Motorola Razr+ 2024 smartphone review – The flip phone with an enormous outer display
With the release of last year's Razr models, Motorola completely overhauled its foldable phones: They now appeal more to a design-oriented audience and the manufacturer has introduced useful additions such as eSIM support and wireless charging. The next generation should of course do a lot better, while also retaining the qualities of its predecessors.
The Motorola Razr+ 2024 (also called Razr 50 Ultra in certain countries) can still be folded open along its short side, which is reminiscent of the legendary flip phones of the late 90s and early 2000s that established the name Razr to begin with. Today, of course, you get a modern smartphone with lots of features at a premium price of just under US$1,000.
What do you get for your money and is this phone worth buying? Let's find out.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735 | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
87 % | v7 (old) | 06/2023 | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 188.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
86.9 % | v7 (old) | 08/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
86.3 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Oppo Find N3 Flip Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 201 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2520x1080 | |
85.4 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Nubia Flip 5G SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644 | 214 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" | 2790x1188 |
Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.
Case – With a smoother hinge
If you compare the Motorola Razr+ 2024 with its predecessor, the first thing you'll notice is that the manufacturer has managed to significantly reduce the thickness of the frame below the screen. Unlike its predecessor, you can no longer see a very wide metal strip but instead, only a thin line. As a result, the outer display has grown significantly in size, namely by 10 % to 4 inches.
Different materials are used for the back which depend on the choice of color: Our Midnight Blue test device comes with an artificial leather back that has a strip with a smoother texture in the middle and is more structured on the sides. This creates a high-quality feel both visually and to the touch. If the dark blue is too boring for you, you can also get Hot Pink in faux suede, Spring Green or the Pantone color of the year 2024 Peach Fuzz in faux leather.
The case makes quite a stable impression: it can hardly be twisted when applying moderate force and it doesn't creak at all. The outer display is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, which provides a high level of protection against scratches. Nevertheless, applying a protective film is probably still a good idea.
Thanks to its slightly less tight hinge, you can now open the Razr+ even more easily with one hand. Even so, it holds its position just as stably, allowing you to prop up the flip phone like a tent and take photos as if you are using a tripod. You can also completely flip the phone around and hold it like a camcorder to record videos or take photos. Furthermore, the system seems to recognize quite well what you are trying to do and activates the corresponding screen layout automatically.
The Razr+'s case is protected according to IPX8, meaning it be submerged in freshwater for up to 30 minutes. The manufacturer hasn't said anything about the phone's protection against dust.
Compared to its predecessor, the new Razr+ is ever so slightly longer and thicker, but this difference isn't noticeable to the naked eye. Its weight has stayed almost the same, despite the new model having a larger battery capacity.
Connectivity – More storage
Motorola's foldable flagship of 2024 additionally comes with more storage: 12 GB RAM and 512 GB mass storage are now available. This makes its MRSP slightly cheaper than the Galaxy Z Flip5 in direct comparison, as Samsung charges an extra US$40 for 512 GB of data storage. The Galaxy Z Flip6, which hadn't been out for long at the time of testing and which we hadn't been able to review yet, is also more expensive. However, all these devices' prices have already dropped significantly on the internet.
The Razr+ doesn't have a microSD card slot, so you can't expand its storage. You can also only insert one nano SIM card—but thanks to its eSIM support, you can still make use of dual-SIM operation.
It's a little annoying that Motorola has again only installed a USB 2.0 port, thus eliminating the option of fast data transfers and wired video output. You'll also have to do without UWB—the ultra-wideband technology that enables fast wireless data transfer between devices over short distances. It is already installed in many high-end phones, but not in the Razr+ 2024.
NFC is on board, enabling the use of contactless payment services.
Software – Stock Android 14
Android 14 comes pre-installed. As is tradition, Motorola hasn't changed much about Google's operating system. However, as the company naturally wants to offer its own functions, these are bundled in several of its own apps, which can be easily updated if necessary.
For example, you can get tips on the phone's special functions, create settings for gaming behaviour, set gestures or customizations, and take care of the phone's security. Motorola also offers a Digital Detox solution, which automatically deactivates functions.
The vast majority of apps also run smoothly on the outer display and are automatically transferred to the large internal screen when the phone is opened. On the other hand, you have to manually allow the transfer to the outer display (sometimes for each app individually), as the phone is actually locked when it is closed. During our test, the transfer didn't work smoothly for all apps; games sometimes simply restarted instead of continuing from the current position. However, the transition worked quite well with appropriately optimized apps such as Google Maps.
Motorola promises 4 years of security updates every two months for the flip phone, specifically until June 2028. In addition, there will be three major Android updates, which should be until Android 17.
Sustainability
Motorola doesn't make it the easiest for you to find out whether and how environmentally friendly the Razr+ is produced. For some of the manufacturer's devices, there are calculations on how much CO2 equivalents the device consumes in its production and life cycle, but unlike its parent company Lenovo, these are not accessible via a central hub and cannot be found for the Razr+ at all despite lengthy research on the internet.
At least Motorola has opted for a plastic-free solution for the phone's packaging, and all films and cable ties are made of paper. The packaging is also printed using petroleum-free soy inks.
So far, Motorola only offers limited self-repair options. Repair instructions and spare parts can be found in cooperation with iFixit, but at the moment, this is only for older devices. For example, you can replace the screen on the Razr 2019, but you have to take the entire device apart to do so. Unfortunately, it isn't possible to say whether this will be easier for the Razr+ 2024 in 5 years' time due to the lack of instructions right now.
Communication and GNSS – WiFi 7 is supported
The Motorola Razr+ 2024 supports WiFi 7, the latest Wi-Fi standard. In terms of speed, however, it is slower than its predecessor and, despite its support for the little-used 6 GHz band, it is also slower than many other high-end smartphones.
Comparable flip phones usually deliver well over 1 Gbit/s but with the Razr+, you get 944 Mbit/s (receiving) and just under 650 Mbit/s (transmitting). This means you can't totally make use of a gigabit internet line, but fast data transfers should still be possible and streaming in 4K quality is no problem at all.
Taking a look at its cellular modem, everything you will currently need is on board: It supports 5G, the fastest mobile communications standard, and there are so many frequencies (both 5G and 4G) that the phone can be used worldwide to access the web on the go.
During our test, we randomly checked the smartphone's reception quality. The Motorola Razr+ 2024 consistently performed very well even in difficult environments, often beating the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, for example.
Networking | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Nubia Flip 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
All important networks for satellite locating are supported, but not SBAS for even more precise positioning.
If you step outside with the phone, you are immediately located with an accuracy of 3 meters, which is a common value. Of course, we also carried out a practical test and took the Razr+ with us on a bike trip. We took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us to compare, which boasts very accurate tracking.
Both devices recorded our 9.3-kilometer route to be roughly the same length. Overall, the Razr+ proved to be an extremely accurate tracking device which was even superior to the very good smartwatch in some areas. So if you are looking for a smartphone with precise location services, the Razr+ is the right choice.
Telephone functions and call quality – Distant at times
Motorola uses the standard Google app for making calls. The app has a simple design and allows quick access to saved favorites, your contacts as well as a number keypad. You can also block individual numbers or completely reject calls from unidentified numbers.
Its call quality via the earpiece is quite good, but the other person's voice sounded distorted at high volumes during our test. Our voice came across as slightly muffled to the person on the other end of the line. The other party could be heard very loudly via the loudspeaker and hands-free microphone if desired. The microphone recorded our voice at quite a distance; according to the other party, it seemed as if we were far away from the phone even though we were sitting directly in front of it.
Cameras – No wide-angle camera anymore
Compared to its predecessor, Motorola has completely overhauled the phone's camera system, paving its own route: Instead of prioritizing a main camera and ultra-wide-angle lens as usual, Motorola has gone for a main camera and a telephoto lens, giving you better options for zooming in closer to an object. As a result, you'll have to do without the possibility of taking wide-angle landscape photos.
The main camera now has a resolution of 50 megapixels, but it usually takes pictures with a quarter of this resolution. Its light sensitivity is nominally even slightly lower than that of its predecessor's main camera. On the other hand, the telephoto lens, which also has a resolution of 50 megapixels, offers the option of using a 2x hybrid zoom.
The main camera takes nice photos in good lighting conditions, in which you can still recognize finer details and light areas aren't overexposed. The photo of our surroundings looks very light, but it hasn't been overexposed and you can see lots of detail even in objects that are further away. In low light and with high contrasts, the smartphone also does a good job—the photos look sharp, and the candle flame and dark areas still remain visible.
The camera's photos are automatically optimized using AI—plus, users can make use of AI image stabilization in addition to OIS, and its shutter speeds are automatically adjusted.
You can record videos in 4K and at 60fps on the Razr+ 2024. Its autofocus reacts quickly—even in less-than-ideal lighting situations—and its exposure compensation works correctly. The resulting videos look good and boast a high level of detail.
The camera on the inside of the foldable phone has a resolution of 32 megapixels and takes fine selfies, although the level of detail is somewhat reduced when they are enlarged. Thanks to the phone's foldability and its external display, it's also super easy to take selfies using the main camera. Its quality is even better, with a higher contrast and beautiful bokeh.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightIn our lab, the phone's main camera had to prove what it can do once again. While the center of the image looked sharp in studio lighting, we noted a clear drop in sharpness towards the edges. At 1 lux illumination, the image became very grainy.
Accessories and warranty – Charger included
The Motorola Razr+ 2024 comes with a matching charger, a USB cable and a SIM tool.
The Premium Protective Cover Edition that we tested also comes with a blue plastic case, which is covered with a slightly velvety fabric on the hinge and the back. You also get a strap with which you can hang the phone in its protective cover like a handbag.
A standard 12-month warranty covers phones purchased in the United States. If you buy it directly from the manufacturer, you also get one year's free protection against display breakage. You can additionally purchase Moto Care, which is an accidental damage protection lasting for 2 or 3 years. However, to get the best deal, you should also compare other cell phone insurance policies.
Input devices & operation – Very precise fingerprint scanner
Both screens are LTPO-capable, meaning they can dynamically adjust their refresh rate between 1 and 165 Hz. This both saves energy and also ensures a very fast response to inputs. This means that you can operate both screens very precisely and well. The crease in the hinge area of the main display can barely be felt with your finger.
Motorola has included a large set of gestures to control the phone, which can be enabled both on the screen and via the standby button: Swiping down on the button allows you to view notifications and quick settings, for example.
A fingerprint sensor and facial recognition can be used to unlock the phone biometrically. Fingerprints are recognized via a sensor integrated into the standby button. It reacts very quickly and accurately to fingerprints that have been saved. Facial recognition is carried out via the camera above the main screen or the main camera when the phone is closed. It also works very reliably.
Display – Two great screens
The size and resolution of the Motorola phone's P-OLED main display haven't been changed compared to its predecessor: It is still a 6.9-inch screen with a resolution of 2,640 x 1,080 pixels. What has changed, however, is its brightness. We already noted almost 1,100 cd/m² when depicting a full white screen and this climbed up to 2,758 cd/m² when showing smaller excerpts (APL 18)—this is very close to the promised 3,000 cd/m². As a result, even large differences in brightness and HDR content are depicted well on the display.
The outdoor display, which has grown to 4 inches in size, isn't quite as bright—but at 1,272 x 1,080 pixels, it has a very high resolution for its size and can also display HDR content very powerfully.
Both screens can achieve a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, so scrolling looks super smooth.
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 972 cd/m²
Contrast: 1:1 (Black: 994 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.138
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7" | Oppo Find N3 Flip AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8" | Nubia Flip 5G OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -63% | -55% | 8% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 1099 | 928 -16% | 836 -24% | 922 -16% | 1164 6% |
Brightness | 1087 | 943 -13% | 848 -22% | 932 -14% | 1172 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 93 -2% | 97 2% | 96 1% | 97 2% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.04 | 2.21 -113% | 2.6 -150% | 0.7 33% | 0.7 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.36 | 6.74 -186% | 4.5 -91% | 1.8 24% | 1.5 36% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.6 -45% | 1.6 -45% | 0.9 18% | 1.1 -0% |
Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.304 95% | 2.22 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6418 101% | 6577 99% | 6319 103% | 6569 99% | 6482 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90.1 Hz Amplitude: 15 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 90.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings
Both the inner and outer displays depict colors very accurately which can hardly be distinguished from the color space's optimum value with the naked eye.
We noted some flickering on the main screen but at 90 Hz, this is adapted to the phone's refresh rate and its amplitude of 15 % isn't too drastic. Even so, sensitive people should check out both displays before buying, as headaches and other complaints caused by PWM flickering can't be completely ruled out with OLED displays.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 17.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
The main display performs well outside—its high brightness means you can even use it in brighter locations. However, the screen is quite reflective, so you may want to retreat to the shade to ensure the best depiction.
In addition, the main display's viewing angles are perfectly fine from every angle.
Performance – only average graphics power
The system is powered by an SoC from Qualcomm: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is significantly slower than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and only delivers a moderate processing power upgrade compared to the SoC inside the predecessor model.
The vast majority of apps run smoothly on the Razr+ 2024 and even demanding tasks can be completed without any stuttering. This is also due to its large 12 GB RAM. However, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G was able to clearly set itself apart in most benchmarks. The recently released Z Flip6 should provide even better performance in this respect.
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1142944 - 1553057, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (13576 - 15572, n=4) |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (946 - 1321, n=5) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra |
Geekbench ML | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (564 - 1051, n=5) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (414 - 967, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (273 - 955, n=5) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
You'll have to make even bigger compromises when it comes to the phone's GPU: In many benchmarks, it came behind the GPU of its predecessor. We will take a look at whether this also results in any differences when gaming in the next section.
Again, the Razr+ delivered high performance, so you can still run graphically demanding apps. However, other flip phones are sometimes significantly faster in this aspect.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Nubia Flip 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Nubia Flip 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
On the other hand, the Razr+ 2024 proved to be super fast at surfing the web during the benchmarks, which is perhaps also partly due to the more up-to-date version of Chrome browser.
Objectively, too, pages load very quickly and you'll never have to wait even for large images while scrolling.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=5) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=5) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chome 114) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=5) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=5) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121) | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=5) | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121) | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114) | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The Razr+ 2024 comes with UFS 4.0 storage, which is a super noticeable update compared to its predecessor: Its sequential write and read speeds have more than doubled, while hardly any changes can be seen in random writing and reading.
During everyday use, data transfers aren't slowed down by the storage and loading times are kept very short.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | Oppo Find N3 Flip | Nubia Flip 5G | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -27% | -21% | 6% | -53% | -2% | -44% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4012 | 1816.8 -55% | 3412.35 -15% | 3794 -5% | 967.4 -76% | 3610 ? -10% | 1715 ? -57% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3512 | 1352.6 -61% | 2289.61 -35% | 2965 -16% | 766.69 -78% | 2940 ? -16% | 1327 ? -62% |
Random Read 4KB | 340 | 362 6% | 444.6 31% | 411 21% | 263.87 -22% | 393 ? 16% | 265 ? -22% |
Random Write 4KB | 457 | 472.3 3% | 161.87 -65% | 558 22% | 295.55 -35% | 474 ? 4% | 291 ? -36% |
Games – Gaming isn't always fun
Unfortunately, gaming looks less positive for the Razr+ 2024: Most of the time, you'll have to make do with 30fps. Only when running PUBG Mobile with very low details does the frame rate come close to 60fps, but on average it tends to settle at 45fps.
In addition, the frame rates are sometimes very unstable, and there were even some reload stutters when we played Genshin Impact. Perhaps Motorola is still in need of optimizing its software but all-in-all, the results are disappointing for such an expensive smartphone.
We measured the frame rates using GameBench.
Emissions – Can get hot
Temperature
The temperatures inside this small case are actually somewhat lower than in the phone's predecessor, but things still get very warm under prolonged load: we measured up to 47 °C. You can clearly notice this and it may also get uncomfortable if you hold the phone for a long time.
During very complex applications such as ray tracing in the Solar Bay benchmark, we measured some significant performance losses, while when running the simpler Wild Life, its performance remained relatively stable even after several runs.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Nubia Flip 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nubia Flip 5G | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra |
Speakers
The previous Razr+ model didn't sound bad at all for having such a slim body when listening to music or movies via its internal speakers.
And this year's Razr+ isn't any different: The earpiece doubles as a second speaker, so slight stereo effects are possible. The sound is even a little louder than its predecessor and it once again impresses with clear low mids, making the sound feel round and warm.
Of course, the phone doesn't come close to a real hi-fi system, but the speakers do a pretty good job for a flip phone.
If you want even better sound, you can additionally connect external speakers or headphones via its USB-C port. Wireless connection via Bluetooth can also be done without any problems. Its support for wireless audio codecs is very good: Thanks to SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus and LHDC V2-5, pretty much everything that can currently be used for wireless sound transmission is on board.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nubia Flip 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life – Lasts for quite a while
Power consumption
In idle mode, the Razr+ 2024 isn't much more power-hungry than other flip phones. Under full load, however, this changes, with it drawing up to 12 watts on average and even more at its peak.
The phone can be recharged at up to 45 watts using the supplied charger—it takes about 1:30 hours to charge it completely. You can also charge the phone wirelessly at up to 15 watts and in addition, the phone supports reverse charging at up to 5 watts.
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt |
Load |
8.5 / 12 Watt |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 4000 mAh | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 3700 mAh | Oppo Find N3 Flip 4300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 36% | -14% | -11% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.9 -29% | 0.44 37% | 0.77 -10% | 0.904 ? -29% | 0.91 ? -30% |
Idle Average * | 1.1 | 1.1 -0% | 0.69 37% | 1.68 -53% | 1.438 ? -31% | 1.441 ? -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 1.3 13% | 0.91 39% | 1.72 -15% | 1.596 ? -6% | 1.607 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 8.5 | 5.5 35% | 6.61 22% | 8.45 1% | 8.07 ? 5% | 6.22 ? 27% |
Load Maximum * | 12 | 10.3 14% | 6.72 44% | 11.05 8% | 11 ? 8% | 9.17 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Runtimes
Thanks to the phone's slightly larger 4,000 mAh battery compared to its predecessor, its battery life has also improved: the phone lasts 12:06 hours when surfing the web. This is a reasonable value for a flip phone, but still relatively short compared to conventional cell phones.
Under high load, you'll get a runtime of around 4:34 hours before the phone has to be plugged in again. If you like to watch movies and download them beforehand, you can do this for around 17 hours. As a result, you should easily be able to watch a good few episodes of a TV show.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra 4000 mAh | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 3800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G 3700 mAh | Oppo Find N3 Flip 4300 mAh | Nubia Flip 5G 4310 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | -11% | 18% | 31% | |
Reader / Idle | 1526 | 1422 -7% | |||
H.264 | 1022 | 1013 -1% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 726 | 669 -8% | 647 -11% | 857 18% | 951 31% |
Load | 274 | 259 -5% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict – An attractive and stable foldable phone
The Motorola Razr+ 2024 sharpens the concept of a compact, foldable phone in certain areas and, as a result, has an even higher quality overall feel.
Its huge front display, which takes up almost the entire front side of the phone and can be operated very smoothly and quickly, opens up lots of possibilities: You can take selfies using the higher-quality back camera while depicting a large viewfinder screen, or you can even run apps directly on the outer display.
The phone's battery runtimes are slightly longer, it charges faster and its large amount of storage works super speedily. Its precise location services are a plus point—as is its stock Android.
Its cameras are still missing a wide-angle lens but in turn, users can take advantage of better zoom options thanks to its new telephoto lens. Its overall picture quality is pretty decent.
The device's processor is barely better and its graphics unit has even taken a step in the opposite direction compared to its predecessor—this also makes itself noticeable in the shape of frame rate issues when playing games. Its OS update promise of 3 years and 4 years of security patches is at best standard for a device in this price range. The phone's high heat build-up under load is also annoying.
Its USB 2.0 port, which makes functions such as wired image output to an external screen impossible, also deserves some criticism.
The Motorola Razr+ 2024 is a foldable smartphone with a wonderful outer display, which makes lots of unconventional functions possible. Compared to normal smartphones, however, it does require a few compromises to be made.
Alternatives could be the Razr+ from last year (which is now a lot cheaper), or the Z-Flip models from Samsung. In turn, you won't be able to find an outer screen as large as the one on the Razr+ 2024 elsewhere.
Price and availability
At the time of writing, you can already get the Motorola Razr+ 2024 for a reduced price of US$899.99 on Amazon.
Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
-
08/02/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.