Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N150 vs Intel Celeron N4500

Intel Processor N150

► remove from comparison Intel Processor N150

The Intel Processor N150 is the slowest mobile processor of the Twin Lake family. Twin Lake is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The N150 is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 4 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.6 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N250, the N150 has a significantly slower iGPU and slightly lower CPU clock speeds.

Gracemont E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be about as good as older dual-core CPUs like the Core i3-10110U. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, this is a pretty slow chip that is only just fast enough for basic tasks.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 24 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.0 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for very old games and low resolutions such as XGA 1024 x 768.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The N150 is supposed to consume 6 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 15 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Processor N150Intel Celeron N4500
CodenameTwin LakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 compare - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
2 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1264BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Processor N150
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 53     avg: 58.9     median: 60.7 (30%)     max: 61.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 130     avg: 162.9     median: 167.2 (3%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2016     avg: 2494     median: 2590.5 (2%)     max: 2777 Points
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 828     avg: 912     median: 935 (38%)     max: 949 Points
452 Points (18%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 313     avg: 347     median: 356.5 (39%)     max: 362 Points
188 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 768     avg: 953     median: 992 (2%)     max: 1059 Points
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 403.3     median: 422.5 (3%)     max: 455 Points
171 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 149.2     median: 153.2 (42%)     max: 156.4 Points
82 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.31     avg: 5     median: 5 (6%)     max: 5.68 Points
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4743     avg: 5016     median: 5015.5 (30%)     max: 5288 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11375     avg: 13159     median: 13159 (10%)     max: 14943 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 17063     avg: 19392     median: 19391.5 (12%)     max: 21720 Points
6954 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7251     avg: 7700     median: 7699.5 (9%)     max: 8148 Points
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 527.99     avg: 775     median: 774.8 (9%)     max: 1021.52 s
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.776     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 30.658 s
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1901     avg: 1930     median: 1929.5 (3%)     max: 1958 Points
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 9639     avg: 11373     median: 11746 (7%)     max: 12362 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3590     avg: 3792     median: 3835 (45%)     max: 3906 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.35     avg: 28.4     median: 28.4 (1%)     max: 32.4 fps
12 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 119.8     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (4%)     max: 159.9 fps
60.6 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.43     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.26 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.217     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.256 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (8%)     max: 0.526 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (6%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 2085     avg: 2337     median: 2277 (29%)     max: 2707 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1063     avg: 1191     median: 1163.5 (8%)     max: 1374 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.957 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5709 Points (12%)
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.09     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (4%)     max: 19.293 s
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39.184     avg: 40     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.809 s
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4416     avg: 5194     median: 5274 (13%)     max: 5810 Points
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 37351     avg: 42422     median: 42421.5 (34%)     max: 47492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 36745     avg: 42156     median: 42156 (34%)     max: 47567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 43172     avg: 47134     median: 47134 (38%)     max: 51096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3612     avg: 4035     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4476 Points
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5201     avg: 5826     median: 5889.5 (11%)     max: 6324 Points
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1704     avg: 1979     median: 1977.5 (8%)     max: 2256 Points
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1129     avg: 1218     median: 1243 (29%)     max: 1255 Points
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 2369     avg: 2849     median: 2967.5 (12%)     max: 3093 Points
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 924     avg: 977     median: 981.5 (33%)     max: 1020 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (20%)     max: 598 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2072     avg: 2463     median: 2556.5 (5%)     max: 2667 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 907     avg: 941     median: 940.5 (4%)     max: 974 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2079     avg: 2309     median: 2308.5 (7%)     max: 2538 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4336     avg: 4432     median: 4431.5 (44%)     max: 4527 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8942     avg: 9608     median: 9608 (9%)     max: 10274 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1044     avg: 1098     median: 1080.5 (1%)     max: 1186 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (16%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 118.3     avg: 126.6     median: 126.3 (33%)     max: 135.3 Points
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (26%)     max: 108 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145.3     avg: 164.6     median: 169.3 (30%)     max: 174.3 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (27%)     max: 7878 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 683     avg: 716     median: 712.5 (27%)     max: 756 Points
381 Points (14%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 25.2 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.1     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 24.1 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.51     avg: 10.2     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 14.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (3%)     max: 5.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 20 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N150 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 47% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 27. 14:40:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18713 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766842844s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:19:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18713 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 18713 +0.008s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.009s ... 0.03s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.079s

#13 return log +0.007s ... 0.086s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)