Notebookcheck Logo

Motorola Razr+ 2024 smartphone review – The flip phone with an enormous outer display

Back in the fold. This year's Motorola Razr+ bears an iconic name and lots has been improved on compared to its predecessor: It is now waterproof, charges faster, and it features a larger outer display and new camera system. Is this enough to keep up with the Galaxy Z Flip and co?

With the release of last year's Razr models, Motorola completely overhauled its foldable phones: They now appeal more to a design-oriented audience and the manufacturer has introduced useful additions such as eSIM support and wireless charging. The next generation should of course do a lot better, while also retaining the qualities of its predecessors.

The Motorola Razr+ 2024 (also called Razr 50 Ultra in certain countries) can still be folded open along its short side, which is reminiscent of the legendary flip phones of the late 90s and early 2000s that established the name Razr to begin with. Today, of course, you get a modern smartphone with lots of features at a premium price of just under US$1,000.

What do you get for your money and is this phone worth buying? Let's find out.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Razr 50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 413 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, second screen: 4.0 inches, 1272x1080, 165Hz, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.1 x 171.4 x 74 ( = 0.28 x 6.75 x 2.91 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45W charging, 15W wireless (Qi), 5W reverse charging with cable
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF, OIS, telephoto lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: OnScreen, cover, carrying strap, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.88W/​kg Head, 1.33W/​kg Body, IPX8-certified, eSIM support, fanless, waterproof
Weight
189 g ( = 6.67 oz / 0.42 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.4 %v8
08/2024
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735
189 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"2640x1080
87 %v7 (old)
06/2023
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
188.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2640x1080
86.9 %v7 (old)
08/2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.3 %v7 (old)
02/2024
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
201 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2520x1080
85.4 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Case – With a smoother hinge

If you compare the Motorola Razr+ 2024 with its predecessor, the first thing you'll notice is that the manufacturer has managed to significantly reduce the thickness of the frame below the screen. Unlike its predecessor, you can no longer see a very wide metal strip but instead, only a thin line. As a result, the outer display has grown significantly in size, namely by 10 % to 4 inches.

Different materials are used for the back which depend on the choice of color: Our Midnight Blue test device comes with an artificial leather back that has a strip with a smoother texture in the middle and is more structured on the sides. This creates a high-quality feel both visually and to the touch. If the dark blue is too boring for you, you can also get Hot Pink in faux suede, Spring Green or the Pantone color of the year 2024 Peach Fuzz in faux leather.

The case makes quite a stable impression: it can hardly be twisted when applying moderate force and it doesn't creak at all. The outer display is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, which provides a high level of protection against scratches. Nevertheless, applying a protective film is probably still a good idea.

Thanks to its slightly less tight hinge, you can now open the Razr+ even more easily with one hand. Even so, it holds its position just as stably, allowing you to prop up the flip phone like a tent and take photos as if you are using a tripod. You can also completely flip the phone around and hold it like a camcorder to record videos or take photos. Furthermore, the system seems to recognize quite well what you are trying to do and activates the corresponding screen layout automatically.

The Razr+'s case is protected according to IPX8, meaning it be submerged in freshwater for up to 30 minutes. The manufacturer hasn't said anything about the phone's protection against dust.

Compared to its predecessor, the new Razr+ is ever so slightly longer and thicker, but this difference isn't noticeable to the naked eye. Its weight has stayed almost the same, despite the new model having a larger battery capacity.

Size comparison

171.4 mm / 6.75 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.1 mm / 0.2795 in 189 g0.4167 lbs170.8 mm / 6.72 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7 mm / 0.2756 in 188.5 g0.4156 lbs170 mm / 6.69 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 214 g0.4718 lbs166.4 mm / 6.55 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 201 g0.4431 lbs165.1 mm / 6.5 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 187 g0.4123 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity – More storage

Motorola's foldable flagship of 2024 additionally comes with more storage: 12 GB RAM and 512 GB mass storage are now available. This makes its MRSP slightly cheaper than the Galaxy Z Flip5 in direct comparison, as Samsung charges an extra US$40 for 512 GB of data storage. The Galaxy Z Flip6, which hadn't been out for long at the time of testing and which we hadn't been able to review yet, is also more expensive. However, all these devices' prices have already dropped significantly on the internet.

The Razr+ doesn't have a microSD card slot, so you can't expand its storage. You can also only insert one nano SIM card—but thanks to its eSIM support, you can still make use of dual-SIM operation.

It's a little annoying that Motorola has again only installed a USB 2.0 port, thus eliminating the option of fast data transfers and wired video output. You'll also have to do without UWB—the ultra-wideband technology that enables fast wireless data transfer between devices over short distances. It is already installed in many high-end phones, but not in the Razr+ 2024.

NFC is on board, enabling the use of contactless payment services.

Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone
Bottom: speaker, USB-C port, microphone
Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Left: SIM card slot
Left: SIM card slot
Right: microphone, volume rocker, microphone, standby button
Right: microphone, volume rocker, microphone, standby button

Software – Stock Android 14

Android 14 comes pre-installed. As is tradition, Motorola hasn't changed much about Google's operating system. However, as the company naturally wants to offer its own functions, these are bundled in several of its own apps, which can be easily updated if necessary.

For example, you can get tips on the phone's special functions, create settings for gaming behaviour, set gestures or customizations, and take care of the phone's security. Motorola also offers a Digital Detox solution, which automatically deactivates functions.

The vast majority of apps also run smoothly on the outer display and are automatically transferred to the large internal screen when the phone is opened. On the other hand, you have to manually allow the transfer to the outer display (sometimes for each app individually), as the phone is actually locked when it is closed. During our test, the transfer didn't work smoothly for all apps; games sometimes simply restarted instead of continuing from the current position. However, the transition worked quite well with appropriately optimized apps such as Google Maps.

Motorola promises 4 years of security updates every two months for the flip phone, specifically until June 2028. In addition, there will be three major Android updates, which should be until Android 17.

Sustainability

Motorola doesn't make it the easiest for you to find out whether and how environmentally friendly the Razr+ is produced. For some of the manufacturer's devices, there are calculations on how much CO2 equivalents the device consumes in its production and life cycle, but unlike its parent company Lenovo, these are not accessible via a central hub and cannot be found for the Razr+ at all despite lengthy research on the internet.

At least Motorola has opted for a plastic-free solution for the phone's packaging, and all films and cable ties are made of paper. The packaging is also printed using petroleum-free soy inks.

So far, Motorola only offers limited self-repair options. Repair instructions and spare parts can be found in cooperation with iFixit, but at the moment, this is only for older devices. For example, you can replace the screen on the Razr 2019, but you have to take the entire device apart to do so. Unfortunately, it isn't possible to say whether this will be easier for the Razr+ 2024 in 5 years' time due to the lack of instructions right now.

Communication and GNSS – WiFi 7 is supported

The Motorola Razr+ 2024 supports WiFi 7, the latest Wi-Fi standard. In terms of speed, however, it is slower than its predecessor and, despite its support for the little-used 6 GHz band, it is also slower than many other high-end smartphones.

Comparable flip phones usually deliver well over 1 Gbit/s but with the Razr+, you get 944 Mbit/s (receiving) and just under 650 Mbit/s (transmitting). This means you can't totally make use of a gigabit internet line, but fast data transfers should still be possible and streaming in 4K quality is no problem at all.

Taking a look at its cellular modem, everything you will currently need is on board: It supports 5G, the fastest mobile communications standard, and there are so many frequencies (both 5G and 4G) that the phone can be used worldwide to access the web on the go.

During our test, we randomly checked the smartphone's reception quality. The Motorola Razr+ 2024 consistently performed very well even in difficult environments, often beating the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, for example.

Networking
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
649 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1343 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
835 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
906 (min: 454) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1576 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼85%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 594) MBit/s ∼89%
Nubia Flip 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
687 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
708 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1456 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1344 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼73%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (450-756)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (782-985)
GPS test outside
GPS test outside
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

All important networks for satellite locating are supported, but not SBAS for even more precise positioning.

If you step outside with the phone, you are immediately located with an accuracy of 3 meters, which is a common value. Of course, we also carried out a practical test and took the Razr+ with us on a bike trip. We took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us to compare, which boasts very accurate tracking.

Both devices recorded our 9.3-kilometer route to be roughly the same length. Overall, the Razr+ proved to be an extremely accurate tracking device which was even superior to the very good smartwatch in some areas. So if you are looking for a smartphone with precise location services, the Razr+ is the right choice.

Motorola Razr+ location services – overview
Motorola Razr+ location services – overview
Motorola Razr+ location services – turning point
Motorola Razr+ location services – turning point
Motorola Razr+ location services – city
Motorola Razr+ location services – city
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location services – city
Garmin Venu 2 location services – city

Telephone functions and call quality – Distant at times

Motorola uses the standard Google app for making calls. The app has a simple design and allows quick access to saved favorites, your contacts as well as a number keypad. You can also block individual numbers or completely reject calls from unidentified numbers.

Its call quality via the earpiece is quite good, but the other person's voice sounded distorted at high volumes during our test. Our voice came across as slightly muffled to the person on the other end of the line. The other party could be heard very loudly via the loudspeaker and hands-free microphone if desired. The microphone recorded our voice at quite a distance; according to the other party, it seemed as if we were far away from the phone even though we were sitting directly in front of it.

Cameras – No wide-angle camera anymore

Selfie using front-facing camera
Selfie using front-facing camera
Selfie using back camera
Selfie using back camera

Compared to its predecessor, Motorola has completely overhauled the phone's camera system, paving its own route: Instead of prioritizing a main camera and ultra-wide-angle lens as usual, Motorola has gone for a main camera and a telephoto lens, giving you better options for zooming in closer to an object. As a result, you'll have to do without the possibility of taking wide-angle landscape photos.

The main camera now has a resolution of 50 megapixels, but it usually takes pictures with a quarter of this resolution. Its light sensitivity is nominally even slightly lower than that of its predecessor's main camera. On the other hand, the telephoto lens, which also has a resolution of 50 megapixels, offers the option of using a 2x hybrid zoom.

The main camera takes nice photos in good lighting conditions, in which you can still recognize finer details and light areas aren't overexposed. The photo of our surroundings looks very light, but it hasn't been overexposed and you can see lots of detail even in objects that are further away. In low light and with high contrasts, the smartphone also does a good job—the photos look sharp, and the candle flame and dark areas still remain visible.

The camera's photos are automatically optimized using AI—plus, users can make use of AI image stabilization in addition to OIS, and its shutter speeds are automatically adjusted.

You can record videos in 4K and at 60fps on the Razr+ 2024. Its autofocus reacts quickly—even in less-than-ideal lighting situations—and its exposure compensation works correctly. The resulting videos look good and boast a high level of detail.

The camera on the inside of the foldable phone has a resolution of 32 megapixels and takes fine selfies, although the level of detail is somewhat reduced when they are enlarged. Thanks to the phone's foldability and its external display, it's also super easy to take selfies using the main camera. Its quality is even better, with a higher contrast and beautiful bokeh. 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

In our lab, the phone's main camera had to prove what it can do once again. While the center of the image looked sharp in studio lighting, we noted a clear drop in sharpness towards the edges. At 1 lux illumination, the image became very grainy.

ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: 6.27 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.6 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
56 ∆E
27 ∆E
38 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
37.7 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: 38.39 ∆E min: 11.7 - max: 65.47 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – Charger included

The Motorola Razr+ 2024 comes with a matching charger, a USB cable and a SIM tool.

The Premium Protective Cover Edition that we tested also comes with a blue plastic case, which is covered with a slightly velvety fabric on the hinge and the back. You also get a strap with which you can hang the phone in its protective cover like a handbag.

A standard 12-month warranty covers phones purchased in the United States. If you buy it directly from the manufacturer, you also get one year's free protection against display breakage. You can additionally purchase Moto Care, which is an accidental damage protection lasting for 2 or 3 years. However, to get the best deal, you should also compare other cell phone insurance policies.

Input devices & operation – Very precise fingerprint scanner

Both screens are LTPO-capable, meaning they can dynamically adjust their refresh rate between 1 and 165 Hz. This both saves energy and also ensures a very fast response to inputs. This means that you can operate both screens very precisely and well. The crease in the hinge area of the main display can barely be felt with your finger.

Motorola has included a large set of gestures to control the phone, which can be enabled both on the screen and via the standby button: Swiping down on the button allows you to view notifications and quick settings, for example.

A fingerprint sensor and facial recognition can be used to unlock the phone biometrically. Fingerprints are recognized via a sensor integrated into the standby button. It reacts very quickly and accurately to fingerprints that have been saved. Facial recognition is carried out via the camera above the main screen or the main camera when the phone is closed. It also works very reliably.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display – Two great screens

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array

The size and resolution of the Motorola phone's P-OLED main display haven't been changed compared to its predecessor: It is still a 6.9-inch screen with a resolution of 2,640 x 1,080 pixels. What has changed, however, is its brightness. We already noted almost 1,100 cd/m² when depicting a full white screen and this climbed up to 2,758 cd/m² when showing smaller excerpts (APL 18)—this is very close to the promised 3,000 cd/m². As a result, even large differences in brightness and HDR content are depicted well on the display.

The outdoor display, which has grown to 4 inches in size, isn't quite as bright—but at 1,272 x 1,080 pixels, it has a very high resolution for its size and can also display HDR content very powerfully.

Both screens can achieve a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, so scrolling looks super smooth.

1102
cd/m²
1098
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1055
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1089
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with Main Display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1111 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1087.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
978
cd/m²
977
cd/m²
975
cd/m²
968
cd/m²
972
cd/m²
955
cd/m²
943
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
967
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with Outer Display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 978 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 965.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 972 cd/m²
Contrast: 1:1 (Black: 994 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.138
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Oppo Find N3 Flip
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"
Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"
Screen
-63%
-55%
8%
14%
Brightness middle
1099
928
-16%
836
-24%
922
-16%
1164
6%
Brightness
1087
943
-13%
848
-22%
932
-14%
1172
8%
Brightness Distribution
95
93
-2%
97
2%
96
1%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.04
2.21
-113%
2.6
-150%
0.7
33%
0.7
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.36
6.74
-186%
4.5
-91%
1.8
24%
1.5
36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
1.6
-45%
1.6
-45%
0.9
18%
1.1
-0%
Gamma
2.199 100%
2.304 95%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.2 100%
CCT
6418 101%
6577 99%
6319 103%
6569 99%
6482 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90.1 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 90.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90.1 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25 % brightness
25 % brightness
50 % brightness
50 % brightness
75 % brightness
75 % brightness
100 % brightness
100 % brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

Both the inner and outer displays depict colors very accurately which can hardly be distinguished from the color space's optimum value with the naked eye.

We noted some flickering on the main screen but at 90 Hz, this is adapted to the phone's refresh rate and its amplitude of 15 % isn't too drastic. Even so, sensitive people should check out both displays before buying, as headaches and other complaints caused by PWM flickering can't be completely ruled out with OLED displays.

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN grayscale outer display
CalMAN grayscale outer display
CalMAN color accuracy outer display
CalMAN color accuracy outer display
CalMAN sRGB color space outer display
CalMAN sRGB color space outer display
CalMAN saturation outer display
CalMAN saturation outer display

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 17.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

The main display performs well outside—its high brightness means you can even use it in brighter locations. However, the screen is quite reflective, so you may want to retreat to the shade to ensure the best depiction.

In addition, the main display's viewing angles are perfectly fine from every angle.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – only average graphics power

The system is powered by an SoC from Qualcomm: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is significantly slower than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and only delivers a moderate processing power upgrade compared to the SoC inside the predecessor model.

The vast majority of apps run smoothly on the Razr+ 2024 and even demanding tasks can be completed without any stuttering. This is also due to its large 12 GB RAM. However, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G was able to clearly set itself apart in most benchmarks. The recently released Z Flip6 should provide even better performance in this respect.

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2040 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=5)
1902 Points +3%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1848 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1460 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points -26%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -45%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5228 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=5)
4854 Points +5%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4630 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3799 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points -18%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1542 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=5)
1434 Points +8%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1294 Points -3%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1107 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=183, last 2 years)
935 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4955 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=5)
4290 Points +8%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3980 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3921 Points -1%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3494 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=183, last 2 years)
3128 Points -21%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1432115 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1142944 - 1553057, n=5)
1410692 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years)
1159866 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1142944 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17105 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
17002 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=5)
16989 Points -1%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15101 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=193, last 2 years)
12453 Points -27%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points -32%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9920 Points -42%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1120 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1127, n=5)
922 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1474, n=153, last 2 years)
850 Points +10%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
771 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
749 Points -3%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points -11%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8541 Points +50%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7488 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 8810, n=5)
7456 Points +31%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6349 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=153, last 2 years)
6068 Points +7%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5685 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4805 Points -15%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14188 Points +14%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12407 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=5)
11996 Points -3%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
10293 Points -17%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10052 Points -19%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9997 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=153, last 2 years)
9958 Points -20%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8629 Points +45%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7411 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 9774, n=5)
7210 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=153, last 2 years)
6551 Points +10%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5966 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5461 Points -8%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4856 Points -19%
Graphics
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26484 Points +230%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=5)
22401 Points +179%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
21505 Points +168%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
19247 Points +140%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)
15841 Points +98%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8020 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7680 Points -4%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2021 Points +15%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1760 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1806, n=5)
1714 Points -3%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1602 Points -9%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1538 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=153, last 2 years)
1537 Points -13%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
40276 Points +159%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 78964, n=146, last 2 years)
17406 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16235 Points +4%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15572 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14826 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (13576 - 15572, n=4)
14696 Points -6%
AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
30444 Points +3118%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years)
18451 Points +1850%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=5)
1147 Points +21%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
946 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
887 Points -6%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (564 - 1051, n=5)
878 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
871 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -5%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (414 - 967, n=5)
773 Points +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +80%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
414 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (273 - 955, n=5)
577 Points +8%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
532 Points

You'll have to make even bigger compromises when it comes to the phone's GPU: In many benchmarks, it came behind the GPU of its predecessor. We will take a look at whether this also results in any differences when gaming in the next section.

Again, the Razr+ delivered high performance, so you can still run graphically demanding apps. However, other flip phones are sometimes significantly faster in this aspect.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3496 Points +111%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3454 Points +108%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1947 Points +17%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1659 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3116 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3090 Points +79%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2001 Points +16%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1723 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
819 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12831 Points +93%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10853 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9805 Points +47%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6661 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3136 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8167 Points +26%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6496 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3124 Points -52%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5532 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5414 Points +68%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3223 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5563 Points +99%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5530 Points +98%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2799 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5825 Points +80%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4329 Points +33%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3243 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20215 Points +66%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12176 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6893 Points -43%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13051 Points +73%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7553 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6091 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
496 fps +70%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
344 fps +18%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
306 fps +5%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
292 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +2%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -3%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps +62%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps +2%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +28%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -7%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
212 fps +91%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps -5%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +31%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +7%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -9%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +6%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +28%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -14%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -16%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +8%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -8%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps -12%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +16%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps 0%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -21%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps -17%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -31%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -62%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +167%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +67%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps +67%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12 fps
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.5 fps -37%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
579 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
739 Points

On the other hand, the Razr+ 2024 proved to be super fast at surfing the web during the benchmarks, which is perhaps also partly due to the more up-to-date version of Chrome browser.

Objectively, too, pages load very quickly and you'll never have to wait even for large images while scrolling.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
191.085 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
163.005 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=5)
158.2 Points -17%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
125 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=159, last 2 years)
111.4 Points -42%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
100.523 Points -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
247 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=5)
179 runs/min -28%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chome 114)
125 runs/min -49%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)
119.3 runs/min -52%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
103 runs/min -58%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
184 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
180 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=5)
142.8 Points -22%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
134 Points -27%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Chrome 121)
22 Points -88%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=150, last 2 years)
105.9 Points -42%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
98 Points -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
55459 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=5)
45952 Points +16%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
45823 Points +16%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
39446 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
39146 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
34402 Points -13%
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124)
22047 Points -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1676 ms * -162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=5)
924 ms * -45%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
917.8 ms * -44%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
909.8 ms * -42%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
779.8 ms * -22%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
638.8 ms *
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
12.7 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=5)
9.36 runs/min -26%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 16.2, n=44, last 2 years)
8.13 runs/min -36%

* ... smaller is better

The Razr+ 2024 comes with UFS 4.0 storage, which is a super noticeable update compared to its predecessor: Its sequential write and read speeds have more than doubled, while hardly any changes can be seen in random writing and reading.

During everyday use, data transfers aren't slowed down by the storage and loading times are kept very short.

Motorola Razr 50 UltraMotorola Razr 40 UltraSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5GOppo Find N3 FlipNubia Flip 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
-21%
6%
-53%
-2%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
4012
1816.8
-55%
3412.35
-15%
3794
-5%
967.4
-76%
3610 ?(1851 - 4512, n=29)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3512
1352.6
-61%
2289.61
-35%
2965
-16%
766.69
-78%
2940 ?(1524 - 3678, n=29)
-16%
Random Read 4KB
340
362
6%
444.6
31%
411
21%
263.87
-22%
Random Write 4KB
457
472.3
3%
161.87
-65%
558
22%
295.55
-35%

Games – Gaming isn't always fun

Unfortunately, gaming looks less positive for the Razr+ 2024: Most of the time, you'll have to make do with 30fps. Only when running PUBG Mobile with very low details does the frame rate come close to 60fps, but on average it tends to settle at 45fps.

In addition, the frame rates are sometimes very unstable, and there were even some reload stutters when we played Genshin Impact. Perhaps Motorola is still in need of optimizing its software but all-in-all, the results are disappointing for such an expensive smartphone.

We measured the frame rates using GameBench.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø29.4 (22-31)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø48.1 (25-60)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39 (30-41)

Emissions – Can get hot

Temperature

The temperatures inside this small case are actually somewhat lower than in the phone's predecessor, but things still get very warm under prolonged load: we measured up to 47 °C. You can clearly notice this and it may also get uncomfortable if you hold the phone for a long time.

During very complex applications such as ray tracing in the Solar Bay benchmark, we measured some significant performance losses, while when running the simpler Wild Life, its performance remained relatively stable even after several runs.

Max. Load
 46.2 °C
115 F
39.5 °C
103 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 47 °C
117 F
40.9 °C
106 F
36 °C
97 F
 
 46.2 °C
115 F
38.5 °C
101 F
34.8 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 47 °C = 117 F
Average: 40.5 °C = 105 F
31 °C
88 F
35.2 °C
95 F
41.5 °C
107 F
31.6 °C
89 F
41.1 °C
106 F
42.3 °C
108 F
33.9 °C
93 F
35.9 °C
97 F
43 °C
109 F
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 37.3 °C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +5%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94.4 %
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.2 % -33%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -38%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.3 % -59%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +28%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 %
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 % -35%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 % -43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.8 % -55%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.2 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.8 %
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.1 (9.79-12.7)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.31 (7.34-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.61 (7.69-22.1)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.3 (9.44-18.8)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.96 (4.91-4.98)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø37.4 (37.2-39.4)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (28.6-45.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø33.8 (28.3-73.9)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.5 (37.4-63.5)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.2 (9.14-19.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.1 (9.19-19.9)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.4 (8.49-16.9)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø4.2 (3.91-4.4)
Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map back
Heat map back

Speakers

The previous Razr+ model didn't sound bad at all for having such a slim body when listening to music or movies via its internal speakers.

And this year's Razr+ isn't any different: The earpiece doubles as a second speaker, so slight stereo effects are possible. The sound is even a little louder than its predecessor and it once again impresses with clear low mids, making the sound feel round and warm.

Of course, the phone doesn't come close to a real hi-fi system, but the speakers do a pretty good job for a flip phone.

If you want even better sound, you can additionally connect external speakers or headphones via its USB-C port. Wireless connection via Bluetooth can also be done without any problems. Its support for wireless audio codecs is very good: Thanks to SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus and LHDC V2-5, pretty much everything that can currently be used for wireless sound transmission is on board.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.638.12538.233.83129.225.54031.233.1503939.66324.530.68018.731.910023.336.512517.337.416014.741.120010.441.925012.543.531512.351.54009.656.550010.157.363013.460.18001368100015.570.1125010.668.8160010.372200010.771.9250011.270.1315013.167.5400013.669.8500014.672.1630014.468.4800015.468.51000016.372.61250016.371.8160001754.3SPL25.681.8N0.750.5median 13.4median 68Delta2.39.539.936.932.428.328.12631.330.429.330.521.927.517.630.325.130.916.73217.644.217.744.114.851.212.256.111.160.412.466.611.669.812.271.51474.812.875.612.87512.876.313.580.213.581.114.481.514.180.813.674.413.567.313.659.514.260.813.853.825.589.50.774.2median 13.6median 69.81.210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Razr 50 UltraNubia Flip 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nubia Flip 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life – Lasts for quite a while

Power consumption

In idle mode, the Razr+ 2024 isn't much more power-hungry than other flip phones. Under full load, however, this changes, with it drawing up to 12 watts on average and even more at its peak.

The phone can be recharged at up to 45 watts using the supplied charger—it takes about 1:30 hours to charge it completely. You can also charge the phone wirelessly at up to 15 watts and in addition, the phone supports reverse charging at up to 5 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 8.5 / 12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
36%
-14%
-11%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.9
-29%
0.44
37%
0.77
-10%
0.904 ?(0.7 - 1.11, n=5)
-29%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.1
-0%
0.69
37%
1.68
-53%
1.438 ?(1.09 - 2.67, n=5)
-31%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.3
13%
0.91
39%
1.72
-15%
1.596 ?(1.16 - 2.75, n=5)
-6%
Load Average *
8.5
5.5
35%
6.61
22%
8.45
1%
Load Maximum *
12
10.3
14%
6.72
44%
11.05
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.97 (0.743-13.2)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.228 (0.722-2.21)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (10.9-15)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.228 (0.722-2.21)

Runtimes

Thanks to the phone's slightly larger 4,000 mAh battery compared to its predecessor, its battery life has also improved: the phone lasts 12:06 hours when surfing the web. This is a reasonable value for a flip phone, but still relatively short compared to conventional cell phones.

Under high load, you'll get a runtime of around 4:34 hours before the phone has to be plugged in again. If you like to watch movies and download them beforehand, you can do this for around 17 hours. As a result, you should easily be able to watch a good few episodes of a TV show.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 34min
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-11%
18%
31%
Reader / Idle
1526
1422
-7%
H.264
1022
1013
-1%
WiFi v1.3
726
669
-8%
647
-11%
857
18%
951
31%
Load
274
259
-5%

Pros

+ high-quality case
+ huge outer display
+ waterproof
+ wireless charging
+ very precise location services
+ eSIM-ready
+ lightweight and compact
+ lots of fast storage

Cons

- comparatively low graphics performance
- sluggish USB-2.0 port
- gets quite hot under load
- no UWB
- mediocre call quality

Verdict – An attractive and stable foldable phone

Motorola Razr+ 2024 review.
Motorola Razr+ 2024 review.

The Motorola Razr+ 2024 sharpens the concept of a compact, foldable phone in certain areas and, as a result, has an even higher quality overall feel.

Its huge front display, which takes up almost the entire front side of the phone and can be operated very smoothly and quickly, opens up lots of possibilities: You can take selfies using the higher-quality back camera while depicting a large viewfinder screen, or you can even run apps directly on the outer display.

The phone's battery runtimes are slightly longer, it charges faster and its large amount of storage works super speedily. Its precise location services are a plus point—as is its stock Android.

Its cameras are still missing a wide-angle lens but in turn, users can take advantage of better zoom options thanks to its new telephoto lens. Its overall picture quality is pretty decent.

The device's processor is barely better and its graphics unit has even taken a step in the opposite direction compared to its predecessor—this also makes itself noticeable in the shape of frame rate issues when playing games. Its OS update promise of 3 years and 4 years of security patches is at best standard for a device in this price range. The phone's high heat build-up under load is also annoying.

Its USB 2.0 port, which makes functions such as wired image output to an external screen impossible, also deserves some criticism. 

The Motorola Razr+ 2024 is a foldable smartphone with a wonderful outer display, which makes lots of unconventional functions possible. Compared to normal smartphones, however, it does require a few compromises to be made.

Alternatives could be the Razr+ from last year (which is now a lot cheaper), or the Z-Flip models from Samsung. In turn, you won't be able to find an outer screen as large as the one on the Razr+ 2024 elsewhere.

Price and availability

At the time of writing, you can already get the Motorola Razr+ 2024 for a reduced price of US$899.99 on Amazon.

Please note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - 08/02/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 73%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
22 / 55 → 40%
Application Performance
71 / 85 → 84%
AI Performance
37%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
75%
Average
65%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
53.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 48.2%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Motorola Razr+ 2024 smartphone review – The flip phone with an enormous outer display
Florian Schmitt, 2024-08- 4 (Update: 2024-08-15)