Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 225H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 14 cores consisting of 4 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 4.9 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.3 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watts (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 130T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.2 GHz.

Performance - High End

Compared to the more powerful variants (such as the top model Core Ultra 9 285H) due to the lack of two P-cores. However, thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be able to hold its own against its Raptor Lake predecessors. As a result, the CPU is also very suitable for demanding tasks such as gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also comes from TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 225HAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
CodenameArrow Lake-HKrackan Point (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H « 4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Clock4300 - 4900 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 14
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt54 Watt
Technology5 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 130T ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
$385 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L2 Cache8 MB
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
Chip AI66 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 225H
40.6 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
119.8 Points (67%)
min: 113.5     avg: 115.7     median: 115.2 (65%)     max: 119 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
859 Points (16%)
min: 720     avg: 893     median: 905 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16466 Points (15%)
min: 12647     avg: 15682     median: 15971.5 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1992 Points (84%)
min: 1916     avg: 1958     median: 1953.5 (82%)     max: 2006 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
763 Points (83%)
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 768.5 (84%)     max: 784 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6399 Points (16%)
min: 4897     avg: 6107     median: 6245.5 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2626 Points (17%)
min: 1932     avg: 2452     median: 2477 (16%)     max: 2734 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
296 Points (82%)
min: 204     avg: 277.1     median: 294 (81%)     max: 305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.5 Points (41%)
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (85%)
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10817 Points (65%)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60850 Points (44%)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
506 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.1 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13090 Points (21%)
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
51720 MIPS (30%)
min: 48124     avg: 56861     median: 58647 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5695 MIPS (67%)
min: 5544     avg: 6017     median: 6045.5 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
155.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
319 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
18.5 fps (33%)
min: 16.2     avg: 20.2     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
358 Seconds (5%)
min: 281     avg: 335     median: 322 (4%)     max: 427 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
216 Seconds (2%)
min: 182     avg: 223.7     median: 200 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14676 Points (31%)
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.9 s (2%)
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.3 s (1%)
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
704 s (3%)
8.7 s (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
81609 Points (63%)
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19195 Points (47%)
min: 13154     avg: 19179     median: 19672 (48%)     max: 21820 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
104953 Points (85%)
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19866 Points (50%)
min: 16181     avg: 18316     median: 18475.5 (47%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
30932 Points (55%)
min: 21629     avg: 27408     median: 28243 (50%)     max: 30008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8886 Points (37%)
min: 8566     avg: 10023     median: 10182 (43%)     max: 11005 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2678     avg: 2724     median: 2724 (66%)     max: 2770 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2783     median: 2854 (69%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12099     avg: 12767     median: 12766.5 (50%)     max: 13434 Points
min: 10774     avg: 13005     median: 13350 (52%)     max: 14194 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1987 Points (75%)
min: 805     avg: 1888     median: 2065.5 (78%)     max: 2155 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
11570 Points (21%)
min: 6705     avg: 11120     median: 11341.5 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
458 ms (1%)
min: 431     avg: 485.2     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 693 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
116620 Points (85%)
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (84%)     max: 119825 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
294 Points (81%)
min: 193.1     avg: 251.1     median: 261 (72%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
309 Points (55%)
min: 256     avg: 301.7     median: 314 (56%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1754 Points (66%)
min: 1452     avg: 1759     median: 1757 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
60.6 Watt (10%)
min: 39.8     avg: 75.3     median: 68.1 (12%)     max: 106.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
69.5 Watt (13%)
min: 39.2     avg: 75.6     median: 67.5 (12%)     max: 115.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.4 Watt (3%)
min: 3.7     avg: 11.4     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.8 Watt (7%)
min: 5.05     avg: 7.2     median: 6.8 (8%)     max: 12.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
37.8 Points per Watt (28%)
min: 21     avg: 34.2     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 49.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 225H → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 292% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 17. 22:25:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18910 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760732706s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:21:56 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18910 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 18910 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.022s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.095s

#13 return log +0.004s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)