Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron N5095

Intel Pentium Silver N5030

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5030

The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-3.1 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. The 5030 is the refresh of the older Pentium 5000 and offers a 400 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5030 in our database proves unable to beat the AMD 3020e, an entry-level dual-core CPU of similar power efficiency, in multi-thread performance, rendering the Pentium a poor option for anything but the most basic day-to-day activities, as of late 2022.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Pentium has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 6 W. This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The Intel Pentium N5030 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes making for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095 and the N5095A is that the latter comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database is about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095 has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095 is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N5030Intel Celeron N4500Intel Celeron N5095
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshJasper LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 « 1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3100 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP6 Watt6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5030
16.9 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
20.6 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
911 Points (1%)
709 Points (1%)
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
430 Points (18%)
452 Points (19%)
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 171     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (20%)     max: 194 Points
188 Points (20%)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (25%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 360     avg: 425.5     median: 425.5 (1%)     max: 491 Points
332 Points (1%)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 226     median: 226 (1%)     max: 248.9 Points
171 Points (1%)
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 75.8     avg: 80.9     median: 80.9 (22%)     max: 86 Points
82 Points (23%)
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (29%)     max: 109 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.1 Points (4%)
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
1 Points (25%)
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2498 Points (15%)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7724 Points (6%)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (4%)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (11%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
526 s (6%)
1270 s (15%)
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.7 s (3%)
50.2 s (10%)
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1163 Points (2%)
1076 Points (2%)
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 6598     avg: 7238     median: 7238 (4%)     max: 7878 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2555     avg: 2645     median: 2645 (31%)     max: 2735 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.6 fps (6%)
12 fps (4%)
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (8%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
84 fps (19%)
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
2.5 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 3319     avg: 3450     median: 3449.5 (24%)     max: 3580 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.402     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (31%)     max: 1.473 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3895 Points (8%)
2053 Points (4%)
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.9 s (5%)
22.8 s (5%)
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
55.9 s (2%)
51.4 s (2%)
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1247 s (6%)
1132 s (5%)
1039 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2326     avg: 2377     median: 2377 (6%)     max: 2428 Points
1507 Points (4%)
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (11%)     max: 4439 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
23701 Points (19%)
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
23621 Points (19%)
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26682     avg: 31360     median: 31360 (26%)     max: 36038 Points
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (39%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2155     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (6%)     max: 2210 Points
1521 Points (4%)
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3014     avg: 3209     median: 3209 (6%)     max: 3404 Points
2017 Points (4%)
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
704 Points (3%)
504 Points (2%)
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2857 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3123 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 491.7     median: 512 (20%)     max: 532 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (25%)     max: 659 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1039     avg: 1263     median: 1221 (2%)     max: 1529 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
356 Points (2%)
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1177 Points (4%)
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2176 Points (22%)
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5662 Points (6%)
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (8%)     max: 7968 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1914     avg: 2410     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 3145 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
355.8 ms (4%)
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 21894     avg: 21899     median: 21899 (17%)     max: 21904 Points
24838 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (27%)     max: 108 Points
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (26%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 91.3     avg: 100.9     median: 95.4 (17%)     max: 116 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (22%)     max: 127.2 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8984 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
31170 Points (67%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9447 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13200 Points (66%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (61%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (28%)     max: 7878 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
381 Points (14%)
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (18%)     max: 495 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 9.09     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.5 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.98     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9.6 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (5%)
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 5.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.4     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (19%)     max: 25.9 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5030 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 83% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 153% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 02. 12:32:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11531 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754130773s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Aug 2025 05:18:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11531 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 11531 +0.008s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.088s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)