Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Athlon Silver 3050e

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

AMD Athlon Silver 3050e

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050e

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.4 to 2.8 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 1000 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The dual channel memory controller supports only DDR4-2400. The chip is manufactured on a 14 nm node and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The average 3050e in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N4120, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, a slight amount of the AMD Zen magic has not helped this chip much. Its performance can be described as fairly slow, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Much like Intel's N-class Celeron and Pentium processors, the AMD 3050e has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

This APU is built with a 14 nm process making for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Athlon Silver 3050e
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Dali (Zen)
Clock3400 - 3900 MHz1400 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache3 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 122 / 4
TDP65 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4940 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e « 1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3020e compare1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
L1 Cache192 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600
29.7 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Athlon 3050e
19.5 pt (27%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 991     avg: 1175     median: 1174.5 (1%)     max: 1358 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 567     avg: 576     median: 576 (25%)     max: 585 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
380 Points (42%)
min: 220     avg: 224.5     median: 224.5 (25%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2793 Points (7%)
min: 386     avg: 419.5     median: 419.5 (1%)     max: 453 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1245     avg: 1254     median: 1248 (8%)     max: 1270 Points
min: 217     avg: 226.5     median: 226.5 (1%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 155.9     avg: 157.4     median: 157.3 (47%)     max: 159 Points
102 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.7 Points (18%)
2.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
1.2 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4726 Points (29%)
3339 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28173 Points (20%)
6780 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
45033 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8024 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
140.9 s (2%)
595 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.5 s (1%)
19 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4517 Points (7%)
1403 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
30898 MIPS (18%)
min: 6540     avg: 6642     median: 6641.5 (4%)     max: 6743 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4020 MIPS (48%)
min: 2223     avg: 2525     median: 2524.5 (30%)     max: 2826 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
75 fps (26%)
13.8 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
205.3 fps (47%)
70.1 fps (16%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.79     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 7.82 fps
min: 1.09     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.44 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.5 GB/s (20%)
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 374.2     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 375.7 Seconds
min: 2159     avg: 2299     median: 2298.5 (16%)     max: 2438 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 1.152     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.215 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R5 2600 +
9290 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.2 s (2%)
41.6 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
24.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
615 s (3%)
1302 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R5 2600 +
43794 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12405 Points (34%)
2724 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
69692 Points (57%)
33061 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
69478 Points (56%)
33195 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
70522 Points (59%)
38969 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11219 Points (28%)
min: 2687     avg: 2722     median: 2722 (7%)     max: 2757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17063 Points (30%)
min: 3986     avg: 4063     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 4140 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6265 Points (26%)
1061 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1014     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 538     avg: 595     median: 594.5 (25%)     max: 651 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5767     avg: 6070     median: 6069.5 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
min: 1133     avg: 1172     median: 1172 (2%)     max: 1211 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1020 Points (4%)
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5885 Points (19%)
1224 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4631     avg: 5109     median: 5109 (51%)     max: 5587 Points
2948 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20633     avg: 23018     median: 23018 (26%)     max: 25403 Points
5000 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
951 ms (1%)
min: 1606     avg: 1711     median: 1710.5 (2%)     max: 1815 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
454.6 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22479 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
179 Points (37%)
min: 90.2     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (21%)     max: 107 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
157.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
149.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8.5 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050e → 47% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 07. 00:59:54

#0 checking url part for id 10032 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12722 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10032 +0.016s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 10032 +0.011s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12722 +0.015s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 12722 +0.01s ... 0.068s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.279s ... 0.347s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.371s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)