, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
MeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
2000 MHz2000 MHz
800667
4 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
34 34
291 291
65 65 1.0375V-1.300V
143 mm2143 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$234 U.S.$286 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 1971     avg: 2040     median: 2040 (18%)     max: 2109
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7300 +
min: 3600     avg: 3733     median: 3732.5 (6%)     max: 3865
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1194     avg: 1680     median: 1729 (10%)     max: 1764 Points
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (9%)     max: 1757 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 24.476 s
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 56     avg: 58.2     median: 59 (3%)     max: 59.686 s
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1433     avg: 1488     median: 1487.5 (7%)     max: 1542 s
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18090 MIPS (9%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12664 MFLOPS (10%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3396     avg: 4396     median: 4297.5 (27%)     max: 5250 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7300 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7300 +
3473 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 98% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 15:56:54

#0 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:08:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0s ... 0.002s

#7 got single benchmarks 324 +0.005s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 168 +0.035s ... 0.043s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.049s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)