Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3735F vs Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Atom Z3735F

► remove from comparison Intel Z3735F

The Intel Atom Z3735F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735D, the Z3735F comes in a different BGA package.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735F competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

ModelIntel Atom Z3735FIntel Celeron N3350
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-TApollo Lake
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F « 1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1330 - 1830 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP<4 Watt6 Watt
Technology22 nm14 nm
SocketUTFCBGA592BGA1296
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$17 U.S.$24 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.6 pt (16%)
Intel Celeron N3350
11.6
max:
72.1 522%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (12%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.72     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 1.07 Points
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.31 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (15%)     max: 0.6 Points
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1079     avg: 1115     median: 1100 (13%)     max: 1165 s
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.33     avg: 35.6     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.89 s
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1595     avg: 1635     median: 1635 (3%)     max: 1675 Points
616 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (21%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 6.79     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (2%)     max: 6.83 fps
6.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 34.95     avg: 35.6     median: 35.9 (8%)     max: 36.06 fps
32.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.0857     avg: 0.3     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.876 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.133     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.136 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.612     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.622 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 856     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (2%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 36.1     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 53.3 s
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 79.1     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 114.9 s
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1566     avg: 1747     median: 1566 (7%)     max: 2109 s
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11980     avg: 12961     median: 12748 (10%)     max: 14156 Points
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12499     avg: 14778     median: 15281 (13%)     max: 16050 Points
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1504 Points (3%)
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (14%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (20%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (6%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2018     avg: 2166     median: 2191.5 (4%)     max: 2213 Points
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 767     avg: 785     median: 786 (15%)     max: 801 Points
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (26%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 2139     avg: 2244     median: 2243.5 (18%)     max: 2348 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 1877     avg: 1957     median: 1956.5 (18%)     max: 2036 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 2059     avg: 2161     median: 2161 (4%)     max: 2263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 2338     avg: 2477     median: 2477 (5%)     max: 2616 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 2128     avg: 2239     median: 2238.5 (6%)     max: 2349 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 Z3735F +
300 MFLOPS (10%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 Z3735F +
145 MFLOPS (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5410     avg: 7761     median: 8832 (10%)     max: 9362 ms
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3067     avg: 4539     median: 3524 (3%)     max: 6457 Points
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (9%)     max: 11461 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (11%)     max: 68 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 Z3735F +
1221 Points (33%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 Z3735F +
1379 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 Z3735F +
3069 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 32624     avg: 33917     median: 33917 (34%)     max: 35210 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5281 Points (26%)
7007 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735F → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 113% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 18:31:33

#0 checking url part for id 5966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5966 +0.003s ... 0.087s

#7 got single benchmarks 5966 +0.058s ... 0.145s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.02s ... 0.165s

#9 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.084s ... 0.249s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.249s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.307s ... 0.556s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.581s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)