source: Tech Advisor

The A71’s appeal will depend heavily on price, but if it’s similar to the A70 then Samsung will be onto a winner. The core spec here is really solid, and the compromises - plastic back, HD display, no wireless charging or waterproofing - are all on points that are less important to most users. If you can ignore the appeal of the S-series branding on the S10 Lite, the A71 looks like the phone to beat in Samsung’s mid-tier offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2020
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A71 has plenty going for it, from its big screen and power to the feature-packed cameras and massive battery - this could well be a winning formula at an attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2020
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A71 has plenty going for it, from its big screen and power to the feature-packed cameras and massive battery - this could well be a winning formula at an attractive price point.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2020
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2020
Source: Blick

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2020
Source: Blick

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2020
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andro 4 All

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Andro 4 All

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Profesional Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Profesional Review

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 93% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 93% workmanship: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; nice display; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; nice display; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Excellent display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Excellent display; great cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70%
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 71%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 63% features: 84%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 63% features: 84%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 84%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 65% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 65% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare

Positive: Powerful processor; attractive price; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; good connectivity; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Pianeta Cellulare

Positive: Powerful processor; attractive price; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; good connectivity; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Diskidee.nl

Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; weak hardware; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: Diskidee.nl

Positive: Elegant design; beautiful display; long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; weak hardware; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% mobility: 100%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% mobility: 100%
Source: Fredzone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Fredzone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; beautiful screen; nice cameras; high autonomy; USB-C; mini jack. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2020
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; beautiful screen; nice cameras; high autonomy; USB-C; mini jack. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; no LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2020
Source: Frandroid

Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2020
Source: Frandroid

Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2020
Source: 90 Sekund

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: 90 Sekund

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/21/2020
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Big screen; good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/21/2020
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; nice performance; decent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2020
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; nice performance; decent cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2020
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hitech Vesti

Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent display; long battery life; great cameras; NFC. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint scanner.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Hitech Vesti

Positive: Stylish design; high performance; excellent display; long battery life; great cameras; NFC. Negative: Plastic case; inflexible fingerprint scanner.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 81% mobility: 89% workmanship: 84%
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; excellent display; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; excellent display; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; great cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; excellent macro cameras; premium design; big screen; quick charging.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice performance; elegant design; great built quality.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; decent hardware; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great cameras; decent hardware; high performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Elegant design; excellent cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Elegant design; excellent cameras; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent cameras; great display; compact size; light weight; nice gaming performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent cameras; great display; compact size; light weight; nice gaming performance; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; suitable for girls; solid workmanship; infinity-O display; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; suitable for girls; solid workmanship; infinity-O display; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls; nice display; good hardware; high performance.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Attractive design; good price; impressive macro cameras; suitable for girls.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Danviet

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2020
Source: Danviet

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; suitable for girls.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; decent hardware; big screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; decent hardware; big screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; slim size; beautiful design; nice display; great cameras.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; premium design; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; slim size; beautiful design; nice display; great cameras.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; premium design; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/22/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn

Positive: Elegant design; high performance; long battery life; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn

Positive: Elegant design; high performance; long battery life; excellent cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: VNReview

Positive: Premium design; great built quality; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: VNReview

Positive: Premium design; great built quality; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Tinh Te

Positive: Elegant design; big screen; super AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Source: Tinh Te

Positive: Elegant design; big screen; super AMOLED display; nice cameras; high performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Compact size; light weight; big screen; good hardware; nice performance; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Compact size; light weight; big screen; good hardware; nice performance; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Elegant design; large battery capacity; high performance; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent display; big screen; large battery capacity; fast charging; nice cameras; powerful processor; modern design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Elegant design; large battery capacity; high performance; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent display; big screen; large battery capacity; fast charging; nice cameras; powerful processor; modern design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice design; great display; excellent cameras; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice design; great display; excellent cameras; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: Danviet

Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; attractive design; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; impressive quad cameras; excellent display; stylish design; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: Danviet

Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; attractive design; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; impressive quad cameras; excellent display; stylish design; powerful hardware; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Nice quad cameras; super AMOLED display; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Nice quad cameras; super AMOLED display; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; high performance; long battery life; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Decent hardware; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Impressive cameras; large battery capacity; attractive price; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Decent hardware; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful processor; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Source: Mobil DK

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil DK

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 80%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 80%
Source: Playtech.ro

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good speakers; great built quality; elegant design; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2020
Source: Playtech.ro

Positive: Excellent display; long battery life; good speakers; great built quality; elegant design; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2020
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: Large screen; nice performance; good autonomy; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: Large screen; nice performance; good autonomy; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
Specifications

Processor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.185kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G (Snapdragon) could appeal to buyers looking for 5G speeds on a budget, as well as those who appreciate its large AMOLED screen. But when it comes to camera performance, this phone is a harder sell, mainly because the competition in the mid-range segment is so fierce. Although it’s a substantial upgrade in terms of imaging over its older down-market sibling, the Galaxy A50, the A71 5G’s street price puts it up against some very capable phones from other makers that provide generally better photo and video quality across the board. Buyers who simply want a nimble, affordable Samsung phone with a nice screen won’t be disappointed, but those who prioritize camera performance should carefully consider other handsets in the same price bracket before opting for the A71 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2020
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a solid mid-range device that competes well with others in its class. It offers an excellent screen with solid battery life and speedy performance. At half the cost of flagships, you'd hardly know it's not a top-flight phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a good phone for 5G on a (relative) budget, with solid performance all around. It also costs $100 less and has a much better camera than the 5G-capable Moto Edge. That said, we'd like to see better durability for $600, and unless you buy the phone on Verizon, you're not getting a future-proof 5G experience. And with the $500 Moto One 5G launching on AT&T and Verizon soon, the competition is really heating up. So while the Galaxy A71 gets most things right, you might want to sit tight to see how things shake out before picking one up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

The Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a cheaper path to 5G service if that’s important to you, but otherwise it’s only a decent $600 phone. For hundreds less, the Pixel 4a and iPhone SE are better in almost every respect, save for battery life, while the OnePlus Nord is a much more well-rounded sub-$500 5G option for those who can buy it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.193kg
Price: 369 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
One of the Koreans' most popular mid-range models is now also being equipped with the fastest mobile network standard to date. In addition, there's more storage, a bigger battery, and a macro camera compared to the predecessor. However, we'll also have to cover the steps taken backwards by the device in this review...
Source: Android Authority

Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Especially since the phone is almost two years old at this point and Samsung is still selling it for its original $400 launch price. We think that spending a bit more for the newer and better Galaxy A53 makes more sense. The phone is also often on sale, going for as low as $350. Alternatively, getting the Pixel 5a at $449 or waiting for the Pixel 6a seems like a better deal. And if you want to spend less on a Samsung phone, get the newer Galaxy A33.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Authority

Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Especially since the phone is almost two years old at this point and Samsung is still selling it for its original $400 launch price. We think that spending a bit more for the newer and better Galaxy A53 makes more sense. The phone is also often on sale, going for as low as $350. Alternatively, getting the Pixel 5a at $449 or waiting for the Pixel 6a seems like a better deal. And if you want to spend less on a Samsung phone, get the newer Galaxy A33.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. The processor delivers the everyday performance people demand, though it is a bit on the sluggish side when it comes to intense gaming. Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. The processor delivers the everyday performance people demand, though it is a bit on the sluggish side when it comes to intense gaming. Battery life is the big winner here, which benefits from the screen and processor combination. You can count on two full days of usage from this phone, which is more than most other handsets offer, though charging speeds aren’t the quickest. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: PC Mag

Each year, Samsung’s Galaxy A-series lineup gets a little better, but there’s always an awkward outlier. This year, it’s the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. Yes, it offers millimeter-wave 5G, but that isn't enough to make up for its shortcomings. With sluggish performance, unimpressive cameras, and a low-res display, the Galaxy A42 5G doesn't stand out from the competition and simply isn't a good value at $400. For an extra $50, the Google Pixel 5a With 5G is miles better, with a sharper display, clearer cameras, and superior software, making it our Editors' Choice award winner for midrange phones. If you're looking to spend less, meanwhile, Samsung's own Galaxy A32 5G is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable models, and offers much better value for the money than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: PC Mag

Each year, Samsung’s Galaxy A-series lineup gets a little better, but there’s always an awkward outlier. This year, it’s the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G. Yes, it offers millimeter-wave 5G, but that isn't enough to make up for its shortcomings. With sluggish performance, unimpressive cameras, and a low-res display, the Galaxy A42 5G doesn't stand out from the competition and simply isn't a good value at $400. For an extra $50, the Google Pixel 5a With 5G is miles better, with a sharper display, clearer cameras, and superior software, making it our Editors' Choice award winner for midrange phones. If you're looking to spend less, meanwhile, Samsung's own Galaxy A32 5G is our Editors’ Choice winner for affordable models, and offers much better value for the money than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: The Verge

If you think you’ll want a little more than the A42 5G has to offer, then the $500 A52 5G is a good step-up option with a bit of a better camera, a great high refresh rate screen, and the added peace of mind of IP-rated waterproofing. If you can find a Pixel 4A 5G in stock anywhere, that would be another good alternative at $500 with a better camera, faster processor, and cleaner software. It offers a smaller 6.2-inch screen, though, and again, you’ll have a hard time finding one new at this point since its successor, the Pixel 5A, will likely be arriving in the near future. If none of the above suits you, then the A42 5G really isn’t a bad choice. Its healthy support policy, decent overall performance, and robust battery life make it one of the best options from Verizon for around $400. Just don’t get too excited about mmWave.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: The Verge

If you think you’ll want a little more than the A42 5G has to offer, then the $500 A52 5G is a good step-up option with a bit of a better camera, a great high refresh rate screen, and the added peace of mind of IP-rated waterproofing. If you can find a Pixel 4A 5G in stock anywhere, that would be another good alternative at $500 with a better camera, faster processor, and cleaner software. It offers a smaller 6.2-inch screen, though, and again, you’ll have a hard time finding one new at this point since its successor, the Pixel 5A, will likely be arriving in the near future. If none of the above suits you, then the A42 5G really isn’t a bad choice. Its healthy support policy, decent overall performance, and robust battery life make it one of the best options from Verizon for around $400. Just don’t get too excited about mmWave.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Android Police

After spending more time with it, I’ve grown to love the Samsung Galaxy A42’s striking design. This is a shiny phone, almost metallic-looking in person, but it also offers an iridescent reflection peppered with an eye-catching dot pattern. I know it's a silly thing to highlight, and yet for me, it makes all of the difference. I still notice how compelling this phone looks a month later, which I didn't expect from a middle-of-the-road Samsung device. It's a stunner, no bones about it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Police

After spending more time with it, I’ve grown to love the Samsung Galaxy A42’s striking design. This is a shiny phone, almost metallic-looking in person, but it also offers an iridescent reflection peppered with an eye-catching dot pattern. I know it's a silly thing to highlight, and yet for me, it makes all of the difference. I still notice how compelling this phone looks a month later, which I didn't expect from a middle-of-the-road Samsung device. It's a stunner, no bones about it.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central

The 5,000mAh battery will let you get two full days out of the A42 — even when you're having to bounce between 4G, Sub6, and UWB on Verizon. The screen is vivid and easy to read outdoors, but the triple-camera setup here is a distinct downgrade from other A-series offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

The 5,000mAh battery will let you get two full days out of the A42 — even when you're having to bounce between 4G, Sub6, and UWB on Verizon. The screen is vivid and easy to read outdoors, but the triple-camera setup here is a distinct downgrade from other A-series offerings.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras. If there’s one reason to champion the Galaxy A42 above its peers, it is surely battery life. Buy the A42 for its stellar battery power over any other reason.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung mostly covered its bases with the Galaxy A42. The phone is a solid package that offers a lot in the way of functionality. It boasts an appealing design that may not be for everyone, but at least it stands out as unique. The screen is big and bright, even if it is lower resolution than some competitors. There’s a very welcome headphone jack and though the speaker is a mono affair it delivers solid sound. Memory card support is also a nice bonus alongside the 128GB of built-in storage. Overall though, the Samsung Galaxy A42 struggles to truly carve a niche among tough competition. Plenty of ~$400 phones swim in the same sea and have better screens and cameras. If there’s one reason to champion the Galaxy A42 above its peers, it is surely battery life. Buy the A42 for its stellar battery power over any other reason.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com

But you also need to consider that, while its a good smartphone overall, the Rs 21,999 price tag still feels unfair, just for the added 5G connectivity, especially when Samsung has cut some corners with the HD+ display. In the same price segment, Samsung’s own Galaxy M32 or M31, Galaxy M51, Galaxy F62 are good alternatives. And if you are looking for smartphones outside of Samsung, then the Poco X3 Pro, OnePlus Nord/Nord CE, Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, Motorola G60, iQoo 3, Mi 10i or Realme X3 SuperZoom, are all great alternatives, and some of these also offer 5G connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Tech2.in.com

But you also need to consider that, while its a good smartphone overall, the Rs 21,999 price tag still feels unfair, just for the added 5G connectivity, especially when Samsung has cut some corners with the HD+ display. In the same price segment, Samsung’s own Galaxy M32 or M31, Galaxy M51, Galaxy F62 are good alternatives. And if you are looking for smartphones outside of Samsung, then the Poco X3 Pro, OnePlus Nord/Nord CE, Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, Motorola G60, iQoo 3, Mi 10i or Realme X3 SuperZoom, are all great alternatives, and some of these also offer 5G connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A42 5G I reviewed is a carrier device, but you can also grab one unlocked. If you're not married to Verizon, Samsung's cheaper A32 ($280 retail) and slightly more expensive A52 ($500 retail) may be better options, depending on what you're looking for, hence the odd positioning of the A42 in the market. Of course, there are fewer options if you want to buy a 5G Samsung phone direct from Verizon, so the A42 is easier to recommend on Big Red's network. Regardless of where you get it, the A42 5G is a solid phone that packs exceptional build quality. Performance is snappy, even though you only get 4GB of RAM, and the large battery means you'll avoid range anxiety. You can also expect expedient and long-term software support, though the massive amount of pre-installed bloatware should have lowered the price a little further, in my opinion. Also, the cameras are just good enough but don't really offer anything special.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A42 5G I reviewed is a carrier device, but you can also grab one unlocked. If you're not married to Verizon, Samsung's cheaper A32 ($280 retail) and slightly more expensive A52 ($500 retail) may be better options, depending on what you're looking for, hence the odd positioning of the A42 in the market. Of course, there are fewer options if you want to buy a 5G Samsung phone direct from Verizon, so the A42 is easier to recommend on Big Red's network. Regardless of where you get it, the A42 5G is a solid phone that packs exceptional build quality. Performance is snappy, even though you only get 4GB of RAM, and the large battery means you'll avoid range anxiety. You can also expect expedient and long-term software support, though the massive amount of pre-installed bloatware should have lowered the price a little further, in my opinion. Also, the cameras are just good enough but don't really offer anything special.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A42 5G might have been a more compelling phone last year, when it was first released outside the United States, but I’m not sure it’s as good of a purchase in 2021 at $399. It’s definitely not a bad phone, with its speedy internal hardware and massive screen, but it feels like less of a value compared to other recent phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is $100 more than this phone and has a better (but still plastic) build, a display with twice the refresh rate (120Hz), and improved cameras. If you can spend the extra money, the Galaxy A52 5G is likely a better investment. On the other side of the price spectrum, the Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G phone at $280, and isn’t much worse than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2021
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A42 5G might have been a more compelling phone last year, when it was first released outside the United States, but I’m not sure it’s as good of a purchase in 2021 at $399. It’s definitely not a bad phone, with its speedy internal hardware and massive screen, but it feels like less of a value compared to other recent phones. The Galaxy A52 5G is $100 more than this phone and has a better (but still plastic) build, a display with twice the refresh rate (120Hz), and improved cameras. If you can spend the extra money, the Galaxy A52 5G is likely a better investment. On the other side of the price spectrum, the Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G phone at $280, and isn’t much worse than the A42.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy M42 comes with a good build quality and it also offers a powerful mid-range processor. The smartphone comes with the latest operating system and will get three more Android updates in the future. It comes with a starting price tag of Rs 21,999 which makes it an affordable 5G smartphone. In our opinion this smartphone is for the people who only want to purchase a Samsung phone. The smartphone will face stiff competition from Realme 8 5G smartphone which is available at Rs 22,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy M42 comes with a good build quality and it also offers a powerful mid-range processor. The smartphone comes with the latest operating system and will get three more Android updates in the future. It comes with a starting price tag of Rs 21,999 which makes it an affordable 5G smartphone. In our opinion this smartphone is for the people who only want to purchase a Samsung phone. The smartphone will face stiff competition from Realme 8 5G smartphone which is available at Rs 22,999.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Sam Mobile

So, should you buy the Galaxy M42 5G? Only if you’re looking for an affordable phone with excellent gaming performance and support for 5G networks. For everything else, there are better alternatives on the market, such as the Galaxy A32. It doesn’t have 5G or great gaming performance but gets you a better display (with a 90Hz refresh rate) and main camera and similar battery life and software features.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2021
Source: Sam Mobile

So, should you buy the Galaxy M42 5G? Only if you’re looking for an affordable phone with excellent gaming performance and support for 5G networks. For everything else, there are better alternatives on the market, such as the Galaxy A32. It doesn’t have 5G or great gaming performance but gets you a better display (with a 90Hz refresh rate) and main camera and similar battery life and software features.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy M42 5G is now the most affordable 5G smartphone that Samsung has on offer. It packs in a capable processor and offers good performance. However, Samsung has cut some corners with the display. An HD+ resolution at the Rs. 21,999 price point is highly disappointing. Given that 5G networks are still not available in India, you could consider the Galaxy F62 to be a worthy alternative. If you are looking specifically for a 5G-ready smartphone, the Xiaomi Mi 10i (Review)and the Realme X7 (Review) are better alternatives to the Galaxy M42 5G at this price level.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy M42 5G is now the most affordable 5G smartphone that Samsung has on offer. It packs in a capable processor and offers good performance. However, Samsung has cut some corners with the display. An HD+ resolution at the Rs. 21,999 price point is highly disappointing. Given that 5G networks are still not available in India, you could consider the Galaxy F62 to be a worthy alternative. If you are looking specifically for a 5G-ready smartphone, the Xiaomi Mi 10i (Review)and the Realme X7 (Review) are better alternatives to the Galaxy M42 5G at this price level.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at Rs 21,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and while the phone gets a couple of things right, the smartphone’s lacklustre display and its uninspiring design stick out like a sore thumb. What’s more, the device faces stiff competition from the likes of Xiaomi’s Mi 10i too which, pound for pound, offers better specs and performance. Lest I forget, the company’s Galaxy F62 (review) retails for around the same price too and puts forth a more well-rounded package as well. Consequently, unless you’re looking for the cheapest 5G phone from Samsung, you might want to spend your hard-earned bucks elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan

The Samsung Galaxy M42 has all that it takes to be a perfect midranger, let it be the CPU itself, the Snapdragon 750G is a king in its class, other than that is the Super AMOLED display, 5G capabilities, Android 11 out-of-the-box, the reliable battery life, and good cameras, aside from its new eye-catchy Prism design, however, the only two downsides we think are its display resolution which is the HD+ and the standard 60 Hz refresh rate, otherwise would be a strong contender in its class at this price (₹21,999). If it doesn’t bother you, this could be one of the best non-Chinese smartphones available in India.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: 91mobiles

The Samsung Galaxy M42 5G starts at Rs 21,999 for the 6GB RAM variant and while the phone gets a couple of things right, the smartphone’s lacklustre display and its uninspiring design stick out like a sore thumb. What’s more, the device faces stiff competition from the likes of Xiaomi’s Mi 10i too which, pound for pound, offers better specs and performance. Lest I forget, the company’s Galaxy F62 (review) retails for around the same price too and puts forth a more well-rounded package as well. Consequently, unless you’re looking for the cheapest 5G phone from Samsung, you might want to spend your hard-earned bucks elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan

The Samsung Galaxy M42 has all that it takes to be a perfect midranger, let it be the CPU itself, the Snapdragon 750G is a king in its class, other than that is the Super AMOLED display, 5G capabilities, Android 11 out-of-the-box, the reliable battery life, and good cameras, aside from its new eye-catchy Prism design, however, the only two downsides we think are its display resolution which is the HD+ and the standard 60 Hz refresh rate, otherwise would be a strong contender in its class at this price (₹21,999). If it doesn’t bother you, this could be one of the best non-Chinese smartphones available in India.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

Samsung has picked a powerful processor for the Galaxy M42 5G to take the battle to the competition. While the Rs. 21,999 starting price is competitive, it does make me wonder whether Samsung has cut corners to reach it. So is the Galaxy M42 5G a smartphone worth recommending? I'll answer this in the full review, coming soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

Samsung has picked a powerful processor for the Galaxy M42 5G to take the battle to the competition. While the Rs. 21,999 starting price is competitive, it does make me wonder whether Samsung has cut corners to reach it. So is the Galaxy M42 5G a smartphone worth recommending? I'll answer this in the full review, coming soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Source: Yugatech

If you are coming from a smartphone with a 1080p display, it might take some time to get used to the Galaxy A42 5G’s 720p display. Still, if you’re not that nitpicky when it comes to the display category, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones on this tier.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Yugatech

If you are coming from a smartphone with a 1080p display, it might take some time to get used to the Galaxy A42 5G’s 720p display. Still, if you’re not that nitpicky when it comes to the display category, the Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is undoubtedly one of the best smartphones on this tier.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Yugatech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2021
Source: Yugatech

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2021
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A42 5G is a cheap 5G mid-ranger, which excels in everything it does - gaming, browsing, multimedia, office apps, and whatnot. It has a large AMOLED screen and a beefy battery to keep whatever you are doing for quite some time. So, yes, the Galaxy A42 5G seems like a great chap.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A42 5G is a cheap 5G mid-ranger, which excels in everything it does - gaming, browsing, multimedia, office apps, and whatnot. It has a large AMOLED screen and a beefy battery to keep whatever you are doing for quite some time. So, yes, the Galaxy A42 5G seems like a great chap.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Nave

In addition to that, the phone comes with the Samsung Knox feature, which is usually available on Samsung flagships only. It allows users to safely store personal data onto the smartphone, so it's particularly suitable for high-ranking business execs. With Knox, you can prevent information stored in the smartphone from being easily leaked.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2020
Source: Tech Nave

In addition to that, the phone comes with the Samsung Knox feature, which is usually available on Samsung flagships only. It allows users to safely store personal data onto the smartphone, so it's particularly suitable for high-ranking business execs. With Knox, you can prevent information stored in the smartphone from being easily leaked.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2020
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is now on sale in Malaysia at the price of RM1599. If you purchase it during this month, you will be entitled to free YouTube Premium access for two months. Of course, you will need to be a Samsung member first and activate it. To learn more about the phone, you may visit Samsung's official online store here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2020
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G is now on sale in Malaysia at the price of RM1599. If you purchase it during this month, you will be entitled to free YouTube Premium access for two months. Of course, you will need to be a Samsung member first and activate it. To learn more about the phone, you may visit Samsung's official online store here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/11/2020
Source: Unbox

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G has a lot of things that we’ve come to enjoy from their other offerings and the addition of Qualcomm’s mid-range 5G-ready processor would have made it easier to recommend for people looking to prepare themselves for the expanding network in the Philippines. But this price bracket has always been contentious and it will definitely have a tough time going against other brands’ products that offer a better price to performance ratio; especially with all the compromises, they’ve made for this model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: Unbox

The Samsung Galaxy A42 5G has a lot of things that we’ve come to enjoy from their other offerings and the addition of Qualcomm’s mid-range 5G-ready processor would have made it easier to recommend for people looking to prepare themselves for the expanding network in the Philippines. But this price bracket has always been contentious and it will definitely have a tough time going against other brands’ products that offer a better price to performance ratio; especially with all the compromises, they’ve made for this model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 75%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2021
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2021
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 65% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 65% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 61% features: 67%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 61% features: 67%
Source: MA Reduc

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: MA Reduc

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 770% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 770% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Support 5G; good price; solid workmanship; nice performance; big screen; decent connectivity; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Support 5G; good price; solid workmanship; nice performance; big screen; decent connectivity; great cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2021
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Samsung Galaxy A12
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.205kg
Price: 179 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Samsung's entry-level Galaxy A12 smartphone combines a powerful 5,000 mAh battery, a large display, and a quad-camera setup with MediaTek's Helio P35 SoC. Find out if the overall concept is convincing and which compromises have to be accepted due to the low price in our review of the Galaxy phone.
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2022
Source: Trusted Reviews

It’s hard to criticise a £169 smartphone that looks this good and keeps going for so long between charges, but the Galaxy A12’s dismal performance poisons the well. It’s so sluggish that it’s difficult to recommend to anybody. The good news is that it is possible to buy a solid all-rounder at the price without compromising on user experience. The Motorola Moto G8 costs £179 and does everything that the Galaxy A12 does well, but without any of the lag.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews

It’s hard to criticise a £169 smartphone that looks this good and keeps going for so long between charges, but the Galaxy A12’s dismal performance poisons the well. It’s so sluggish that it’s difficult to recommend to anybody. The good news is that it is possible to buy a solid all-rounder at the price without compromising on user experience. The Motorola Moto G8 costs £179 and does everything that the Galaxy A12 does well, but without any of the lag.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch, and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power (2022) ($199), and while both appear well suited for someone buying their first smartphone, the Galaxy is a far safer pick. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N20 ($282) or pick up Samsung’s newer Galaxy A13 5G ($249) if you want to tap into top speeds.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch, and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power (2022) ($199), and while both appear well suited for someone buying their first smartphone, the Galaxy is a far safer pick. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N20 ($282) or pick up Samsung’s newer Galaxy A13 5G ($249) if you want to tap into top speeds.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2022
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power ($249) and Moto G Play ($169), and it’s well suited for someone buying their first smartphone. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) or splurge a bit on Samsung’s Galaxy A32 5G ($279) if you want to tap into top speeds. Samsung’s Galaxy A12 is also available on Verizon, US Cellular, and AT&T.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a solid upgrade over the Galaxy A11 in almost every way. What this budget-friendly phone does bring to the table is a good 48MP main camera, excellent battery life, and Samsung’s crisp and attractive One UI software. Unfortunately, the peripheral cameras lack punch and the laggy performance can be frustrating, but these are expected trade-offs at this price tier. We’ve mentioned that the Galaxy A12 lands right around Motorola’s Moto G Power ($249) and Moto G Play ($169), and it’s well suited for someone buying their first smartphone. The lack of 5G limits its future prospects, though you can try out the OnePlus Nord N200 ($239) or splurge a bit on Samsung’s Galaxy A32 5G ($279) if you want to tap into top speeds. Samsung’s Galaxy A12 is also available on Verizon, US Cellular, and AT&T.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. But Samsung had to cut several corners to get the price this low, and unfortunately, performance just can't keep up with modern standards. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. But Samsung had to cut several corners to get the price this low, and unfortunately, performance just can't keep up with modern standards. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget smartphone competing in the Essential segment ($200 or under). Despite the modest price point, it offers some impressive specs, including an octa-core processor, a 6.5-inch TFT display with HD+ resolution, and 64 GB of internal memory to store your photos and videos. For the rear camera, the primary module with a 48 MP sensor is assisted by a 5 MP ultra-wide, a 2 MP macro camera, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a budget smartphone competing in the Essential segment ($200 or under). Despite the modest price point, it offers some impressive specs, including an octa-core processor, a 6.5-inch TFT display with HD+ resolution, and 64 GB of internal memory to store your photos and videos. For the rear camera, the primary module with a 48 MP sensor is assisted by a 5 MP ultra-wide, a 2 MP macro camera, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera test.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2021
Source: Phone Arena

It’s a fully plastic build, but we think the blue color and textured back make it quite fun to hold in hand. And also, one or two cool things here. We get dual sim support with a dedicated Micro SD card slot and a headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: Phone Arena

It’s a fully plastic build, but we think the blue color and textured back make it quite fun to hold in hand. And also, one or two cool things here. We get dual sim support with a dedicated Micro SD card slot and a headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A12 is one of the cheapest smartphones currently sold by Samsung, so it’s probably not much of a surprise that the phone isn’t wildly fast. However, the phone is incredibly frustrating to use, even by the standard of other budget smartphones. When the keyboard is lagging during the initial setup process, you know you’re in for trouble. I would strongly recommend buying a Galaxy A32 5G instead if you can afford it, which normally costs $279.99 but frequently goes on sale for $205. Buying a used iPhone 8 or iPhone X is another solid option in this price range — battery life likely won’t be as good, but you could replace the battery later on, and even these old iPhones are substantially faster than the Galaxy A12. They should also have a few iOS updates left since iOS 15 still supports devices as old as the iPhone 6S.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2021
Source: XDA Developers

The Galaxy A12 is one of the cheapest smartphones currently sold by Samsung, so it’s probably not much of a surprise that the phone isn’t wildly fast. However, the phone is incredibly frustrating to use, even by the standard of other budget smartphones. When the keyboard is lagging during the initial setup process, you know you’re in for trouble. I would strongly recommend buying a Galaxy A32 5G instead if you can afford it, which normally costs $279.99 but frequently goes on sale for $205. Buying a used iPhone 8 or iPhone X is another solid option in this price range — battery life likely won’t be as good, but you could replace the battery later on, and even these old iPhones are substantially faster than the Galaxy A12. They should also have a few iOS updates left since iOS 15 still supports devices as old as the iPhone 6S.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/18/2021
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. The Galaxy A32 costs $100 more, and includes a better display and improved camera quality. There are also phones like the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which has much better hardware for just $240. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Police

Budget phones have their place, and for some, spending more than $200 on a mobile device is simply not worth it. The Galaxy A12 isn't a bad phone — in fact, it's an able road trip companion, with its giant display and a battery to match. The Galaxy A32 costs $100 more, and includes a better display and improved camera quality. There are also phones like the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which has much better hardware for just $240. Ultimately, the Galaxy A12 fails to find a single category where it defeats the competition. It's a phone of compromises, but one that makes all the wrong choices when cutting corners. Extra-long battery life only takes you so far when using the phone is frustratingly slow. With superior devices available for just a bit of extra cash upfront, you're better off opting for something else.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews

Ultimately, it’s hard not to think of the Galaxy A12 as something of a misfire by Samsung. Yes, it has phenomenal battery life, and I sincerely hope that the company adopts the two-tone look onto other handsets, but even at £169 it still misses the mark. Much of that is down to the outstanding things other manufacturers are doing on a budget, but Samsung’s entry-level handsets have been able to hold their own in the past. It’s hard not to pin the disappointment entirely on the MediaTek Helios MT6765. Exynos and Qualcomm handsets never felt this sluggish. What should you buy instead? While all of the options highlighted in the ‘price and competition’ section would be preferable, my suggestion is the Poco X3 NFC if you can stretch to £199. If you can’t, then you should pay the same £169 for a Realme 7 or save £19 and buy a Nokia 5.3.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A12’s saving grace is its big battery and a set of cameras that perform well in the daylight. In most other aspects, it is mostly a hit-or-miss and that makes it falter against the competition. The budget segment has evolved quite a bit and I believe that Samsung’s more recent Galaxy M12 is a better answer to its rivals.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A12’s saving grace is its big battery and a set of cameras that perform well in the daylight. In most other aspects, it is mostly a hit-or-miss and that makes it falter against the competition. The budget segment has evolved quite a bit and I believe that Samsung’s more recent Galaxy M12 is a better answer to its rivals.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Manila Shaker

For a quick rundown, the Samsung Galaxy A12 gives an impressive camera and tough battery life for the price of P7,990 (4GB+128GB) and P9,990 (6GB+128GB). You may be nitpicking on some other phones in its price range but if you are not into heavy gaming or you are on a budget, or even an average user that wants the Samsung’s environment, software, AI, and optimization, Give the Galaxy A12 a try, and you might find it enjoyable.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

For a quick rundown, the Samsung Galaxy A12 gives an impressive camera and tough battery life for the price of P7,990 (4GB+128GB) and P9,990 (6GB+128GB). You may be nitpicking on some other phones in its price range but if you are not into heavy gaming or you are on a budget, or even an average user that wants the Samsung’s environment, software, AI, and optimization, Give the Galaxy A12 a try, and you might find it enjoyable.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

We tested the power of the latest entry-level device from Samsung-- the Samsung Galaxy A12. In our video, we also tested the battery life, benchmarks, charging, and the fps counter of each game including; Mobile Legends, League of Legends: Wildrift, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, Honkai Impact 3, and Genshin Impact. Watch our video to see the results.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

We tested the power of the latest entry-level device from Samsung-- the Samsung Galaxy A12. In our video, we also tested the battery life, benchmarks, charging, and the fps counter of each game including; Mobile Legends, League of Legends: Wildrift, PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, Honkai Impact 3, and Genshin Impact. Watch our video to see the results.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

Samsung Galaxy A12 is one of Samsung's latest entry-level smartphones on their Galaxy A series. For the price of P7,990, is it enough?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

Samsung Galaxy A12 is one of Samsung's latest entry-level smartphones on their Galaxy A series. For the price of P7,990, is it enough?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Source: Unbox

While the Samsung Galaxy A12 is far more affordable than the brand’s other offerings as we found out in this review, it’s going up against stiff competition against phones that are cheaper and faster. It does offer a decent vlogging experience for people who shoot vertical videos to be put up on TikTok, IG Stories, or FB.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2021
Source: Unbox

While the Samsung Galaxy A12 is far more affordable than the brand’s other offerings as we found out in this review, it’s going up against stiff competition against phones that are cheaper and faster. It does offer a decent vlogging experience for people who shoot vertical videos to be put up on TikTok, IG Stories, or FB.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung is probably not the name that pops in mind when one talks about the budget phone segment. But the company has been trying to carve out a name in this price range. Samsung Galaxy A12 seems to work in the same direction. Will the phone make a leap forward for the popular flagship maker? That only time can tell. But the device does make a point that the company has everything to become a popular choice in the budget phone category. With its decent camera abilities and good battery life, Galaxy A12 does make a case for Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung is probably not the name that pops in mind when one talks about the budget phone segment. But the company has been trying to carve out a name in this price range. Samsung Galaxy A12 seems to work in the same direction. Will the phone make a leap forward for the popular flagship maker? That only time can tell. But the device does make a point that the company has everything to become a popular choice in the budget phone category. With its decent camera abilities and good battery life, Galaxy A12 does make a case for Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung often struggles to compete with the value-oriented brands in the lower market segments, and that's the case with the Galaxy A12 we have here. It's not a bad phone, and it excels in endurance, it takes decent pictures, and it looks good in the process. It's also a Samsung, and the brand itself could make it more appealing than its actual merits.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung often struggles to compete with the value-oriented brands in the lower market segments, and that's the case with the Galaxy A12 we have here. It's not a bad phone, and it excels in endurance, it takes decent pictures, and it looks good in the process. It's also a Samsung, and the brand itself could make it more appealing than its actual merits.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is satisfactory as long as you use it casually. Its best selling point is none other than the battery, of course, which can last up to two days and the camera performance is satisfactory. However, it faces tough competition from other phones, which are cheaper yet deliver similar or superior specs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: PC Quest

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the latest offering in the infamous “A” line-up of phones. Samsung has always tried to make their phones accessible to people of all walks of life and the “A” series that started off as a high mid-range segment has made its way to the mid-range and budget segment quite gracefully.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A12 is satisfactory as long as you use it casually. Its best selling point is none other than the battery, of course, which can last up to two days and the camera performance is satisfactory. However, it faces tough competition from other phones, which are cheaper yet deliver similar or superior specs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: PC Quest

The Samsung Galaxy A12 is the latest offering in the infamous “A” line-up of phones. Samsung has always tried to make their phones accessible to people of all walks of life and the “A” series that started off as a high mid-range segment has made its way to the mid-range and budget segment quite gracefully.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: NLT

But the Samsung Galaxy A12 here offers a much better user experience – especially the software – in comparison with other phones in this category. And since the software is what we interact with whenever we touch the device, I’d argue that some people will definitely pay more to get a better experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: NLT

But the Samsung Galaxy A12 here offers a much better user experience – especially the software – in comparison with other phones in this category. And since the software is what we interact with whenever we touch the device, I’d argue that some people will definitely pay more to get a better experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: Phone World

After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly, this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A12 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. Under this price range, the phone is worth buying.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2021
Source: Phone World

After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly, this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A12 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. Under this price range, the phone is worth buying.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/26/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Great battery life; solid workmanship; nice main camera. Negative: Plastic case; weak processor; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Great battery life; solid workmanship; nice main camera. Negative: Plastic case; weak processor; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 65% features: 60% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 65% features: 60% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 62% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 62% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Good price; long battery life; modern design; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Good price; long battery life; modern design; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2021
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; nice performance; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; nice performance; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; nice display; long battery life; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Attractive price; beautiful design; nice display; long battery life; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Beautiful design; bright display; decent autonomy; nice cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2021
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Beautiful design; bright display; decent autonomy; nice cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Long battery life; high performance; stylish design; great cameras; beautiful display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Long battery life; high performance; stylish design; great cameras; beautiful display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; 6GB RAM; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/18/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; 6GB RAM; long battery life; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/18/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; stylish design; great built quality; nice performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; stylish design; great built quality; nice performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice cameras; big screen; large storage; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice cameras; big screen; large storage; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Impressive autonomy; high gaming performance; modern design; nice cameras; large storage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Impressive autonomy; high gaming performance; modern design; nice cameras; large storage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Modern design; excellent quad cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Tinh Te

Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; excellent cameras; decent performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Modern design; excellent quad cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Tinh Te

Positive: Good price; nice design; great display; excellent cameras; decent performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; impressive battery life; large storage; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; impressive battery life; large storage; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice quad cameras; powerful hardware; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery life; excellent quad cameras; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; high autonomy; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery life; excellent quad cameras; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; high autonomy; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; big screen; nice quad cameras; quick charging; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; big screen; nice quad cameras; quick charging; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Great quad cameras; long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Zing

Positive: Great quad cameras; long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Samsung Galaxy A02s
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.50 inch, 19:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 165 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The current entry-level model from Samsung's Galaxy A series is the A02s. For barely 165 Euros (~$197), the manufacturer includes a triple camera system and a quite large battery. However, there are a lot of competitors, including other inhouse models, and there are also some really basic problems.
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A02s is an incredibly cheap smartphone that ticks a lot of key boxes. However, the positives – which include impressive battery life, expandable storage and a lovely design – need to be offset against the negatives. Here, it’s the camera and general performance that are found lacking.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A02s is an incredibly cheap smartphone that ticks a lot of key boxes. However, the positives – which include impressive battery life, expandable storage and a lovely design – need to be offset against the negatives. Here, it’s the camera and general performance that are found lacking.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Android Authority

The Galaxy A02s is a good smartphone if you only need the basics and you’re working with a tight budget. It’s hands-down the most affordable way to get your hands on Samsung’s One UI 3.1, but the processor can’t always keep up and the cameras won’t be your go-to for many family photos. That said, if you want a cheap way to watch your favorite shows and use your wired headphones, the Galaxy A02s is happy to oblige. If you’re willing to expand your budget a bit, there are plenty of Galaxy A02s rivals to consider for under $200. Samsung’s own Galaxy A12 ($179) might be one of the best, with a significantly better camera and a side-mounted fingerprint reader for not much more money. There’s also the Motorola Moto G Play ($169) that ditches the third camera but offers near-stock Android and a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner. Finally, the Nokia G10 ($149) offers splash protection, a slightly bigger battery, and a better base configuration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Authority

The Galaxy A02s is a good smartphone if you only need the basics and you’re working with a tight budget. It’s hands-down the most affordable way to get your hands on Samsung’s One UI 3.1, but the processor can’t always keep up and the cameras won’t be your go-to for many family photos. That said, if you want a cheap way to watch your favorite shows and use your wired headphones, the Galaxy A02s is happy to oblige. If you’re willing to expand your budget a bit, there are plenty of Galaxy A02s rivals to consider for under $200. Samsung’s own Galaxy A12 ($179) might be one of the best, with a significantly better camera and a side-mounted fingerprint reader for not much more money. There’s also the Motorola Moto G Play ($169) that ditches the third camera but offers near-stock Android and a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner. Finally, the Nokia G10 ($149) offers splash protection, a slightly bigger battery, and a better base configuration.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A02s isn't competing with flagships or even mid-range devices. It's slow enough that some basic software features are just about unusable without a great deal of patience. But everything works, it's $110, and you can depend on Samsung to value your security and keep the phone safe to use for the next four years. It may be slow, but it's reliable. In all, I'm pretty stunned at what you can get today for such a low price. Admittedly, for just $60 more, you can get the $170 Moto G Play, which I also like. The Moto is much, much faster — the new Snapdragon 460 positively flies compared to the somewhat decrepit Snapdragon 450 in the A02s. Plus, the Moto has a fingerprint sensor, among other benefits. The A02s is, by all hardware metrics, a worse smartphone, but Moto's software commitment for most of its phones is basically a joke in 2021; it abandons them so quickly.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2021
Source: Android Police

The Galaxy A02s isn't competing with flagships or even mid-range devices. It's slow enough that some basic software features are just about unusable without a great deal of patience. But everything works, it's $110, and you can depend on Samsung to value your security and keep the phone safe to use for the next four years. It may be slow, but it's reliable. In all, I'm pretty stunned at what you can get today for such a low price. Admittedly, for just $60 more, you can get the $170 Moto G Play, which I also like. The Moto is much, much faster — the new Snapdragon 460 positively flies compared to the somewhat decrepit Snapdragon 450 in the A02s. Plus, the Moto has a fingerprint sensor, among other benefits. The A02s is, by all hardware metrics, a worse smartphone, but Moto's software commitment for most of its phones is basically a joke in 2021; it abandons them so quickly.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/20/2021
Source: Tech Nave

In Malaysia, most consumers want to get the best out of the products that they have purchased. This is true even for tech gadget enthusiasts, especially with the current global situation. Digital devices are so important now, as they help us stay connected. But what if someone just wants something affordable, reliable, and easy to use? This is where the Samsung Galaxy A02 and Galaxy A02s come in with the special Digi Prihatin 35 Prepaid Bundle subscription, which offers a rebate of RM300 where subscribers can bring home the latter at only RM95, whereas the former can be theirs absolutely free of charge. If that sounds like something you'd be interested in, read on below to find out more about the features of the two phones and the Digi plan.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: Tech Nave

In Malaysia, most consumers want to get the best out of the products that they have purchased. This is true even for tech gadget enthusiasts, especially with the current global situation. Digital devices are so important now, as they help us stay connected. But what if someone just wants something affordable, reliable, and easy to use? This is where the Samsung Galaxy A02 and Galaxy A02s come in with the special Digi Prihatin 35 Prepaid Bundle subscription, which offers a rebate of RM300 where subscribers can bring home the latter at only RM95, whereas the former can be theirs absolutely free of charge. If that sounds like something you'd be interested in, read on below to find out more about the features of the two phones and the Digi plan.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: Expert Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A02s feels like a return to the bad old days when cheap handsets sold based on name recognition, even if the internals bore little resemblance to the brand’s trusted products. This may be a Galaxy in name and looks, but the four-year old processor makes it a pretty poor choice in 2021 – especially when the Motorola Moto G10 is £10 cheaper and is the same or better on every metric.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Expert Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A02s feels like a return to the bad old days when cheap handsets sold based on name recognition, even if the internals bore little resemblance to the brand’s trusted products. This may be a Galaxy in name and looks, but the four-year old processor makes it a pretty poor choice in 2021 – especially when the Motorola Moto G10 is £10 cheaper and is the same or better on every metric.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: GSM Arena

Ultimately, if you're on a tight budget and looking to get the most out of it, perhaps brand loyalty shouldn't be on top of your priorities list, and you should look at competing offers from classic value-oriented makers. If you insist on a Galaxy, certain concessions are inevitable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena

Ultimately, if you're on a tight budget and looking to get the most out of it, perhaps brand loyalty shouldn't be on top of your priorities list, and you should look at competing offers from classic value-oriented makers. If you insist on a Galaxy, certain concessions are inevitable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A02s is a good entry-level smartphone that I would recommend for people who don’t need much from their device, or they simply need a secondary one. At RM529, the Malaysian retail version will only have the 4GB RAM 64GB storage configuration, which will end up performing at least slightly better than our review unit.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 60% performance: 40% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A02s is a good entry-level smartphone that I would recommend for people who don’t need much from their device, or they simply need a secondary one. At RM529, the Malaysian retail version will only have the 4GB RAM 64GB storage configuration, which will end up performing at least slightly better than our review unit.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 60% performance: 40% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone World

Samsung with the launch of its latest budget smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy A02s, is hoping to grab the market share once again. The Galaxy A02 comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 along with the Adreno 506. In Pakistan, Samsung introduced the 4GB RAM variant along with 64GBs of internal storage only. The physical dimension of the phone is 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 and weighs 196g.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2021
Source: Phone World

Samsung with the launch of its latest budget smartphone, the Samsung Galaxy A02s, is hoping to grab the market share once again. The Galaxy A02 comes with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 along with the Adreno 506. In Pakistan, Samsung introduced the 4GB RAM variant along with 64GBs of internal storage only. The physical dimension of the phone is 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 and weighs 196g.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2021
Source: NLT

We just reviewed the Galaxy S21 Ultra, but now, we’re taking a look at the company’s entry-level smartphone. The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a pretty nice name too – like an anime mecha bot. That aside, here’s our review of the entry-level smartphone, Galaxy A02s. It’s not really that entry-level actually.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2021
Source: NLT

We just reviewed the Galaxy S21 Ultra, but now, we’re taking a look at the company’s entry-level smartphone. The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a pretty nice name too – like an anime mecha bot. That aside, here’s our review of the entry-level smartphone, Galaxy A02s. It’s not really that entry-level actually.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; decent gaming performance; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; only 3GB RAM and 32GB ROM; mediocre connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; decent gaming performance; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: No fingerprint sensor; only 3GB RAM and 32GB ROM; mediocre connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; large battery capacity; decent quad cameras; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; solid workmanship; large battery capacity; decent quad cameras; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; very long battery life; quick charging; good price; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; very long battery life; quick charging; good price; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Nice design; high performance; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Nice design; high performance; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Modern design; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Modern design; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; quick charging; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; powerful processor; nice triple cameras; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; powerful processor; nice triple cameras; low price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Impressive macro cameras; powerful hardware; long battery life; attractive price.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/25/2020
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; decent autonomy; quick charging; good price.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2020
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 56%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 56%
Samsung Galaxy A02
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6739WW
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8100
Display: 6.50 inch, 22:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.206kg
Price: 120 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Source: Tech Nave

In Malaysia, most consumers want to get the best out of the products that they have purchased. This is true even for tech gadget enthusiasts, especially with the current global situation. Digital devices are so important now, as they help us stay connected. But what if someone just wants something affordable, reliable, and easy to use? This is where the Samsung Galaxy A02 and Galaxy A02s come in with the special Digi Prihatin 35 Prepaid Bundle subscription, which offers a rebate of RM300 where subscribers can bring home the latter at only RM95, whereas the former can be theirs absolutely free of charge. If that sounds like something you'd be interested in, read on below to find out more about the features of the two phones and the Digi plan.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/15/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Beautiful design; attractive price; large battery capacity.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Low price; impressive battery life. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Modern design; good price; long battery life; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Impressive cameras; low price; modern design; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Decent processor; nice dual cameras; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Low price; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 429 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The Galaxy A52 5G is an updated version of one of the most successful Samsung smartphones. It comes with a price hike, which puts it above the 400-Euro (~$480) mark for the first time. Read our review to learn why it is still worth every cent.
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a solid mid-ranger with a few predictable shortcomings. It competes well in a market that’s saturated with alternatives and could be a winner for Samsung.On the whole, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a scrappy mid-ranger that offers a lot of value — far more than its predecessor. No $500 phone is without compromises, but none of the A52 5G’s shortcomings feel like total deal-breakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a solid mid-ranger with a few predictable shortcomings. It competes well in a market that’s saturated with alternatives and could be a winner for Samsung.On the whole, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a scrappy mid-ranger that offers a lot of value — far more than its predecessor. No $500 phone is without compromises, but none of the A52 5G’s shortcomings feel like total deal-breakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. While we've not put it head to head with the Pixel 5a yet, we'd imagine this statement holds true there too. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. While we've not put it head to head with the Pixel 5a yet, we'd imagine this statement holds true there too. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The only true downside of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is its lengthy charging time, particularly when compared to its rivals, and that is largely attributable to the Samsung’s 15W in-box charger (vs. 33W for the Xiaomi and 65W for the Oppo). With a compatible 25W charger, the charging experience would likely improve significantly. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more than two days of autonomy, and put in an especially good performance in our on the go tests.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: DxOMark

The only true downside of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is its lengthy charging time, particularly when compared to its rivals, and that is largely attributable to the Samsung’s 15W in-box charger (vs. 33W for the Xiaomi and 65W for the Oppo). With a compatible 25W charger, the charging experience would likely improve significantly. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G provides more than two days of autonomy, and put in an especially good performance in our on the go tests.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: GSM Arena

Unfortunately, the Galaxy A52 5G is just priced unfavorably. There are many better or faster 5G phones at a similar or even cheaper price out there and while the promises of very long software support may be boosting the A52 5G's value proposition it still feels your are not getting the best bang for your buck. Not least because the regular A52 with the same kind of support and largely the same feature set is that much cheaper. Samsung can make the Galaxy A52 5G an attractive offer by applying a price cut as it has done in some markets. In most places, however, you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: GSM Arena

Unfortunately, the Galaxy A52 5G is just priced unfavorably. There are many better or faster 5G phones at a similar or even cheaper price out there and while the promises of very long software support may be boosting the A52 5G's value proposition it still feels your are not getting the best bang for your buck. Not least because the regular A52 with the same kind of support and largely the same feature set is that much cheaper. Samsung can make the Galaxy A52 5G an attractive offer by applying a price cut as it has done in some markets. In most places, however, you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Make Use Of

For the most part, Samsung pulled the right strings in making the A52 an excellent midrange device; the screen is large, vibrant, and snappy, the battery life is just plain incredible, and the camera delivers sufficient quality that rounds out this phone's experience. The main competitor of this phone isn't from another brand, but from Samsung itself. The Galaxy A52 exists in a space where you can still pick up the S20 FE, and if the rumors are true, Samsung is set to release the Galaxy S21 FE later this summer, and the price difference between the S20 FE and the A52 is marginally thin, especially if you consider the promotions Samsung and its carriers run all year-round.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Make Use Of

For the most part, Samsung pulled the right strings in making the A52 an excellent midrange device; the screen is large, vibrant, and snappy, the battery life is just plain incredible, and the camera delivers sufficient quality that rounds out this phone's experience. The main competitor of this phone isn't from another brand, but from Samsung itself. The Galaxy A52 exists in a space where you can still pick up the S20 FE, and if the rumors are true, Samsung is set to release the Galaxy S21 FE later this summer, and the price difference between the S20 FE and the A52 is marginally thin, especially if you consider the promotions Samsung and its carriers run all year-round.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: CNet

As with any phone, even a good one, not everything is roses and sunshine. The in-screen fingerprint reader is so annoying to use that I preferred to enter my PIN to unlock the phone. The mediocre macro camera seems like a frivolous add-on that is only there to boost the total number of cameras on the phone. More is definitely not better. There are many duplicate apps like Samsung's version of an internet browser and photo gallery app in addition to the ones from Google. But after two months, when I step back and consider everything, the Galaxy A52 5G is an all-around good phone with some great features and a few minor and annoying flaws. It's a solid buy for $500, but as I write this review, you can get a Galaxy A52 5G unlocked on Samsung's website for $425, which makes it even harder to pass up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: CNet

As with any phone, even a good one, not everything is roses and sunshine. The in-screen fingerprint reader is so annoying to use that I preferred to enter my PIN to unlock the phone. The mediocre macro camera seems like a frivolous add-on that is only there to boost the total number of cameras on the phone. More is definitely not better. There are many duplicate apps like Samsung's version of an internet browser and photo gallery app in addition to the ones from Google. But after two months, when I step back and consider everything, the Galaxy A52 5G is an all-around good phone with some great features and a few minor and annoying flaws. It's a solid buy for $500, but as I write this review, you can get a Galaxy A52 5G unlocked on Samsung's website for $425, which makes it even harder to pass up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ($499.99) has big shoes to fill: Samsung customers are expecting a lot of value from the successor to the Galaxy A51, one of the top-selling phones of 2020. For the most part, the Galaxy A52 5G delivers, with a gorgeous 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, an ambitious camera array, and solid battery life. What’s missing, however, is performance. The A52 5G is a bit sluggish when compared with the Google Pixel 4a 5G ($499) or even the Moto G Stylus 5G ($399.99).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ($499.99) has big shoes to fill: Samsung customers are expecting a lot of value from the successor to the Galaxy A51, one of the top-selling phones of 2020. For the most part, the Galaxy A52 5G delivers, with a gorgeous 120Hz AMOLED display, 5G connectivity, an ambitious camera array, and solid battery life. What’s missing, however, is performance. The A52 5G is a bit sluggish when compared with the Google Pixel 4a 5G ($499) or even the Moto G Stylus 5G ($399.99).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The A52 5G could be brighter in most tested conditions, which is true in the video use case as well. The device does not read 60 fps UHD content, which is inconvenient for some, and its ghost touches are something gamers will notice right away. But despite a few quirks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G delivers good quality and performance for the price. Its colors are accurate, especially in outdoor conditions, and it retains good details without degrading content, especially in direct sunlight. Web browsing feels smooth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: DxOMark

The A52 5G could be brighter in most tested conditions, which is true in the video use case as well. The device does not read 60 fps UHD content, which is inconvenient for some, and its ghost touches are something gamers will notice right away. But despite a few quirks, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G delivers good quality and performance for the price. Its colors are accurate, especially in outdoor conditions, and it retains good details without degrading content, especially in direct sunlight. Web browsing feels smooth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G punched above its weight class in terms of the quality of the sound it produces in playback, and did reasonably well as a recording device too. With an exceptional artifacts score, good timbre performance, and strong spatial performance, the device provides good value in playback. As a recording device, it performed well in terms of overall timbre score, but has some shortcomings, including mono recording in the memo app and not capturing sufficient loudness in life videos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G punched above its weight class in terms of the quality of the sound it produces in playback, and did reasonably well as a recording device too. With an exceptional artifacts score, good timbre performance, and strong spatial performance, the device provides good value in playback. As a recording device, it performed well in terms of overall timbre score, but has some shortcomings, including mono recording in the memo app and not capturing sufficient loudness in life videos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Source: XDA Developers

I didn’t find much to complain about with the Galaxy A52 5G. The build quality could be better, and I would have preferred a telephoto lens over the nearly-useless 5MP macro. Samsung’s software also remains as polarizing as ever — while some (like me) generally prefer One UI over stock Android, it’s definitely not a perfect experience. The abundance of features can feel overwhelming, and the advertisements in system applications like Samsung Pay and Weather are still inexcusable. Overall, the Galaxy A52 5G is one of the strongest budget phones we’ve seen yet out of Samsung, especially in the United States. It’s a great package for the typical price of $500, and if you can get it on sale, that’s even better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2021
Source: XDA Developers

I didn’t find much to complain about with the Galaxy A52 5G. The build quality could be better, and I would have preferred a telephoto lens over the nearly-useless 5MP macro. Samsung’s software also remains as polarizing as ever — while some (like me) generally prefer One UI over stock Android, it’s definitely not a perfect experience. The abundance of features can feel overwhelming, and the advertisements in system applications like Samsung Pay and Weather are still inexcusable. Overall, the Galaxy A52 5G is one of the strongest budget phones we’ve seen yet out of Samsung, especially in the United States. It’s a great package for the typical price of $500, and if you can get it on sale, that’s even better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/02/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a high-end smartphone that sits just behind the A72 5G in the South Korean manufacturer’s more affordable A-series lineup. It features an FHD+ 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a 4500 mAh battery with 25W super-fast charging. The Android OS is powered by an octa-core processor with 6GB RAM, and there’s 128 GB of internal storage that’s expandable to 1 TB via Micro SD. The handset is also IP67 rated for water and dust resistance. For photography, the device features a quad rear camera including a 64 MP primary module and a 12 MP ultra-wide. A 5 MP macro and 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh simulation complete the shooting options. Let’s see how the device performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a high-end smartphone that sits just behind the A72 5G in the South Korean manufacturer’s more affordable A-series lineup. It features an FHD+ 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display and a 4500 mAh battery with 25W super-fast charging. The Android OS is powered by an octa-core processor with 6GB RAM, and there’s 128 GB of internal storage that’s expandable to 1 TB via Micro SD. The handset is also IP67 rated for water and dust resistance. For photography, the device features a quad rear camera including a 64 MP primary module and a 12 MP ultra-wide. A 5 MP macro and 5 MP depth sensor for bokeh simulation complete the shooting options. Let’s see how the device performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G isn’t going to blow you away with top-end specs or a remarkably affordable price, but it’s still a solid choice for a mid-range handset that can compete with the likes of the Google Pixel 4a. It’s a difficult phone to love, but if you’re looking for a lot for a lower price point than most other Samsung devices, you may enjoy what the Galaxy A52 5G has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G isn’t going to blow you away with top-end specs or a remarkably affordable price, but it’s still a solid choice for a mid-range handset that can compete with the likes of the Google Pixel 4a. It’s a difficult phone to love, but if you’re looking for a lot for a lower price point than most other Samsung devices, you may enjoy what the Galaxy A52 5G has to offer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2021
Source: Best Products

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the best smartphone $500 can buy today. It offers top-tier features and a great user experience at an agreeable price point. I also tip my hat to Samsung for committing to provide 4 years’ worth of timely security updates for the A52. It's rare to see this level of support available for Android's cheaper phones. For comparison, a $500 budget will get you an entry-level iPhone XR with less storage (64GB), one rear-facing camera, and no 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G also costs the same, but it’s nowhere near as feature-packed. It isn’t waterproof, either. At this price point, the Galaxy A52 5G is the one to beat.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: Best Products

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the best smartphone $500 can buy today. It offers top-tier features and a great user experience at an agreeable price point. I also tip my hat to Samsung for committing to provide 4 years’ worth of timely security updates for the A52. It's rare to see this level of support available for Android's cheaper phones. For comparison, a $500 budget will get you an entry-level iPhone XR with less storage (64GB), one rear-facing camera, and no 5G. The Google Pixel 4a 5G also costs the same, but it’s nowhere near as feature-packed. It isn’t waterproof, either. At this price point, the Galaxy A52 5G is the one to beat.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are very solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G gets more right than it gets wrong. It offers solid build quality, a pleasing display, excellent battery life, and a capable main camera. It's not the most performant mid-ranger out there and the secondary cameras underwhelm, but if you're in the market for a $500 phone with 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G is up there with the best.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G gets more right than it gets wrong. It offers solid build quality, a pleasing display, excellent battery life, and a capable main camera. It's not the most performant mid-ranger out there and the secondary cameras underwhelm, but if you're in the market for a $500 phone with 5G, the Galaxy A52 5G is up there with the best.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Engadget

Samsung's Galaxy A52 5G really shows how far mid-range Android phones have come. It has a great screen, decent, cameras, all-day battery life, and pretty snappy performance. The problem is that at $500, it has a lot of competition, including from Samsung itself. The S20 FE can be found new for $599, or with a discount or trade-in for as low as $399, and it has a better screen, processor, and camera setup. Add in some great phones from OnePlus in a similar range, and even the iPhone 11 for around the same price, and while the A52 5G is good, that might not be enough.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Engadget

Samsung's Galaxy A52 5G really shows how far mid-range Android phones have come. It has a great screen, decent, cameras, all-day battery life, and pretty snappy performance. The problem is that at $500, it has a lot of competition, including from Samsung itself. The S20 FE can be found new for $599, or with a discount or trade-in for as low as $399, and it has a better screen, processor, and camera setup. Add in some great phones from OnePlus in a similar range, and even the iPhone 11 for around the same price, and while the A52 5G is good, that might not be enough.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Tech Advisor

The Galaxy A52 5G sweats on the details, with a fine 120Hz AMOLED display, an IP67-rated body, a competent OIS-laden camera and the promise of four years of security updates. There’s better value to be had, however, if not quite the same sense of security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor

The Galaxy A52 5G sweats on the details, with a fine 120Hz AMOLED display, an IP67-rated body, a competent OIS-laden camera and the promise of four years of security updates. There’s better value to be had, however, if not quite the same sense of security.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central

Samsung continues to offer up a compelling mid-range phone with a near-flagship experience in the Galaxy A52 5G. With a large 120Hz screen, 4500mAh battery that will last all day even with heavy use, it's the 5G phone under $500 to beat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

Samsung continues to offer up a compelling mid-range phone with a near-flagship experience in the Galaxy A52 5G. With a large 120Hz screen, 4500mAh battery that will last all day even with heavy use, it's the 5G phone under $500 to beat.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Verge

What I didn’t love — the cluttered software, fussy fingerprint sensor, a tendency toward oversaturated color in photos — feels more forgivable when the phone gets the nonnegotiable stuff right. The Pixel 4A 5G is probably this device’s closest competition, and it beats the A52 5G on camera quality and a cleaner UI, but it’s a smaller device without a fancy fast refresh rate screen. Depending on how you feel about either of those things, the 4A 5G might be the better pick for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: The Verge

What I didn’t love — the cluttered software, fussy fingerprint sensor, a tendency toward oversaturated color in photos — feels more forgivable when the phone gets the nonnegotiable stuff right. The Pixel 4A 5G is probably this device’s closest competition, and it beats the A52 5G on camera quality and a cleaner UI, but it’s a smaller device without a fancy fast refresh rate screen. Depending on how you feel about either of those things, the 4A 5G might be the better pick for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: TechTablets

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review. An in-depth review covers, the design, battery life, benchmarks, camera samples, charge time, gaming performance, and thermals. ESR 20% discount code: MX3JL5JD
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Source: TechTablets

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Review. An in-depth review covers, the design, battery life, benchmarks, camera samples, charge time, gaming performance, and thermals. ESR 20% discount code: MX3JL5JD
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Source: Hardware Zone

With so much to offer at under $550, phones like the Galaxy A52 and its competitors might start to eat into the appeal that flagship phones once held a strong grip. Is this the end of ultra-expensive phones? Or is this just the beginning as top-end phone models start to explore the realms of multi-displays, foldable display, rollable display and other such leading-edge experiences? We tend to think there’s a push for the latter as more brands are debuting showcase devices that we may one day pine for. Till then, the mainstream audience stands to benefit from the continual process and technological improvements to bring devices like the Samsung Galaxy A52 at ever more palatable price points.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone

With so much to offer at under $550, phones like the Galaxy A52 and its competitors might start to eat into the appeal that flagship phones once held a strong grip. Is this the end of ultra-expensive phones? Or is this just the beginning as top-end phone models start to explore the realms of multi-displays, foldable display, rollable display and other such leading-edge experiences? We tend to think there’s a push for the latter as more brands are debuting showcase devices that we may one day pine for. Till then, the mainstream audience stands to benefit from the continual process and technological improvements to bring devices like the Samsung Galaxy A52 at ever more palatable price points.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: T3

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an Android handset with an excellent main camera, it has a large display with a 120Hz refresh rate, water-resistance and a long-lasting 4,500mAh battery. Granted its performance won’t blow you away but you get what you pay for there.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an Android handset with an excellent main camera, it has a large display with a 120Hz refresh rate, water-resistance and a long-lasting 4,500mAh battery. Granted its performance won’t blow you away but you get what you pay for there.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are pretty solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide

There are also some things I really like about the Galaxy A52 5G, including its playful design, the 120Hz refresh rate and its versatile main 64MP camera. And the performance and battery life are pretty solid for the price. However, a couple of things frustrated me about this phone, including the easily scratched display. And while Samsung offers more cameras than the Pixel 4a 5G, Google’s phone tends to take better pics overall. The Google Pixel 4a 5G remains the better choice for the money, assuming you want 5G in your Android handset. Stepping down to the Nord N10 5G is probably only worth it if you're on a very tight budget. If you're very interested in the A52 5G's high refresh rate or its main camera, though, those are good enough reasons to go for this over the more well-rounded competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

It’s worth noting right off the bat that while the A52 and A52 5G are similar in name and design. There’s more than just 5G that separates them. The one I have had in my pocket for the last week is the 5G model and all of my views relate to it alone. Keep that in mind when you’re looking for deals in the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews

It’s worth noting right off the bat that while the A52 and A52 5G are similar in name and design. There’s more than just 5G that separates them. The one I have had in my pocket for the last week is the 5G model and all of my views relate to it alone. Keep that in mind when you’re looking for deals in the future.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews

This, among other things, is one of the reasons why the A52 5G might actually be a more well-informed pick. The Pixel 4a, as much as it’s an astonishing mid-range handset in a bunch of areas, isn’t quite as versatile in the camera department. Don’t forget that it also has a smaller (60Hz) screen, no expandable storage and a slightly weaker processor, too. If you’re weighing up your options in the mid-range space, then the Galaxy A52 5G has absolutely scaled the ranks, disrupting the recent tradition of “Pixel is best”. As long as you can afford the extra £50, then you really can’t go wrong with picking up a Galaxy A52 5G instead.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Phone Arena

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is here in a slew of different colors and bringing a handful of upgrades to a line that desperately needed them to stay competitive. It’s a €350 midranger with a pretty OK camera, a beautiful, 90 Hz AMOLED screen, and performance that… you know — will do the job.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is here in a slew of different colors and bringing a handful of upgrades to a line that desperately needed them to stay competitive. It’s a €350 midranger with a pretty OK camera, a beautiful, 90 Hz AMOLED screen, and performance that… you know — will do the job.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: XDA Developers

Prices for major markets like the US and India have not been announced yet, but the Galaxy A52 5G is selling for around the equivalent of $510 in Europe, the UK, and Hong Kong. At this price, the phone should be a top contender for one of the best mid-tier phones — in North America and South Korea. Samsung has one of the widest retail networks for an Android smartphone brand, and in a fair few places, the Galaxy A52 might be the only viable option that consumers will be able to buy. In markets like Asia, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a lot of competition, though Samsung’s combination of proven quality, brand reputation, and marketing prowess should make this another top seller.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: XDA Developers

Prices for major markets like the US and India have not been announced yet, but the Galaxy A52 5G is selling for around the equivalent of $510 in Europe, the UK, and Hong Kong. At this price, the phone should be a top contender for one of the best mid-tier phones — in North America and South Korea. Samsung has one of the widest retail networks for an Android smartphone brand, and in a fair few places, the Galaxy A52 might be the only viable option that consumers will be able to buy. In markets like Asia, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a lot of competition, though Samsung’s combination of proven quality, brand reputation, and marketing prowess should make this another top seller.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Pocket Lint

An excellent mid-range phone, packed with a great display, plenty of power, and waterproofing to help it stand out from the crowd. Running Samsung's latest software, it's an affordable way to get the latest Samsung experience with little major compromise.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Trusted Reviews

The A52 5G certainly comes with plenty packed in, and if you’re after that Samsung name – and the look that comes with it – then, following a few day's use, this appears to be a good pick.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brings a variety of top-end features you'd normally expect to be included on flagship phones to its cheaper variant including 5G connectivity and an improved screen technology. This may be one to watch if you're after a cheaper Samsung phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Pocket Lint

An excellent mid-range phone, packed with a great display, plenty of power, and waterproofing to help it stand out from the crowd. Running Samsung's latest software, it's an affordable way to get the latest Samsung experience with little major compromise.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Trusted Reviews

The A52 5G certainly comes with plenty packed in, and if you’re after that Samsung name – and the look that comes with it – then, following a few day's use, this appears to be a good pick.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G brings a variety of top-end features you'd normally expect to be included on flagship phones to its cheaper variant including 5G connectivity and an improved screen technology. This may be one to watch if you're after a cheaper Samsung phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A52 5G will be one of Samsung's 2021 mid-range offerings, along with its larger variant – the Galaxy A72 5G. Over its predecessor from last year, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a smoother 90Hz display, which will also feature great contrast and colors thanks to its AMOLED technology. In addition, A52 5G owners will enjoy the phone's modern design with minimal bezels, curved edges, and versatile quad-camera setup.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Phone Arena

The Galaxy A52 5G will be one of Samsung's 2021 mid-range offerings, along with its larger variant – the Galaxy A72 5G. Over its predecessor from last year, the Galaxy A52 5G will have a smoother 90Hz display, which will also feature great contrast and colors thanks to its AMOLED technology. In addition, A52 5G owners will enjoy the phone's modern design with minimal bezels, curved edges, and versatile quad-camera setup.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2021
Foreign Reviews
5G-Smartphones für schmale Geldbeutel 5G-Smartphones für schmale GeldbeutelSource: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: PCtipp.ch

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PCtipp.ch

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbase

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Computerbase

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2021
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2021
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 83% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 83% display: 90% mobility: 88% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Slow charging; average cameras.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Excellent display; high performance; great speakers; long battery life; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Excellent display; high performance; great speakers; long battery life; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Xataka

Positive: Beautiful design; long battery life; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Xataka

Positive: Beautiful design; long battery life; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80%
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 80%
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 55% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 55% performance: 60% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 62% features: 77%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 62% features: 77%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% features: 85% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% mobility: 84% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 82% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 86%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 82% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 86%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% display: 89% mobility: 90% workmanship: 86%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% display: 89% mobility: 90% workmanship: 86%
Source: Bright.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Bright.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: High performance; long battery life. Negative: No headphone jack.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2022
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Geeks and Com

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geeks and Com

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: 01Net

Positive: Excellent display; beautiful design. Negative: Average autonomy; slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2021
Source: 01Net

Positive: Excellent display; beautiful design. Negative: Average autonomy; slow charging; poor cameras; low performance; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2021
Source: Fredzone

Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Fredzone

Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Phonandroid

Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Phonandroid

Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Komputerswiat

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Attractive price; support 5G; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/01/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great main camera; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Elegant design; nice display; great main camera; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Waterproof and dust avoiding; excellent display; nice cameras; great speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Waterproof and dust avoiding; excellent display; nice cameras; great speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% features: 85% mobility: 89% workmanship: 87%
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% features: 85% mobility: 89% workmanship: 87%
Source: Zing

Positive: Support 5G; nice quad cameras; decent processor; waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Support 5G; nice quad cameras; decent processor; waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/08/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful processor; excellent display; high performance; excellent cameras; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful processor; excellent display; high performance; excellent cameras; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; nice performance. Negative: Old design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Beautiful design; decent hardware; nice performance; good price; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; nice performance. Negative: Old design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Beautiful design; decent hardware; nice performance; good price; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/30/2021
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Komputer for alle

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Komputer for alle

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT

Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; nice display; long battery life; headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: Arena IT

Positive: Decent hardware; nice gaming performance; nice display; long battery life; headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; long battery life; elegant design. Negative: High price; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: Excellent display; powerful processor; long battery life; elegant design. Negative: High price; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Puhelinvertailu

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 750G 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 619
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing, at least at first look, significant improvements in the display with a 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look both the A72 and the A52 sport, with fresh and youthful colors. Here’s our hands-on experience with the new midranger. We noticed a smaller improvement in the processor and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone for an affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the budget-friendly Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. We are now expecting its successor, the Galaxy A72, to soon hit the market scene, offering, just like its predecessor, a good balance between quality and price. The phone is expected to come in two variants, connectivity-wise: a 5G version and an LTE-only version. Here, we will focus on the 5G variant of the phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 75% display: 88% mobility: 87% workmanship: 85%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Excellent cameras; stereo speakers; mini jack. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/20/2022
Samsung Galaxy A72
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 449 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Samsung has relaunched its mid-range top model: The Galaxy A72 is even better than the already strong predecessor and has, among other things, the larger battery and better cameras. As the review shows, the Galaxy A72 should also be the standard against which all mid-range rivals have to measure themselves this year.
Source: DxOMark

Although it overall behind the Oppo Reno6 5G and the Xiaomi 11T, which both offer a better charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy A72 battery has the best autonomy in its segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/09/2021
Source: DxOMark

Although it overall behind the Oppo Reno6 5G and the Xiaomi 11T, which both offer a better charging experience, the Samsung Galaxy A72 battery has the best autonomy in its segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/09/2021
Source: DxOMark

Announced in March 2021, the Snapdragon 720G-powered Samsung Galaxy A72 looks like an enticing option in the High-end ($400-599) segment, offering a comprehensive camera setup with a Quad-Bayer sensor in the primary module as well as a 3x tele, a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a dedicated macro camera. Let’s see how it fares in the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2021
Source: DxOMark

Announced in March 2021, the Snapdragon 720G-powered Samsung Galaxy A72 looks like an enticing option in the High-end ($400-599) segment, offering a comprehensive camera setup with a Quad-Bayer sensor in the primary module as well as a 3x tele, a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a dedicated macro camera. Let’s see how it fares in the DXOMARK Camera test protocol.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different from the Galaxy A52, and that's a problem. The telephoto camera is a nice addition but I didn't find it very useful since its image quality was average at best. Other than this, you're paying a premium over the Galaxy A52 for a slightly larger battery and the bundled 25W charger. It's hard to justify spending at least Rs. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you can get nearly the same performance and features with the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26,499, and some phones priced under Rs. 30,000 offer even better specifications and capabilities. If the Samsung name and features such as the IP rating and stereo speakers are what drew you towards the Galaxy A72, I'd suggest buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving some money. If you absolutely want to spend more, then any of the above competitors would be a better buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

As it turns out, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is not too different from the Galaxy A52, and that's a problem. The telephoto camera is a nice addition but I didn't find it very useful since its image quality was average at best. Other than this, you're paying a premium over the Galaxy A52 for a slightly larger battery and the bundled 25W charger. It's hard to justify spending at least Rs. 34,999 for the Galaxy A72 when you can get nearly the same performance and features with the Galaxy A52 at Rs. 26,499, and some phones priced under Rs. 30,000 offer even better specifications and capabilities. If the Samsung name and features such as the IP rating and stereo speakers are what drew you towards the Galaxy A72, I'd suggest buying the Galaxy A52 instead and saving some money. If you absolutely want to spend more, then any of the above competitors would be a better buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech PP

We think Samsung has shown some major guts in launching the Galaxy A72 with a starting price of Rs. 34,999. The phone not only comes with an older processor but also does not really bring anything too unique to the table. Yes, we love the design; the cameras and display are very good, and the battery life is impressive, but there is a lot of competition lurking around at that price point. There is the Mi 11X which comes with a Snapdragon 870 at around Rs 30,000, as does the iQOO 7. And well, there will be those who might think of the OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60, which cost a little more but come with better processors and equally formidable specs. And well, all of those worthies also bring 5G to the table, which is a welcome bonus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech PP

We think Samsung has shown some major guts in launching the Galaxy A72 with a starting price of Rs. 34,999. The phone not only comes with an older processor but also does not really bring anything too unique to the table. Yes, we love the design; the cameras and display are very good, and the battery life is impressive, but there is a lot of competition lurking around at that price point. There is the Mi 11X which comes with a Snapdragon 870 at around Rs 30,000, as does the iQOO 7. And well, there will be those who might think of the OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60, which cost a little more but come with better processors and equally formidable specs. And well, all of those worthies also bring 5G to the table, which is a welcome bonus.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Indian Express

The Galaxy A72 is aimed at those who have a budget of higher than Rs 35,000, and want a phone with a good camera. The phone is also more affordable compared to other mid-range flagships such as vivo X60 (Rs 39,990), OnePlus 9R (Rs 39,999). However, the recently launched Mi 11X costs Rs 29,999 and undercuts the A72 in pricing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: The Indian Express

The Galaxy A72 is aimed at those who have a budget of higher than Rs 35,000, and want a phone with a good camera. The phone is also more affordable compared to other mid-range flagships such as vivo X60 (Rs 39,990), OnePlus 9R (Rs 39,999). However, the recently launched Mi 11X costs Rs 29,999 and undercuts the A72 in pricing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: GSM Arena

So bottom line then - just like the Galaxy A52, the A72 is a truly unique package, even on the current over-saturated mid-ranger scene. That being said, its value relies on a very particular mix of features. If it just happens to be something that resonates with you, there really is no reason to look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: GSM Arena

So bottom line then - just like the Galaxy A52, the A72 is a truly unique package, even on the current over-saturated mid-ranger scene. That being said, its value relies on a very particular mix of features. If it just happens to be something that resonates with you, there really is no reason to look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Yugatech

Now that we’ve talked about almost everything, let’s finally focus on price. The Samsung Galaxy A72 is officially available for PHP 23,990. And as I’ve mentioned, it’s quite in a risky spot because first, it only got minimal improvements from its predecessor the A71, then there’s the competition in its price range with other phones offering better performance and cameras. It does however give the advantage of being a familiar Samsung device with an attractive design and large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Yugatech

Now that we’ve talked about almost everything, let’s finally focus on price. The Samsung Galaxy A72 is officially available for PHP 23,990. And as I’ve mentioned, it’s quite in a risky spot because first, it only got minimal improvements from its predecessor the A71, then there’s the competition in its price range with other phones offering better performance and cameras. It does however give the advantage of being a familiar Samsung device with an attractive design and large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A72 nails the basics: you get a sublime 90Hz AMOLED display, minimal design with pastel hues, robust hardware, reliable cameras at the back, a 5000mAh battery, and long-term software updates. But the fact that there's no 5G here makes it a non-starter in global markets, and you also have to contend with a lot of bloatware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A72 nails the basics: you get a sublime 90Hz AMOLED display, minimal design with pastel hues, robust hardware, reliable cameras at the back, a 5000mAh battery, and long-term software updates. But the fact that there's no 5G here makes it a non-starter in global markets, and you also have to contend with a lot of bloatware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Unbox

Our review of the Galaxy A72 for the Philippines shows that the phablet is the most value-packed Samsung mid-range phone to date. Additions like a bigger battery, telephoto camera, high refresh rate, and an IP rating made the Galaxy A72 a compelling offering—and arguably one of Samsung’s best mid-range phones in recent memory.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Unbox

Our review of the Galaxy A72 for the Philippines shows that the phablet is the most value-packed Samsung mid-range phone to date. Additions like a bigger battery, telephoto camera, high refresh rate, and an IP rating made the Galaxy A72 a compelling offering—and arguably one of Samsung’s best mid-range phones in recent memory.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Lowyat.net

The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a cheery phone, or at least that’s the picture the company wants to paint for it. While the names of its colours can rub people the wrong way (it certainly did for me), it’s difficult to counter the point that the phone is a fine mid-range device, at least by today’s standards. The unique back is a minor plus point, but the IP67 rating is, in my opinion, the bigger and better deal.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Lowyat.net

The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a cheery phone, or at least that’s the picture the company wants to paint for it. While the names of its colours can rub people the wrong way (it certainly did for me), it’s difficult to counter the point that the phone is a fine mid-range device, at least by today’s standards. The unique back is a minor plus point, but the IP67 rating is, in my opinion, the bigger and better deal.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

Absolutely – but the price is obviously at a premium here since you’re getting the best experience available on a mid-range smartphone. At RM1,899 – I think it’s a little steep and inching close to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G’s current price of RM2,099.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: KL Gadget Guy

I can’t deny that there’s a bunch of important upgrades and the Galaxy A72 does have a lot to offer, but you may look the other way if you’re aiming for a 5G phone. Apart from that, the phone looks great, performs well and has a long-lasting battery life. It’s a decent phone if you don’t mind the lacking performance in lowlight photography and the absence of 5G support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Manila Shaker

Absolutely – but the price is obviously at a premium here since you’re getting the best experience available on a mid-range smartphone. At RM1,899 – I think it’s a little steep and inching close to the Galaxy S20 FE 4G’s current price of RM2,099.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: KL Gadget Guy

I can’t deny that there’s a bunch of important upgrades and the Galaxy A72 does have a lot to offer, but you may look the other way if you’re aiming for a 5G phone. Apart from that, the phone looks great, performs well and has a long-lasting battery life. It’s a decent phone if you don’t mind the lacking performance in lowlight photography and the absence of 5G support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing significant improvements to the table, with a smooth 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look the Galaxy A72 sports, with fresh and youthful colors. There is a smaller improvement in the processor capabilities and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone, with great battery life and a capable camera for the affordable price of $430.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena

Last year, the midrange Galaxy A71 was a success and became quite popular. Now, its successor is here, bringing significant improvements to the table, with a smooth 90Hz high refresh rate, a bigger 5,000mAh battery, and a versatile camera system. All of these cool features are packed under a gorgeous new look the Galaxy A72 sports, with fresh and youthful colors. There is a smaller improvement in the processor capabilities and its performance is not a giant step forward from the Galaxy A71, but despite that, the A72 is a good investment for anyone wanting a smooth Samsung phone, with great battery life and a capable camera for the affordable price of $430.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A72, like the Galaxy A52, is a mid-range phone that offers a high-end experience. You get an excellent display with 90Hz refresh rate that makes for smooth scrolling and animations, water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, a zoom camera capable of up to 30x magnification, the latest software out of the box along with a guarantee of three major OS upgrades, and mostly excellent performance with the Snapdragon 720G processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A72, like the Galaxy A52, is a mid-range phone that offers a high-end experience. You get an excellent display with 90Hz refresh rate that makes for smooth scrolling and animations, water and dust resistance, stereo speakers, a zoom camera capable of up to 30x magnification, the latest software out of the box along with a guarantee of three major OS upgrades, and mostly excellent performance with the Snapdragon 720G processor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2021
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 92% performance: 50% display: 880% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 92% performance: 50% display: 880% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 88% mobility: 93% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 70% display: 88% mobility: 93% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; good price; excellent display; nice selfie camera. Negative: Unsupported 5G; poor main camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Large battery capacity; quick charging; good price; excellent display; nice selfie camera. Negative: Unsupported 5G; poor main camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Canaltech

Positive: High gaming performance; long battery life; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; great speakers. Negative: Heavy and bulky; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: High gaming performance; long battery life; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; great speakers. Negative: Heavy and bulky; high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 70% features: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 70% features: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: Tutto Android

Positive: Support 5G; decent autonomy; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2021
Source: Tutto Android

Positive: Support 5G; decent autonomy; nice display. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2021
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Very long battery life; nice cameras; good support. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Very long battery life; nice cameras; good support. Negative: Poor display; unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2021
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2021
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Beautiful display; nice cameras; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2021
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Beautiful display; stereo speakers; waterproof IP67. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Beautiful display; stereo speakers; waterproof IP67. Negative: Weak processor; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; big screen; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; big screen; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: Danviet

Positive: Modern design; excellent display; big screen; nice gaming performance; decent quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Source: Danviet

Positive: Modern design; excellent display; big screen; nice gaming performance; decent quad cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; decent hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; decent hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery capacity; nice gaming performance; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Large battery capacity; nice gaming performance; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Excellent cameras; good price; waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Excellent cameras; good price; waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; excellent display; high performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; excellent display; high performance; great cameras; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; great quad cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick charging; great quad cameras; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Impressive battery life; attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2021
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arena IT

Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; high autonomy; great speakers; waterproof IP67; headphone jack; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2021
Source: Arena IT

Positive: Big screen; beautiful display; high autonomy; great speakers; waterproof IP67; headphone jack; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: High performance; great autonomy; nice cameras; attractive price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2021
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: High performance; great autonomy; nice cameras; attractive price. Negative: Poor display; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 720G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 618
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 409 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Those who can live without 5G will be able to get the Samsung Galaxy A52 for about 70 Euros (~$85) less, depending on the configuration. While there is still an older SoC, the option to choose between two storage configurations continues to be available. Our test evaluates the capabilities of the more powerful of the two.
Source: Manila Shaker

For us, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good all-rounder smartphone. It has a decent quality on its camera and it just needs optimization. It also has average gaming performance even though the chipset isn’t capable of connecting to 5G. But the best offering is the display and the aesthetic and pleasing look which is great for entertainment use. 100 Days Review: We haven’t encountered any issues for around 3 months of use, and the device is stable and working fine as a daily driver. I won’t recommend the device if you are aiming for a mid-range gaming-focused smartphone, but if you are looking for a long-term device with the promise of android support for more than a couple of years, this will be a great option. Samsung Galaxy A52 is priced at P18,990 for the same 8GB + 128GB configuration. For the price, it really offers value with a couple of drawbacks but with strong upsides. The increments compared to its predecessor is very notable and worthy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

For us, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a good all-rounder smartphone. It has a decent quality on its camera and it just needs optimization. It also has average gaming performance even though the chipset isn’t capable of connecting to 5G. But the best offering is the display and the aesthetic and pleasing look which is great for entertainment use. 100 Days Review: We haven’t encountered any issues for around 3 months of use, and the device is stable and working fine as a daily driver. I won’t recommend the device if you are aiming for a mid-range gaming-focused smartphone, but if you are looking for a long-term device with the promise of android support for more than a couple of years, this will be a great option. Samsung Galaxy A52 is priced at P18,990 for the same 8GB + 128GB configuration. For the price, it really offers value with a couple of drawbacks but with strong upsides. The increments compared to its predecessor is very notable and worthy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2021
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Manila Shaker

I have been using the Samsung Galaxy A52 for almost 4 months now, And in this video, I will share my experience, what I love and issues that I have encountered ever since I started using this device as my daily driver.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

I have been using the Samsung Galaxy A52 for almost 4 months now, And in this video, I will share my experience, what I love and issues that I have encountered ever since I started using this device as my daily driver.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2021
Source: MrMobile

This is the Galaxy A52, Samsung’s top of the line mid-ranger, which on my book is maybe the best update the company has brought to the series. See, price and features are all nice things to have, but if you can add a bit of style to the package, I think the premise can go farther. I’m Jaime Rivera with Pocketnow and let’s dive into our full review
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2021
Source: MrMobile

This is the Galaxy A52, Samsung’s top of the line mid-ranger, which on my book is maybe the best update the company has brought to the series. See, price and features are all nice things to have, but if you can add a bit of style to the package, I think the premise can go farther. I’m Jaime Rivera with Pocketnow and let’s dive into our full review
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2021
Source: Gadgetspeak

This is the latest Samsung offering to cross my desk, my unit has a matt sky blue back, a shiny slightly darker blue sides and a very shiny front. There are a vertical line of three cameras top left of the back and a forth camera and LED flash beside these.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak

This is the latest Samsung offering to cross my desk, my unit has a matt sky blue back, a shiny slightly darker blue sides and a very shiny front. There are a vertical line of three cameras top left of the back and a forth camera and LED flash beside these.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police

The A52 is $100 more expensive than the A51 was at launch. For that hundred bucks, you're getting an overhauled design, a better processor, more RAM, faster display, and IP67 water resistance (the A51 didn't have any official rating). That's a lot of improvement. In the grand A-series tradition, the A52 is another competent mid-range Samsung phone in a long line of competent mid-range Samsung phones. But I would've liked to see some tweaks to either hit a lower price or allocate more budget to the A52's weaker points — dropping the two useless camera modules and swapping out the 120Hz panel for a 90Hz one, for instance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tech PP

All of which makes it appear as if the Galaxy A52 will have a tough time repeating the bestselling achievements of its predecessor. It is a very good option for those who want a phone that looks different and performs well but starts fading the moment the spec sheet comparisons come into play. The Galaxy A52 ticks a lot of boxes but does not really top the class in any significant department.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Source: Tech PP

All of which makes it appear as if the Galaxy A52 will have a tough time repeating the bestselling achievements of its predecessor. It is a very good option for those who want a phone that looks different and performs well but starts fading the moment the spec sheet comparisons come into play. The Galaxy A52 ticks a lot of boxes but does not really top the class in any significant department.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2021
Source: Phandroid

At the end of the day, I’m pretty impressed by what the Galaxy A52 has to offer. Sure there are quite a few smartphones from Chinese brands that deliver better specs at the same price, but if you’re in the US, the only real option that might be better at $500 is the Pixel 4a 5G. There’s a noticeable gap in performance and camera quality between this phone and the Galaxy S21, but the $300 price difference definitely makes up for it, especially when you consider the improvements the A52 offers over last year’s model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Phandroid

At the end of the day, I’m pretty impressed by what the Galaxy A52 has to offer. Sure there are quite a few smartphones from Chinese brands that deliver better specs at the same price, but if you’re in the US, the only real option that might be better at $500 is the Pixel 4a 5G. There’s a noticeable gap in performance and camera quality between this phone and the Galaxy S21, but the $300 price difference definitely makes up for it, especially when you consider the improvements the A52 offers over last year’s model.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Manila Shaker

And finally – the price. At RM1,499, I think that the Galaxy A52 is rather pricy, yes – so maybe wait until there’s a free gift bundle promotion. Truthfully speaking, both the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A72 are pretty much the most balanced smartphones – in all aspects – at their own price range.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Manila Shaker

And finally – the price. At RM1,499, I think that the Galaxy A52 is rather pricy, yes – so maybe wait until there’s a free gift bundle promotion. Truthfully speaking, both the Galaxy A52 and Galaxy A72 are pretty much the most balanced smartphones – in all aspects – at their own price range.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a decent smartphone for its asking price but leaves a lot to be desired especially since you’re spending upwards of Rs 25,000. It does give users a viable alternative in the face of OnePlus Nord and the likes but does little to stand out in the crowd. It looks good in the hand and the matte finish on the back steers it clear of fingerprints and smudges. However, the biggest gripe is the fact that while the A52 supports 25W fast charging, Samsung wants users to pay for an additional adapter.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 66% performance: 58% workmanship: 65%
Source: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a decent smartphone for its asking price but leaves a lot to be desired especially since you’re spending upwards of Rs 25,000. It does give users a viable alternative in the face of OnePlus Nord and the likes but does little to stand out in the crowd. It looks good in the hand and the matte finish on the back steers it clear of fingerprints and smudges. However, the biggest gripe is the fact that while the A52 supports 25W fast charging, Samsung wants users to pay for an additional adapter.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 66% performance: 58% workmanship: 65%
Source: Yugatech

The Galaxy A52 is an interesting device given that it has two versions in the Philippine market. The one that we have is the 4G version that is priced at PHP 18,990, while the other is the 5G version with a more powerful chipset, higher refresh rate, and 5G connectivity for a more expensive PHP 23,990. Is it a good upgrade to the Galaxy A51? Yes, it is. Should you get one? If you’re okay not having the bells and whistles of the Galaxy A52 5G, and have a lower budget, then we think it’s a good buy. But if you really need 5G and a better performing chipset at this budget, we think you’re better off looking for a better option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: Yugatech

The Galaxy A52 is an interesting device given that it has two versions in the Philippine market. The one that we have is the 4G version that is priced at PHP 18,990, while the other is the 5G version with a more powerful chipset, higher refresh rate, and 5G connectivity for a more expensive PHP 23,990. Is it a good upgrade to the Galaxy A51? Yes, it is. Should you get one? If you’re okay not having the bells and whistles of the Galaxy A52 5G, and have a lower budget, then we think it’s a good buy. But if you really need 5G and a better performing chipset at this budget, we think you’re better off looking for a better option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

With the Galaxy A52, Samsung is not trying to do something entirely different apart from revisiting the spec-sheets that have worked for the company. This is a reliable daily driver and the promise of software update for three years makes the deal sweeter. Having said that the price is a bit high when compared to other brands offering similar features in phones under Rs 20,000. But then as said above, this is where Samsung’s brand value and build quality comes in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Gadgets Now

With the Galaxy A52, Samsung is not trying to do something entirely different apart from revisiting the spec-sheets that have worked for the company. This is a reliable daily driver and the promise of software update for three years makes the deal sweeter. Having said that the price is a bit high when compared to other brands offering similar features in phones under Rs 20,000. But then as said above, this is where Samsung’s brand value and build quality comes in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 91mobiles

In sum, the Galaxy A52 is a good device overall, but one that could have been better. That statement can actually be applied to anything and everything, but Samsung could have done well to include a faster processor, and some basic essentials like a 25W charger (since the phone supports it), and a case in the box. The 5G version of the Galaxy A52, which hasn’t been launched in India yet, does come with a 5G-capable Snapdragon 750G SoC and a 120Hz display, which are specs that sound much better on paper as compared to what the 4G version of the Galaxy A52 offers. When it comes to rivals, the Galaxy A52 goes up against the likes of the OnePlus Nord (review), the Xiaomi Mi 10T, the Mi 10i (review), and others in its price segment. Each of these devices has its own set of pluses and minuses, and in most cases, offers better performance than the Samsung Galaxy A52. On the other hand, the Galaxy A52 does feature IP67 waterproofing, which could appeal to a fair chunk of prospective buyers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: 91mobiles

In sum, the Galaxy A52 is a good device overall, but one that could have been better. That statement can actually be applied to anything and everything, but Samsung could have done well to include a faster processor, and some basic essentials like a 25W charger (since the phone supports it), and a case in the box. The 5G version of the Galaxy A52, which hasn’t been launched in India yet, does come with a 5G-capable Snapdragon 750G SoC and a 120Hz display, which are specs that sound much better on paper as compared to what the 4G version of the Galaxy A52 offers. When it comes to rivals, the Galaxy A52 goes up against the likes of the OnePlus Nord (review), the Xiaomi Mi 10T, the Mi 10i (review), and others in its price segment. Each of these devices has its own set of pluses and minuses, and in most cases, offers better performance than the Samsung Galaxy A52. On the other hand, the Galaxy A52 does feature IP67 waterproofing, which could appeal to a fair chunk of prospective buyers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Business Standard

Priced Rs 26,499 onwards, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is an all-round midrange smartphone with something in store for everyone. It boasts a good sAMOLED display of 90Hz refresh rate, loud and clear stereo speakers, 3.5mm audio out port for wired earphones, a capable camera system, and sleek performance. Except for the IP67 protection and camera system with OIS, there is nothing new that the Galaxy A52 brings to the table when compared with other smartphones in the midrange segment. Therefore, it might not be the best midrange smartphone but the best in Samsung's line-up.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/07/2021
Source: Business Standard

Priced Rs 26,499 onwards, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is an all-round midrange smartphone with something in store for everyone. It boasts a good sAMOLED display of 90Hz refresh rate, loud and clear stereo speakers, 3.5mm audio out port for wired earphones, a capable camera system, and sleek performance. Except for the IP67 protection and camera system with OIS, there is nothing new that the Galaxy A52 brings to the table when compared with other smartphones in the midrange segment. Therefore, it might not be the best midrange smartphone but the best in Samsung's line-up.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/07/2021
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A52 has so many quality of life changes from its predecessor and checks many of the boxes that we’ve wanted to see from Samsung mid-rangers. You still have their beautiful display that has been improved with a higher refresh rate plus the addition of stereo speakers just ups the enjoyment with this device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: Unbox

The Galaxy A52 has so many quality of life changes from its predecessor and checks many of the boxes that we’ve wanted to see from Samsung mid-rangers. You still have their beautiful display that has been improved with a higher refresh rate plus the addition of stereo speakers just ups the enjoyment with this device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and brings IP67 water and dust resistance rating to the table, which most of its competition miss out on. Sadly, apart from this, not a lot of things are in its favour. It does certain things well but the competition does them better. The Galaxy A52 does not offer the best performance and doesn't have the best cameras. However, it will appeal to the design-conscious, and if you are a bit clumsy, the water resistance is a big plus.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and brings IP67 water and dust resistance rating to the table, which most of its competition miss out on. Sadly, apart from this, not a lot of things are in its favour. It does certain things well but the competition does them better. The Galaxy A52 does not offer the best performance and doesn't have the best cameras. However, it will appeal to the design-conscious, and if you are a bit clumsy, the water resistance is a big plus.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian

In our opinion, the Galaxy A52 is a much better pick than the Galaxy A72 as both of them have almost everything in common except a camera sensor, and display & battery size. The Galaxy A72 is also a decent phone but at that price, you have better options and even the differences between the two are not worth spending Rs 8500 more on the Galaxy A72.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Times of India

Overall, the Galaxy A52 is a decent mid-range phone except for its occasional stutters. The phone also has a lot to offer in terms of display, cameras and battery life. Galaxy A52 will most likely be a no brainer for Samsung fans seeing how the Galaxy A51 was a best-seller. But those looking for better value-for-money options can definitely consider checking out Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, and Realme X7 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: The Times of India

Overall, the Galaxy A52 is a decent mid-range phone except for its occasional stutters. The phone also has a lot to offer in terms of display, cameras and battery life. Galaxy A52 will most likely be a no brainer for Samsung fans seeing how the Galaxy A51 was a best-seller. But those looking for better value-for-money options can definitely consider checking out Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, and Realme X7 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/04/2021
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is quite an interesting smartphone. For RM1,499, you get 4 years of guaranteed software support, an experience that is typically reserved for their more premium smartphones. You get decent build quality, punchy colours on the display, 90Hz refresh rate, a good camera system, IP67, stereo speakers, headphone jack is included, and a pretty solid battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pokde

The Samsung Galaxy A52 is quite an interesting smartphone. For RM1,499, you get 4 years of guaranteed software support, an experience that is typically reserved for their more premium smartphones. You get decent build quality, punchy colours on the display, 90Hz refresh rate, a good camera system, IP67, stereo speakers, headphone jack is included, and a pretty solid battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

There's honestly very little to actually criticize about the Galaxy A52. Sure, the Snapdragon 720G is not the quickest chip around, but it doesn't seem to be holding back the experience in any practical way. Samsung's "Awesome is for everyone" slogan actually rings very true here. We, for one, are on board and give the A52 a hearty recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: GSM Arena

There's honestly very little to actually criticize about the Galaxy A52. Sure, the Snapdragon 720G is not the quickest chip around, but it doesn't seem to be holding back the experience in any practical way. Samsung's "Awesome is for everyone" slogan actually rings very true here. We, for one, are on board and give the A52 a hearty recommendation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: XDA Developers

The Samsung Galaxy A52 brings many improvements over the older generations. While the hardware gets a major upgrade, the smartphone’s software experience is likely to drive many users looking for a long-lasting phone that can replace their old iPhone SE’s and XR’s. The improved experience includes a superior display, better cameras, and fast charging. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 720G chipset brings improved performance, better thermal stability, and support for the Google Camera mod compared to counterparts in the Exynos family.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: XDA Developers

The Samsung Galaxy A52 brings many improvements over the older generations. While the hardware gets a major upgrade, the smartphone’s software experience is likely to drive many users looking for a long-lasting phone that can replace their old iPhone SE’s and XR’s. The improved experience includes a superior display, better cameras, and fast charging. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 720G chipset brings improved performance, better thermal stability, and support for the Google Camera mod compared to counterparts in the Exynos family.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Indian Express

You are probably eyeing a flagship smartphone for months but have no budget to spend Rs 80,000 on a phone, especially during the pandemic. But the fact is there is no need to spend a ridiculous amount on a smartphone when you get a much capable phone for way less. Samsung’s new Galaxy A52, even though a premium mid-range phone, offers pretty much every feature you would wish to get in a high-end phone including a high refresh rate display, IP67 dust and water resistance, and even stereo speakers. With the Galaxy A52 starting at Rs 26,499, this smartphone sets a benchmark for premium mid-range devices.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A52 is the best mid-range phone from Samsung yet. Actually, it feels a lot like a high-end phone, and in some markets, that’s the reason why it’s priced a little above the Galaxy A51. It’s a good thing then that you’re getting an excellent phone. The only disadvantage I see is that you are still getting a macro camera instead of a zoom camera, and perhaps the stereo speakers could have been louder. Other than that, the Galaxy A52 does everything right, and you can order one with your eyes closed if you’re in the market for a sub-$400 phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: The Indian Express

You are probably eyeing a flagship smartphone for months but have no budget to spend Rs 80,000 on a phone, especially during the pandemic. But the fact is there is no need to spend a ridiculous amount on a smartphone when you get a much capable phone for way less. Samsung’s new Galaxy A52, even though a premium mid-range phone, offers pretty much every feature you would wish to get in a high-end phone including a high refresh rate display, IP67 dust and water resistance, and even stereo speakers. With the Galaxy A52 starting at Rs 26,499, this smartphone sets a benchmark for premium mid-range devices.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Sam Mobile

The Galaxy A52 is the best mid-range phone from Samsung yet. Actually, it feels a lot like a high-end phone, and in some markets, that’s the reason why it’s priced a little above the Galaxy A51. It’s a good thing then that you’re getting an excellent phone. The only disadvantage I see is that you are still getting a macro camera instead of a zoom camera, and perhaps the stereo speakers could have been louder. Other than that, the Galaxy A52 does everything right, and you can order one with your eyes closed if you’re in the market for a sub-$400 phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A52 brings exciting upgrades in all key areas. You get a gorgeous design with pastel hues, lag-free performance, responsive 90Hz display, IP67 water resistance, outstanding battery life, cameras that take great photos, and three guaranteed Android updates.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central

The Galaxy A52 brings exciting upgrades in all key areas. You get a gorgeous design with pastel hues, lag-free performance, responsive 90Hz display, IP67 water resistance, outstanding battery life, cameras that take great photos, and three guaranteed Android updates.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Sam Mobile

On paper, the Galaxy A52 is a fantastic phone, with a plethora of high-end features one could only dream of seeing on Samsung’s mid-range devices until last year. Just how well those specs come together in practice is something we will tell you in our full review in the next couple of days, but we think we can say with absolute certainty that Samsung has another winner of a mid-range phone in its hands, one that could outsell both the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A51 combined.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2021
Source: Sam Mobile

On paper, the Galaxy A52 is a fantastic phone, with a plethora of high-end features one could only dream of seeing on Samsung’s mid-range devices until last year. Just how well those specs come together in practice is something we will tell you in our full review in the next couple of days, but we think we can say with absolute certainty that Samsung has another winner of a mid-range phone in its hands, one that could outsell both the Galaxy A50 and Galaxy A51 combined.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and is sure to grab eyeballs. The cameras also seem to be in line with what one should expect at this price point, going by their specifications. However, I have some reservations about the choice of processor here. Can the Galaxy A52 change my mind? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 to find out in the full review, coming up soon.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Galaxy A52 is a good-looking smartphone and is sure to grab eyeballs. The cameras also seem to be in line with what one should expect at this price point, going by their specifications. However, I have some reservations about the choice of processor here. Can the Galaxy A52 change my mind? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 to find out in the full review, coming up soon.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Engadget

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Yugatech

Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/17/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Netzwelt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 81%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 85% mobility: 81%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% features: 90% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% features: 90% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Showmetech.com.br

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% performance: 85% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Showmetech.com.br

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% performance: 85% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil

Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2021
Source: Gizmodo Brasil

Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; large battery capacity; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; elegant design; great speakers; long battery life. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; elegant design; great speakers; long battery life. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2021
Source: Mais Tecnologia

Positive: Good price; excellent cameras; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Mais Tecnologia

Positive: Good price; excellent cameras; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: DDay IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: DDay IT

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 77%
Source: Chimera Revo

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Batista70Phone

Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; decent autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2021
Source: Batista70Phone

Positive: Attractive price; nice quad cameras; excellent display; powerful processor; decent autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2021
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techzine

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Want.nl

Positive: Decent hardware; good price; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: Want.nl

Positive: Decent hardware; good price; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: Fredzone

Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Fredzone

Positive: Nice display; decent processor; great cameras; good price. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Great display; waterproof IP67; beautiful design. Negative: Slow charging; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Antyweb

Positive: Great display; waterproof IP67; beautiful design. Negative: Slow charging; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2021
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Log.com.tr

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice display; excellent cameras; support waterproof; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice display; excellent cameras; support waterproof; quick charging; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; excellent display; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; excellent display; waterproof IP67.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; excellent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; long battery life; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Nice quad cameras; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Nice quad cameras; compact size; light weight; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Stylish design; decent processor; high performance; excellent quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Stylish design; decent processor; high performance; excellent quad cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Attractive price; nice cameras; powerful hardware; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Good price; waterproof and dust avoiding; nice display; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful hardware; excellent cameras; long battery life; stylish design; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Modern design; great built quality; decent cameras; nice display.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; excellent quad cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; great display; large battery capacity; quick charging; impressive waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Premium design; solid workmanship; excellent quad cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Beautiful design; nice quad cameras; powerful processor; great display; large battery capacity; quick charging; impressive waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/18/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Nice display; quick charging; waterproof.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Nice display; quick charging; waterproof.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Nice gaming performance; decent hardware; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: features: 79%
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Nice gaming performance; decent hardware; great display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Rating: features: 79%
Source: Mobility.bg

Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; elegant design; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Mobility.bg

Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; elegant design; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Source: Alt om Data

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G80
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.40 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.186kg
Price: 229 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
If this is what you think sometimes and are looking for a mid-range smartphone without support for the newest mobile communication standard, Samsung has an offer for you: The Galaxy A22 4G is more compact than its 5G version, but also slower at a similar price. So is the 4G smartphone only something for 5G fiends?
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/04/2022
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: GSM Arena

Samsung has really been putting in the work when it comes to the current Galaxy A lineup. Pretty much every model from the family recently has been solid and generally competitive in one way or another. The same is mostly true for the Galaxy A22 as well. The LTE Galaxy A22 is a well-put-together device, with a solid-performing AMOLED panel, complete with 90Hz refresh rate and straight-forward refresh rate handling (even if lower-res). The Galaxy A22 also manages great battery endurance from its 5,000 mAh battery, has a surprisingly feature-rich One UI 3.1 Core skin running on top of Android 11 and uses the decent, if unimpressive MediaTek Helio G80 chipset to its full potential. It has its fair share of issues and deficiencies as well, though. The plastic body feels a bit hollow at the back, it lacks any formal ingress protection or a "brand name" designation for its protective display glass. There are also no light or proximity sensors onboard the A22; charging is pretty slow, and the single bottom-firing loudspeaker is unimpressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2021
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, let’s wrap up this review of the Samsung Galaxy A22. Should you buy it? I think the answer is region-specific. That’s because the A22 costs the same as the M32 here in Nepal, so in this case, my recommendation would be to go with the A22 because it’s better-optimized, has a better camera, and more importantly, it feels like you are holding a premium phone. However, if you are living in India, the A22 at INR 18,500 is a bit on the expensive side which makes it an easy no for me. Plus, Samsung has also launched the costlier 5G variant of A22, which is even more ridiculously priced. And like I said in my Poco M3 Pro review, the sad truth with almost every mid-range 5G phone right now is that they are priced quite absurdly and you might want to skip them until and unless you absolutely want 5G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 is a cheaper alternative to Galaxy M32. Although OIS on the primary camera steals the show, the camera setup is largely capped with the potential of the underwhelming processor aka G80 SoC. A slightly powerful processor and an FHD+ display could have made a lot of difference. For Rs 18,499/-, the device feels a bit pricey since you can get a powerful processor and FHD+ displays on many of its rivals at this price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is difficult to recommend that the overall features of both the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and A22 4g smartphones devices overlap. But if you are looking for better camera technology, you might prefer the A22 4G. But on the other hand, if you are considering a phone for the long term, then the Galaxy A22 5G could be a great option in that case. However, you will get standard camera results. It’s not like there are flaws in both models, but minimal ones for the superb privileges. On that note, there is always room for an alternative. If you’re looking for the most valuable phone, check out the Realme X7 smartphone a worthwhile decision.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Ofertaman

Positive: Great cameras; long battery life; nice AMOLED display; support both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot. Negative: Poor display; weak processor; unsupported 5G; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Ofertaman

Positive: Great cameras; long battery life; nice AMOLED display; support both dual SIM and MicroSD card slot. Negative: Poor display; weak processor; unsupported 5G; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/13/2022
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Excellent display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Decent processor; good performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Decent processor; good performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2022
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; excellent AMOLED display; modern design; solid workmanship; decent performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; excellent AMOLED display; modern design; solid workmanship; decent performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Powerful processor; high gaming performance; large battery capacity; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Stylish design; large battery capacity; nice display; great cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Stylish design; large battery capacity; nice display; great cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; excellent display; great cameras; impressive battery life. Negative: Easy getting dirts; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; light weight; excellent display; great cameras; impressive battery life. Negative: Easy getting dirts; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; stylish design; long battery life; quick charging; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent quad cameras; great display; stylish design; long battery life; quick charging; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Elegant design; great quad cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Elegant design; great quad cameras; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Impressive cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Impressive cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Dimensity 700
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Display: 6.60 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.203kg
Price: 229 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The Galaxy A22 is available either with 4G or 5G. Although the 5G model doesn't offer an OLED display, it does provide fast Internet, a versatile camera system, and good performance rates. We take a closer look at Samsung's mid-range phone in our review.
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is another well balanced if deeply unexciting affordable phone from Samsung. It’s the kind of no frills, no nasty surprises experience you arguably want for around the £200 mark. Its stand out feature is a 48MP main camera that’s capable of taking genuinely decent shots in good lighting, as well as a battery that will see you through two days of light to moderate usage. Where it fails to impress is with its performance, which feels a little slow and creaky even for a budget phone. The display, meanwhile, lacks pop, and the phone as a whole feels a little big and heavy. The good news is that given its age, you’ll likely be able to find the Galaxy A22 5G for significantly less than RRP, and Samsung’s ongoing software support means that it remains a viable choice for the money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is another well balanced if deeply unexciting affordable phone from Samsung. It’s the kind of no frills, no nasty surprises experience you arguably want for around the £200 mark. Its stand out feature is a 48MP main camera that’s capable of taking genuinely decent shots in good lighting, as well as a battery that will see you through two days of light to moderate usage. Where it fails to impress is with its performance, which feels a little slow and creaky even for a budget phone. The display, meanwhile, lacks pop, and the phone as a whole feels a little big and heavy. The good news is that given its age, you’ll likely be able to find the Galaxy A22 5G for significantly less than RRP, and Samsung’s ongoing software support means that it remains a viable choice for the money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: Ricks Tech

In this video im doing camera glass replacement on the back of a Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, the same steps are used for A22 4G also
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G doesn't quite deliver the kind of experience that most people would expect, considering its price and competition. A wide selection of 5G bands would be a good thing to brag about, provided one could actually take advantage of them in India, but I'm pretty sure that by the time we get to use 5G, we will have had multiple successors to this phone. Unfortunately, there's little else to get excited about with the Galaxy A22 5G. In fact, I feel you'd be better served by Samsung's own Galaxy M32 5G or even the Galaxy F62. There's no shortage of good phones from the competition either, and a quick look though our list of the best phones under Rs. 20,000 and Rs. 25,000 should offer plenty of options.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: Think Digit

As a phone for the average user, there's very little to fault the Galaxy A22 5G for. The phone offers solid build quality, a good design and also a nice display. It also does well in the battery department and offers cameras that promise good daytime performance as well as low-light photography with the help of the camera's Night Mode. To top it all, it's 5G ready and also packs plenty of power to handle apps of daily use -- I.e of course, if you're looking to not run too many graphics-intensive games on it. Despite there being a lot of options in the segment, the Galaxy A22 5G still manages to emerge as a good option in the sub-Rs 20,000 segments of the market. So, if you're looking for a new 5G phone in this price range, and especially one from Samsung's stables, then this is definitely the device for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 63% performance: 59% workmanship: 70%
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a smartphone aimed at budget-minded users and competes against other devices in the Advanced segment ($200 to 399). General specs include an octa-core processor, a 6.6-inch TFT display with FHD+ resolution, 64 GB of internal memory, and a large 5000 mAh battery. The rear camera comprises a primary module with a 48 MP sensor, a 5 MP ultra-wide, and a depth sensor. Let’s see how this combo does in the DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: Cashify

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G rips off almost the same specifications as its 4G counterpart but with some downgrades to accommodate for the “5G network”. The battery is well-specced although Samsung should’ve gone for faster charging speed. For an informed decision, Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a tonne of alternatives such as Samsung Galaxy A32 (FHD, Super AMOLED, 90Hz) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Poco X3 Pro, or you can check out Realme 8 5G which scores better than A22 5G on various benchmarking tests even with the same processor. Other alternatives include Redmi Note 10T 5G, Redmi Note 10 5G, and Poco M3 Pro 5G just to mention.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: The Indian Express

While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Indian Express

While a few features are missing, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is still a good option under Rs 20,000 price segment. If you are someone who wants to buy a Samsung phone for general usage, then you can buy this mid-range phone and be prepared for the dawn of 4G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Sam Mobile

These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2021
Source: Sam Mobile

These days, I’m judging Samsung’s affordable and mid-range phones based on how quickly I want to move back to a flagship device after the review, and the A22 5G passes with flying colors. All I missed were the considerably better cameras you get on flagships – nothing else truly bothered me, which is the highest praise I can give this phone. The A22 5G has a smooth display, excellent performance and battery life, decent main camera, and a cute little design. On the flip side, the software is too basic, an AMOLED screen would have been much better, the bezels should have been smaller, and you’re still having to make do with Samsung’s old and slow 15W charging tech.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgets Now

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a good looking phone with long battery life, support for a number of 5G bands and offers decent performance in terms of multi-tasking. However, at a starting price of Rs 19,999, the smartphone faces tough competition from many lower-priced phones from rival brands as well as Samsung’s own Galaxy M31s, Galaxy M51 and Galaxy F41.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: The Mobile Indian

Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian

Shots taken under artificial lighting were decent again. The colours looked vibrant, while details were minimal. And the software again struggled to give accurate edge detection. Coming to night mode shots, these pictures looked atrocious. There’s no amount of detailing you can expect, and there’s a smudged effect all over the pictures. Wide-angle in night conditions behaves like a VGA camera with no sort of colours or details. Night mode didn’t make things better either.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: GSM Arena

And that's kind of leads to the elephant in the room - should you even get a 5G phone for under €250? If you really need 5G in your next device and can't stretch your budget any further, then the Galaxy A22 5G is worth considering. If you can compromise and settle for a 4G model instead, there is much more overall value to be had from other devices in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 64%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/07/2022
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Computerbild

Positive: Nice cameras; support 5G and NFC; expandable memory; dual SIM. Negative: Dark display; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: Computerbild

Positive: Nice cameras; support 5G and NFC; expandable memory; dual SIM. Negative: Dark display; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: Tudo Celular

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/01/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50%
Source: Tudo Celular

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/01/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50%
Source: Tutto Android

Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice performance; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2021
Source: Tutto Android

Positive: Attractive price; good hardware; nice performance; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2021
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: FPT shop

Positive: High performance; powerful hardware; support 5G; nice display; attractive price; decent cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/06/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: High performance; powerful hardware; support 5G; nice display; attractive price; decent cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/06/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Fast 5G; nice cameras; long battery life; excellent display; modern design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Fast 5G; nice cameras; long battery life; excellent display; modern design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Impressive 5G; high gaming performance; nice display; nice cameras; quick charging; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Impressive 5G; high gaming performance; nice display; nice cameras; quick charging; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Support 5G; good price; big screen; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Support 5G; good price; big screen; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/23/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; big screen; nice display; good price; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Modern design; big screen; nice display; good price; support 5G. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Support 5G; large battery capacity; nice cameras; beautiful display; decent processor; great connectivity.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Support 5G; large battery capacity; nice cameras; beautiful display; decent processor; great connectivity.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; nice display; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: TechTimes VN

Positive: Modern design; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Big screen; nice display; support 5G; decent autonomy; quick charging. Negative: Mediocre design; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: TechTimes VN

Positive: Modern design; nice performance; support 5G; decent cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Support 5G; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance. Negative: No NFC; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Jagat Review

Positive: Support 5G; excellent cameras; powerful hardware; high gaming performance. Negative: No NFC; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 160 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Compared to last year, Samsung hasn't changed much in the Galaxy A03s. The very affordable phone at least comes with more stable Wi-Fi, which was one of our biggest points of criticism with the predecessor. Is the Galaxy A03s worth it or is it too expensive for 160 Euros?
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a basic smartphone that’s neither cheap enough nor good enough to warrant your money. It offers decent battery life and it looks pretty good, but performance and camera quality are severely lacking. You can get practically the exact same user experience from Samsung’s older and cheaper Galaxy A02s. If you’re looking to upgrade from the A02s, don’t be duped by the naming convention; the A03s is not a step up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2022
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a basic smartphone that’s neither cheap enough nor good enough to warrant your money. It offers decent battery life and it looks pretty good, but performance and camera quality are severely lacking. You can get practically the exact same user experience from Samsung’s older and cheaper Galaxy A02s. If you’re looking to upgrade from the A02s, don’t be duped by the naming convention; the A03s is not a step up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2022
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung’s Galaxy A03s is a decent option among sub-$200 smartphones and a fair fit for those looking at the Galaxy A03s as a first smartphone or an option for those on a tight budget. It’s the most affordable way to enter Samsung’s Galaxy ecosystem, and One UI is feature-packed and extremely well-supported for those looking to keep a phone for several years. The addition of a fingerprint reader is a nice touch for simple security, too. However, the processor and overall camera setup still leave something to be desired — two crucial areas for any modern phone. The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority

Samsung’s Galaxy A03s is a decent option among sub-$200 smartphones and a fair fit for those looking at the Galaxy A03s as a first smartphone or an option for those on a tight budget. It’s the most affordable way to enter Samsung’s Galaxy ecosystem, and One UI is feature-packed and extremely well-supported for those looking to keep a phone for several years. The addition of a fingerprint reader is a nice touch for simple security, too. However, the processor and overall camera setup still leave something to be desired — two crucial areas for any modern phone. The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: CNet

I'd recommend the Galaxy A03S to anyone who wants to spend less than $200 on a new Samsung phone. Since it's the newest of the three phones, it'll get more years of software and security updates. I also found that it offered respectable performance for the price. While the A12 does take better photos, I didn't think the step up in quality was worth the extra $20. Instead, buy the A03S and invest that $20 toward the microSD card you'll need. If you wanted to check out other sub-$200 phones that aren't made by Samsung, Motorola has the $160 Moto G Pure phone and a $200 Moto G Power phone. The OnePlus Nord N200 5G goes slightly above the $200 threshold at $240, but it offers 5G connectivity.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2022
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating. If you don’t mind spending a bit more, the Samsung Galaxy A13 ($249) and Nokia X100 ($252) are affordable ways to add 5G to the mix. Nokia’s device adds a 48MP primary camera with a sharp Full HD+ display but falls short on software updates. The Galaxy A13, on the other hand, offers a 50MP camera with Samsung’s robust update policy and a sleek, minimalist design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has increased in price from last year, giving even more rivals to square off against. Motorola’s Moto G Play ($169) is perhaps the closest competition, with a nearly identical set of cameras and a marginally more powerful Snapdragon 460 processor. However, it offers even slower charging, less base RAM and storage, and does not support NFC for contactless payments. If you want a slightly upgraded Motorola option, the Moto G Pure ($159) ships with Android 11 out of the box and a basic IP rating. If you don’t mind spending a bit more, the Samsung Galaxy A13 ($249) and Nokia X100 ($252) are affordable ways to add 5G to the mix. Nokia’s device adds a 48MP primary camera with a sharp Full HD+ display but falls short on software updates. The Galaxy A13, on the other hand, offers a 50MP camera with Samsung’s robust update policy and a sleek, minimalist design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A03s is a good entry-level smartphone - that's undeniable. It has a good screen, a reliable battery, a recent Android OS with OneUI interface, and a non-nonsense primary camera. Unfortunately, the A03s feels overpriced for what it offers - there are much better phones on the same shelf. If it were priced around €100-€110, it would have been a great competitive offer, a worthy budget phone. So, if you can get the Galaxy A03s with a price cut that makes sense - we'd recommend it for its skills. But for now - we'd suggest looking elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 52%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A03s is a good entry-level smartphone - that's undeniable. It has a good screen, a reliable battery, a recent Android OS with OneUI interface, and a non-nonsense primary camera. Unfortunately, the A03s feels overpriced for what it offers - there are much better phones on the same shelf. If it were priced around €100-€110, it would have been a great competitive offer, a worthy budget phone. So, if you can get the Galaxy A03s with a price cut that makes sense - we'd recommend it for its skills. But for now - we'd suggest looking elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 52%
Source: Unbox

We’ve found that in our Samsung Galaxy A03s Hands-On that the device does cover a lot of the basics if you’re looking for a more affordable option from the Korean brand; coming in at Php 6,490 or if you’re lucky to catch it on sale — Php 5,990. Unfortunately, we all know that there are some serious tough contenders out there that pretty much rule the roost. If you’re sen on getting a Samsung device and can increase your budget a bit, then we suggest taking a look at the Galaxy M22 as an option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2021
Source: Unbox

We’ve found that in our Samsung Galaxy A03s Hands-On that the device does cover a lot of the basics if you’re looking for a more affordable option from the Korean brand; coming in at Php 6,490 or if you’re lucky to catch it on sale — Php 5,990. Unfortunately, we all know that there are some serious tough contenders out there that pretty much rule the roost. If you’re sen on getting a Samsung device and can increase your budget a bit, then we suggest taking a look at the Galaxy M22 as an option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2021
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

All in all, considering Samsung’s recent budget launches, the Galaxy A03s is a pretty average offering. It has a solid design, an above-average primary camera, and a reliable battery life. That being said, Samsung could have done better in the performance department seeing how Chinese companies offer the same CPU-memory configuration for much cheaper. Its slow charging speed is also a headache material.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

All in all, considering Samsung’s recent budget launches, the Galaxy A03s is a pretty average offering. It has a solid design, an above-average primary camera, and a reliable battery life. That being said, Samsung could have done better in the performance department seeing how Chinese companies offer the same CPU-memory configuration for much cheaper. Its slow charging speed is also a headache material.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is clearly seen that the Samsung Galaxy A03s smartphone is a strong competitor of the Galaxy M02s which has more advanced features with the same budget. While the battery and chipset can be strong features on the Galaxy A03s, they don’t get much attention from users. There aren’t any spectacular features worth mentioning, but it’s interesting to know that you’ll get some premium services, including Samsung Health, Samsung Members, and Smart Switch. There shouldn’t be a lot of enthusiasm for these features because most Samsung phones come with these starter features. This 4G product is available especially in India, but you also have alternatives. If you are looking for an alternative our recommendation would be the OnePlus Nord N200 smartphone. Every device has some decent features that are worth your money and everyone’s purposes of use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

It is clearly seen that the Samsung Galaxy A03s smartphone is a strong competitor of the Galaxy M02s which has more advanced features with the same budget. While the battery and chipset can be strong features on the Galaxy A03s, they don’t get much attention from users. There aren’t any spectacular features worth mentioning, but it’s interesting to know that you’ll get some premium services, including Samsung Health, Samsung Members, and Smart Switch. There shouldn’t be a lot of enthusiasm for these features because most Samsung phones come with these starter features. This 4G product is available especially in India, but you also have alternatives. If you are looking for an alternative our recommendation would be the OnePlus Nord N200 smartphone. Every device has some decent features that are worth your money and everyone’s purposes of use.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: News Bytes

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/11/2021
Source: News Bytes

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/11/2021
Source: Computerbild

Positive: Big screen; long battery life; NFC module; jack socket. Negative: Low performance; poor display; unsupported waterproof; no 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: Computerbild

Positive: Big screen; long battery life; NFC module; jack socket. Negative: Low performance; poor display; unsupported waterproof; no 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2022
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Good cameras set. Negative: Average performance; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2022
Source: Canaltech

Positive: Good cameras set. Negative: Average performance; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2022
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 40% performance: 40% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 40% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/06/2022
Rating: Total score: 40% performance: 40% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 40% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 40% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 60% display: 40% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Good price; big screen; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Good price; big screen; large battery capacity; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Large battery capacity; big screen; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent battery life; good price; nice performance; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Large battery capacity; big screen; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent battery life; good price; nice performance; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Low price; decent hardware; nice performance; long battery life; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Low price; decent hardware; nice performance; long battery life; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; nice gaming performance; decent hardware; big screen; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; nice gaming performance; decent hardware; big screen; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; nice performance; long battery life; decent triple cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Good price; nice performance; long battery life; decent triple cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice triple cameras; large battery capacity; low price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Nice triple cameras; large battery capacity; low price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Simple design; great built quality; long battery life; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: Cell Phones

Positive: Simple design; great built quality; long battery life; good price.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Great performance; elegant design; attractive price; big screen; nice display; decent cameras.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Great performance; elegant design; attractive price; big screen; nice display; decent cameras.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; big screen; powerful processor; large battery capacity; simple design; compact size; light weight; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good price; big screen; powerful processor; large battery capacity; simple design; compact size; light weight; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Samsung Galaxy A12 Exynos SM-A127F
Specifications

Processor: Samsung Exynos 850
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.205kg
Price: 170 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
The Galaxy A12 Nacho reveals good features in our review, but also some weaknesses. As with the Galaxy A12, the pricing of the Samsung phone is very attractive. Read our review to find out whether the entry-level smartphone is worth buying.
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

Except for the Exynos 850 chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho is an overall good smartphone in the low-budget segment. Where Galaxy has a huge collection, Nacho is one more phone that adds to the Galaxy A12 series. Since the phone is not available globally, there is no way for you to access it. Either you have to wait or go to the alternative. According to company information, they may be available on their official website. This colorful smartphone is a good choice for everyone looking for a low-budget smartphone with lots of awesome specs. If you’re spending $149 (Rs 12,000), the Galaxy A12 Nacho is an amazing smartphone that’s worth your money. There is also the Realme C25Y at the same price, otherwise, you can check for the TCL 20R smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2021
Samsung Galaxy A03
Specifications

Processor: T606
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Display: 6.50 inch, 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.196kg
Price: 160 euro
Links: Samsung notebook section
Pricecompare
Average Score:
The predecessor was a bit behind its time, but Samsung noticeably catches up in the low-priced phones segment with the Galaxy A03. Are the fast Wi-Fi and the new camera enough to really shake up the competition?
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A03 provides a decent user experience for most people, especially those who simply expect the phone to do daily tasks. Compared to the Galaxy A03s, the Galaxy A03 offers faster performance, though it's not very noticeable. Serious users will probably notice the difference, especially when opening apps. However, one drawback to the Galaxy A03 is the micro-USB port, which I think should not be used nowadays. Ultimately, the choice is yours. For the price, I definitely recommend the Galaxy A03 as you will get a better value with the performance of the Unisoc T606. At RM469, it's also cheaper than the A03s (RM559). Other suitable alternatives for this phone include the vivo Y20 (RM459), realme Narzo 50i (RM449), OPPO A16 (RM479), and Redmi 9C (RM449). Are you interested in this smartphone? Share your thoughts in the comments, and stay tuned to TechNave for more reviews like this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2022
Source: Tech Nave

The Samsung Galaxy A03 provides a decent user experience for most people, especially those who simply expect the phone to do daily tasks. Compared to the Galaxy A03s, the Galaxy A03 offers faster performance, though it's not very noticeable. Serious users will probably notice the difference, especially when opening apps. However, one drawback to the Galaxy A03 is the micro-USB port, which I think should not be used nowadays. Ultimately, the choice is yours. For the price, I definitely recommend the Galaxy A03 as you will get a better value with the performance of the Unisoc T606. At RM469, it's also cheaper than the A03s (RM559). Other suitable alternatives for this phone include the vivo Y20 (RM459), realme Narzo 50i (RM449), OPPO A16 (RM479), and Redmi 9C (RM449). Are you interested in this smartphone? Share your thoughts in the comments, and stay tuned to TechNave for more reviews like this.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2022
Source: NLT

So, for the price of starting price of RM439, this is indeed a very capable phone. However, the RM469 variant only comes with 3GB RAM and 32GB of storage – which I think is just way too little even though this phone has a microSD card slot. There is another variant with 4GB RAM and 64GB of storage but it is priced at RM549. Still, I think for the price of RM549, it’s a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2022
Source: NLT

So, for the price of starting price of RM439, this is indeed a very capable phone. However, the RM469 variant only comes with 3GB RAM and 32GB of storage – which I think is just way too little even though this phone has a microSD card slot. There is another variant with 4GB RAM and 64GB of storage but it is priced at RM549. Still, I think for the price of RM549, it’s a decent price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2022
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is an exemplary example of a budget phone with a large display and a huge battery along with the added bonus of a 3.5mm audio jack and expandable memory via a dedicated microSD card slot. For RM549, you’re getting a well built, affordable phone that is a solid shot across the bow for other budget phone vendors. The cheaper variant does look tempting but it’s well worth the extra outlay to get more RAM and storage. The Samsung Galaxy A03 epitomises the ideals of a budget phone with essential features that include a large display and long battery life with a fair performance to price ratio at a modest price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Hitech Century

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is an exemplary example of a budget phone with a large display and a huge battery along with the added bonus of a 3.5mm audio jack and expandable memory via a dedicated microSD card slot. For RM549, you’re getting a well built, affordable phone that is a solid shot across the bow for other budget phone vendors. The cheaper variant does look tempting but it’s well worth the extra outlay to get more RAM and storage. The Samsung Galaxy A03 epitomises the ideals of a budget phone with essential features that include a large display and long battery life with a fair performance to price ratio at a modest price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2022
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03’s main selling point would be its long battery life and other in-between custom features. Also, you’re looking for a robust battery with decent performance, this phone might not even be a tough fight for the competition and the reason for this is the Samsung brand image. For example, if they launch a cheap phone on the Indian offline market, it will sell like crazy as it is a well-known brand. The same story also applies to other countries. But, we didn’t want our readers to waste their money on something when you can still consider alternative options that provide an exceptional features at a similar price point or a higher level. The Tecno Camon 18T is worth your money, but it costs a little more. But still, if you’re looking for something in Samsung, you have the Galaxy A03 core to check out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03’s main selling point would be its long battery life and other in-between custom features. Also, you’re looking for a robust battery with decent performance, this phone might not even be a tough fight for the competition and the reason for this is the Samsung brand image. For example, if they launch a cheap phone on the Indian offline market, it will sell like crazy as it is a well-known brand. The same story also applies to other countries. But, we didn’t want our readers to waste their money on something when you can still consider alternative options that provide an exceptional features at a similar price point or a higher level. The Tecno Camon 18T is worth your money, but it costs a little more. But still, if you’re looking for something in Samsung, you have the Galaxy A03 core to check out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is the rebooted version of the Samsung Galaxy A03s announced in November 2021, and the phone is expected to fall in the price range of $150 (Rs 11,999) approx. The phone renders a 6.5-inches PLS IPS display panel that generates average pixel density support, while the aspect ratio is good. As for the processing powers, the phone offers a standard 4x 1.6GHz cloaking speed chipset that renders decent renders mediocre results. In terms of the software layering, the phone is also equipped with the Android 11 OS. Now, speaking of the camera module, the Galaxy A03 brings the 48MP primary camera and 2MP depth sensor that completes the dual camera setup. This setup also includes a 5MP selfie camera at the front. You can record up to 1080p videos from the primary camera. On the other hand, you will obtain impressive screen time with a battery life worth 5000 mAh. Lastly, you can purchase this phone in three exciting colors of Black, Blue, and Red.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 is the rebooted version of the Samsung Galaxy A03s announced in November 2021, and the phone is expected to fall in the price range of $150 (Rs 11,999) approx. The phone renders a 6.5-inches PLS IPS display panel that generates average pixel density support, while the aspect ratio is good. As for the processing powers, the phone offers a standard 4x 1.6GHz cloaking speed chipset that renders decent renders mediocre results. In terms of the software layering, the phone is also equipped with the Android 11 OS. Now, speaking of the camera module, the Galaxy A03 brings the 48MP primary camera and 2MP depth sensor that completes the dual camera setup. This setup also includes a 5MP selfie camera at the front. You can record up to 1080p videos from the primary camera. On the other hand, you will obtain impressive screen time with a battery life worth 5000 mAh. Lastly, you can purchase this phone in three exciting colors of Black, Blue, and Red.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/13/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is one of the basic entry-level smartphones that Samsung released in November 2021, and the expected price is shooting up to $150 (Rs 10,999) approx. On top of that, the phone brings a tall 6.5-inches HD+ TFT screen, and the bezels are pretty thin compared to the competition. As for the performance section, the makers installed a 28nm Unisoc SC9863A chipset that allows users to prefer basic daily tasks with a bit exposure of to multitasking. The phone provides an 8MP rear camera on the back panel that can record up to 1080p videos without any problem. At the same time, you will also get a 5MP selfie camera. In terms of battery life, the massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery support gives a bit of hope to get decent screen time. Apart from this, you can choose the Galaxy A03 Core smartphone in black and blue color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is one of the basic entry-level smartphones that Samsung released in November 2021, and the expected price is shooting up to $150 (Rs 10,999) approx. On top of that, the phone brings a tall 6.5-inches HD+ TFT screen, and the bezels are pretty thin compared to the competition. As for the performance section, the makers installed a 28nm Unisoc SC9863A chipset that allows users to prefer basic daily tasks with a bit exposure of to multitasking. The phone provides an 8MP rear camera on the back panel that can record up to 1080p videos without any problem. At the same time, you will also get a 5MP selfie camera. In terms of battery life, the massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery support gives a bit of hope to get decent screen time. Apart from this, you can choose the Galaxy A03 Core smartphone in black and blue color options.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2021
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tudo Celular

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 80%
Source: Tudo Celular

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Good price; very long battery life; nice performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Good price; very long battery life; nice performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; decent performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Excellent cameras; long battery life; decent performance; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras; low price; big screen; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2022
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Long battery life; nice cameras; low price; big screen; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/30/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: High autonomy; nice dual cameras; very good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/25/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: High autonomy; nice dual cameras; very good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/25/2022
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; large battery capacity; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Big screen; nice cameras; large battery capacity; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2022
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; excellent cameras; great battery life; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Impressive cameras; very long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Attractive price; excellent cameras; great battery life; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Impressive cameras; very long battery life; decent hardware; good price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022