Notebookcheck Logo
OnePlus 15T in review

OnePlus 15T Review: Incredible battery life makes the compact smartphone competition pale in comparison

Cannot deny its origins.

The handier and cheaper alternative to the OnePlus 15 comes with the best hardware and an XXL battery — more than 2x as large than that of the Apple iPhone 17. In this review, we see whether the OnePlus 15T is worth buying or whether it makes sense to opt for the flagship OnePlus 15 instead.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Android 5G Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen Smartphone

Verdict on the OnePlus 15T

The OnePlus 15T smartphone looks stylish, feels high-quality, and leaves a strong impression in everyday use. Thanks to a great ultrasonic sensor, a high-end chipset that is beyond reproach and a really beautiful OLED panel, the mini flagship from OnePlus makes the hearts of fans of compact smartphones beat faster. 

The battery run times are also phenomenally good for this handy form factor.

Are there possible deal breakers with the OnePlus 15T? Unfortunately, yes. Due to lack of availability outside of China, certain limitations have to be accepted with the software — such as eSIM or WearOS support — although ColorOS with its multi-language package and Google integration is also quite easy to use in Europe unlike Xiaomi phones from the Far East. 

The OnePlus phone cannot deny its origins when it comes to cellular frequency support either.

However, the disadvantages of importing the OnePlus 15T are sweetened by the low price. For less than €600, the overall package is really good for the compact class and therefore an interesting alternative to a Galaxy S26 or Pixel 10 Pro.

Pros

+ bright OLED panel with 165 Hz
+ powerful chipset
+ super long runtimes
+ high-quality casing with IP69 rating

Cons

- pronounced SoC throttling
- Speakers without depth
- Question mark for updates
- Restriction in availability

Price and availability of the OnePlus 15T

The OnePlus 15T has so far been launched exclusively for the Chinese market at an RRP of ¥4,300 or around €550. As an import from Trading Shenzhen, prices start at around €570. A global launch currently seems unlikely.

Amazon Logo
  • $637.23
    OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Mint Breeze
  • $660.29
    OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 512GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Charcoal Black
  • $859.99
    OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh Battery, Infinite Black

Specifications of the OnePlus 15T

OnePlus 15T (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X Ultra Pro
Display
6.32 inch 19.5:9, 2640 x 1216 pixel 460 PPI, capacitrive Touchscreen, OLED, Crystal Shield Glass, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 455 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G GSM: 850/900/1800 MHz 3G WCDMA: Frequenzbänder 1/2/4/5/8 4G LTE FDD: Bänder 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/26/28/66 4G LTE TDD: Frequenzbänder 34/38/39/40/41/42/43/48 5G NR: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n18/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n48/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 150.6 x 71.8 ( = 0.33 x 5.93 x 2.83 in)
Battery
7500 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.8, 85 mm, tele, 3.5x optical zoom, OIS)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 23 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, info material, case, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5), Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid,, fanless, waterproof
Released
03/24/2026
Weight
194 g ( = 6.84 oz / 0.43 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build and features: Handy Android phone with IP69 and thin edges

Color selection of the OnePlus 15T
ⓘ OnePlus
Color selection of the OnePlus 15T

OnePlus relies on the same design as the flagship 15 for its 15T model. Thanks to the metal frame and glass back, the housing, which is water-resistant to IP69, feels premium in the hands.

The dimensions and weight are similar to an Apple iPhone 17, but the OnePlus 15T sports more than twice the battery capacity. It is all the more impressive that OnePlus has managed to make the display edges super-thin, with a screen-to-body ratio of nearly 91%.

In contrast to the OnePlus 15, the T model only has one USB 2.0 port. Otherwise, the compact Android phone is very well equipped with NFC, infrared port, and dual-band GNSS as well as UFS 4.1 flash and LPDDR5X Ultra RAM.

OnePlus 15T smartphone
OnePlus 15T smartphone
OnePlus 15T smartphone
OnePlus 15T smartphone

Size comparison

151.1 mm / 5.95 in 71.8 mm / 2.83 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 191 g0.4211 lbs150.6 mm / 5.93 in 71.8 mm / 2.83 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 194 g0.4277 lbs150.57 mm / 5.93 in 71.92 mm / 2.83 in 7.95 mm / 0.313 in 190 g0.4189 lbs150.5 mm / 5.93 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 155 g0.3417 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation: OnePlus 15T with Wi-Fi 7 and ultrasonic fingerprint sensor

In addition to Bluetooth 6.0, the OnePlus 15T also supports the modern Wi-Fi 7 standard. Transmission speeds including in the 6 GHz channel are high, but the consistency is only average.

The compact Android phone shows weaknesses for use in Europe when it comes to LTE frequencies. Neither band 20 nor band 32 can be used with the OnePlus 15T. 

In the 5G network, however, there are no restrictions for German-speaking countries.

When it comes to operation, the strengths of the little brother of the OnePlus 15 come to the fore. The touchscreen feels very responsive and fast.

Thanks to an ultrasonic finger pressure sensor, the compact OnePlus phone unlocks very quickly and reliably. The vibration motor (X-axis) also provides high-quality haptic feedback.

Networking
OnePlus 15T
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7
1951 (min: 1727) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7
1354 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼91%
Vivo X300
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1843 (min: 1759) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1802 (min: 1718) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 17
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1086 (min: 1009) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1262 (min: 1051) MBit/s ∼70%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
760 (min: 648) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1025) MBit/s ∼87%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7
1746 (min: 1411) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7
1488 (min: 1354) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7
1587 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7
1455 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼98%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850190019502000Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø760 (648-907)
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1569 (1025-1737)
OnePlus 15T 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1353 (960-1511)
OnePlus 15T 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1951 (1727-2032)

Software and sustainability: OnePlus gives Android 16 for its top-of-the-range phone

ColorOS comes pre-installed on the OnePlus 15T instead of the global OxygenOS. However, the differences are rather minor overall. German language and Android Auto are supported, but WearOS watches or eSIMs are not supported.

There are question marks over the duration of the updates provided. The manufacturer does not usually provide any information on this for China. Typically, a OnePlus 15 should receive security updates for six years.

As the OnePlus 15T is not officially coming to Europe, repairability is significantly limited and, as is usual for Chinese devices, we cannot find out any information on the CO2 footprint or details of the recycled materials contained.

Homescreen
Homescreen
Quick controls
Quick controls
Settings page
Settings page

Cameras: OnePlus 15T offers telephoto and OIS

Selfie with the OnePlus 15T front camera
Selfie with the OnePlus 15T front camera

The compactness and price range of the OnePlus 15T have the most negative impact on the camera system. The cooperation with Hasselblad is now Oppo-exclusive and OnePlus' built-in image sensors are quite small and therefore not very bright.

The 50 MP main camera only comes with a 1/1.56-inch sensor, although good photos are possible in daylight as well as in the dark but top quality looks different. It lacks sharpness and dynamics. As our comparison photos show, the compact smartphone from OnePlus is still a class above the handy iPhone 17 from Apple.

The OnePlus 15T does not have an ultra-wide-angle camera, but it can zoom 3.5x optically thanks to the 50 MP telephoto lens. 

Since the main camera takes relatively wide-angle photos at 24 mm, the addition of a telephoto lens with OIS makes much more sense in our opinion.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Low light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15T: 7.89 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 12.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15T: 9.32 ∆E min: 3.13 - max: 14.24 ∆E

Display: OnePlus 15T with a 165 Hz OLED panel

The 6.32-inch 165 Hz AMOLED panel achieves a very good pixel density of 460 ppi with a resolution of 1,216 pixels. We achieved the advertised maximum brightness of 1,800 nits fairly accurately in our APL18 measurement. 

However, the measured values for the HDR peak brightness (3,600 nits) are a good deal lower, but 3,125 cd/m² is also easily sufficient for good HDR effects.

OnePlus advertises an extremely high-frequency PWM dimming (3,840 Hz) below 70 cd/m² to control the brightness. 

At higher brightness levels, the 15T switches to a DC-like dimming mode. We measured a base frequency of only 120 Hz and an amplitude of 18 percent — neither of which are optimal values for PWM-sensitive people, despite the high-frequency dimming modes.

1109
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
1097
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
1119
cd/m²
1108
cd/m²
1103
cd/m²
1078
cd/m²
1085
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1119 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1101.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1119 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.22 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
CCT: 7147 K
OnePlus 15T
OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Vivo X300
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Xiaomi 17
LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3"
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Screen
33%
12%
35%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1119
1537
37%
1030
-8%
1324
18%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1101
1523
38%
1021
-7%
1311
19%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
96
0%
98
2%
98
2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.22
1.4
37%
1.44
35%
0.93
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.18
2.6
50%
3.68
29%
2.07
60%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
2.1
34%
2.5
22%
1.5
53%
Gamma
2.243 98%
2.28 96%
2.274 97%
2.224 99%
CCT
7147 91%
6754 96%
6868 95%
6383 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2386 cd/m² +37%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1745 cd/m²
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1654 cd/m² -5%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4072 cd/m² +30%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3254 cd/m² +4%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3125 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.7 Hz
Amplitude: 18 %

The display backlight flickers at 120.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

Grayscale (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)
Color Gamut (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)
Color Gamut (Color mode: Natural, Target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.1 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

Performance, emissions, and battery life: Compact Android smartphone with large battery and high-end SoC

There is no need to compromise on the chipset with the compact Android phone. The OnePlus 15T uses a powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 that, thanks to its Adreno 840, achieves very high scores not only in the CPU benchmarks but also in the graphics benchmarks.

In the 3DMark stress tests, however, the OnePlus 15T shows a sharp drop in performance of over 50%, which significantly lowers our rating.

OnePlus relies on a silicon-carbon-based battery with a large capacity of 7,500 mAh for its mini flagship smartphones. The energy storage can be charged with a maximum of 100 W or 50 W wirelessly. In our practical battery test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m², the OnePlus 15T achieved an excellent battery life of nearly 1.5 days.

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3662 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3462 - 3831, n=18)
3651 Points +1%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3621 Points
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
3397 Points -6%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3397 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=199, last 2 years)
1848 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9979 - 12383, n=18)
11083 Points +1%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10976 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
10842 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10166 Points -7%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
9998 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11811, n=199, last 2 years)
5492 Points -50%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
29901 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30892, n=17)
28494 Points -5%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
26989 Points -10%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
26476 Points -11%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
25598 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30892, n=181, last 2 years)
12345 Points -59%
Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
7621 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=18)
7343 Points +7%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
7089 Points +3%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
6856 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
6311 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8263, n=182, last 2 years)
3244 Points -53%
Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
14986 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9692 - 14403, n=15)
12918 Points +4%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12398 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
12146 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (703 - 14986, n=82, last 2 years)
9887 Points -20%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3271 Points +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
3145 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2566 - 3198, n=13)
2890 Points +5%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2756 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2566 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (132 - 3271, n=146, last 2 years)
1458 Points -47%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps +100%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
120 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 301, n=17)
112.2 fps +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=194, last 2 years)
61.8 fps +3%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
374 fps +23%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
361 fps +18%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
305 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (92 - 378, n=18)
296 fps -3%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
281 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 378, n=194, last 2 years)
131.4 fps -57%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps +100%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
120 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=17)
98.2 fps +64%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 144, n=195, last 2 years)
50.2 fps -16%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
151 fps +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
146 fps +15%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
127 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=18)
120.7 fps -5%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
108 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 151, n=194, last 2 years)
50.7 fps -60%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
62 fps +17%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
61 fps +15%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 62, n=17)
52 fps -2%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
49 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 63, n=195, last 2 years)
23.1 fps -56%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
834 Points +53%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
698 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=107, last 2 years)
678 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (471 - 843, n=17)
633 Points +16%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
612 Points +12%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
545 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=107, last 2 years)
2671 Points +391%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
833 Points +53%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
646 Points +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
621 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (471 - 843, n=17)
620 Points +14%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
544 Points
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 49889, n=107, last 2 years)
3977 Points +206%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1744 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1987, n=17)
1422 Points +9%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1409 Points +8%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
1409 Points +8%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1299 Points
CrossMark
Overall
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2356 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2856, n=14)
2307 Points +15%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2177 Points +9%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1999 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (376 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)
1213 Points -39%
Productivity
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2012 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1380 - 2366, n=14)
1931 Points +14%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1851 Points +10%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1687 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2366, n=116, last 2 years)
1100 Points -35%
Creativity
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1806 Points +16%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1765 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1289 - 2123, n=14)
1747 Points +12%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1559 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (310 - 2123, n=116, last 2 years)
1000 Points -36%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
9768 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6210 - 12907, n=14)
9235 Points +30%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7094 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
6872 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (466 - 13042, n=116, last 2 years)
3662 Points -48%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
271.964 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (70.1 - 409, n=9)
182.9 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (59.7 - 423, n=131, last 2 years)
158.5 Points -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone
  (257 - 28190, n=139, last 2 years)
1071 ms * -104%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
663.7 ms * -26%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
634.81 ms * -21%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524.8 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (284 - 799, n=16)
466 ms * +11%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
371.6 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 15TVivo X300Xiaomi 17Honor Magic8 Pro AirAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-10%
-32%
-24%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4115.87
2056.87
-50%
3943.44
-4%
3567.89
-13%
3635 ?(1954 - 4366, n=39)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
4076.12
1997.76
-51%
3784.97
-7%
339.02
-92%
3164 ?(339 - 4113, n=39)
-22%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
578.74
332.61
-43%
487.69
-16%
377.83
-35%
413 ?(279 - 614, n=39)
-29%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
721.05
654.09
-9%
643.31
-11%
821.54
14%
Max. Load
 41.7 °C
107 F
38.9 °C
102 F
35.5 °C
96 F
 
 43.4 °C
110 F
40.3 °C
105 F
37.3 °C
99 F
 
 46.5 °C
116 F
40.1 °C
104 F
37 °C
99 F
 
Maximum: 46.5 °C = 116 F
Average: 40.1 °C = 104 F
37.1 °C
99 F
37.4 °C
99 F
41 °C
106 F
37.9 °C
100 F
43.3 °C
110 F
46.4 °C
116 F
38.4 °C
101 F
40.5 °C
105 F
50.8 °C
123 F
Maximum: 50.8 °C = 123 F
Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72.8 % +57%
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58.9 % +27%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58.8 % +27%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
46.4 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150Tooltip
OnePlus 15T Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.8 (18.7-40.6)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.7 (28-38)
OnePlus 15T Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.8 (71.8-154.7)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.2 (98.9-135.9)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.9 (26.8-36.8)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (13.9-18.6)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.14.72529.27.33130.55.34026.6125030.616.16333.214.680367.7100351812533.828.916037.541.820032.949.625027.354.131535.656.94003355.150032.45863028.367.880031.467.7100032.868.8125029.970.1160022.869.6200024.571.7250020.767.5315021.660400015.560.250009.271.263008.275.4800012.871.4100009.864125007.463.8160009.954.3SPL39.381.5N349.8median 27.3median 63.8Delta98.845.838.337.234.627.331.13536.245.644.727.62717.621.220.33917.150.419.756.716.95915.96117.462.916.962.117.364.721.667.320.570.518.469.418.569.417.571.614.575.714.670.614.366.416.475.419.578.321.280.421.872.419.670.319.277.316.768.230.886.21.466.7median 17.5median 69.41.65.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 15TXiaomi 17
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 15T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (22.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 147)
34h 17min
OnePlus 15T
7500 mAh
Vivo X300
5360 mAh
Xiaomi 17
7000 mAh
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S26
4300 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
34.3
19.6
-43%
30.9
-10%
20.3
-41%
17.7
-48%

Notebookcheck's overall impressions of the OnePlus 15T

With the OnePlus 15T, power users get a real endurance runner in the compact class thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC and a massive 7,500 mAh battery.

OnePlus 15T in review
OnePlus 15T in review

OnePlus 15T - 04/24/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 82%
Weight
89%
Battery
97%
Display
90%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
91 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
37%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
63 / 90 → 70%
Camera
80%
Average
69%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95%
Repairability
35%
Software Updates
63.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.1%

Potential competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86%
OnePlus 15T
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon:
1. $637.23
OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256G...
2. $660.29
OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 512G...
3. $859.99
OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB...
List Price: 600€
194 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.32"
2640x1216
460 PPI
OLED
2.
88%
Vivo X300
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon: List Price: 1049€190 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.2%
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon:
1. $929.99
XIAOMI 17 5G Ai (Compatible ...
2. $860.00
Xiaomi 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat...
3. $755.00
XIAOMI 15T PRO Ai 5G (Compat...
List Price: 650€
191 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.30"
2656x1220
464 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
4.
88.3%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x
Amazon:
1. $13.80
Kukoufey Compatible with Hon...
2. $13.80
ShouBao Compatible with Hono...
3. $13.80
Elubugod Compatible with Hon...
List Price: 800€
155 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > OnePlus 15T Review: Incredible battery life makes the compact smartphone competition pale in comparison
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-04-29 (Update: 2026-04-29)