Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver J5005 vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Pentium Silver J5005

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium J5005

The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is a quad-core SoC that was introduced at the end of 2017 and is mainly used in inexpensive mini PCs. It clocks from 1.5 to 2.8 GHz (single-core burst) and belongs to the Gemini Lake platform. In addition to the four CPU cores, the chip also integrates a DirectX 12-capable graphics unit and a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual channel, 2,400 MHz). The SoC cannot be replaced as it is soldered directly to the mainboard (BGA package).

Architecture

The processor architecture of the Gemini Lake SoCs has been slightly enhanced compared to its predecessor. Intel now calls them Goldmont Plus cores and doubles the level 2 cache from 2 to 4 MB. Nevertheless, the per-MHz performance should still remain well behind the current Kaby Lake processors.

Performance

The CPU performance of the J5005 with 4 CPU cores is only in the entry-level class and is only sufficient for undemanding tasks. Even when surfing the web, you notice a clear difference to faster processors.

Power consumption

Like its predecessor, the entire SoC is specified by Intel with a TDP of 10 watts.

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver J5005Intel Celeron N4100
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 « 1.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50051.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1500 - 2800 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.8 GHz Intel Goldmont Plus
4 / 4
TDP10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium J5005
17.4 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
15.7 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1571 Points (1%)
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
455 Points (19%)
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
173.6 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
555 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
254 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
78.3 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (20%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2357 Points (14%)
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8157 Points (6%)
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10929 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
536 s (6%)
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.6 s (3%)
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
8146 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2454 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.7 fps (0%)
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (0%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
87 fps (2%)
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (1%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
4571 Seconds (58%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2330 Seconds (16%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.6 sec (34%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4179 Points (9%)
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.6 s (6%)
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1247 s (6%)
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
2874 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (19%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2146     avg: 2954     median: 2910 (5%)     max: 3799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1118 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
387 Points (9%)
358 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1188 Points (5%)
1083 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
328 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
833 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
466 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1638     avg: 1640     median: 1640 (3%)     max: 1642 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1731     avg: 1779     median: 1795 (18%)     max: 1799 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4713     avg: 5188     median: 5259 (5%)     max: 5404 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (20%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (7%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (21%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2186 ms (3%)
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (7%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (17%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
90.2 Points (16%)
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (14%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
385 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5005 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 79% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 10. 00:26:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 20010 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1768001178s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:03:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 20010 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 20010 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.013s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.063s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)