Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3450U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1115G4 and also the Ryzen 3 4300U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a better-than-expected result for an aging lower mid-range chip that is the 3450U, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. These values are fairly high, making active cooling solutions something of a necessity.

The CPU is built with a somewhat old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3450UAMD Ryzen 7 4800U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz1800 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 16
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5FP6
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
25.1 pt (35%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (3%)     max: 3195 Points
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (37%)     max: 892 Points
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (36%)     max: 351 Points
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (3%)     max: 1247 Points
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (4%)     max: 603 Points
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (41%)     max: 138 Points
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (9%)     max: 16305 MIPS
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.43 fps
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (17%)     max: 6568 Points
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58600 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58705 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27926 Points (24%)
67233 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (16%)     max: 9587 Points
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (9%)     max: 2567 Points
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (35%)     max: 866 Points
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (5%)     max: 3123 Points
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
853 Points (4%)
1162 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2630 Points (8%)
7298 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3486 Points (35%)
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10200 Points (11%)
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36619 Points (33%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (30%)     max: 146 Points
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (28%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37.3 Watt (6%)
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
36.2 Watt (7%)
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.6 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 197% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 01:19:33

#0 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.021s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.013s ... 0.058s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.021s ... 0.079s

#9 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.017s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.336s ... 0.432s

#12 return log +0.063s ... 0.495s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)