Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U vs Intel Core i7-1265U

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5825U

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the "Barcelo" refresh in early 2022 and offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores compared to the old Ryzen 7 5800U. The R7 5825U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series processor at launch. They are clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average 5825U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 7735U and the Core i7-1270P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is a really good result, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 37 W, the 2022 Envy x360 15 is among the fastest laptops built around the 5825U that we know of. It can be more than 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor (most chips are configured higher than 15 Watt). That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

Intel Core i7-1265U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1265U

The Intel Core i7-1265U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.8 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.3 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The 1265U offers "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the 10 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older quad-core Tiger Lake CPUs with 15 Watt (like the Intel Core i7-1160G7). The sustained performance will be limited by the TDP setting and thermals and therefore only short term loads. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the big Golden Cove cores, the single thread performance should be better than similar clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5825UIntel Core i7-1265U
CodenameBarcelo-U (Zen 3)Alder Lake-U
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Alder Lake-M
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7430U compare2.3 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U compare2.3 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U compare2.7 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz1300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB928 KB
L2 Cache4 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1610 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5825U
34.5 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1265U
34.9 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
86 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9339     avg: 10179     median: 10152 (9%)     max: 10904 Points
min: 4332     avg: 7486     median: 8225 (8%)     max: 9219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1433     avg: 1448     median: 1452 (61%)     max: 1460 Points
min: 1144     avg: 1595     median: 1679.5 (71%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 547     avg: 559     median: 565 (62%)     max: 567 Points
min: 528     avg: 619     median: 642 (70%)     max: 701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3645     avg: 3954     median: 3973 (10%)     max: 4180 Points
min: 1669     avg: 2884     median: 3214.5 (8%)     max: 3584 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1575     avg: 1736     median: 1757 (11%)     max: 1860 Points
min: 706     avg: 1244     median: 1344.5 (8%)     max: 1572 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 228     avg: 231.6     median: 232 (64%)     max: 235 Points
min: 165.3     avg: 229.7     median: 240 (66%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 18.56     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (25%)     max: 19.72 Points
16.5 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.75     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (66%)     max: 2.78 Points
3 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6200     avg: 6252     median: 6252 (38%)     max: 6304 Points
8549 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 32641     avg: 32965     median: 32964.5 (24%)     max: 33288 Points
38152 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 59300     avg: 59732     median: 59731.5 (38%)     max: 60163 Points
60266 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11823     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (14%)     max: 11845 Points
13904 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 116.561     avg: 228.7     median: 228.7 (3%)     max: 340.8 s
217.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.018     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 9.2 s
5.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5835     avg: 6637     median: 6637 (11%)     max: 7439 Points
5960 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 42883     avg: 47619     median: 48177 (28%)     max: 50524 MIPS
min: 20087     avg: 32344     median: 34399 (20%)     max: 38715 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5208     avg: 5386     median: 5427 (64%)     max: 5468 MIPS
min: 4614     avg: 5198     median: 5285.5 (62%)     max: 5617 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 98.05     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (3%)     max: 100.3 fps
81 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 249.6     avg: 250.6     median: 250.6 (6%)     max: 251.5 fps
265.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.1     avg: 12.4     median: 12.6 (22%)     max: 13.4 fps
min: 5.09     avg: 8.6     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
0.9 GB/s (27%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (25%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.7     avg: 9.9     median: 9.9 (26%)     max: 11 GB/s
9.7 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 486     avg: 539     median: 555 (7%)     max: 567 Seconds
min: 684     avg: 887     median: 834 (11%)     max: 1326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 301     median: 297 (2%)     max: 322 Seconds
min: 364     avg: 465.9     median: 423.5 (3%)     max: 684 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.536 sec
min: 0.4666     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.578 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11292     avg: 11671     median: 11670.5 (25%)     max: 12049 Points
min: 7351     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (20%)     max: 11516 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (2%)     max: 7.912 s
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (1%)     max: 17.124 s
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
429.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57609 Points (44%)
min: 26635     avg: 35503     median: 35502.5 (27%)     max: 44370 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10473     avg: 12841     median: 12620 (31%)     max: 15153 Points
min: 7560     avg: 11888     median: 11716 (29%)     max: 16290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74842 Points (61%)
63003 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
74397 Points (60%)
63619 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
84711 Points (68%)
67580 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13778     avg: 14930     median: 14798 (37%)     max: 16247 Points
min: 5667     avg: 9450     median: 10255 (26%)     max: 12375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19642     avg: 20827     median: 20481 (37%)     max: 22730 Points
min: 8745     avg: 14302     median: 14659 (26%)     max: 18414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5841     avg: 6534     median: 6520 (27%)     max: 7124 Points
min: 3482     avg: 5221     median: 5352.5 (23%)     max: 6837 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1988 Points (50%)
2376 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
8644 Points (34%)
7304 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1847 Points (59%)
1789 Points (57%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
6556 Points (27%)
7851 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1438     avg: 1481     median: 1482 (58%)     max: 1520 Points
min: 1429     avg: 1697     median: 1739.5 (68%)     max: 1806 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5827     avg: 7077     median: 7074.5 (13%)     max: 8330 Points
min: 5022     avg: 7709     median: 8127 (15%)     max: 8981 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1447     avg: 1451     median: 1451 (6%)     max: 1455 Points
min: 1489     avg: 1648     median: 1678 (7%)     max: 1700 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7235     avg: 7750     median: 7749.5 (24%)     max: 8264 Points
min: 6992     avg: 8211     median: 8305.5 (26%)     max: 8917 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6279 Points (63%)
7515 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33719 Points (33%)
33057 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 619     avg: 628     median: 623 (1%)     max: 645 ms
min: 542     avg: 572     median: 553 (1%)     max: 636 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
70779 Points (52%)
min: 68050     avg: 75259     median: 73251 (54%)     max: 84477 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 207     avg: 217.8     median: 213 (59%)     max: 242 Points
min: 198.4     avg: 233.9     median: 242.5 (67%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 239     avg: 260.2     median: 264 (47%)     max: 275 Points
min: 221     avg: 268.4     median: 279.5 (50%)     max: 288 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1124     avg: 1293     median: 1324 (50%)     max: 1387 Points
min: 1301     avg: 1540     median: 1593.5 (60%)     max: 1623 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.6     avg: 44.5     median: 42.6 (7%)     max: 54.3 Watt
min: 20.8     avg: 41.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 63 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.3     avg: 47.1     median: 48.5 (9%)     max: 54 Watt
min: 25.2     avg: 48.6     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 72.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.81     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 8.73 Watt
min: 3.54     avg: 6.8     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.11     avg: 5.1     median: 4.8 (6%)     max: 6.3 Watt
min: 3.67     avg: 5     median: 4.6 (6%)     max: 6.61 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 33.6     avg: 35.5     median: 34.4 (26%)     max: 38.6 Points per Watt
min: 18.3     avg: 25.8     median: 26.1 (19%)     max: 30.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5825U → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1265U → 97% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 25. 15:12:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14092 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14072 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758805979s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14092 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14092 +0.01s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14072 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 14072 +0.013s ... 0.038s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.093s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)