Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5-12600H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core i5-12600H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600H

The Intel Core i5-12600H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and all 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.7 to 4.5 GHz on the performance cluster and 2 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 18 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12650H, the 12600H offers less P-cores but more E-cores, a faster iGPU and "Enterprise" vPro features (for remote management).

Performance

Thanks to the 12 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older Tiger Lake-H CPUs with similar clock speeds (especially like the Core i5-11500H with only 6 cores). Due to the architectural improvements, single-core performance is also better than similar or higher clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (95 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Core i5-12600H
CodenameArrow Lake-HAlder Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H « 2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock4500 - 5400 MHz2000 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
12 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology5 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$651 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.1 MB
L2 Cache10 MB
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL B,., GNA, vPro En., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126     avg: 127.6     median: 127 (71%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 986     median: 991 (18%)     max: 1194 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16632     avg: 19618     median: 20442 (19%)     max: 22080 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2105     avg: 2137     median: 2133 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 809     avg: 819     median: 817 (89%)     max: 830 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6517     avg: 7633     median: 7920 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2797     avg: 3085     median: 3137 (20%)     max: 3333 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 309     avg: 313     median: 313 (87%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.3     median: 38.7 (50%)     max: 40.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.82 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11334     avg: 11456     median: 11459 (69%)     max: 11576 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 77213     median: 74797 (54%)     max: 84729 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 111175     avg: 113680     median: 113680 (73%)     max: 116185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17328     avg: 17422     median: 17421.5 (21%)     max: 17515 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.802     avg: 206.2     median: 238.3 (3%)     max: 275.558 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 4.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6751     avg: 10391     median: 7690 (12%)     max: 16732 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 53335     avg: 61495     median: 60639 (35%)     max: 69676 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5999     avg: 6146     median: 6136 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 176.05     avg: 180.6     median: 180.6 (60%)     max: 185.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 356.5     avg: 359.8     median: 359.8 (83%)     max: 363 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.8     avg: 22.6     median: 23.6 (41%)     max: 25.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 259     avg: 328.8     median: 341 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 159     avg: 193.2     median: 197 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4111     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4428 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15781     avg: 16231     median: 16206.5 (34%)     max: 16728 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.338 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 90659     median: 91977.5 (71%)     max: 97633 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19102     avg: 22397     median: 22766 (56%)     max: 24334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 109770     median: 112526 (91%)     max: 117704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 107393     median: 109206 (89%)     max: 113839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 103278     avg: 114769     median: 116506 (94%)     max: 124524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20952     avg: 21910     median: 21599 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27803     avg: 33382     median: 34056 (61%)     max: 35532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11394     median: 11650 (49%)     max: 13154 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2902     median: 2895 (72%)     max: 3110 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16238     median: 15647.5 (61%)     max: 17992 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1973     avg: 2073     median: 2060 (81%)     max: 2256 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14243     avg: 15350     median: 15207 (27%)     max: 16626 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1945     avg: 2056     median: 2027 (9%)     max: 2196 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14890     avg: 15084     median: 15136 (48%)     max: 15225 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8471     avg: 8740     median: 8530 (85%)     max: 9220 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 54076     avg: 55531     median: 55924 (56%)     max: 56593 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 418     avg: 443.8     median: 450 (1%)     max: 465 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (85%)     max: 121454 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 298.5     median: 311 (85%)     max: 323.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 280     avg: 323.4     median: 324 (58%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1812     avg: 2055     median: 2064 (77%)     max: 2227 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 82.3     median: 69.5 (12%)     max: 131.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 97.7     median: 102.8 (19%)     max: 130.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 10.9     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.5     avg: 32.8     median: 31.9 (24%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 11. 17:38:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14053 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754926707s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.013s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14053 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 14053 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.057s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)