AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove AMD 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

AMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5
Zen+Zen+
: Ryzen 5 Zen+
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (compare)3600 - 4200 MHz6 / 1216 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 26003400 - 3900 MHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (compare)3600 - 4200 MHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 26003400 - 3900 MHz6 / 1216 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
3400 - 3900 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
4 MB2 MB
16 MB4 MB
6 / 124 / 8
65 15
4940 4500
12 12
213 mm2
AM4 (1331)AM4
SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 ( - 1200 MHz)
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
2600 +
1270 Points (29%)
611 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
2600 +
159 Points (73%)
144 Points (66%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
2600 +
13.7 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
2600 +
1.8 Points (88%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
2600 +
4726 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
2600 +
28173 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
2600 +
45033 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
2600 +
8024 Points (78%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
2600 +
140.9 seconds (2%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
2600 +
5.5 seconds (1%)
WinRAR - Result
100%
2600 +
4517 KB/s (53%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
16531 MIPS (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
3516 MIPS (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
2600 +
75 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
2600 +
205.3 fps (76%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
100%
2600 +
7.8 fps (26%)
3.6 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.7 GB/s (37%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
2600 +
1 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
2600 +
7.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender 2.79 *
100%
2600 +
375.7 Seconds (4%)
786 Seconds (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
2600 +
9290 Points (62%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
2600 +
11.2 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
2600 +
24.3 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
2600 +
615.2 Seconds (3%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
2600 +
43794 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
2600 +
12405 points (64%)
6412 points (33%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
2600 +
69692 Points (45%)
43514 Points (28%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
100%
2600 +
69478 Points (83%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
100%
2600 +
70522 Points (82%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
2600 +
11219 Points (28%)
6090 Points (15%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
2600 +
17063 Points (53%)
9070 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
2600 +
4631 Points (73%)
3820 Points (60%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
2600 +
20633 Points (36%)
10419 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
1325.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
27689 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 2600 +
157.5 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 2600 +
149.5 Watt (26%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 74%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)