Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a high-end desktop processor with 6 cores (12 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the second fastest Ryzen CPU behind the Ryzen 7 2700X. The CPU cores clock at 3.6 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.2 GHz. All 6 cores and 12 threads can clock up to 3.9 GHz. The 6 cores are divided in two cluster (3 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1600X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 5 2600X
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 5
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz3600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP15 Watt95 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4940 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP5AM4 (1331)
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHASSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Die Size209.78 mm2
$229 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600X
31 pt (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
352 Points (39%)
421 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1549 Points (4%)
2688 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
693 Points (4%)
1341 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
139 Points (42%)
163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (10%)
14.6 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (41%)
1.8 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4525 Points (27%)
4958 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18307 Points (13%)
29954 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
48146 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8272 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
274.7 s (3%)
133.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.2 s (1%)
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 Points (5%)
4599 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15209 MIPS (9%)
33222 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3572 MIPS (43%)
4293 MIPS (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40.1 fps (14%)
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
135.3 fps (31%)
207.4 fps (48%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.1 fps (7%)
8.3 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (10%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.5 GB/s (9%)
8 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
710 Seconds (5%)
min: 350     avg: 352     median: 352 (2%)     max: 353.9 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5545 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12 s (3%)
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.2 s (1%)
24.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
694 s (3%)
616 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21501 Points (19%)
45760 Points (40%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6856 Points (19%)
12074 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
47473 Points (39%)
73430 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
48287 Points (39%)
73424 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
52082 Points (44%)
74442 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6687 Points (17%)
11855 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9805 Points (17%)
18091 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2898 Points (12%)
6530 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
900 Points (38%)
min: 1066     avg: 1145     median: 1144.5 (48%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2990 Points (5%)
min: 5816     avg: 6094     median: 6094 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1067 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5939 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4577     avg: 4642     median: 4641.5 (46%)     max: 4706 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21616     avg: 22301     median: 22301 (25%)     max: 22986 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1243 ms (1%)
884 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.1 Watt (7%)
171.7 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40 Watt (7%)
164.4 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600X → 156% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 14:26:10

#0 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9980 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.015s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.008s ... 0.046s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.015s ... 0.061s

#9 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.009s ... 0.071s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.262s ... 0.332s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.355s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)