Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Intel Core i9-10885H

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600HS

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600HS integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 5 4600H, the 4600HS is the power efficient version with a TDP of 35 Watt (10 Watt less).

Due to the two deactivated cores and the slower Turbo clock speed, the Ryzen 5 4600HS should be significantly slower than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The old top model Ryzen 7 3750H is still clearly slower due to the four Zen+ cores. Compared to the competition, the Intel Core i7-8850H (6-core Coffee Lake 2.6 - 4.3 GHz) should offer a similar performance.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics card with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). Although the TDP is 10 Watt lower than the Ryzen 5 4600H, the chip is still intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. 

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 4600HSIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir-HS (Zen 2)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS compare2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4000 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FCBGA1440
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$556 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6420 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
217.8 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.9 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
31296 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
30997 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1100 Points (46%)
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6345 Points (11%)
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4630 Points (46%)
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20170 Points (22%)
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 124% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 31. 05:54:35

#0 checking url part for id 11691 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:40:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11691 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 11691 +0.009s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.028s ... 0.087s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.179s ... 0.267s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.301s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)