Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core i7-14650HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9850HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Fire Range series with 12 of 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. Unlike the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, the chip does not offer a 3D V-Cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming laptops.

The CPU uses the new Zen 5 architecture for the 12 cores and clocks them at up to 5.2 GHz (single-core boost).

Thanks to the 12 fast Zen 5 cores, the performance should be excellent and well suited for all demanding applications. We assume that the performance will be similar to the old Ryzen 9 7845HX (12 x Zen 4 with up to 5.2 GHz) is similar. The faster Ryzen 9 9955HX and 9955HX3D should be able to set themselves apart significantly due to the higher number of cores (with multi-thread performance).

The 9850HX is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and is therefore configurable from 45 - 75 watts TDP (default 55 watts). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (both compute dies, I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore have very good energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-14650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14650HX

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is similar to the older Core i7-13700HX except for slightly higher CPU clock rates (max 200 MHz).

The total of 24 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 20 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock from 2.2 to 5.2 GHz (single core) or 4.5 GHz (all cores) and the E-cores from 1.6 to 3.7 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 4800 MHz (and not 5600 MHz like the i9 HX models).

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory in the top models (up to 5600 MHz in the i9).

The performance should be slightly above the older Core i7-13700HX (with the same TDP settings and cooling). This makes the CPU ideal for demanding tasks and games.

The 14650HX continues to be manufactured using Intel's improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a high-end notebook processor of the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the new Zen 5 architecture for all 16 cores and clocks them at 2.5 to 5.4 GHz (single-core boost). As a special feature, the HX3D has an additional 64M 3D V-Cache on a CCD. This means that the CPU offers combined 128 MB L3 cache and 16 MB L2 cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming notebooks.

AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the fastest mobile gaming CPU. Based on the experience with its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, this is quite realistic. The 3D V-Cache in particular can accelerate demanding 3D games. However, the 16 fast Zen 5 cores should also provide enough power for all possible demanding applications.

The 9955HX3D is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and can therefore draw quite an amount of power (configurable from 55- to 75 watts TDP, default 55 watts). The SoC consists out of three dies on a package where the processor dies are manufactured in the modern 4nm 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore still have a good energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 9850HXIntel Core i7-14650HXAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
CodenameFire Range-HX (Zen 5)Raptor Lake-HX RefreshFire Range-HX (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)Intel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX « 3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900HX1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX « 1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D « - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5200 MHz1600 - 5200 MHz <=5400 MHz
L1 Cache960 KB1.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB24 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MB30 MB128 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
12 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP45 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14650HX
42.4 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX3D
49.6 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 116     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (65%)     max: 117 Points
min: 129.4     avg: 129.7     median: 129.7 (73%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 835     avg: 1035     median: 1035 (19%)     max: 1235 Points
min: 2072     avg: 2117     median: 2120 (39%)     max: 2160 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16453     avg: 20454     median: 20454 (19%)     max: 24455 Points
min: 38864     avg: 39065     median: 39065 (36%)     max: 39266 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1963     avg: 1969     median: 1969 (83%)     max: 1975 Points
min: 2165     avg: 2172     median: 2172 (91%)     max: 2179 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 754     avg: 758     median: 758 (83%)     max: 762 Points
min: 847     avg: 849     median: 849 (93%)     max: 851 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6236     avg: 7793     median: 7792.5 (19%)     max: 9349 Points
min: 15146     avg: 15162     median: 15161.5 (37%)     max: 15177 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3142     avg: 3471     median: 3470.5 (22%)     max: 3799 Points
min: 6041     avg: 6043     median: 6042.5 (38%)     max: 6044 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 284     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (80%)     max: 287 Points
min: 321     avg: 327     median: 327 (91%)     max: 333 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
43.9 Points (57%)
min: 69.12     avg: 69.9     median: 69.9 (90%)     max: 70.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
4 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
15819 Points (96%)
min: 9264     avg: 9269     median: 9269 (56%)     max: 9274 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
112749 Points (82%)
min: 77481     avg: 79410     median: 79410 (58%)     max: 81339 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144628 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17085 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
642 s (8%)
min: 135     avg: 172.7     median: 172.7 (2%)     max: 210.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.8 s (3%)
min: 4.4     avg: 5     median: 5 (1%)     max: 5.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
38336 Points (61%)
min: 11412     avg: 29422     median: 29421.5 (47%)     max: 47431 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 68711     avg: 81199     median: 81198.5 (47%)     max: 93686 MIPS
min: 145803     avg: 146945     median: 146944 (84%)     max: 148086 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6364     avg: 6530     median: 6529.5 (77%)     max: 6695 MIPS
min: 7151     avg: 7226     median: 7225.5 (85%)     max: 7300 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
257.1 fps (86%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
363.6 fps (84%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (34%)     max: 25.6 fps
min: 42.3     avg: 42.5     median: 42.5 (75%)     max: 42.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (97%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.7 GB/s (64%)
min: 4.5     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.8 GB/s (52%)
min: 27.5     avg: 29.1     median: 29.1 (76%)     max: 30.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 247     avg: 307     median: 307 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
123 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 141     avg: 173.5     median: 173.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
80 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4195     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4244 sec
min: 0.3552     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3677 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.1 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.3 s (1%)
min: 373     avg: 373.3     median: 373.3 (2%)     max: 373.6 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20090     avg: 22127     median: 22126.5 (54%)     max: 24163 Points
min: 33212     avg: 34146     median: 34146 (84%)     max: 35080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17628 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28404     avg: 30196     median: 30196 (54%)     max: 31988 Points
min: 37856     avg: 41184     median: 42689 (76%)     max: 43007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12741     avg: 14026     median: 14026 (59%)     max: 15311 Points
min: 12913     avg: 13307     median: 13082 (55%)     max: 13926 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2752.5 (69%)     max: 2761 Points
min: 3146     avg: 3188     median: 3184.5 (80%)     max: 3237 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12892     avg: 14451     median: 14451 (56%)     max: 16010 Points
min: 19788     avg: 20200     median: 20231 (79%)     max: 20551 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2991 Points (95%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
19386 Points (80%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1933     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (76%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 2381     avg: 2391     median: 2391 (93%)     max: 2401 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12584     avg: 14697     median: 14697 (26%)     max: 16810 Points
min: 23468     avg: 23569     median: 23568.5 (42%)     max: 23669 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2270 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
23588 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9492 Points (95%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
97490 Points (97%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 483     avg: 484.5     median: 484.5 (1%)     max: 486 ms
397 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98007 Points (74%)
132328 Points (100%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 277     median: 277 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 320     avg: 326.5     median: 326.5 (90%)     max: 333 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 300     median: 300 (54%)     max: 311 Points
min: 342     avg: 354     median: 354 (64%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1965     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (76%)     max: 2092 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2243     median: 2264 (85%)     max: 2265 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.8     avg: 157.6     median: 157.6 (27%)     max: 159.3 Watt
min: 216     avg: 222     median: 222 (38%)     max: 228 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
197 Watt (36%)
221 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (16%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 12.3     avg: 35.1     median: 35.1 (23%)     max: 57.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (18%)     max: 17.6 Watt
min: 14.2     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (33%)     max: 45.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.3 Points per Watt (14%)
27.3 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14650HX → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 15:16:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18733 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17170 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18729 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751289390s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18733 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 18733 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17170 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 17170 +0.01s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18729 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 18729 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.082s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.082s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)