Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs Intel Core 3 N355 vs Intel Celeron J4115

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5000

The Intel Pentium Silver N5000 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max. 2.6 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5000 in our database is in the same league as the AMD 3050e and the Pentium 4415U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really poor result, as of Q3 2023.

The Yoga 330-11IGM is among the fastest laptops featuring the N5000 that we know of. It can be more than 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Core 3 N355

► remove from comparison Intel Core 3 N355

The Intel Core 3 N355 (sometimes referred to as the Intel Processor N355) is a mobile processor of the Twin Lake family which is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The chip is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs; it offers 8 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.9 GHz but no Performance cores.

The E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

The performance of the Core 3 CPU depends heavily on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Provided both are good enough, it will deliver multi-thread benchmark cores on par with older quad-core CPUs like the Ryzen 3 5300U and Core i7-1165G7, which should be enough to run most day-to-day tasks in 2025. Its single-core performance is much less impressive due to the lack of P-cores.

The Alder Lake-N Core i3-N305 (8 cores, up to 3.8 GHz) that was introduced in early 2023 should be just a few percentage points slower than the N355.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 32 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.35 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for older games and fairly low resolutions. GTA V is perfectly playable at 768p on Medium.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The Intel Core 3 N355 is supposed to consume 15 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. While no data on PL2 has been provided, we do know that Asus has given the Core 3 a power limit of 35 watts (PL2) in the NUC 14 Essential.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N5000Intel Core 3 N355Intel Celeron J4115
CodenameGemini LakeTwin LakeGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 « 1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 3 N355 « 3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2700 MHz3000 - 3900 MHz1800 - 2500 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
TDP6 Watt15 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1264BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) ( - 1350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5000
17 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 3 N355
27.2 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
66 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
334 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1232 Points (1%)
5262 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
438 Points (18%)
1039 Points (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 167     avg: 170     median: 170 (19%)     max: 173 Points
393 Points (43%)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 424     avg: 469.3     median: 484 (1%)     max: 500 Points
2015 Points (5%)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 240.2     median: 236.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
822 Points (5%)
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 73     avg: 77.5     median: 78 (22%)     max: 80 Points
168 Points (47%)
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.8 Points (4%)
11.2 Points (14%)
3.2 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (22%)
2.1 Points (49%)
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2260     avg: 2292     median: 2295 (14%)     max: 2310 Points
5770 Points (35%)
2087 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5730     avg: 6794     median: 6688 (5%)     max: 8195 Points
26431 Points (19%)
7426 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40876 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9010 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
645 s (8%)
242.2 s (3%)
564 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.8 s (3%)
8.3 s (2%)
19.1 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1245 Points (2%)
3463 Points (5%)
1203 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
7320 MIPS (4%)
23225 MIPS (13%)
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2431 MIPS (29%)
4044 MIPS (48%)
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
15.4 fps (5%)
57.6 fps (19%)
17.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
209 fps (48%)
76.3 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.3 fps (2%)
5.9 fps (10%)
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.5 GB/s (16%)
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
1.1 GB/s (19%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
5.9 GB/s (15%)
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1121 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2707 Seconds (19%)
574 Seconds (4%)
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
0.8 sec (17%)
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3247     avg: 3320     median: 3320 (7%)     max: 3393 Points
8507 Points (18%)
3683 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.2 s (5%)
17.1 s (4%)
27.4 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
56.3 s (2%)
35.5 s (2%)
63.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1319 s (6%)
1472 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5882 Points (5%)
28501 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2619     median: 2619 (6%)     max: 2969 Points
9920 Points (24%)
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24195     avg: 25128     median: 24695 (20%)     max: 26493 Points
57287 Points (47%)
27642 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24199     avg: 24660     median: 24279 (20%)     max: 25501 Points
57560 Points (47%)
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26948     avg: 32002     median: 30593 (25%)     max: 38156 Points
62307 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2141     avg: 2355     median: 2307 (6%)     max: 2873 Points
8433 Points (21%)
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3193     avg: 3563     median: 3448 (6%)     max: 4263 Points
11682 Points (21%)
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3827 Points (16%)
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1319     avg: 1332     median: 1331.5 (33%)     max: 1344 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 4513     avg: 4801     median: 4800.5 (19%)     max: 5088 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
421 Points (16%)
1082 Points (42%)
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (16%)     max: 410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1582 Points (3%)
4903 Points (9%)
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1073 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4891 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1975     avg: 2027     median: 2027 (20%)     max: 2054 Points
4824 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5467     avg: 5841     median: 5790 (6%)     max: 6202 Points
18845 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2046     median: 2045 (23%)     max: 2084 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5460     median: 5488 (8%)     max: 5654 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5045     avg: 5523     median: 5547.5 (10%)     max: 5868 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1707     avg: 1781     median: 1777.5 (35%)     max: 1876 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5789 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1850 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3759 Points (30%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2847 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4823 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6247 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4819 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2251     avg: 2714     median: 2797 (3%)     max: 2871 ms
968 ms (1%)
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
194.6 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13075     avg: 13480     median: 13121 (10%)     max: 14601 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
149.3 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 88.2     avg: 89.1     median: 89.1 (16%)     max: 90 Points
182.4 Points (33%)
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
907 Points (34%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.6 Watt (6%)
12.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
23.1 Points per Watt (17%)
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5000 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 3 N355 → 292% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 100% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 17. 01:28:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9420 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18745 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752708506s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9420 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 9420 +0.012s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18745 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 18745 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#13 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.092s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)