Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

► remove from comparison Intel Z8350

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 410 MSM8916

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (MSM8916) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio.

ModelIntel Atom x5-Z8350Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
SeriesIntel Atom x5Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCherry TrailCortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 compare1.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 compare1.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 « 1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 compare1.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x5-E8000 compare1.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1440 - 1920 MHz1400 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.90 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 500 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS-1600 (12,8 GB/s), USB 3.0, 1x PCIe 2.0Adreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, LTE, FM, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory Controller
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 306 (450 MHz)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8350 +
0.4 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902.5 (5%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 2575     avg: 2939     median: 2978.5 (2%)     max: 3130 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
1108 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8350 +
36.2 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 987     avg: 1267     median: 1313 (4%)     max: 1418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12990 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8436     avg: 12570     median: 14078 (12%)     max: 15195 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
min: 929     avg: 1036     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 Z8350 +
1588 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1126 Points (13%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1151 Points (13%)
min: 579     avg: 688     median: 714 (8%)     max: 770 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (9%)     max: 926 Points
min: 515     avg: 516     median: 516 (5%)     max: 517 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (3%)     max: 2490 Points
min: 1261     avg: 1322     median: 1322 (1%)     max: 1383 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 836     avg: 888     median: 890.5 (12%)     max: 934 Points
391 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264.5 (6%)     max: 2399 Points
918 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2130     avg: 2247     median: 2289 (4%)     max: 2332 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 709     avg: 755     median: 760 (15%)     max: 796 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5047     avg: 5908     median: 5630 (7%)     max: 7230 ms
min: 11843     avg: 14378     median: 13968 (16%)     max: 20618 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1022     avg: 1395     median: 1380 (15%)     max: 1760 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1262     avg: 1373     median: 1372.5 (13%)     max: 1483 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4722     avg: 6393     median: 6494 (6%)     max: 7265 Points
min: 1447     avg: 2659     median: 2737.5 (2%)     max: 3296 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 720     avg: 862     median: 799 (21%)     max: 1219 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 966     avg: 1165     median: 1164 (26%)     max: 1313 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 1929     avg: 2030     median: 2024 (27%)     max: 2139 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 11992     avg: 13834     median: 13943.5 (32%)     max: 15455 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
20844 Points (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 20041     avg: 21467     median: 21313 (21%)     max: 23242 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
58565 Points (20%)
min: 18230     avg: 24859     median: 26409 (9%)     max: 28232 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3608 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
11411 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
1139 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
19618 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
35776 Points (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 403     avg: 540     median: 405 (12%)     max: 812 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 6416     avg: 7524     median: 7580 (25%)     max: 8577 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 9346     avg: 10830     median: 9857 (1%)     max: 13288 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3376 Points (22%)
min: 2217     avg: 2944     median: 2913 (19%)     max: 3701 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4671 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
473 min (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
1635 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2006 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8350 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 → 57% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 00:32:44

#0 checking url part for id 8088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4974 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:38:31 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8088 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 8088 +0.045s ... 0.084s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4974 +0.003s ... 0.086s

#9 got single benchmarks 4974 +0.06s ... 0.146s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.146s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.101s ... 0.247s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.108s ... 0.356s

#13 return log +0.026s ... 0.382s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)