Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X vs AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a high-end desktop processor with 6 cores (12 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the second fastest Ryzen CPU behind the Ryzen 7 2700X. The CPU cores clock at 3.6 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.2 GHz. All 6 cores and 12 threads can clock up to 3.9 GHz. The 6 cores are divided in two cluster (3 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1600X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3150U

The AMD Athlon Gold 3150U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Dali series (Raven Ridge Dual Core) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.6 to 3.3 GHz with SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Gold 3150C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

The average 3150U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-10110U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, this is an entry-level chip, as of mid 2022. While not slow by any means, it is anything but fast, either.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Athlon has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Most will go for a higher value to reach higher performance levels. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The AMD 3150U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process resulting in low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600XAMD Athlon Gold 3150U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Dali (Zen)
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 122 / 4
TDP95 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size209.78 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)FP5
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Architecturex86x86
$229 U.S.
Announced
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
L1 Cache192 KB
max. Temp.95 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600X
31 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Athlon 3150U
22.8 pt (32%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
421 Points (47%)
303 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2688 Points (7%)
795 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1341 Points (8%)
352 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
163 Points (49%)
117 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.6 Points (19%)
4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (45%)
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4958 Points (30%)
3639 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
29954 Points (22%)
7566 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
48146 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8272 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
133.8 s (2%)
1280 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
40.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4599 Points (7%)
1631 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
33222 MIPS (19%)
8752 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4293 MIPS (51%)
3065 MIPS (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (28%)
22.5 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
207.4 fps (48%)
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.3 fps (15%)
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8 GB/s (21%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 350     avg: 352     median: 352 (2%)     max: 353.9 Seconds
1348 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4189 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
13.9 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
616 s (3%)
727 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
45760 Points (40%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12074 Points (33%)
4287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73430 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73424 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74442 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11855 Points (30%)
3923 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18091 Points (32%)
5692 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6530 Points (28%)
1862 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1066     avg: 1145     median: 1144.5 (48%)     max: 1223 Points
751 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5816     avg: 6094     median: 6094 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
1847 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1067 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5939 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4577     avg: 4642     median: 4641.5 (46%)     max: 4706 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21616     avg: 22301     median: 22301 (25%)     max: 22986 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
884 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
171.7 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
164.4 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600X → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Gold 3150U → 52% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 20:23:30

#0 checking url part for id 9980 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11693 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.018s ... 0.035s

#7 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.011s ... 0.046s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11693 +0.019s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 11693 +0.01s ... 0.075s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.272s ... 0.347s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.379s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)