Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N150 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel Processor N150

► remove from comparison Intel Processor N150

The Intel Processor N150 is the slowest mobile processor of the Twin Lake family. Twin Lake is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The N150 is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 4 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.6 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N250, the N150 has a significantly slower iGPU and slightly lower CPU clock speeds.

Gracemont E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be about as good as older dual-core CPUs like the Core i3-10110U. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, this is a pretty slow chip that is only just fast enough for basic tasks.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 24 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.0 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for very old games and low resolutions such as XGA 1024 x 768.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The N150 is supposed to consume 6 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 15 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5825U

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the "Barcelo" refresh in early 2022 and offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores compared to the old Ryzen 7 5800U. The R7 5825U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series processor at launch. They are clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average 5825U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 7735U and the Core i7-1270P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is a really good result, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 37 W, the 2022 Envy x360 15 is among the fastest laptops built around the 5825U that we know of. It can be more than 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor (most chips are configured higher than 15 Watt). That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

ModelIntel Processor N150AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
CodenameTwin LakeBarcelo-U (Zen 3)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Barcelo-U (Zen 3)
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 compare - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7430U compare2.3 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U compare2.3 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U compare2.7 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz2000 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
SocketBGA1264FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
max. Temp.95 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Processor N150
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5825U
34.5 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 53     avg: 58.9     median: 60.7 (34%)     max: 61.3 Points
86 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 130     avg: 162.9     median: 167.2 (3%)     max: 187 Points
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2016     avg: 2494     median: 2590.5 (2%)     max: 2777 Points
min: 9339     avg: 10179     median: 10152 (9%)     max: 10904 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 828     avg: 912     median: 935 (39%)     max: 949 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1448     median: 1452 (61%)     max: 1460 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 313     avg: 347     median: 356.5 (39%)     max: 362 Points
min: 547     avg: 559     median: 565 (62%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 768     avg: 953     median: 992 (2%)     max: 1059 Points
min: 3645     avg: 3954     median: 3973 (10%)     max: 4180 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 403.3     median: 422.5 (3%)     max: 455 Points
min: 1575     avg: 1736     median: 1757 (11%)     max: 1860 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 149.2     median: 153.2 (42%)     max: 156.4 Points
min: 228     avg: 231.6     median: 232 (64%)     max: 235 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.31     avg: 5     median: 5 (6%)     max: 5.68 Points
min: 18.56     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (25%)     max: 19.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
min: 2.75     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (66%)     max: 2.78 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4743     avg: 5016     median: 5015.5 (30%)     max: 5288 Points
min: 6200     avg: 6252     median: 6252 (38%)     max: 6304 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11375     avg: 13159     median: 13159 (10%)     max: 14943 Points
min: 32641     avg: 32965     median: 32964.5 (24%)     max: 33288 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 17063     avg: 19392     median: 19391.5 (12%)     max: 21720 Points
min: 59300     avg: 59732     median: 59731.5 (38%)     max: 60163 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7251     avg: 7700     median: 7699.5 (9%)     max: 8148 Points
min: 11823     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (14%)     max: 11845 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 527.99     avg: 775     median: 774.8 (9%)     max: 1021.52 s
min: 116.561     avg: 228.7     median: 228.7 (3%)     max: 340.8 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.776     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 30.658 s
min: 4.018     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 9.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1901     avg: 1930     median: 1929.5 (3%)     max: 1958 Points
min: 5835     avg: 6637     median: 6637 (11%)     max: 7439 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 9639     avg: 11373     median: 11746 (7%)     max: 12362 MIPS
min: 42883     avg: 47619     median: 48177 (28%)     max: 50524 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3590     avg: 3792     median: 3835 (45%)     max: 3906 MIPS
min: 5208     avg: 5386     median: 5427 (64%)     max: 5468 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.35     avg: 28.4     median: 28.4 (9%)     max: 32.4 fps
min: 98.05     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (33%)     max: 100.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 119.8     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (32%)     max: 159.9 fps
min: 249.6     avg: 250.6     median: 250.6 (58%)     max: 251.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.43     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.26 fps
min: 11.1     avg: 12.4     median: 12.6 (22%)     max: 13.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.217     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.256 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (8%)     max: 0.526 GB/s
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (25%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (6%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
min: 8.7     avg: 9.9     median: 9.9 (26%)     max: 11 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 2085     avg: 2337     median: 2277 (29%)     max: 2707 Seconds
min: 486     avg: 539     median: 555 (7%)     max: 567 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1063     avg: 1191     median: 1163.5 (8%)     max: 1374 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 301     median: 297 (2%)     max: 322 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.957 sec
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.536 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5709 Points (12%)
min: 11292     avg: 11671     median: 11670.5 (25%)     max: 12049 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.09     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (4%)     max: 19.293 s
min: 7.2     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (2%)     max: 7.912 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39.184     avg: 40     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.809 s
min: 15.7     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (1%)     max: 17.124 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57609 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4416     avg: 5194     median: 5274 (13%)     max: 5810 Points
min: 10473     avg: 12841     median: 12620 (31%)     max: 15153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 37351     avg: 42422     median: 42421.5 (34%)     max: 47492 Points
74842 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 36745     avg: 42156     median: 42156 (34%)     max: 47567 Points
74397 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 43172     avg: 47134     median: 47134 (39%)     max: 51096 Points
84711 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3612     avg: 4035     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4476 Points
min: 13778     avg: 14930     median: 14798 (37%)     max: 16247 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5201     avg: 5826     median: 5889.5 (11%)     max: 6324 Points
min: 19642     avg: 20827     median: 20481 (37%)     max: 22730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1704     avg: 1979     median: 1977.5 (8%)     max: 2256 Points
min: 5841     avg: 6534     median: 6520 (27%)     max: 7124 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1129     avg: 1218     median: 1243 (31%)     max: 1255 Points
1988 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 2369     avg: 2849     median: 2967.5 (12%)     max: 3093 Points
8644 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
min: 1847     avg: 2476     median: 2476 (79%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
min: 6556     avg: 13780     median: 13779.5 (57%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 924     avg: 977     median: 981.5 (38%)     max: 1020 Points
min: 1438     avg: 1481     median: 1482 (58%)     max: 1520 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2072     avg: 2463     median: 2556.5 (5%)     max: 2667 Points
min: 5827     avg: 7077     median: 7074.5 (13%)     max: 8330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 907     avg: 941     median: 940.5 (4%)     max: 974 Points
min: 1447     avg: 1451     median: 1451 (6%)     max: 1455 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2079     avg: 2309     median: 2308.5 (7%)     max: 2538 Points
min: 7235     avg: 7750     median: 7749.5 (24%)     max: 8264 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4336     avg: 4432     median: 4431.5 (44%)     max: 4527 Points
6279 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8942     avg: 9608     median: 9608 (10%)     max: 10274 Points
33719 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1044     avg: 1098     median: 1080.5 (1%)     max: 1186 ms
min: 619     avg: 628     median: 623 (1%)     max: 645 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
70779 Points (53%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 118.3     avg: 126.6     median: 126.3 (35%)     max: 135.3 Points
min: 207     avg: 217.8     median: 213 (59%)     max: 242 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145.3     avg: 164.6     median: 169.3 (30%)     max: 174.3 Points
min: 239     avg: 260.2     median: 264 (47%)     max: 275 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 683     avg: 716     median: 712.5 (27%)     max: 756 Points
min: 1124     avg: 1293     median: 1324 (50%)     max: 1387 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 25.2 Watt
min: 34.6     avg: 44.5     median: 42.6 (7%)     max: 54.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.1     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 24.1 Watt
min: 37.3     avg: 47.1     median: 48.5 (9%)     max: 54 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.51     avg: 10.2     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 14.3 Watt
min: 2.81     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 8.73 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.11     avg: 5.1     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 6.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 20 Points per Watt
min: 33.6     avg: 35.5     median: 34.4 (26%)     max: 38.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N150 → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5825U → 259% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 05. 07:40:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18713 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14092 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751694050s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18713 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18713 +0.008s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14092 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 14092 +0.01s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.085s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)