Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8183 vs Intel Celeron N3350

Mediatek MT8183

► remove from comparison  MT8183

The Mediatek MT8183 is a mainstream ARM SoC (System on a Chip) that was introduced in Late 2019 and is primarily used for Android based tablets. It is manufactured in a 12 nm process (unverified) and has a total of eight CPU cores with four powerful Cortex-A73 and four small Cortex-A53 cores in a big.LITTLE configuration. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali-G72 with three clusters (MP3).

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the chip is also equipped with an LPDDR3/LPDDR4x memory controller, a Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac) modem (but no cellular modem). Furthermore, Mediatek states that it integrated an AI accelerator with a performance of 0.5 TOPS.

The maximum display resolution is only 2,400 x 1,080 pixels.

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

ModelMediatek MT8183Intel Celeron N3350
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Apollo Lake
Series Mediatek MT8Intel Celeron
Clock2000 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 2
Technology12 nm14 nm
Features32 MP Camera ISP, 1080p H.264 Video Encoder, H.265 DecoderDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
L2 Cache2 MB
TDP6 Watt
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1296
$24 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - MT8183
0.5 pt (36%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.2 pt (19%)
Intel Celeron N3350
11.2
max:
60.1 437%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (11%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
616 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (20%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
32.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1159     avg: 1294     median: 1333 (3%)     max: 1356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15776     avg: 18163     median: 18829 (15%)     max: 19883 Points
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 941     avg: 986     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 2085     avg: 2543     median: 2560.5 (24%)     max: 2966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 2322     avg: 2590     median: 2543 (29%)     max: 2963 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
323 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
1214 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 260     avg: 292.8     median: 300 (12%)     max: 305 Points
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (13%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 909     avg: 1208     median: 1293 (2%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1397     avg: 1431     median: 1430.5 (14%)     max: 1464 Points
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5308     avg: 5377     median: 5376.5 (5%)     max: 5445 Points
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1395 Points (15%)
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (17%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4968 Points (7%)
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (3%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 5754     avg: 6212     median: 6212 (10%)     max: 6670 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 1410     avg: 1469     median: 1468.5 (22%)     max: 1527 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (17%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 MT8183 +
805 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 MT8183 +
1718 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 MT8183 +
10758 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 MT8183 +
5381 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
6072 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3957     avg: 4403     median: 4337.5 (5%)     max: 4979 ms
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8665     avg: 9742     median: 9822 (7%)     max: 10670 Points
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (7%)     max: 11461 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 54.3     median: 55.5 (10%)     max: 60 Points
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (9%)     max: 68 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 MT8183 +
32912 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 MT8183 +
32293 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
25424 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
67925 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
158554 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
160693 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
69184 Points (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8183 +
175006 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 6087     avg: 13047     median: 13046.5 (6%)     max: 20006 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 5224     avg: 5900     median: 5830.5 (21%)     max: 6716 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2714     avg: 3143     median: 3143 (17%)     max: 3572 Points
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 6470     avg: 11152     median: 11152 (24%)     max: 15834 Points
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5056     avg: 5633     median: 5264 (34%)     max: 6735 Points
5377 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6284     avg: 7442     median: 7441.5 (37%)     max: 8599 Points
7007 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 3.4     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.44 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 1.871     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.889 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8183 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 88% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 15:13:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11547 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755522814s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11547 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 11547 +0.012s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.007s ... 0.03s

#10 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.033s ... 0.063s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.028s ... 0.09s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.092s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.108s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.109s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.109s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.11s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.11s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.124s

#20 return log +0.024s ... 0.148s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)