Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 3900 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

AMD Ryzen 9 3900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 3900

The Ryzen 9 3900 is a fast desktop CPU with 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Matisse series. It is the fastest 65 Watt CPU at launch in late 2019 and clocks the cores between 3.1 (base) to 4.3 (boost) clock (including Precision Boost). It uses 4 CCX-clusters where 3 of the 4 cores are activated. The CPU is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC. The I/O die on the package is separate and manufactured in 12 nm at Globalfoundries.

Due to the reduced Turbo speed, the Ryzen 9 3900 is aimed at content creators and other professionals that can make use of the 12 cores. For games, a fast 8-core CPU with higher boost clocks is the better choice.

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3800XT

The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 2 architecture. At launch it is the fastest 8-core-CPU of the Matisse series. The 3800XT clocks from 3.9 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (Turbo). All eight cores can reach up to 4.2 GHz.

Performance

The average 3800XT in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13500H, Core i9-10910, Ryzen 7 5700G, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series processor has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 105 W. Needless to say, if one was to overclock it, the chip's power consumption would go up by a huge margin.

The R7 3800XT is built with TSMC's 7 nm process making for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300X

The Ryzen 3 3300X is a mid-range desktop processor of the Matisse series with 4 cores and 8 threads. It clocks from 3.8 (base) - 4.3 GHz (boost) and uses the Zen 2 microarchitecture. It uses all four cores in a single CCX-cluster, unlike the slower Ryzen 3 3100 which uses two clusters. The CPU is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC. The I/O die on the package is separate and manufactured in 12 nm at Globalfoundries. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and therefore the CPU wont need a big beefy cooler.

Thanks to the high clock rates, the Ryzen 3300X is performing similar than the old Core i7-7700K (a former high end CPU) and therefore a good pick for entry level gaming systems.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 3900AMD Ryzen 7 3800XTAMD Ryzen 3 3300X
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
CodenameMatisse (Zen 2)Matisse (Zen 2)Matisse (Zen 2)
Series: Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) Matisse (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 « 3.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT « 3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X « 3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Clock3100 - 4300 MHz3900 - 4700 MHz3800 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache64 MB32 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 248 / 164 / 8
TDP65 Watt105 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
SocketAM4 (1331)AM4 (LGA1331)AM4 (1331)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.95 °C
$399 U.S.$120 U.S.
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 3900
39 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3800XT
39.1 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300X
33.9 pt (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
490 Points (54%)
544 Points (60%)
500 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6321 Points (15%)
5120 Points (12%)
2430 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2804 Points (18%)
2230 Points (14%)
1071 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
197 Points (59%)
219 Points (66%)
195 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31 Points (40%)
24.2 Points (31%)
11.8 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (55%)
2.4 Points (59%)
2.3 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5700 Points (34%)
6035 Points (36%)
5856 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44191 Points (32%)
40528 Points (29%)
25416 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
68388 Points (47%)
40869 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10497 Points (13%)
10250 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
81.4 s (1%)
164.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.7 s (1%)
6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7145 Points (11%)
7467 Points (12%)
7177 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
75612 MIPS (43%)
59247 MIPS (34%)
30353 MIPS (17%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5134 MIPS (61%)
5516 MIPS (66%)
5329 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
131.9 fps (46%)
119 fps (42%)
61.8 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
255.5 fps (59%)
271 fps (63%)
233.5 fps (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
18.9 fps (33%)
16.1 fps (28%)
8.3 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.4 GB/s (41%)
2 GB/s (34%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.4 GB/s (27%)
11.4 GB/s (30%)
5.9 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
179 Seconds (1%)
222.7 Seconds (2%)
449.4 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.5 sec (11%)
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R9 3900 +
13817 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.6 s (2%)
9.1 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.9 s (1%)
19.6 s (1%)
20.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
547 s (2%)
508 s (2%)
531 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
16803 Points (45%)
18905 Points (51%)
12952 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82027 Points (67%)
75411 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82302 Points (67%)
75503 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
84207 Points (71%)
77142 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16410 Points (42%)
14253 Points (36%)
10377 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26216 Points (47%)
25132 Points (45%)
14632 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10725 Points (45%)
10302 Points (43%)
5161 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1246 Points (53%)
1353 Points (57%)
1296 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10190 Points (18%)
8948 Points (16%)
5311 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1258 Points (5%)
1360 Points (6%)
1299 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10695 Points (34%)
9163 Points (29%)
5406 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5449 Points (54%)
5830 Points (58%)
5753 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
40720 Points (45%)
35526 Points (39%)
20529 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R9 3900 +
5482 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R9 3900 +
41058 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
746 ms (1%)
683 ms (1%)
716 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
249 Points (52%)
233 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
191.8 Watt (33%)
144.7 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
193.7 Watt (35%)
137.3 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 3900 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT → 97% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300X → 75% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 11. 01:33:10

#0 checking url part for id 12174 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12265 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12167 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12174 +0.019s ... 0.065s

#8 got single benchmarks 12174 +0.011s ... 0.076s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12265 +0.014s ... 0.09s

#10 got single benchmarks 12265 +0.008s ... 0.098s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12167 +0.017s ... 0.116s

#12 got single benchmarks 12167 +0.008s ... 0.124s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.399s ... 0.522s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.522s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)