Notebookcheck Logo
OnePlus 15 review

OnePlus 15 smartphone review – Gaming at 165fps, despite being slower than the predecessor

Performance problems.

The OnePlus 15 is very stylish looking and somewhat cheaper than other high-end smartphones. Being able to deliver up to 165fps in games comes at the cost of a slightly scaled-down camera system, and also some performance issues we encountered in our tests.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict - OnePlus 15

Although the OnePlus 15's specifications show it isn't intended to be Oppo's flagship camera phone, it's still capable of taking good photos.

The main focus is on performance, which is designed to operate without any artificial limitations. The downside, however, is that this can cause the phone to overheat and shut down. Furthermore, the phone throttles significantly under sustained load. Despite this, its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 means you won't have to worry about running out of power for apps or games.

The chassis is very high-quality, and its satin-finish frame lends the device a particularly premium feel.

The large 7,300 mAh battery has also made its way to Europe thanks to its dual-cell design. While it doesn't quite take the battery life crown, the OnePlus 15 is still a significant upgrade over its predecessor.

The screen displays movements very smoothly, and the phone feels very responsive thanks to its dedicated touch controller chip.

However, users will have to put up with PWM flickering, so anyone sensitive to such issues should try out the screen before parting with their cash.

The sub $1,000 price makes the OnePlus 15 attractive for budget-conscious users for whom the camera isn't the most crucial factor.

Pros

+ stylish design
+ comparatively inexpensive (especially when imported)
+ bright display
+ up to 165 fps in games
+ highly responsive touchscreen
+ waterproof
+ good camera system
+ powerful speakers
+ good battery life
+ 120W fast charging
+ world phone with good reception
+ accurate GPS
+ 6 years of updates

Cons

- performance issues, significant throttling
- case gets very hot
- only mediocre energy efficiency
- stripped-down camera system
- display has PWM flickering
- only mediocre Wi-Fi performance
- no UWB
- Chinese import lacks eSIM support
- slight creaking when bent
- back cover partly plastic instead of glass
- charger only included with Chinese version

Price and availability

At the time of reviewing, purchasing the $999 smartphone directly from the manufacturer will also get you a free OnePlus Watch3.

However, importing the device from China can save you significantly more: The phone has a starting price of $632 if bought from our rental partner, TradingShenzhen.

When it started out, OnePlus was revolutionary: significantly cheaper than the established competition, yet very well-equipped and boasting premium workmanship. Furthermore, they always cared about what the community had to say and implemented feedback in future models.

However, OnePlus's current models no longer quite live up to this legendary reputation. This is partly because the brand has had to differentiate itself internally from the smartphones of its sister company, Oppo, and often comes up short in this regard.

Nevertheless, the OnePlus 15 is once again an exciting smartphone that is somewhat cheaper than other high-end phones, yet still well-equipped.

Specifications

OnePlus 15
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 486 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n13/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.4 x 76.7 ( = 0.32 x 6.35 x 3.02 in)
Battery
7300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 120W wired charging (Oppo 120W SuperVOOC), 50W wireless charging (Oppo 50W AirVOOC), 10W wireless reverse charging, 5W wired reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase shift AF, Laser AF, Contrast AF, OIS, Dual-LED flash, Videos @4320p/​30fps (camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.8, phase shift AF, OIS, 3.5x optical Zoom, periscope (Camera 2); 50.0MP, f/​2.0, phaseshift AF, wide angle lens (Camera3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), silicone bumper, SIM needle, USB cable, charger (not in Europe), 12 Months Warranty, IP68/​IP69 certified, eSIM, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g ( = 7.58 oz / 0.47 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – A matte ceramic coating

When it comes to the case, OnePlus is trying to forge its own path, and is also clearly inspired by the smartphone giant, Apple: The rounded screen corners, the action button placement, and the printed antennas could fool a less experienced user into thinking they're holding a phone from California rather than Shenzhen.

However, the design is also unique thanks to its matte finish: OnePlus uses a process called Micro-Arc Oxidation, which leaves a ceramic protective layer both on the metal of the frame and camera module.

Unfortunately, this finish is only available for the Sand Storm color option, which we were able to test. Opting for this color, however, means you'll have to accept that the back is made of fiberglass-reinforced plastic. In contrast, the Infinite Black and Ultra Violet versions have a glass back.

The phone is sturdy, but we heard a very faint creaking sound when attempting to twist it, and this is something that should be absent in this price range. It offers IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance.

The front features very thin display bezels, and screen protection is provided by the modern Gorilla Glass Victus 2.

OnePlus 15 review
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15

Size comparison

162.9 mm / 6.41 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 213 g0.4696 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 218 g0.4806 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 219 g0.4828 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 224 g0.4938 lbs161.4 mm / 6.35 in 76.7 mm / 3.02 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 215 g0.474 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features – Extra fast RAM

A USB 3.1 Gen 1 port with data throughput of up to 5 Mbps and DisplayPort are standard features on high-end phones, and the OnePlus 15 delivers on this front. One bonus is the included infrared port, which can be used to control devices such as TVs. Although UWB for easy device discovery isn't included, Bluetooth 6.0 offers similar functionality.

NFC allows for mobile payments and the reading of tags or ID cards.

The OnePlus 15 is available in two storage configurations:

  • OnePlus 15 256 GB UFS 4.1 flash, 12 GB of LPDDR5X Ultra RAM
  • OnePlus 15 512 GB UFS 4.1 flash, 16 GB of LPDDR5X Ultra+ RAM

OnePlus has managed to squeeze even more speed out of the RAM in the larger storage variant. The price difference between the storage options is currently around $50.

There is no microSD card slot, and although the import model does not support eSIM, the European models do, and even support two eSIM profiles.

Top: Speaker, IR blaster
Top: Speaker, IR blaster
Bottom: Speaker, microphone, USB-C port, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: Speaker, microphone, USB-C port, microphone, SIM slot
Right: Volume rocker, standby button
Right: Volume rocker, standby button
Left: Action button
Left: Action button

Software – 6-year updates

The China-based lender, TradingShenzhen, provided us with our review unit that came pre-installed with ColorOS, and not the global OxygenOS.

The differences aren't significant; for example, you can select European languages ​​with the Chinese ROM, and Android Auto should also work. However, after extensive testing, TradingShenzhen now offers import models with OxygenOS pre-installed.

The main difference between the software versions is that no Chinese apps are pre-installed, and Google services don't have to be activated separately. Both operating systems are very responsive and intuitive to use. They come with a good gallery app with comprehensive AI editing options and a wide range of settings. However, a few minor translation errors (in German) are also to be found in OxygenOS.

The OnePlus 15 is said to receive six years of security updates and four major Android updates. According to the EPREL database, we can expect at least 5 years of updates. This is still too short to conform to EU regulations, so it will be interesting to see how strictly this is handled by the EU.

OnePlus 13 software (ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 software (ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 software (ColorOS)
OnePlus 13 software (ColorOS)

Sustainability

OnePlus offers repair manuals and spare parts for its smartphones, enabling users to carry out repairs themselves. According to the EPREL database, the repairability has received a B rating, the second-highest possible grade. Repair costs can also be viewed in advance.

According to the manufacturer's website, the phone is over 90% recyclable; however, no information has been provided regarding the recycled materials used. There is also no information concerning its carbon footprint.

Communication and GNSS – A world phone

Modern WiFi 7 is supported, but our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router only supports WiFi 6E. This allows for a connection via the less congested 6 GHz band.

In our test, the OnePlus 15 achieved only mediocre transfer speeds, and other smartphones, including its predecessor, were faster. A gigabit internet connection can easily be utilized with the OnePlus 15, but anyone who relies on even higher speeds within their own networks will quickly find their limits.

Both the Chinese import and the European versions of the OnePlus 15 are truly global phones and can connect to mobile networks almost anywhere in the world. Reception is excellent, even in challenging situations, as demonstrated by several spot tests during our analysis, including in narrow streets.

Networking
OnePlus 15
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
536 (min: 375) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼86%
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼90%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
932 (min: 738) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1461 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
937 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1088 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
712 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1399 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
OnePlus 15; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø536 (375-595)
OnePlus 15; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1401 (1217-1518)
GPS outdoor test
GPS outdoor test
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Outdoors, the OnePlus 15 quickly pinpointed our location to within a few meters. All major satellite systems are available for positioning, but unfortunately, the device lacks SBAS for even greater accuracy.

We aimed to test the positioning in real-life situations on a bike trip. In addition, we also used the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch with very accurate positioning.

Both devices calculated exactly the same distance, and the OnePlus 15 accurately represented our route. On the bridge, we were placed a few meters off our actual path, but overall, the phone is very well-suited for navigation and location tracking.

OnePlus 15 positioning – Overview
OnePlus 15 positioning – Overview
OnePlus 15 positioning – Turning point
OnePlus 15 positioning – Turning point
OnePlus 15 positioning  – Bridge
OnePlus 15 positioning – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – Bridge

Telephone functions and voice quality – Loud and clear

If you're using the Chinese ColorOS, you have your own dedicated phone app, while OxygenOS uses Google's phone app. The OnePlus app can even detect if a caller's voice is AI-generated.

The call quality via the earpiece is very good, and our voice was also transmitted clearly in a test call. Calls work flawlessly via the speakerphone and the hands-free microphone, although the noise cancellation could be improved.

Cameras – Hasselblad, adieu!

Front camera image
Front camera image

The OnePlus 15's camera system has been scaled back, and the Hasselblad partnership has been removed. To internally differentiate it from the Oppo Find X9 Pro, it also has slightly less light-sensitive sensors at its disposal.

Nevertheless, the 50-megapixel main camera takes very good photos, which can easily be enlarged. They are both detailed and color-accurate. Even in low light and high-contrast situations, strong detail reproduction is still present, and some detail is only lost in dark areas.

Videos can be recorded at up to 8K at 30fps. At 4K, you can even achieve slow-motion effects at up to 120fps, and the image quality is very good.

The telephoto camera is fitted with a periscope zoom. It also possesses a 50-megapixel resolution and achieves a 7x optical zoom compared to the main camera. Photos taken at maximum optical zoom still appear very detailed.

The ultrawide camera also has a 50-megapixel resolution, but snapshots taken from longer distances have barely discernible details.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantEnvironmentLow lightWide-angle camera
orginal image
click to load images

We would like to have seen a bit more sharpness under full studio lighting, but the subject was still very clearly recognizable at only 1 lux illumination.

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15: 6.69 ∆E min: 2.07 - max: 11.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15: 12.11 ∆E min: 5.78 - max: 19.31 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – No charger in Europe

The OnePlus 15 comes with a charger in China, but not in Europe. OnePlus traditionally offers a wide range of accessories, such as stylish cases and charging cables.

OnePlus phones purchased in Europe come with a 24-month warranty. TradingShenzhen allows warranty claims for its Chinese imported devices to be processed via a German address.

Input devices and operation – Dedicated touch controller

The touchscreen is said to respond to touch inputs up to 3,200 times per second. This is made possible by a custom-designed chip, and the result is indeed a OnePlus 15 that feels very fast and responsive.

The fingerprint sensor is located beneath the screen, but unusually high up. In practice, this proves quite convenient since you never have to reposition your hand. It's also equally easy for right- and left-handed users to operate, and even users with small hands will have no issues.

Face recognition is also possible, but only using 2D scanning via the front camera.

Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display – Bright and fast, but with PWM

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The display offers a slightly lower resolution than its predecessor, but it can display images at up to 165 Hz. However, this only works in specially adapted games; otherwise, it tops out at 120 Hz.

The maximum brightness in everyday situations is around 1,100 cd/m², which is typical for its class. In small areas, we measured approximately 1,434 cd/m². When viewing HDR content, up to 1,800 cd/m² is said to be possible in certain areas. This is good, but not exactly record-breaking.

Color reproduction is very accurate, and no deviations are perceptible to the naked eye.

The PWM flickering we measured is adapted to the 120 Hz refresh rate, and this helps to make it somewhat less distracting. The PWM rate can also be increased in the options to potentially alleviate any such issues.

1118
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1105
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1114
cd/m²
1095
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1084
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1120 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1108.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1114 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.33 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.273
CCT: 6708 K
OnePlus 15
AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Oppo Find X9 Pro
LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen
13%
8%
-34%
5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1114
1155
4%
1105
-1%
1357
22%
1099
-1%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1109
1155
4%
1084
-2%
1350
22%
1067
-4%
Brightness Distribution (%)
97
98
1%
95
-2%
94
-3%
95
-2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.33
1
25%
1.02
23%
3.1
-133%
1.05
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.42
1.8
26%
2.32
4%
4.7
-94%
2.38
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
1.6
16%
1.4
26%
2.2
-16%
1.7
11%
Gamma
2.273 97%
2.3 96%
2.244 98%
2 110%
2.232 99%
CCT
6708 97%
6503 100%
6411 101%
6391 102%
6779 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

A series of measurements with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

The bright screen is easy to read outdoors, and the display remains clear even at wide viewing angles.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance – Speedy but with throttling issues

The OnePlus 15 features the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 GPU, which makes it one of the fastest SoCs currently available. However, our observations in other smartphones have shown that it isn't always able to deliver its full potential, heating up too quickly to be adequately cooled within the compact smartphone's chassis.

The OnePlus 15 seems to have particular problems with this, with it even lagging behind its predecessor, the OnePlus 13, in almost every benchmark. Under very heavy load, some benchmarks even crashed, such as our temperature monitoring test using the Burnout benchmark or the stress tests. However, the SoC remained stable during our tests running demanding apps or games.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=6)
3660 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3640 Points +4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3511 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3498 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -9%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)
1754 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=6)
11154 Points +5%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10645 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10620 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10378 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -6%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)
5128 Points -52%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2981365 Points +21%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2390211 - 3269237, n=5)
2645053 Points +8%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2456231 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2390211 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)
1486089 Points -39%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (19432 - 28557, n=5)
21700 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19833 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19802 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)
14800 Points -25%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13977 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2495, n=5)
2170 Points +28%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1858 Points +9%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1698 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=130, last 2 years)
1139 Points -33%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (12929 - 16690, n=5)
14136 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +2%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13002 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12929 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points -16%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10756 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=149, last 2 years)
7680 Points -41%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18137 - 21153, n=5)
19389 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19202 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18137 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -11%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15554 Points -19%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=149, last 2 years)
11422 Points -41%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (13505 - 24052, n=5)
17348 Points +14%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
15236 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13505 Points -11%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=149, last 2 years)
8705 Points -43%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
8243 Points -46%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (52356 - 61797, n=5)
54484 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53231 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
52659 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
48863 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -13%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)
26041 Points -51%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2143 - 2468, n=5)
2265 Points +2%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2221 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2143 Points -4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2109 Points -5%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2468, n=149, last 2 years)
1701 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (22372 - 23712, n=5)
22989 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22665 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22372 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19960 Points -12%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
16866 Points -26%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27205 Points +1321%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1915 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1455 - 2381, n=4)
1885 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1455 Points -24%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=51, last 2 years)
846 Points +29%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
655 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=5)
613 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524 Points -20%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
192 Points -71%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=51, last 2 years)
3901 Points +677%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=5)
577 Points +15%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
502 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
486 Points -3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
176 Points -65%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=51, last 2 years)
5559 Points +443%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=5)
1196 Points +17%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1023 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
974 Points -5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
436 Points -57%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)
884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14336 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22149, n=4)
12199 Points +9%
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11212 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=73, last 2 years)
4497 Points -60%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
765 Points -93%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -93%

The graphics performance also highlights that the SoC is unable to reach its full potential. However, the manufacturer and Qualcomm might be able to improve this with patches. Nevertheless, every kind of mobile game should run on this graphics card, and this ought to continue for the next few years.

Technologically, it has almost everything you could desire. From ray tracing and mesh shading to tile memory heaps, many current gaming technologies are available.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7198 Points +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6985 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6168 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7167 Points +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6969 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points -2%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6289 Points -10%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25978 Points 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25885 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
23088 Points -11%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14788 Points +18%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12546 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10958 Points -13%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14635 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12559 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points -5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10886 Points -13%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3198 Points +11%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2886 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -17%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3211 Points +12%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2871 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points -8%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
954 fps +25%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
762 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
537 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
606 fps +32%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +3%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
458 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
327 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
110 fps +83%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
369 fps +9%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +7%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
340 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
232 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
85 fps +42%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +4%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
205 fps
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
199 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -21%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
126 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
100 fps +67%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +25%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
109 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +16%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps +78%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +38%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
287 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps +2%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
233 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps -13%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +18%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +18%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48 fps +9%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps -20%

Web browsing is fast and, in most cases, lag-free. Images are almost always available immediately while scrolling.

Despite this, the phone performed poorly in benchmarks, with the OnePlus 13 and its previous generation chip almost always faster. 

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +115%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
154.8 Points +6%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
146.211 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 146.2, n=4)
115.8 Points -21%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
109.286 Points -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
624 runs/min +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (593 - 624, n=3)
607 runs/min +1%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
603 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min -30%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 140)
404 runs/min -33%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=130, last 2 years)
223 runs/min -63%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +38%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
21.3 runs/min
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
20.9 runs/min -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 21.3, n=4)
19.9 runs/min -7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
17.9 runs/min -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)
14.4 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
278 Points +14%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points -3%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=5)
171.8 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
147.4 Points -39%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
129 Points -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
99417 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +1%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
98523 Points
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=5)
80938 Points -18%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
74649 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
48980 Points -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1164 ms * -269%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
503.8 ms * -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=5)
443 ms * -40%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -19%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)
315.6 ms *
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
305.9 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

The UFS 4.1 flash handles data transfers quite quickly, and loading times are short.

OnePlus 15OnePlus 13Oppo Find X9 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro MaxAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-32%
-8%
32%
5%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3962.2
3984.23
1%
3219.8
-19%
3823.28
-4%
3971.4
0%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3741.2
3684.36
-2%
1239.76
-67%
3361.24
-10%
3899.9
4%
3282 ?(1240 - 4035, n=20)
-12%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
352.6
301.29
-15%
367.54
4%
287.85
-18%
548.4
56%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
334.4
344.63
3%
176.98
-47%
331.61
-1%
561.3
68%

Games – Up to 165fps is possible

When it comes to gaming, OnePlus aims to show the way, with frame rates of up to 165fps. This should be feasible in titles such as Call of Duty Mobile. Now, let's put that to the test.

Normally, we can already play smoothly at up to 60fps at maximum settings. However, even at medium details, 165fps is achievable and consistently maintained. This makes for extremely smooth gameplay.

The improved touch sensitivity can be activated in the gaming overlay, and even professional gamers will find it a suitable environment.

Other games also run smoothly, even at high detail settings. We measured the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
Call of Duty Mobile
Call of Duty Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Call of Duty Mobile; low: Ø165.6 (151-166)
OnePlus 15; Call of Duty Mobile; very high: Ø59.8 (53-61)
OnePlus 15; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60.3 (56-61)
OnePlus 15; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø60.4 (55-61)

Emissions – Things can get hot

Temperature

We measured a noticeable increase in the case temperature under load, hitting almost 50°C. The burnout benchmark repeatedly failed to complete as the device needed to cool down.

A few 3DMark stress tests also failed to run. When we finally managed to complete runs, the throttling was severe, with the remaining performance after several benchmark runs ranging between 52% and 62%.

Max. Load
 45.4 °C
114 F
43.9 °C
111 F
37.8 °C
100 F
 
 47.1 °C
117 F
45.2 °C
113 F
42.2 °C
108 F
 
 47.1 °C
117 F
44.2 °C
112 F
42 °C
108 F
 
Maximum: 47.1 °C = 117 F
Average: 43.9 °C = 111 F
36.9 °C
98 F
38.5 °C
101 F
38.8 °C
102 F
38 °C
100 F
40.2 °C
104 F
40.9 °C
106 F
38.6 °C
101 F
41.2 °C
106 F
49.7 °C
121 F
Maximum: 49.7 °C = 121 F
Average: 40.3 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 19.8 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
99.6 % +61%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
61.9 %
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
60.3 % -3%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.2 % +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % +1%
OnePlus 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52 %
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
38.7 % -26%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 %
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
20.6 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
42.4 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.4 (22.7-43.5)
OnePlus 15; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø119.1 (95.3-154)

Speakers

The two speakers housed inside the OnePlus 15 sound very clear and perform well even at maximum volume. Although 80.4 dB(A) isn't record-breaking, the phone still gets loud enough to fill a medium-sized room with sound.

Anyone preferring to connect external audio devices or headphones can do so via Bluetooth or USB. The most important codecs are supported for wireless transmission: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, as well as LDAC and LHDC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.234.5252933.13123.324.94028.832.55030.533.96317.619.4809.427.21009.936.512512.544.716010.447.12001052.72508.356.33157.658.94006.556.75008.760.463015.66780012.264.8100011.667.4125010.869.416001071.920007.671.325006.869.231506.461.640006.764.450006.768.86300770.680007.269.1100007.563.7125007.664.6160007.650SPL21.480.4N0.347.9median 7.6median 64.4Delta1.88.146.539.943.236.134.730.836.535.944.345.329.429.918.830.221.743.72152.52058.617.660.61663.516.967.913.164.717.265.621.166.421.366.818.167.916.274.817.876.316.374.512.869.812.568.211.971.212.572.112.680.212.476.812.368.312.270.511.666.728.385.8166.1median 16.2median 67.93.53.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 15Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtime – Work for days on end thanks to the huge battery

Power consumption

Power consumption was relatively high even under light loads, and the review device never dropped below 1.2 watts. The maximum power consumption of 12.3 watts is also slightly higher than most comparable devices, but significantly lower than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. All in all, the OnePlus 15 proves itself to be only moderately efficient.

The phone can be charged at a generous 120 watts, but only the Chinese import version comes with a compatible charger. This allows the phone to be fully recharged in just over an hour. Wireless charging is possible at up to 50 watts, and reverse charging with or without a cable is also supported.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 12.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 15
7300 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
21%
1%
29%
12%
8%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.2
0.86
28%
0.6
50%
0.55
54%
0.6
50%
0.826 ?(0.6 - 1.2, n=5)
31%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.4
1.74
-24%
1
29%
0.77
45%
0.8
43%
1.426 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=5)
-2%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.8
1.85
-3%
1.3
28%
0.91
49%
1.4
22%
1.776 ?(1.4 - 2.18, n=5)
1%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.7
10.69
-60%
6.9
-3%
13.81
-106%
6.5
3%
5.83 ?(4.2 - 6.7, n=4)
13%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
12.3
11.92
3%
11.9
3%
16.69
-36%
9.1
26%
10.5 ?(8.9 - 12.3, n=4)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus 15; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.28 (5.31-12.3)
OnePlus 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.614 (1.212-3.05)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
OnePlus 15; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.2 (12.1-12.2)
OnePlus 15; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.614 (1.212-3.05)

Battery life

The 7,300 mAh battery is divided into two cells, which means there are no regulatory issues with the European model.

In our everyday Wi-Fi test, the phone kept going for over 30 hours. That might not be a record result, but it's a very good one nonetheless. Two days without charging are usually possible.

Under load, the phone doesn't last quite as long and runs out of power after just over 4 hours of gaming.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
30h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 11min
OnePlus 15
7300 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Battery runtime
-16%
16%
-20%
16%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
30.7
22.5
-27%
34.3
12%
22.2
-28%
33.8
10%
Load (h)
4.2
4
-5%
5
19%
3.7
-12%
5.1
21%
Reader / Idle (h)
37.8
65.6
45.8
70.2
H.264 (h)
38.7
41.2
32.3
34.8

Notebookcheck overall rating

The OnePlus 15 is very affordable, especially when importing the Chinese model.

The chassis is high-quality, and the screen is bright, but the phone is prone to overheating. Additionally, the camera system is good, but not top-notch.

OnePlus 15 review. Review device provided by Trading Shenzhen.
OnePlus 15 review. Review device provided by Trading Shenzhen.

OnePlus 15 - 11/25/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
61 / 69 → 89%
Weight
88%
Battery
96%
Display
91%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 70%
Application Performance
81 / 85 → 95%
AI Performance
34%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
83%
Average
71%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
95.4%
Repairability
72%
Software Updates
86.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.1%
OnePlus 15
OnePlus 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $799.99
OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for OnePlus 15 Scree...
3. $9.99
ottpluscase [2 Pack Screen P...
List Price: 999€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $799.99
OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ...
2. $549.99
OnePlus 13R, 12GB RAM + 256G...
3. $11.99
JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
3.
87.7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
2. $6.67
FZZSZS (3-Pack Screen Protec...
3. $9.99
Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl...
List Price: 1299€
224 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
4.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $919.50
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
3. $1,120.00
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.19
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen...
2. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
3. $14.53
INIU for iPhone 17 Charger, ...
List Price: 940€
219 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > OnePlus 15 smartphone review – Gaming at 165fps, despite being slower than the predecessor
Florian Schmitt, 2025-11-27 (Update: 2025-11-27)