Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 735 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 735

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 735

The Qualcomm Adreno 735 (Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 GPU) is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip), the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 was unveiled at the end of 2023 and can be found in Android-based high-end devices in 2024.

According to initial benchmarks, the GPU's performance is between the Adreno 730 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The GPU supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (Bloom, Depth of Field, Motion Blur is accelerated). The following graphics APIs are supported: OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.3.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722 compare
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement13.04.2024 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 735GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
15748 Points (68%)
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
28632 Points (63%)
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 7553     avg: 11252     median: 11751 (49%)     max: 13954 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 12176     avg: 18081     median: 19249.5 (48%)     max: 21647 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6661     avg: 11309     median: 12039 (6%)     max: 12985 Points
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1659     avg: 2926     median: 3076 (4%)     max: 3332 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 12     avg: 20.4     median: 21 (8%)     max: 24 fps
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 44     avg: 48.6     median: 48 (9%)     max: 55 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 111     avg: 137.6     median: 136 (10%)     max: 185 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 92.9     median: 99 (9%)     max: 110 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 111     avg: 166.6     median: 171 (4%)     max: 200 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 170     avg: 243.4     median: 265 (11%)     max: 287 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 735
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 292     avg: 430.1     median: 451 (4%)     max: 520 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 360377     avg: 467209     median: 485070 (49%)     max: 538320 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 294513     avg: 474851     median: 505042 (40%)     max: 532103 Points
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 179.33     avg: 187     median: 187 (5%)     max: 194.7 fps
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 8771     avg: 8905     median: 8844 (2%)     max: 9172 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 9821     avg: 9981     median: 9942 (2%)     max: 10263 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
38490 Points (13%)
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
60368 Points (100%)
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.33     avg: 10.3     median: 10.8 (4%)     max: 12.1 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 21% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 735:
59.2  fps
51%
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
59.1  fps
51%
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 735:
29.4 59.5 ~ 44 fps
84%
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
29.9 51.8 59 59.2 60 ~ 52 fps
52%
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 735:
48.1 58.2 60 60 118 ~ 69 fps
57%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 735:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
52%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 735:
39 39.6 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 735:
60  fps
150%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 71%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 64%

Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.259.13030
Genshin Impact4452373627
PUBG Mobile696040394031
Dead Trigger 26090
Qualcomm Adreno 735Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


2


1
1
1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 02:34:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12721 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756254858s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:18:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12721 +0.012s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 12721 +0.008s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.037s ... 0.061s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.082s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.082s

#15 Got 140 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.097s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.097s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.098s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.101s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.101s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.102s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)