Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 504 vs Intel HD Graphics 510

Qualcomm Adreno 504

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 504 is a mobile graphics card for lower mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

In the Snapdragon 429, the Adreno 504 is manufactured in the modern 12nm process and should be very power efficient.

Intel HD Graphics 510

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 510

The Intel HD Graphics 510 (GT1) is an integrated graphics unit, which can be found in low-end ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processors of the Skylake generation. This "GT1" version of the Skylake GPU offers 12 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 950 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 510 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Performance

Depending on various factors like memory configuration, the HD Graphics 510 should perform sligthly below the older HD Graphics 4400 and will handle modern games (as of 2015) only in lowest settings (if it does at all).

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4a (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The HD Graphics 510 can be found in mobile processors specified at 15 W TDP and is therefore suited for compact laptops and ultrabooks.

Qualcomm Adreno 504Intel HD Graphics 510
Gen. 9 Series
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
ArchitectureAdreno 500Gen. 9 Skylake
Core Speed450 MHz300 - 950 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)QuickSync
Date of Announcement30.06.2018 01.09.2015
CodenameSkylake GT1
Pipelines12 - unified
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4
CPU in Adreno 504GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4294 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+5 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 41004 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
min. - max.320 MHz? MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-6198DU2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 4405U2 x 2100 MHz, 15 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz950 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 510
0.2 pt (1%)
0.05576 -76%
0.0842 -64%
0.192 -17%
Intel HD Graphics 510
0.2324
0.3143 35%
max:
33.3 14229%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6895     avg: 6896     median: 6896 (1%)     max: 6897 Points
43274 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
26846 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4721 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5664 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
570 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
621 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
62653 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 428     avg: 445     median: 445 (2%)     max: 462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 336     avg: 364.5     median: 364.5 (1%)     max: 393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
257 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
210 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 428     avg: 449     median: 449 (4%)     max: 470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 364     avg: 381.5     median: 381.5 (2%)     max: 399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 189     avg: 189.5     median: 189.5 (1%)     max: 190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 152     avg: 152.5     median: 152.5 (1%)     max: 153 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
985 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
847 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3798 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3125 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 510
3DMark 06
7253 Points (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
9.3 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
10.8 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
13.5 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
7348 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
17.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.7     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
35.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
51.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 4.7     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
64.6 fps (3%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 504
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
11 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 510
121.9 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
167 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
302 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
500 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
3898 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
860 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 510 → 1346% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 504:
23  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 504:
32  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 504:
31  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
18.3  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
70.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
41.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
24.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
9.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
13.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
7.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
11.1  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
25  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
11  fps
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
48.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
29.2  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
38.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
25.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
66.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
41.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
110.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
19.3  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
30.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
26.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
31.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
22.2  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
72  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
47  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
173.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
32.2  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
135.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
32.8  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
22.5  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
high
100%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
39  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
20.1  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
17.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 510:
52.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
23.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
16.2  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 504Intel HD Graphics 510
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile23
Arena of Valor3231
Asphalt 9: Legends77
Qualcomm Adreno 504Intel HD Graphics 510
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1




1



1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 19:34:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9890 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6475 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750959244s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9890 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 9890 +0s ... 0.029s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6475 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#11 got single benchmarks 6475 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.051s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.051s

#15 Got 47 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.053s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.053s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.054s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.06s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.06s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)