Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.

The GPU features 1024 shaders, 64 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs. The 4 GB GDDR5 memory is connected with a 128-bit memory interface and clocked at 2000 MHz. At a TGP of 60W, the clock speeds are specified from 1575 MHz (base) to 1785 MHz (boost).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro M Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3N12E-Q5
ArchitectureTuringFermi
Pipelines1024 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz450 MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz1300 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5 ECC
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption60 Watt100 Watt
Transistors4.7 Billion3 Billion
technology12 nm40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 22.02.2011
Shader Speed900 MHz
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (18%)     max: 13392 Points
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (4%)     max: 3100 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (12%)     max: 13677 Points
2693 Points (2%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
12991 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
11047 Points (6%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24769 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
3DMark 06
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (25%)     max: 20979 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (23%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (23%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (35%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 7.99     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 53.6     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 33.89     avg: 38.2     median: 38.1 (20%)     max: 42.4 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (19%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (19%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6620 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.1     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (23%)     max: 69.9 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (12%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 22% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
35.3  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
81.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
28.2  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
high 1600x900
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
NVIDIA Quadro 5010Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3105.435.3
Crysis 281.628.2
Call of Duty: Black Ops10572.8
Fifa 11268.6162.3
Mafia 286.651.9
StarCraft 298.452.7
Metro 203337.914.6
Battlefield: Bad Company 288.945.3
CoD Modern Warfare 293.462.5
Risen64.341.9
Resident Evil 5120.673.3
Need for Speed Shift108.567
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
9
2
2
5
4
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 01:46:40

#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.093s ... 0.094s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.094s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.094s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.025s ... 0.118s

#8 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.013s ... 0.131s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0.002s ... 0.133s

#10 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.009s ... 0.142s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.142s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.119s ... 0.261s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.262s

#14 Got 24 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.265s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.265s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.273s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.029s ... 0.302s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.302s

#19 return log +0.042s ... 0.344s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)