Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

The Ryzen 9 9950X is a very, very powerful desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 16 Zen 5 cores (32 threads), PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start in August.

The 9950X shares some of the specifications with the mighty Zen 4-powered Ryzen 9 7950X, including (but not limited to) the 16 MB L2 cache, the 64 MB L3 cache, the 5.7 GHz top clock speed and the 170 W long-term TDP.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9950X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9950X has an impressive 64 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5,600 MT/s (up to 8,000 MT/s if overclocked).

The 9950X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

According to early July leaks, its multi-thread performance is about as good as that of the 24-core Core i9-14900K Intel CPU. We'll definitely update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9950X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with TSMC's N4P process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 9's long-term TDP is 170 W. It'll probably consume up to 250 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. Unlike the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, the chip does not offer a 3D V-Cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming laptops.

Thanks to the high-clocked 16 Zen 5 cores, the performance of the CPU should be excellent and only be outperformed by the 9955HX3D thanks to the 3D V-Cache. Together with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at the top of the mobile CPUs.

The 9955HX is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and is therefore configurable from 55-75 watts TDP (default 55 watts). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (both compute dies, I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore have very good energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 9950XAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
CodenameGranite RidgeFire Range-HX (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X « 4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X compare3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D compare2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX compare3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock4300 - 5700 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1.3 MB
L2 Cache16 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP170 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm & 6 nm4 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 9 9950X
51.5 pt (86%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX
49.8 pt (83%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points (76%)
min: 125.3     avg: 128.9     median: 129.5 (73%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
2254 Points (42%)
min: 1775     avg: 1951     median: 1971.5 (37%)     max: 2069 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
40924 Points (38%)
min: 36078     avg: 37923     median: 37994 (35%)     max: 39690 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2202 Points (93%)
min: 1828     avg: 2119     median: 2175 (92%)     max: 2183 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
871 Points (95%)
min: 819     avg: 847     median: 852 (93%)     max: 854 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15788 Points (38%)
min: 14166     avg: 14803     median: 14761.5 (36%)     max: 15524 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6335 Points (40%)
min: 5639     avg: 5914     median: 5989.5 (38%)     max: 6103 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
344 Points (95%)
min: 320     avg: 334     median: 336.5 (93%)     max: 338 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.3 Points (94%)
min: 64.66     avg: 67.4     median: 67.4 (87%)     max: 69.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.03     avg: 4     median: 4 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
min: 3.72     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (94%)     max: 3.97 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9402 Points (57%)
min: 8710     avg: 9087     median: 9178.5 (55%)     max: 9279 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
71611 Points (52%)
min: 73626     avg: 76474     median: 76058 (55%)     max: 80152 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 14159     avg: 76087     median: 76087 (49%)     max: 138015 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17067     avg: 17205     median: 17205 (21%)     max: 17343 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
29.3 s (0%)
min: 32.998     avg: 90.4     median: 33.9 (0%)     max: 204.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
min: 2.195     avg: 3.3     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 5.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13778 Points (22%)
min: 9033     avg: 21586     median: 10079 (16%)     max: 45647 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
160423 MIPS (92%)
min: 132435     avg: 138666     median: 138664 (80%)     max: 144064 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7852 MIPS (93%)
min: 7061     avg: 7285     median: 7309.5 (86%)     max: 7462 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
271 fps (7%)
min: 233.5     avg: 234.8     median: 234.8 (6%)     max: 236 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
392 fps (10%)
min: 343.5     avg: 351.3     median: 351.3 (9%)     max: 359 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
45.1 fps (79%)
min: 38.9     avg: 41.3     median: 41.5 (73%)     max: 43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
3.4 GB/s (100%)
min: 3.1     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (91%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.6 GB/s (97%)
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
32.4 GB/s (84%)
min: 27.3     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (72%)     max: 27.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
118 Seconds (2%)
min: 122     avg: 130.7     median: 128.5 (2%)     max: 145 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
77 Seconds (1%)
min: 80     avg: 85.2     median: 85.5 (1%)     max: 91 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
min: 0.3517     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3665 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
21838 Points (46%)
min: 19498     avg: 19963     median: 19731 (42%)     max: 20890 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
min: 7.701     avg: 7.9     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 8.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
min: 16.472     avg: 16.8     median: 16.6 (1%)     max: 17.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
375.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 93819     avg: 98006     median: 98275.5 (75%)     max: 101654 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
38269 Points (94%)
min: 29429     avg: 31913     median: 32120 (79%)     max: 32984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 78557     avg: 82036     median: 83067 (67%)     max: 84483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78596     avg: 81706     median: 81638 (66%)     max: 84884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81426     avg: 82900     median: 81582 (66%)     max: 85692 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 23962     avg: 24593     median: 23963 (61%)     max: 25855 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
49522 Points (88%)
min: 37802     avg: 41850     median: 42890 (76%)     max: 44312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16112 Points (68%)
min: 9758     avg: 12521     median: 12927 (54%)     max: 13348 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3408 Points (85%)
min: 3156     avg: 3213     median: 3224.5 (81%)     max: 3253 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
21383 Points (83%)
min: 16313     avg: 18792     median: 19287.5 (75%)     max: 19587 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2559 Points (100%)
min: 2307     avg: 2373     median: 2375 (93%)     max: 2423 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
23982 Points (43%)
min: 20576     avg: 21882     median: 22041 (39%)     max: 22406 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2445 Points (11%)
min: 2233     avg: 2235     median: 2235 (10%)     max: 2237 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
23387 Points (74%)
min: 20686     avg: 21227     median: 21227 (67%)     max: 21768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
10016 Points (100%)
min: 9140     avg: 9238     median: 9237.5 (92%)     max: 9335 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100326 Points (100%)
min: 87050     avg: 88125     median: 88125 (88%)     max: 89200 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
377 ms (0%)
min: 397     avg: 409     median: 403.5 (0%)     max: 430 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
136623 Points (100%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
357 Points (98%)
min: 287     avg: 301.8     median: 298.8 (82%)     max: 322 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
409 Points (73%)
min: 315     avg: 337.5     median: 336.5 (60%)     max: 361 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2451 Points (92%)
min: 2176     avg: 2214     median: 2220.5 (83%)     max: 2259 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
319 Watt (55%)
min: 122.3     avg: 169.1     median: 162.5 (28%)     max: 229 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
313 Watt (57%)
min: 143.7     avg: 179.6     median: 176.8 (32%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100 Watt (66%)
min: 19.3     avg: 27.4     median: 27.3 (18%)     max: 35.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 13.6     avg: 18.2     median: 15.7 (17%)     max: 25.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
20.2 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 32.6     avg: 35     median: 32.8 (24%)     max: 39.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9950X → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX → 91% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 03:59:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17637 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18731 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757210358s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Sep 2025 05:17:50 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17637 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 17637 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18731 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 18731 +0.01s ... 0.028s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.076s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)