Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10885M vs Intel Core i7-13800H

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-13800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13800H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5.2 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.8 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 4 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports the full set of vPro Enterprise management features.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i7-13800H should be faster than the older Core i9-12900HK. Therefore, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelIntel Xeon W-10885MIntel Core i7-13800H
CodenameComet Lake-HRaptor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H « 1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz1800 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1614 / 20
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1744
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIThread Director
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13800H
41.5 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
119.3 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
976 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6893 Points (6%)
17591 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1300 Points (55%)
2017 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (54%)     max: 502 Points
776 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
6714 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
2765 Points (17%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (58%)     max: 211 Points
287 Points (80%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.3 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7865 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44583 Points (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
70500 MIPS (40%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (65%)     max: 5703 MIPS
6310 MIPS (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.1 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.9 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
20 fps (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
191 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (45%)     max: 18404 Points
23253 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
29543 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
12662 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1756 Points (42%)
2766 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
8148 Points (32%)
12876 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (51%)     max: 1347 Points
1972 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
12880 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (32%)     max: 32939 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
477 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
283 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (41%)     max: 231 Points
314 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1823 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150 Watt (26%)
150.1 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.9 Watt (28%)
155.6 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
8.9 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13800H → 154% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 23:39:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14719 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759700379s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14719 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14719 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.054s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)