Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 510 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP5

Qualcomm Adreno 510

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 510

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Qualcomm Adreno 510ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Mali-G Series
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 500Valhall
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 14.09.2021
CodenameValhall
Pipelines5 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM89768 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM89566 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 21087     avg: 21766     median: 21533 (2%)     max: 23175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1381     avg: 1454     median: 1441.5 (6%)     max: 1579 Points
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1354     avg: 1395     median: 1389.5 (3%)     max: 1459 Points
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
971 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
867 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2796     avg: 2911     median: 2955 (1%)     max: 2987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 796     avg: 1252     median: 825 (1%)     max: 3001 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.4     median: 13 (2%)     max: 14 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 34.4     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 22     avg: 30.8     median: 31 (0%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (18%)     max: 149350 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44.8 fps (74%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (0%)     max: 41.92 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971     avg: 3046     median: 3069 (1%)     max: 3098 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039     avg: 3083     median: 3102 (1%)     max: 3109 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
6078 Points (6%)
12517 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2559 Points (4%)
3997 Points (7%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4270 Points (93%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.04 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 448% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G68 MP5:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
50 56 58 ~ 55 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
43 50 ~ 47 fps
ultra
Mali-G68 MP5:
36 38 39.7 ~ 38 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
30  fps
high
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 510:
30 50 57 60 ~ 49 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 510:
20 29 30 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
high
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-G68 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554738
PUBG Mobile303032
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2


1
1

1







Qualcomm Adreno 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 249
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 03:42:29

#0 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11584 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:41:40 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.124s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.124s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.124s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.042s ... 0.166s

#8 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.047s ... 0.213s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.002s ... 0.215s

#10 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.015s ... 0.23s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.23s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.112s ... 0.342s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.343s

#14 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.364s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.364s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.367s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.382s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.382s

#19 return log +0.05s ... 0.431s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)