Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Z1 Extreme

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports SMT (hyperthreading , 16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

The performance of the R7 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 7840U, the Z1 Extreme offers no AI engine.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series and fastest model of the U-series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.3 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840U, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840U is, depending on the workload, only slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS (higher base clock speed and TDP). Compared to the previous generation Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, the 7840U is clearly faster thanks to the Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen Z1 ExtremeAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP30 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Z1 Extreme
43.8 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840U
42.7 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13004     avg: 13982     median: 13982 (13%)     max: 14960 Points
min: 12929     avg: 13952     median: 13869 (13%)     max: 15142 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1733     avg: 1756     median: 1756 (75%)     max: 1779 Points
min: 1703     avg: 1721     median: 1717 (73%)     max: 1747 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 672     avg: 682     median: 682 (76%)     max: 692 Points
min: 652     avg: 669     median: 670 (74%)     max: 684 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5109     avg: 5467     median: 5467 (13%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 4970     avg: 5450     median: 5424 (13%)     max: 5981 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2050     avg: 2224     median: 2223.5 (14%)     max: 2397 Points
min: 2014     avg: 2223     median: 2229 (14%)     max: 2418 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 268     avg: 274     median: 274 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 263     avg: 267     median: 266 (80%)     max: 273 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 56966     avg: 59812     median: 59811.5 (34%)     max: 62657 MIPS
min: 57056     avg: 59146     median: 58603 (34%)     max: 62320 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6316 MIPS (76%)
min: 5633     avg: 5846     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 5988 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
min: 15.9     avg: 16.8     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 17.8 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 366     avg: 406     median: 406 (5%)     max: 446 Seconds
min: 354     avg: 384.8     median: 387.5 (5%)     max: 410 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
213 Seconds (2%)
min: 217     avg: 234.3     median: 236 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4447     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4662 sec
min: 0.4658     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4807 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15202     avg: 18389     median: 19181 (52%)     max: 20784 Points
min: 16111     avg: 17318     median: 17331.5 (47%)     max: 18499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15761 Points (40%)
min: 16274     avg: 17360     median: 17641 (45%)     max: 18165 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19305     avg: 23686     median: 25255 (45%)     max: 26499 Points
min: 21327     avg: 23216     median: 23745 (42%)     max: 24045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6281     avg: 8857     median: 9704 (41%)     max: 10587 Points
min: 8245     avg: 8428     median: 8405.5 (35%)     max: 8657 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2530     avg: 2534     median: 2534 (77%)     max: 2538 Points
min: 1896     avg: 2330     median: 2467 (75%)     max: 2491 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10872     avg: 10931     median: 10931 (43%)     max: 10990 Points
min: 7596     avg: 10604     median: 11375.5 (45%)     max: 12069 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 1917     median: 1898 (80%)     max: 1956 Points
min: 1740     avg: 1806     median: 1801 (76%)     max: 1881 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9589     avg: 10103     median: 9803 (18%)     max: 10917 Points
min: 9663     avg: 10365     median: 10437.5 (19%)     max: 10920 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
556 ms (1%)
min: 526     avg: 557     median: 565.5 (1%)     max: 571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86617 Points (78%)
min: 85772     avg: 87443     median: 87442.5 (79%)     max: 89113 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
277 Points (80%)
234 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 366     median: 366 (76%)     max: 432 Points
min: 259     avg: 283.5     median: 279 (58%)     max: 317 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1718 Points (66%)
min: 1533     avg: 1595     median: 1588 (61%)     max: 1669 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42.2 Watt (7%)
min: 39.7     avg: 51.8     median: 54.9 (9%)     max: 57.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.8 Watt (8%)
min: 5.18     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (4%)     max: 8.88 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.95     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (10%)     max: 12.3 Watt
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
40 Points per Watt (30%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U → 97% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 04. 05:02:15

#0 checking url part for id 15017 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15058 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15017 +0.021s ... 0.041s

#7 got single benchmarks 15017 +0.015s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15058 +0.015s ... 0.071s

#9 got single benchmarks 15058 +0.017s ... 0.088s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.178s ... 0.266s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.291s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)