LG Ultra PC 14 review: Stamina meets performance

After reviewing the 16-inch Ultra PC, we are now taking a look at its little bother. Is the 14-inch device a gram alternative that has great battery life but isn't trying to be as light as possible? We can already tell you the answer is yes right now. The Ultra PC 14 lasts about 17 hours with Wi-Fi enabled, surpassing the gram 14 by a mile in terms of stamina.
So that's all there is to say about the product, right? Certainly not. We are after all testing out a more expensive model with an AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25 watts) and 16 GB of RAM. The laptop not only outperforms its Intel counterpart, but also is on the same level as devices with nominally more powerful 45-watt processors of the latest generation under sustained load.
Depending on specs, the Ultra PC costs between €800 and €1,350 (US$870 to US$1,470). At this price range, you'll find a ton of thin portable laptops with either AMD or Intel processors. Featuring a high-res display, the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 is an upmarket alternative that you should take a look at. With the Acer Swift 3 SF314 and HP Pavilion Plus 14, 45-watt processors offering more performance (single-core) have made their way into 14-inch laptops.
Other LG laptop reviews:
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Are you a techie who knows how to translate (DE-EN, EN-DE)? Then join our Team!
Details here
Comparison with possible competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.6 % | 01/2023 | LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.3 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.6 % | 10/2022 | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 980 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
83.8 % | 08/2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.5 % | 11/2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
87.3 % | 11/2022 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.6 % | 08/2022 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.4 % | 07/2022 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.6 % | 08/2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR R5 5625U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.37 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Case & specifications
Are there any differences between the gram and Ultra PC series? Yes. For instance, they are different in terms of weight (980 g versus 1.29 kg, or 2.16 lb versus 2.84 lb) and hinge design (the Ultra PC uses a metal hinge, whilst the one on the gram is hidden). The Ultra PC is made of plastic instead of magnesium and has a stiffer chassis thanks to the strong vertical and horizontal reinforcements inside. Other than material, the Ultra PC has a 72Wh battery that is heavier than the special lightweight batteries used in the LG gram.
The base section and display exhibit some moderate flex. As with the 16-inch Ultra PC, twisting the display lightly will immediately cause distinct discolouration on the TFT panel – this time around not at the lower edge but across the upper half of the screen. This phenomenon also appears to some extent when moving the display. That said, it doesn't negatively affect usage and isn't noticeable when the device is on the lap or shaken.
When it comes to ports, what we said about the Ultra PC 16 applies here as well: you can use a USB-C charger instead of the 65-watt adapter with barrel plug to power the device (we tested 45- and 65-watt chargers).
The Ultra PC 14 is equipped with an Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (with Bluetooth 5.1). The module didn't perform as well as the one in the Ultra PC 16, in both transmit and receive rates. The card readers on the two Ultra PC models delivered identical speeds.
The 14-inch laptop shares the same internal design as its 16-inch big brother. The only difference is that the components are more tightly packed together. It seems the two laptops use the same motherboard; the speakers, battery and I/O board also appear to be identical. There is a second SSD slot available for storage expansion, but the memory is soldered and can't be upgraded. To open up the device, all you need is a small Phillips-head screwdriver. Once the screws are undone, the bottom panel will practically lift up by itself.
In Germany, LG provides a two-year warranty on the LG Ultra PC 14, with an option to extend it to three years for €50 (US$54). Warranty terms and conditions may vary by country. For example, the standard warranty period is only one year in the US.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14.9 - 193.9, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 239, n=34, last 2 years) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (694 - 1629, n=7) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 1780, n=16, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (832 - 1722, n=7) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (353 - 1749, n=16, last 2 years) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |


Input devices
The Ultra PC 14's keyboard is not backlit and lacks a numerical pad. We can't recommend the keyboard wholeheartedly to those who type a lot. Although the keys offer nice, crisp resistance, the keyboard flexes in the middle. This prevents users from typing quickly and diminishes the quality feel of the laptop. The touchpad is of the same size as the one on the 16-inch Ultra PC (13.2 x 8.2 cm, or 5.2 x 3.2"). It has a noticeable travel, a distinct actuation point and a moderately loud click.
Display
Unlike the Ultra PC 16, which features an LG panel, the 14-inch model is equipped with a display made by BOE (NV140WUM-N44). The widescreen panel (1,920 x 1,200, 16:10) similarly suffers from backlight bleed on black screen – this time mostly at the lower edge.
The displays on Ultra PCs are matt and non-reflective, but LG gram laptops have screens with higher resolution (2,560 x 1,600). Our review model supports AMD Vari-Bright, which adjusts screen brightness based on the content being shown. This feature can be disabled as necessary. At 331 cd/m², the Ultra PC 14 has a higher peak brightness than the gram 14 and Ultra PC 16.
We measured response times of 9 and 16 ms, which are good and fairly standard values for IPS panels. Another positive thing is that the display didn't exhibit any PWM flicker.
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 1595:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.54 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.32 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
40.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G BOE NV140WUM-N44, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | LG Gram 14Z90Q LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Samsung SDC4171 (ATNA40YK07-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Samsung SDC4170, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 109% | 78% | 119% | 72% | 122% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.6 | 98.4 148% | 72.2 82% | 98.05 148% | 69.3 75% | 99.9 152% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.6 | 99.9 70% | 99.5 70% | 99.63 70% | 98.5 68% | 100 71% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.9 | 85.9 110% | 74.3 82% | 97.22 138% | 70.4 72% | 98.9 142% |
Response Times | -185% | -237% | 67% | -146% | 88% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16 ? | 47.5 ? -197% | 45.2 ? -183% | 44.9 ? -181% | 1.2 ? 92% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 9 ? | 24.5 ? -172% | 35.2 ? -291% | 3 ? 67% | 18.9 ? -110% | 1.4 ? 84% |
PWM Frequency | 360 | 357 ? | ||||
Screen | 2% | 12% | 116% | 20% | 31% | |
Brightness middle | 335 | 341 2% | 310.6 -7% | 389 16% | 451 35% | 388.3 16% |
Brightness | 331 | 305 -8% | 302 -9% | 389 18% | 439 33% | 391 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 87 9% | 92 15% | 98 23% | 92 15% | 98 23% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.26 -24% | 0.22 -5% | 0.029 86% | 0.31 -48% | |
Contrast | 1595 | 1312 -18% | 1412 -11% | 13414 741% | 1455 -9% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.54 | 3.11 44% | 2.67 52% | 3.51 37% | 2.46 56% | 4.51 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.31 | 8.29 57% | 4.54 76% | 6.87 64% | 4.24 78% | 7.06 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.92 | 0.83 83% | 2.33 53% | 2.11 57% | 1.32 73% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.32 | 5.3 -128% | 3.7 -59% | 2.2 5% | 3.5 -51% | 1.2 48% |
Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.037 108% | 2.12 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 6870 95% | 7571 86% | 6398 102% | 6320 103% | 7289 89% | 6290 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-2% | -49% /
-10% | 101% /
113% | -18% /
8% | 80% /
66% |
* ... smaller is better
The Ultra PC 14 has the worst sRGB coverage amongst the devices in our comparison. This could be relevant in applications where colour accuracy is critical. The screen's contrast of 1,600:1 is a touch higher than what the competitors are capable of, even surpassing the gram 14. We managed to improve colour accuracy through calibration, particularly for the greyscale (Delta E reduced from 2.3 to 0.7). You can download the colour profile created by us in the box above.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Our review unit is equipped with an octa-core processor – the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2.0 GHz, boost clock up to 4.5 GHz, L3 cache 16 MB). There are also lower-price variants with a hexa-core CPU (Ryzen 5625U). Models with Ryzen 5 or 7 come with 16 GB of RAM (dual channel) as standard.
Test conditions
LG Smart Assistant is now available for power management. In the software, we set the cooling mode to high for the benchmarks and to low for the battery life tests. We left the Radeon Software in its default settings, meaning the power-saving fps limiter was disabled. Likewise, we deactivated AMD Vari-Bright. In Windows, all power-saving modes were disabled and the power plan was set to "Best performance". For the battery life tests, we allowed Windows battery saver to run under balanced mode.
Processor
With its 8 cores and 16 threads, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (TDP: 25 watts) turns the laptop into a genuine work machine. The Ryzen CPU delivered excellent performance in our comparison. It is able to keep pace with the Intel Core i7-12500H (45 watts) under sustained load and has slightly higher single-core performance than the Core i5-1135G7 (28 watts). But as expected, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U performs better in multi-thread tests and is able to make full use of its potential.
When running Cinebench R15 Multi in a loop, the Ryzen initially scored 1,800 before subsequently settling down at an average score of 1,600. The Core i5-1240P in the LG gram 14 trails behind by a considerable margin, with the Ryzen having 80-90% better performance.
Please refer to our CPU comparison table for more information and benchmarks.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10152 - 10904, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (965 - 14917, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1452 - 1460, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (409 - 1796, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (3973 - 4180, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (376 - 5762, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (565 - 567, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 701, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (1799 - 1860, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 2166, n=99, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (231 - 232, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (74.5 - 263, n=89, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (253 - 2583, n=93, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (281 - 313, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (48177 - 49511, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7436 - 54374, n=89, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5427 - 5446, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 5833, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1024 - 11434, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (293 - 1937, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (12.6 - 13.4, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.02 - 14.8, n=84, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 157, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (52.8 - 55.2, n=2) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.4587 - 1.649, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (0.515 - 0.529, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (11752 - 12710, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 14130, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (74912 - 80383, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5668 - 89691, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2513 - 2738, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (355 - 3077, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (92066 - 94210, n=2) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 101910, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10866 - 11551, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1078 - 13309, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (40635 - 44537, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3056 - 49277, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (103123 - 108712, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 121917, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (639 - 708, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 962, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (6153 - 6675, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 7412, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 48416, n=83, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (14241 - 19826, n=2) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR |
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Subnotebook (456 - 1548, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (486 - 567, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
System performance
Throughout PCMark 10, our review unit achieved exceptional results that even rival those of the HP Pavilion Plus 14 (45-watt system). By contrast, the LG gram 14 with a Core i5 only scored half as many points in the performance rating.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9877 - 10879, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4599 - 10836, n=83, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9459 - 9516, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2833 - 9852, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (6332 - 6372, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average of class Subnotebook (973 - 8855, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1811, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1324 - 1330, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1755, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1328 - 1351, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 1928, n=42, last 2 years) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1402 - 1439, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1815, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1020 - 1086, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G |
PCMark 10 Score | 6030 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Average of class Subnotebook (12783 - 73486, n=83, last 2 years) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (34310 - 42917, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10258 - 73719, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (39349 - 39413, n=2) | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10533 - 68247, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (34165 - 41720, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (95.7 - 105.9, n=2) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 126.5, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0252ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ITL6 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
LG UltraPC 14 14U70Q-G.AA79G | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
Our Ultra PC is ranked last in terms of storage performance. The Samsung PM991a drive is by no means a high-flyer in any of the sub-benchmarks. Considering this, the laptop's sub-scores are astonishingly high in PCMark 10. CrossMark, however, was able to pick up on the slow SSD and mostly put the review unit at the very bottom. As you can see on the DiskSpd chart, the SSD had a moderate drop in performance under load, but this is nothing unusual.