Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (Microsoft Surface Edition) is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

As the Ryzen 5 3580U CPU specification is identical to the Ryzen 5 3500U, the processor performance should be similar. AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U and 3580U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 GHz to 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics adapter with 10 CUs (640 shaders) clocked at up to 1,400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 7 3700C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3700U in our database is a solid mid-range CPU, with multi-thread benchmark scores matching those of Intel Core i5-10310U and Core i5-1035G7 and, perhaps surprisingly, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. This Ryzen 7 is good for more than just binge-watching Netflix and writing e-mails. Just do not expect it to be as fast as a Core i7-11800H.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This can be changed by a laptop manufacturer to anything between 12 W and 35 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured on an old, as of early 2023, 12 nm process for average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3300UAMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 7 3700U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+Picasso-U (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C
ManufacturerAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R7 3700U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
27.5 pt (31%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
30.3 pt (34%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3700U
29.4 pt (33%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
337 Points (39%)
352 Points (40%)
min: 285     avg: 339.2     median: 343 (39%)     max: 368 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
921 Points (4%)
1549 Points (7%)
min: 1047     avg: 1344     median: 1499 (6%)     max: 1560 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
471 Points (5%)
693 Points (7%)
min: 537     avg: 648     median: 672 (7%)     max: 683 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
134 Points (41%)
139 Points (42%)
min: 127     avg: 138     median: 139 (42%)     max: 146 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (11%)
min: 5.02     avg: 7     median: 7.6 (11%)     max: 7.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (5%)
min: 1.23     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (5%)     max: 1.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4280 Points (26%)
4525 Points (27%)
min: 4045     avg: 4411     median: 4410.5 (27%)     max: 4776 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12357 Points (9%)
18307 Points (13%)
min: 12881     avg: 15461     median: 15461 (11%)     max: 18041 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 27166     avg: 27205     median: 27205 (20%)     max: 27244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7765     avg: 7767     median: 7767 (42%)     max: 7769 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
404.6 s (5%)
274.7 s (3%)
450.4 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.9 s (2%)
7.2 s (1%)
13.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2398 Points (14%)
2924 Points (17%)
2392 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (7%)
15209 MIPS (9%)
min: 12738     avg: 15166     median: 15386.5 (10%)     max: 17153 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (40%)
3572 MIPS (43%)
min: 3038     avg: 3423     median: 3492.5 (42%)     max: 3668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (10%)
40.1 fps (15%)
27.1 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
132.1 fps (31%)
135.3 fps (32%)
104.8 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.8 fps (6%)
4.1 fps (9%)
min: 2.76     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (7%)     max: 3.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
0.4 GB/s (13%)
0.4 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (8%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
0.6 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.7 GB/s (8%)
3.5 GB/s (11%)
3.8 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
710 Seconds (5%)
min: 671     avg: 797     median: 703 (5%)     max: 1018 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (9%)
5545 Points (12%)
4595 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.8 s (3%)
12 s (3%)
12.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.4 s (1%)
27.2 s (1%)
29.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
709 s (3%)
694 s (3%)
748 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
21501 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4587 Points (12%)
6856 Points (19%)
min: 5060     avg: 5955     median: 5416 (15%)     max: 7250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51741 Points (43%)
47473 Points (39%)
min: 30752     avg: 31840     median: 31238.5 (26%)     max: 34132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47170 Points (39%)
48287 Points (40%)
min: 30487     avg: 32042     median: 31393 (26%)     max: 34896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
55407 Points (47%)
52082 Points (44%)
min: 24397     avg: 31189     median: 30959.5 (26%)     max: 38440 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3953 Points (10%)
6687 Points (17%)
min: 2957     avg: 4954     median: 4978 (13%)     max: 7033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5629 Points (10%)
9805 Points (18%)
min: 6380     avg: 8272     median: 8698.5 (16%)     max: 9457 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2006 Points (10%)
2898 Points (14%)
min: 2012     avg: 2427     median: 2224 (11%)     max: 3044 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
824 Points (36%)
900 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2578 Points (9%)
2990 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
843 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2722 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3861 Points (40%)
min: 3445     avg: 3785     median: 3843.5 (40%)     max: 4009 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10787 Points (12%)
min: 8907     avg: 10275     median: 10542 (12%)     max: 11107 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3672 Points (52%)
3908 Points (56%)
3247 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10223 Points (25%)
11829 Points (29%)
9117 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
10170 Points (18%)
10238 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3469 Points (68%)
3003 Points (59%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11467 Points (18%)
10881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3780 Points (57%)
3354 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8470 Points (68%)
7277 Points (59%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6808 Points (62%)
5738 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12111 Points (24%)
12851 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8746 Points (18%)
10434 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9508 Points (25%)
10025 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.5 (1%)     max: 1281 ms
1243 ms (1%)
min: 1285     avg: 1321     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1405 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
136.9 ms (2%)
147.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27764 Points (26%)
28517 Points (27%)
min: 23657     avg: 26597     median: 27490 (26%)     max: 28301 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 141     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (36%)     max: 166 Points
min: 152     avg: 154     median: 154 (36%)     max: 156 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.3 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 122% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3700U → 108% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 10. 10:16:48

#0 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11141 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:55:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.012s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.009s ... 0.059s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.011s ... 0.07s

#10 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.007s ... 0.077s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11141 +0.008s ... 0.084s

#12 got single benchmarks 11141 +0.04s ... 0.124s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.819s ... 0.944s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.944s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)