Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 1700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores and SMT (16 threads) that was introduced in early 2017. It is based on the new Zen architecture and it is the second fastest model at the time of announcement.

The CPU cores clock from 3.4 base speed up to 3.9 GHz (XFR). The 2-core Turbo is specified at 3.8 GHz and using all 8 cores, the CPU can reach up to 3.5 GHz. Therefore, the CPU offers 200 MHz less than the Ryzen 7 1800X at the same TDP.

The performance in applications that can make use of all 8 cores is very competitive to high end Intel CPUs at a very good price point. However, non optimized apps like many games can't make full use of the new architecture.

A detailed look at the new Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X and 1700 can be found in our review (upcoming).

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4417U

The Intel Pentium Gold Processor 4417U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry level laptops based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2019 and integrates two "big" cores (similar to the Core i3, i5 and i7 CPUs) clocked at 2.3 GHz (fixed, no Turbo Boost). The integrated graphics card is named Intel HD Graphics 610 and offers 12 EUs clocked at 300 - 950 MHz. The integrated memory controller supports slower memory speeds than the faster i3 and i5 models (DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600) and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

With a fixed clock speed of 2.3 GHz, the dual core CPU is clearly slower than models with Turbo Boost and high clock speeds for single thread performance. The multi thread performance however is also limited due to the two cores. The faster Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and  fast Turbo Boost speeds therefore offers a much better performance. Still, the Pentium 4417U offers enough performance for daily tasks and non demanding applications.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 12.5 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down) with a clearly reduced performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 1700XIntel Core i7-8650UIntel Pentium Gold 4417U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameZenKaby Lake RefreshKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X3.6 - 4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X « 3.4 - 3.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 17003 - 3.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U « 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock3400 - 3800 MHz1900 - 4200 MHz2300 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 82 / 4
TDP95 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4800 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4BGA1356BGA1356
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreading
Architecturex86x86x86
$399 U.S.$409 U.S.$161 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 950 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
335 Points (37%)
203 Points (23%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3280 Points (8%)
472 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1537     avg: 1544     median: 1537 (10%)     max: 1557 Points
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
228 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 152     avg: 154.3     median: 154 (46%)     max: 157 Points
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (51%)     max: 178 Points
89 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 16.7     avg: 17     median: 17 (22%)     max: 17.2 Points
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.72     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (43%)     max: 1.74 Points
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.04 Points
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4662 Points (28%)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
3570 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31950 Points (23%)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
8012 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 109     avg: 109.4     median: 109.4 (1%)     max: 109.8 s
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
665 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 5.77 s
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
21.2 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3457     avg: 3728     median: 3728 (6%)     max: 3999 Points
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
1792 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
39624 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3746 MIPS (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 89.5     avg: 90.1     median: 90.1 (31%)     max: 90.6 fps
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (14%)     max: 41.98 fps
15.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 174     avg: 180     median: 180 (42%)     max: 186 fps
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
81.1 fps (19%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.9 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.892     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.898 GB/s
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9.3 GB/s
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
327.1 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9027     avg: 9076     median: 9076 (19%)     max: 9125 Points
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
3204 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.8 s (2%)
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
17.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.7 s (1%)
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
39.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
576 s (3%)
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
922 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (19%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 2831     avg: 3011     median: 3010.5 (8%)     max: 3190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
min: 28577     avg: 28749     median: 28749 (23%)     max: 28921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
min: 27361     avg: 27522     median: 27521.5 (22%)     max: 27682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (48%)     max: 58675 Points
min: 29007     avg: 29032     median: 29032 (24%)     max: 29057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
min: 2590     avg: 2591     median: 2590.5 (7%)     max: 2591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18407 Points (33%)
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 3635     avg: 3644     median: 3644 (6%)     max: 3653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7806 Points (33%)
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 1369     avg: 1398     median: 1398 (6%)     max: 1427 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
932 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6275 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4277 Points (43%)
2695 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
24555 Points (27%)
5248 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4035     avg: 4184     median: 4184 (57%)     max: 4333 Points
2599 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19550     avg: 20294     median: 20294 (49%)     max: 21038 Points
5029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
28135 Points (44%)
5089 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4004 Points (60%)
2389 Points (36%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4882 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2254 Points (44%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8730 Points (70%)
6053 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7294 Points (66%)
5722 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
26601 Points (52%)
4999 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
22628 Points (46%)
5090 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 19561     avg: 19631     median: 19631 (51%)     max: 19701 Points
5280 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
2162 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
165.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (30%)     max: 42822 Points
16702 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (47%)
102 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
169 Watt (29%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
165 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 1700X → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 78% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4417U → 49% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 26. 18:02:59

#0 checking url part for id 8512 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11489 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8512 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 8512 +0.01s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.002s ... 0.054s

#10 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.042s ... 0.097s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11489 +0.003s ... 0.1s

#12 got single benchmarks 11489 +0.01s ... 0.11s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.451s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.451s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)