Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core i5-10200H

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core i5-10200H
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Comet Lake-H
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1 MB
L3 Cache96 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP120 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm
Voltage1.1 - 1.2 V
Die Size193 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C100 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)BGA1440
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2DDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
28.3 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17197     median: 16817 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1646     avg: 1726     median: 1713 (72%)     max: 1820 Points
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (75%)     max: 709 Points
419 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (78%)     max: 291 Points
171.6 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (92%)     max: 8235 MIPS
4497 MIPS (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (81%)     max: 35127 Points
6233 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31455     median: 30687 (55%)     max: 33345 Points
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10908     avg: 12327     median: 11975 (50%)     max: 14098 Points
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2634 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
14288 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (73%)     max: 2027 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (42%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
882 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
187.3 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (83%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 43% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 08:39:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759214399s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.005s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.055s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)