Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U vs Intel Processor N200

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. Compared to the similar R7 6800H, the 6800U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800U in our database easily shoulders its way towards the best of the best, trading blows with the Core i7-1270P, the Core i7-11850H and the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Throw everything you can at this little guy. He'll take it all and ask for more.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of more than 20 W, the Mercury EM680 is among the fastest systems built around the 6800U that we know of. It can be at least 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must.

The R7 6800U is manufactured on the 6 nm TSMC process for higher-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 6800UIntel Processor N200
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-N
CodenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U « 2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U compare2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2700 - 4700 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800U
39.1 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
79 Points (55%)
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
496 Points (9%)
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9130     avg: 10653     median: 10546 (10%)     max: 11741 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 878     avg: 1418     median: 1506 (64%)     max: 1534 Points
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 341     avg: 553     median: 585.5 (65%)     max: 602 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3529     avg: 4122     median: 4083.5 (10%)     max: 4574 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1463     avg: 1766     median: 1776 (11%)     max: 1978.53 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 142.6     avg: 225.4     median: 242 (73%)     max: 246 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.1 Points (27%)
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.9 Points (72%)
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6450 Points (39%)
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
35314 Points (26%)
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60447 Points (42%)
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12163 Points (15%)
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
113.5 s (1%)
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.5 s (1%)
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4639 Points (7%)
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 40058     avg: 49128     median: 50614 (29%)     max: 53934 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3398     avg: 5120     median: 5452.5 (65%)     max: 5511 MIPS
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.1 fps (35%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
219.5 fps (51%)
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.8     avg: 13.1     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 14.2 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 474     avg: 516     median: 504 (6%)     max: 572 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 272     avg: 302.5     median: 304 (2%)     max: 347 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.508     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.529 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9102     avg: 9965     median: 9964.5 (21%)     max: 10827 Points
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.9 s (2%)
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.3 s (1%)
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
692 s (3%)
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 52884     avg: 55833     median: 55833 (49%)     max: 58782 Points
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12198     avg: 14018     median: 14280 (39%)     max: 15136 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51726     avg: 54789     median: 54788.5 (45%)     max: 57851 Points
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51601     avg: 54760     median: 54760 (44%)     max: 57919 Points
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 58776     avg: 63558     median: 63558 (54%)     max: 68340 Points
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12402     avg: 13741     median: 13574 (34%)     max: 15247 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15312     avg: 18647     median: 18882 (34%)     max: 21992 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6355     avg: 7107     median: 7103.5 (30%)     max: 7731 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2028 Points (55%)
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
8771 Points (35%)
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 926     avg: 1431     median: 1514 (64%)     max: 1555 Points
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6854     avg: 7729     median: 7678 (14%)     max: 8935 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1306     avg: 1433     median: 1462.5 (6%)     max: 1500 Points
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7024     avg: 7646     median: 7767 (24%)     max: 8026 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5657     avg: 6065     median: 6261 (63%)     max: 6278 Points
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27734     avg: 30075     median: 30925 (34%)     max: 31566 Points
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 594     avg: 690     median: 634.5 (1%)     max: 1016 ms
1460 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43921     avg: 62717     median: 69752 (63%)     max: 74479 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 133.2     avg: 198.2     median: 213 (61%)     max: 221 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 181.3     avg: 254.9     median: 270 (56%)     max: 295 Points
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1009     avg: 1436     median: 1481 (57%)     max: 1575 Points
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 47.2     median: 48 (8%)     max: 55.6 Watt
106%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 50     median: 47 (9%)     max: 58 Watt
107%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 6.8     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 8.73 Watt
101%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.59     avg: 8.9     median: 8.8 (10%)     max: 9.41 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 34.1     avg: 36.2     median: 34.2 (25%)     max: 40.2 Points per Watt
47%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800U → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 45% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 20:54:23

#0 checking url part for id 14088 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14088 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#7 got single benchmarks 14088 +0.023s ... 0.07s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.017s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.011s ... 0.098s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.396s ... 0.494s

#12 return log +0.053s ... 0.547s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)