Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-3520M vs Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

Intel Core i7-3520M

► remove from comparison Intel 3520M

The Intel Core i7-3520M is the fastest dual-core processor for laptops based on the Ivy Bridge architecture at the time of introduction in Q2 2012. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.9 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz (for 2 active cores) and 3.6 GHz (for 1 active core). As its Sandy-Bridge-based predecessor Core i7-2640M, it offers a 4 MB L3-Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of the Core i7-3520M is slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to the architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance is about 5 - 10 % above the old i7-2640M (see benchmarks below).

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 offers 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1250 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it one of the fastest variants.

Just like most other Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the i7-3520M is rated at a TDP of 35 W. Therefore, even smaller laptops can use the Core i7.

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

► remove from comparison Intel E3-1505M v6

The Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 is a fast quad-core processor notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest mobile Xeon model and the performance is slightly better tha the 100 MHz slower clocked consumer Core i7-7820HQ. Compared to the Core processors, the chip also supports ECC-RAM (error correction). Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 3 - 4 GHz (4 cores up to 3.6 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.8 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the professional HD Graphics P630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clocks, even the smaller model of the mobile Xeons is ahead of the fastest Skylake models (Xeon E3-1575M v6) and is therefore als powerful enough for very demanding applications.

Graphics

The integrated professional Intel HD Graphics P630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory. It offers certified drivers for 15 professional and CAD applications.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

 

ModelIntel Core i7-3520MIntel Xeon E3-1505M v6
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Kaby Lake
CodenameIvy BridgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-3940XM compare3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3920XM compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3840QM compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3820QM compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3740QM compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3720QM compare2.6 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3635QM compare2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3630QM compare2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3615QM compare2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3610QM compare2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3632QM compare2.2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3612QM compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3540M compare3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3520M « 2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3687U compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3667U compare2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3537U compare2 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3517U compare1.9 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-3689Y compare1.5 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 « 3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2900 - 3600 MHz3000 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 8
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology22 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023, PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics 4000, DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, SIPP, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1250 MHz)Intel HD Graphics P630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$346 U.S.$623 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 654     avg: 728     median: 737 (5%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 170     avg: 170.3     median: 170 (51%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3     avg: 3.3     median: 3.4 (4%)     max: 3.44 Points
min: 7.89     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (11%)     max: 8.61 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.41     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.47 Points
1.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4408     avg: 4813     median: 4855 (29%)     max: 4903 Points
6332 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9112     avg: 10167     median: 10467 (8%)     max: 10605 Points
23780 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 3520M +
min: 11581     avg: 12766     median: 12889.5 (9%)     max: 13151 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 3520M +
min: 6029     avg: 6128     median: 6146.5 (7%)     max: 6203 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 456     avg: 493.2     median: 492.1 (6%)     max: 570 s
min: 319     avg: 327.2     median: 327.2 (4%)     max: 335.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 14.4     avg: 15.5     median: 15.4 (3%)     max: 17.1 s
min: 11     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 11.02 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 2661     avg: 2863     median: 2715 (4%)     max: 3527 Points
min: 3986     avg: 4554     median: 4554 (7%)     max: 5122 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 6.7     avg: 16.1     median: 18.9 (7%)     max: 19.44 fps
min: 48     avg: 48.5     median: 48.5 (17%)     max: 49.05 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 35.1     avg: 86.2     median: 98.6 (23%)     max: 101.8 fps
185 fps (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.164     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.176 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.249     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.302 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.2     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (4%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
4.4 GB/s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3528     avg: 4086     median: 4134 (9%)     max: 4212 Points
min: 7230     avg: 7714     median: 7713.5 (16%)     max: 8197 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 10     avg: 10.3     median: 10 (2%)     max: 10.94 s
min: 9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 10 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 24     avg: 24.8     median: 25 (1%)     max: 25.87 s
min: 20     avg: 21.5     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 565     avg: 591     median: 594 (3%)     max: 612 s
min: 489     avg: 509     median: 508.5 (2%)     max: 528 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 3520M +
min: 55800     avg: 63808     median: 67130 (32%)     max: 69140 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 3520M +
min: 41450     avg: 42502     median: 42450 (33%)     max: 44032 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 3520M +
7.2 Points (92%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 3520M +
min: 9277     avg: 11188     median: 11511 (10%)     max: 11788 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3582     avg: 4275     median: 4466 (12%)     max: 4774 Points
min: 9594     avg: 9882     median: 9813 (27%)     max: 10239 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
39221 Points (32%)
44564 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
42023 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52711     avg: 53987     median: 53987 (45%)     max: 55263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3393 Points (9%)
min: 4304     avg: 6891     median: 8126 (21%)     max: 8243 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4772 Points (9%)
min: 6294     avg: 9708     median: 11348 (20%)     max: 11483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4282 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14680 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4042 Points (79%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15367 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4224 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 847     avg: 884     median: 897 (1%)     max: 907 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36239     avg: 39903     median: 39902.5 (36%)     max: 43566 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
81.1 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.7 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.1 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-3520M → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 → 181% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 10:14:02

#0 checking url part for id 3065 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8448 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3065 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 3065 +0.041s ... 0.081s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8448 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 8448 +0.02s ... 0.103s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.226s ... 0.329s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.356s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)