Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarSchenker Vision 14 2023 review: Magnesium ultrabook with very long battery life
Schenker has upgraded its compact Vision 14 ultrabook with the latest Raptor-Lake processors from Intel and the optional GeForce RTX 3050 Refresh. Our review sample is the iGPU model with the Core i7-13700H, 32 GB RAM, a fast 1 TB SSD and a matte 14-inch IPS panel (16:10) with a resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 and a frequency of 90 Hz. The Vision 14 starts at EUR 1,549; our test configuration costs around EUR 1,680.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.9 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 90 % | 08/2023 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 987 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.5 % | 06/2023 | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89 % | 04/2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.2 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 85.6 % | 05/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Case & equipment
Nothing has changed about the Vision 14's case compared to last year and it still uses a magnesium alloy, either in silver or black. Apart from the color, there are no differences, but the black variant is much more susceptible to fingerprints. The stability of the base unit is very good, but the lid is very thin and it twists a little under torsional stress, which did not result in creaking noises or image errors. The weak point this year is once again the hinge, as the lid visibly teeters. The maximum opening angle is around 160 degrees.
The bottom cover is secured with five Phillips screws only and is easy to remove. The WLAN module, the two RAM modules and the M.2 2280 SSD are replaceable. However, due to the large 99 Wh battery, there is no longer a second M2 slot.
Unlike its predecessors, the Vision 14 is only available with the large 99 Wh battery; the slightly thinner (1 mm) and lighter (~1.1 kg) model with the 53 Wh battery is no longer offered and so the weight has increased to 1.27 kg (models with RTX GPU ~1.31). Nevertheless, the Vision 14 is still one of the lighter models. Only the LG Gram Style 14 is noticeably lighter at less than one kilogram, but some devices are heavier at 1.5-1.6 kg.
Depending on the choice of GPU, the Vision 14 comes with either a 130-watt or 150-watt power supply. The 150-watt charger is more modern and compact, but both weigh around 500 grams and use a proprietary charging port.
There is little to criticize in terms of ports because everything you needed for everyday life is available. Thanks to a Thunderbolt 4 port on the right side, you can also connect external graphics cards. In our iGPU variant, the left USB-C port does not support the Display Port ALT function; this only works in the Vision 14 with the Nvidia GPU. USB-C power supplies are supported (min. 65 watts, max. 100 watts).
The fully fledged SD card reader has become slower compared to last year's model and now appears to be connected via USB 2.0, since we determined transfer rates of just over 20 MB/s only. The WLAN module (Intel AX201) is also unchanged and offers solid performance. 6 GHz networks (Wi-Fi 6E) are not supported by the antenna configuration of the Vision 14, which is why no corresponding module is offered. The 1080p webcam serves its purpose.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Input devices - Backlit keyboard and glass touchpad
No changes in the input devices have taken place compared to last year's model. The backlit keyboard offers a comfortable typing feel and long texts pose no issue, but the keys feel slightly wobbly in our review sample. The large glass touchpad also works excellently; only the clicks are still somewhat too loud.
Display - IPS panel at 90 Hz
Again, we can be brief about the display because it is still the matte 3K IPS display (2,880 x 1,800) in a 16:10 format. The subjective picture quality is very good and bright surfaces are not grainy. Movements are smooth and there are no ghosting effects, even though the response times are not among the fastest. PWM flickering was not detected.
Schenker specifies a brightness of 380 cd/m², which was also confirmed in our tests. However, the values are slightly worse than those of the predecessor, which corresponds to the normal series dispersion. The black value is a decent 0.27 cd/m², resulting in a very good maximum contrast ratio of almost 1,500:1. We measured the panel using professional CalMAN software and the values are already very good in delivery state. There is no color cast and, with the exception of 100% red, colors also fall below the important DeltaE-2000 deviation of 3. We were able to improve the grayscale reproduction somewhat with our own calibration, but this is not really necessary. The panel fully covers the sRGB color space.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: 1489:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
75.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Samsung, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Samsung ATNA40CU02-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | 19% | -3% | 16% | 20% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 74.7 | 99.92 34% | 99 33% | 71.8 -4% | 98.7 32% | 99.7 33% | 74.1 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.2 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.4 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75.8 | 94.71 25% | 95 25% | 73.1 -4% | 87.6 16% | 95.7 26% | 75.3 -1% |
| Response Times | 91% | 91% | -51% | -1% | 99% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.2 ? | 2 ? 94% | 2 ? 94% | 43.2 ? -34% | 31.5 ? 2% | 0.5 ? 98% | 31.5 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15.4 ? | 2 ? 87% | 2 ? 87% | 25.9 ? -68% | 15.8 ? -3% | 0.1 ? 99% | 14.5 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 350 | 250 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 31% | 270% | -54% | 27% | 283% | -32% | |
| Brightness middle | 402 | 384 -4% | 372 -7% | 386 -4% | 441 10% | 409 2% | 421 5% |
| Brightness | 371 | 388 5% | 376 1% | 366 -1% | 453 22% | 410 11% | 416 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 97 13% | 98 14% | 91 6% | 92 7% | 99 15% | 89 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.054 80% | 0.01 96% | 0.26 4% | 0.34 -26% | 0.01 96% | 0.28 -4% |
| Contrast | 1489 | 7111 378% | 37200 2398% | 1485 0% | 1297 -13% | 40900 2647% | 1504 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.47 -37% | 2.01 -12% | 3.8 -111% | 0.6 67% | 2.36 -31% | 3.2 -78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 4.33 -20% | 4.05 -13% | 9.1 -153% | 1.3 64% | 4.07 -13% | 5.5 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.81 -87% | 2.17 -45% | 1.2 20% | 0.6 60% | 3.16 -111% | 2 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.63 -46% | 1.84 -2% | 6.2 -244% | 0.8 56% | 3.06 -70% | 4.4 -144% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.09 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6695 97% | 6279 104% | 6488 100% | 6618 98% | 6597 99% | 6882 94% | 6384 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
37% | 127% /
191% | -36% /
-42% | 14% /
21% | 134% /
200% | -10% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The matte display of the Vision 14 can also be used comfortably outdoors and there are no major problems in terms of viewing angle stability. The panel only brightens a little when viewed from above angles.
Performance - Raptor Lake-H45
The Vision 14 M23 is only available with the Raptor Lake Core i7-13700H. As previously mentioned, the GeForce RTX 3050 Refresh with 6 GB VRAM is optionally available (surcharge: EUR 275) and compared to last year's model, DDR5-4800 RAM is now used instead of DDR4-3200 RAM.
Testing conditions
Schenker offers two different performance profiles in the preinstalled Control Center: Silent and Performance. In Silent, the maximum TDP of the processor is reduced to 20 watts, while this is 45 -> 40 watts for Performance (as well as for both subprofiles Balanced and Enthusiast). This results in a reduction compared to the predecessor, where the processor was allowed to consume up to 60 watts for short bursts before leveling off at 40 watts. We chose the profile Enthusiast for the following benchmarks and measurements.
Processor - Core i7-13700H
The Core i7-13700H is the direct successor of last year's Core i7-12700H (Alder Lake) and the performance values are ultimately identical. In the current Vision 14 M23, however, the processor is only allowed to consume 45 watts for short periods of time instead of 60 watts as in last year's model, which is why multi-core performance is initially worse in the new model. Under sustained load, both operate at the specified 40 watts and are practically on par.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Although the Core i7-13700H is a 45-watt processor, it is rarely used as such and is able to consume more than 120 watts in extreme cases. One might therefore have the idea that a Raptor-Lake P processor (4 P cores) would have been the better choice, but this is not the case. This can be seen very clearly in a direct comparison with the Core i7-1360P in the Lenovo Yoga 9 14. Thanks to higher short-term consumption, the i7-1360P is initially faster, but at 38 watts it clearly falls behind the i7-13700H at 40 watts (~13%).
On battery power, the processor is allowed to consume a maximum of 40 watts (and it takes a few seconds until the consumption is actually at 40 watts), which is why multi-core performance is about 14% lower. More CPU benchmarks are available here.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=27) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 276, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (19552 - 52727, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
System Performance
Our subjective performance impression is very good and all inputs were implemented without delays in everyday use. No problems occured during testing either.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5531 - 6247, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9961 - 11401, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7072 - 7691, n=4) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6413 - 7727, n=4) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1548 - 1868, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1500 - 1787, n=4) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1620 - 2009, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1456 - 1715, n=4) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5687 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (40018 - 78081, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (44583 - 79656, n=27) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (42710 - 99898, n=27) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=27) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latency
In our standardized latency test (web browsing, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), our test device shows limitations under the current BIOS version when running real-time audio applications.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage devices
You can select different SSDs in the configurator and our test device contains the 1 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro, which is a fast PCIe 4.0 drive. The transfer rates were extremely high at up to 7 GB/s and remained stable, even under prolonged load, which is not a given. Further SSD benchmarks are listed in our tech section.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
Graphics output is still handled by Intel's integrated Iris Xe Graphics G7. Those who opt for the optional dedicated GeForce GPU will now get the refresh version of the GeForce RTX 3050 with 6 GB of RAM; last year's model was the RTX 3050 Ti with 4 GB of RAM. The performance of the two dGPUs should be roughly comparable, but thanks to additional VRAM, the new RTX 3050 Refresh has fewer restrictions in high details or high resolutions.
The performance of the Iris Xe Graphics G7 remains unchanged, unsurprisingly, and is of course sufficient for everyday activities such as high-resolution video playback, but those who want to do some gaming with the Vision 14 should definitely invest the extra EUR 275 for the dedicated GPU, otherwise you'll be limited to low/medium details, even with older titles. At least performance remains stable during prolonged gaming sessions.
On battery power, the GPU performance is about 10% lower. More benchmarks are available here.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7781 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5591 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2047 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (302 - 548, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (53 - 72, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91 - 115, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=94) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 122.2 | 109.9 | 25.6 | 10.6 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94 | 63 | 36 | 14.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 96 | 72.3 | 63.1 | 56.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44 | 26.1 | 18.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.8 | 39.4 | 35.5 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 55 | 30 | 28 | 26 | 18 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 84.9 | 41.9 | 33.6 | 27.7 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 101.5 | 52.1 | 40.4 | 28.9 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 45.7 | 41.3 | 30.4 | ||
| F1 23 (2023) | 42.4 | 37.7 | 26.6 |
Emissions & Energy
Noise
Unfortunately, the two fans fire up quite quickly in everyday use, which also applies to Silent mode. The volume isn't particularly high, but still a little annoying. Under load the fans can quickly spin up to 42-45 dB(A), which is quite high for a pure iGPU model that also uses liquid metal for better heat dissipation and not far from its predecessor with the RTX 3050 Ti, where we were recorded a maximum of just under 49 dB(A). In Silent mode, the two fans reach a maximum of 36.4 dB(A). No other electronic noises were detected.
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 30.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.5 / 44.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 0% | 7% | -4% | -5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 25 18% | 26.5 13% | 24.2 20% | 36.8 -21% | 32 -5% | 27.8 9% |
| Load Average * | 39.5 | 37 6% | 39.8 -1% | 36.2 8% | 43.7 -11% | 45.25 -15% | 43.3 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 37 11% | 42.7 -2% | 46.2 -11% | 48.2 -16% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 40.62 10% | 45.5 -1% | 36.2 19% | 46.2 -3% | 45.3 -1% | 48.8 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The surface temperatures of the Vision 14 never become critical. In normal use, the case always stays pleasantly cool and we only measured more than 40 °C in a few places during our stress test. The hottest spot is in the upper middle keyboard area, which is also noticeable when typing, but this does not throw up any limitations. Even under load, the laptop can be placed on the thighs without issue.
In stress testing with combined CPU/GPU load, the processor initially works at 45 watts and then levels off at 40 watts after a few minutes.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | -10% | 4% | -5% | -12% | -13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 45.8 | 36.3 21% | 38.9 15% | 39.2 14% | 41.6 9% | 43.9 4% | 48.4 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 36.8 12% | 43.4 -3% | 49.8 -19% | 55.7 -33% | 50.7 -21% | 57.1 -36% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.5 | 29.2 -6% | 33.5 -22% | 24.2 12% | 25.9 6% | 30.8 -12% | 28.1 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 27.4 -1% | 35.3 -30% | 25.1 7% | 28 -3% | 31.6 -17% | 29 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
We see a difference in the stereo speakers compared to last year's model: the overall quality has improved, even if the sound is still a bit thin. At least the Vision 14 is now on a comparable level with other rivals such as the Yoga Pro 7 14.
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
Schenker has been able to reduce the idle power consumption a little because the new model only needs a maximum of 8 instead of the predecessor's 11.4 watts. The slightly darker display certainly plays a role here, but that doesn't explain the large difference, which is why there must have been further optimizations. We measured a maximum of 76 watts under load, but this settles at around 68 watts after a few minutes. So the included 130-watt power supply is actually oversized and a more compact 90-watt model would have sufficed here.
| Off / Standby | 0.63 / 1.1 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 7.4 / 8 Watt |
| Load |
42.8 / 76 Watt |
   
| |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -17% | -16% | -87% | -8% | -66% | -13% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3.58 15% | 6 -43% | 4.1 2% | 7.6 -81% | 4.2 -0% | 7.5 -79% | 5.26 ? -25% | 4.9 ? -17% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.125 4% | 7 5% | 7.7 -4% | 13.3 -80% | 4.7 36% | 10.4 -41% | 8.46 ? -14% | 8.36 ? -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 12.1 -51% | 11.8 -48% | 7.9 1% | 13.7 -71% | 11.4 -43% | 11.4 -43% | 10.7 ? -34% | 10.4 ? -30% |
| Load Average * | 42.8 | 40.67 5% | 44 -3% | 66.2 -55% | 88.2 -106% | 61.5 -44% | 83.3 -95% | 44.8 ? -5% | 45.9 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.9 | 42.6 11% | 61.5 -28% | 94.2 -97% | 55.1 -15% | 92.7 -94% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 76 | 64.2 16% | 95 -25% | 84.3 -11% | 143 -88% | 64 16% | 110.3 -45% | 66.8 ? 12% | 66 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
Battery life
The battery life of the Vision 14 is extremely good and the optimizations compared to the predecessor are noticeable here as well. We recorded almost 14 hours with the large 99 Wh battery in our WLAN test at 150 cd/m² (corresponding to 37% of maximum brightness). This was still more than 10 hours at full screen brightness, which is a significant improvement and only the WQHD variant of Lenovo's Yoga Pro 7 14 can keep up here. A full charge takes 2 hours with the device turned on and 70% is available again after just under an hour.
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Vision 14 2023 convinces with a lot of stamina
The 2023 model of the Schenker Vision 14 feels very familiar. The compact Ultrabook has undergone a number of changes in recent years and there is now only the basic variant with a large 99 Wh battery, which is why the second M.2 slot from earlier models is no longer available. The weight is now just under 1.3 kg and has clearly moved away from the 1 kg model. The magnesium chassis (optionally in silver or black) is still impressive in terms of quality and the maintenance options are also very good. Only the somewhat wobbly hinge remains a weak point in the design.
The new Raptor Lake processor offers surprisingly slightly less performance than the old Alder Lake model, which is due to the reduced power limit under short-term load. For us, this drop is incomprehensible, but overall performance remains decent. A current AMD processor would naturally be the better choice in this performance class of around 40 watts and would also offer the faster iGPU, but is not available. The 90 Hz, 3K display is still good and has no issues in everyday life, but competing brands now offer a number of models with 120 Hz or P3 coverage, so Schenker needs to move up a level soon in order to remain competitive.
The Schenker Vision 14 M23 with the new Raptor Lake processor is only a minor upgrade if you choose the iGPU variant. However, it is still a good overall package with improved battery life and good maintenance options, but the somewhat restless fans during everyday tasks can be annoying.
A big advantage is certainly the enormous battery life, which is due not only to the 99 Wh battery but also to the optimized power consumption. Even at full screen brightness, our WLAN test runs for more than 10 hours and, at adjusted brightness, 13-14 hours is easily possible. Almost all competitors are clearly at a disadvantage here. The fact that the iGPU version also comes with a massive 130-watt power supply is unnecessary; a more compact 90-watt model would have sufficed.
However, the Vision 14 with a base price of EUR 1,549 is not a bargain and competing devices in this price range are many. The very good Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 with its AMD processor and 90 Hz display is already available for around EUR 1,100 (US$1050 via Lenovo US) and the variant with its Core i7, RTX 4050 and a 3K display with 120 Hz for around EUR 1,700, so clearly cheaper than the dGPU variant of the Vision 14.
Price and Availability
The starting configuration of the Schenker Vision 14 2023 is priced at EUR 1549. This is available to customers of Europe only; interested buyers should double check (via the "inc. tax and excl. shipping" link below the price) whether shipping to their country is possible and what charges this may incur.
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
-
10/13/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
More articles related to this device
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Vision 14 Series)Related Articles
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
