Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 1600

The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor with 6 cores and Hyper Threading (SMT = 12 threads). It is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor in the beginning of 2017, but the 65-watt TDP is much lower compared to the higher-clocked Ryzen 5 1600X.

The Ryzen 5 1600 has a base frequency of 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 3.6 GHz via Turbo (up to 2 cores) or 3.7 GHz via XFR (also up to 2 cores). The maximum clock for all six cores is 3.4 GHz.

The performance is particularly good in applications. The chip can benefit from its six native cores. They are divided into two clusters (3 cores with dedicated L3 cache each), which connected via Infinity Fabric.

The processor based on the Zen architecture is not fully convincing in games. AMD blames missing optimizations from the gaming producers. Intel's powerful Core i7 quad-cores are usually faster in this case.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 1600AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
CodenameZenZen+
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 « 3.2 - 3.6 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 compare3.2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock3200 - 3600 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache576 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4800 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 1600
26.2 pt (44%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
24.7 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
6468 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
915 Points (38%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 317     avg: 349     median: 349 (38%)     max: 381 Points
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (39%)     max: 369 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2484     avg: 2578     median: 2578 (6%)     max: 2672 Points
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1125     avg: 1144     median: 1129 (7%)     max: 1200 Points
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 144.8     median: 147 (41%)     max: 155 Points
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (39%)     max: 144 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 12.5     avg: 12.7     median: 12.6 (16%)     max: 13.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (39%)     max: 1.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 4330     avg: 4516     median: 4538 (27%)     max: 4681 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 25561     avg: 26196     median: 25970 (19%)     max: 27058 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R5 1600 +
42924 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R5 1600 +
7803 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 145.8     avg: 216     median: 149 (2%)     max: 353.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 5.2     avg: 8.2     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 12.66 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 3040     avg: 3550     median: 3430 (5%)     max: 4299 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 28872     avg: 30144     median: 30143.5 (17%)     max: 31415 MIPS
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3555     avg: 3834     median: 3834 (45%)     max: 4113 MIPS
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (41%)     max: 3516 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 66.8     avg: 69.5     median: 68.7 (2%)     max: 73.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 163     avg: 179.7     median: 177 (5%)     max: 199 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.97     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (13%)     max: 7.45 fps
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 0.649     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (19%)     max: 0.67 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R5 1600 +
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 5.3     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (17%)     max: 7.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 387.2     avg: 404.1     median: 404.1 (3%)     max: 421 Seconds
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.659     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.734 sec
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 8222     avg: 8244     median: 8244 (18%)     max: 8266 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 11     avg: 11.9     median: 12 (3%)     max: 12.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 23.78     avg: 26.8     median: 26.2 (1%)     max: 30.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 599     avg: 648     median: 650 (3%)     max: 694 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8803     avg: 10655     median: 11164 (27%)     max: 11998 Points
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
65880 Points (54%)
43514 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 R5 1600 +
65950 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 64701     avg: 65495     median: 65495 (53%)     max: 66289 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9471     avg: 10035     median: 10034.5 (25%)     max: 10598 Points
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14959     avg: 15666     median: 15818 (28%)     max: 16220 Points
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4863     avg: 5425     median: 5542 (23%)     max: 5871 Points
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 920     avg: 950     median: 950 (37%)     max: 980 Points
863 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5210     avg: 5425     median: 5424.5 (10%)     max: 5639 Points
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 846     avg: 915     median: 914.5 (4%)     max: 983 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 5117     avg: 5403     median: 5402.5 (17%)     max: 5688 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3611     avg: 3966     median: 3841 (38%)     max: 4445 Points
3820 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16235     avg: 18578     median: 18788 (18%)     max: 20712 Points
10419 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 3542     avg: 3775     median: 3652 (40%)     max: 4130 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 15037     avg: 16023     median: 15096 (20%)     max: 17937 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
19391 Points (34%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
3189 Points (42%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 20410     avg: 21267     median: 21266.5 (33%)     max: 22123 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 3449     avg: 3737     median: 3736.5 (56%)     max: 4024 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 6734     avg: 8501     median: 8501 (45%)     max: 10268 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 6127     avg: 7118     median: 7118 (49%)     max: 8109 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 20566     avg: 22510     median: 22510 (44%)     max: 24454 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 17236     avg: 17330     median: 17329.5 (35%)     max: 17423 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 R5 1600 +
min: 15944     avg: 16217     median: 16217 (42%)     max: 16490 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 952     avg: 987     median: 986.5 (1%)     max: 1021 ms
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
89 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
30668 Points (22%)
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (20%)     max: 27689 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
180 Points (32%)
142 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
175.8 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 1600 +
157.8 Watt (29%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 R5 1600 +
7.6 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 1600 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 70% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 02:12:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9132 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758931934s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9132 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 9132 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)