Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 619 Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 642 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 8 nm 14 nm 5 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 07.05.2021
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788 avg: 55662 median: 55911 (6%) max: 56286 Points
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602 avg: 4041 median: 4118 (18%) max: 4286 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817 avg: 4280 median: 4298 (9%) max: 4573 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536 avg: 2906 median: 2981.5 (15%) max: 3107 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412 avg: 2788 median: 2834 (8%) max: 3008 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635 avg: 1108 median: 1194.5 (1%) max: 1227 Points
482 Points (0%)
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189 avg: 327.8 median: 351 (0%) max: 371 Points
143 Points (0%)
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9 avg: 3.5 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3 avg: 7.4 median: 7.7 (1%) max: 8.9 fps
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17 avg: 20.1 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16 avg: 18.5 median: 19 (2%) max: 20 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26 avg: 32.4 median: 34 (1%) max: 35 fps
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33 avg: 45.4 median: 46 (3%) max: 68 fps
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55 avg: 87.8 median: 91 (1%) max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241 avg: 91217 median: 97281.5 (12%) max: 102780 Points
43224 Points (5%)
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62 avg: 26.6 median: 26.8 (0%) max: 29.71 fps
14.3 fps (0%)
48 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363 avg: 1377 median: 1377.5 (0%) max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119 avg: 1168 median: 1160 (0%) max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763 avg: 23246 median: 25388 (25%) max: 30058 Points
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274 avg: 19611 median: 22384 (39%) max: 28746 Points
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69 avg: 3.6 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 7.31 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 42% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 198% n=14
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
26 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 [X] Honor Magic4 Lite 3.2.0.5531
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
30 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
60 [X] Sony Xperia 10 V 4.3.0.6993
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
28 fps
45 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
54 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
36 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
29 fps, max:
47 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 619:
20 [X] Motorola Moto G34 4.5.0_21307647_21321795
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
max:
20 fps
28 [X] Nokia XR21 3.7.0_14806628_14807925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
18 fps, max:
41 fps
30 ~ 26 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Nokia G42 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
59 60 60 [X] Nokia X20 1.59.7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia X10 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
51 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Nokia XR20 1.60.13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Realme 9 Pro 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 60 [X] Nokia X30 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 1.7GHz
Adreno 619
min:
55 fps, max:
61 fps
60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
83%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 [X] Nokia X20 2.8.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Motorola Moto G51 3.3.5a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 619
min:
24 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
77%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 79% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 85%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 157% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 179%
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 13. 12:08:29
#0 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.116s ... 0.118s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.118s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.118s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.042s ... 0.16s
#9 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.118s ... 0.278s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.002s ... 0.28s
#11 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.021s ... 0.301s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.303s
#13 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.007s ... 0.309s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.309s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.176s ... 0.486s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.486s
#17 Got 129 rows for game benchmarks. +0.043s ... 0.529s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.529s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.534s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.556s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.556s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.558s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)