Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notebookcheck review

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max smartphone review – Does the giant phone's second display help it step out of Apple's shadow?

More than an Apple clone?

The huge Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has big ambitions, and aims to compete with the world's best smartphones. To achieve this goal, it boasts two extremely bright LTPO AMOLED displays and a total of four 50-megapixel cameras, each with its own sensor. Can this large phone stand out from the Apple and Samsung crowd?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict - Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a fantastic, lightning-fast smartphone with a bright screen, fast storage, snappy internet, and every feature you could wish for.

Its massive battery results in truly excellent battery life, and currently, few Android smartphones can match it. Apple, on the other hand, almost manages to keep pace with a much smaller battery thanks to numerous software optimizations.

The bright screen also displays HDR content effectively, and the premium-feeling case is impeccably crafted.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

The real highlight is the relatively large display on the back, but it raises a few questions: What will future app support look like? And could it be very fragile when dropped?

Xiaomi is also staying tight-lipped about the operating system update support and sustainability.

Furthermore, the phone is likely not to be officially released outside of Asia. While importing it through specialized retailers like TradingShenzhen is a relatively straightforward process, restrictions such as the lack of Android Auto and eSIM support remain.

Nevertheless, its dedicated camera sensor and secondary display make the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max a very compelling high-end phone.

Pros

+ very long battery life
+ two very bright LTPO AMOLED displays
+ high-quality camera system
+ powerful performance
+ speedy UFS 4.1 storage
+ fast Wi-Fi including Wi-Fi 7
+ comprehensive feature set

Cons

- considerable heat production under load
- severe throttling
- secondary display has limited app support
- no official distribution outside of Asia (yet)
- advertising in key apps
- no Android Auto
- no eSIM support
- pointless apps pre-installed in the West
- only English available as a Western language
- unclear update period
- PWM flickering

Price and availability

TradingShenzhen

Our device lender, TradingShenzhen, currently offers the Xiaomi Mi 17 Pro Max, starting at $1,088.

As is normally the case, this retailer doesn't charge any additional import fees from Hong Kong.
 

17 Pro Max – anyone hearing that name probably immediately thinks of Apple's largest iPhone model. And it would appear Xiaomi has deliberately copied the name of one of the world's most successful smartphones.

The 17 Pro Max is currently the largest model in the 17 series, at least until December when the Xiaomi 17 Ultra launches.

Our review takes a closer look at whether the secondary rear display is genuinely useful and whether Xiaomi (and its bold choice of name) can actually compete with Apple's flagship phone.

Specifications

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 20:9, 2608 x 1200 pixel 416 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3; second display (back): 2.9'', 976 x 596 pixels, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
1TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 992 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8; 3G:B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 5G:n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89 , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162.9 x 77.6 ( = 0.31 x 6.41 x 3.06 in)
Battery
7500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100 Watt charging, 50 Watt wireless charging, 22.5 Watt reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.7, 23mm, 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS (camera 1); 50 MP, f/2.6, 115mm, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom (camera 2); 50 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 102°, 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF video@4K@30/60fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, IP 68 certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
219 g ( = 7.73 oz / 0.48 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
940 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Premium and with slim bezels

With the Xiaomi 17 Pro having become significantly more compact, Xiaomi apparently still wanted to offer a top smartphone for its large-screen fans.

To achieve this, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max features a 6.9-inch screen and a body that is almost exactly the same size as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max.

The front of the phone boasts a screen-to-body ratio of almost 91% with bezels that are barely visible. Xiaomi has opted to use its own proprietary Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3 for protection, and it is said to only show scratches on materials with a Mohs hardness of 7.

The phone is IP68-rated for water and dust resistance, which means it can be used not only in dirty environments but also underwater.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notebookcheck review
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review

The aluminum frame provides the phone with good stability, meaning you can't twist it using your bare hands.

However, the rear screen poses a stability question mark, with it protruding quite far from the case and not possessing the same high-quality protective glass as the front.

The simple matte back looks elegant and is available in dark gray, white, purple, or green.

Size comparison

163.4 mm / 6.43 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 233 g0.514 lbs163.1 mm / 6.42 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 226 g0.4982 lbs163.2 mm / 6.43 in 76.7 mm / 3.02 in 8.7 mm / 0.3425 in 229 g0.505 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 218 g0.4806 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 219 g0.4828 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features – Relatively affordable with plenty of storage

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max comes in three storage variants:

  • 12 GB of RAM / 512 GB of UFS 4.1 data storage
  • 16 GB of RAM / 512 GB of UFS 4.1 data storage
  • 16 GB of RAM / 1,024 GB of UFS 4.1 data storage

Xiaomi doesn't offer quite as many options as Apple or Samsung. However, when it comes to price, it significantly undercuts its competitors, hovering at around $1,000.

The USB-C port can transfer data at up to 5 Gbps and also features a DisplayPort mode, which allows you to create a wired connection between the phone and external monitors.

The included ultra-wide band support ensures fast data exchange, and precise location tracking is included, as well as NFC for mobile payment services and ID applications.

Two nano-SIM slots are the only way to use a SIM card since eSIMs are not widely used in China.

Top: No ports
Top: No ports
Bottom: Speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: Speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot
Left: No ports
Left: No ports
Right: Volume rocker, standby button
Right: Volume rocker, standby button

Software – Also with Google Play

Xiaomi's HyperOS 3 is based on Android 16, which makes it a very up-to-date operating system. Google Play Services are already on board and can be fully enabled in the settings.

However, the Chinese ROM comes with many pre-installed apps you might feel the need to uninstall, since they are practically unusable in Western regions. Furthermore, the only Western language option is English. Other example limitations, such as Android Auto, are also present.

The duration of updates is also uncertain. A the time of this review, the security updates on our device were from a very up-to-date October 2025.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max software
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max software
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max software

Sustainability

Unfortunately, no information is available either regarding the smartphone's carbon footprint or the recycling rate of the materials used. It is also unclear whether Xiaomi will provide spare parts and repair manuals.

On the positive side, the phone comes in plastic-free packaging.

Communication and GNSS – WiFi 7 is included

Currently, WiFi 7 is the most advanced WiFi standard and is also featured on the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; however, our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router isn't yet designed for it. Using the WiFi 6E standard, the phone still achieved fast data speeds of up to 1,748 Mbps. This will allow you to fully take advantage of a gigabit internet connection and leave room for even faster networks.

The reception was excellent close to the router, and websites loaded very swiftly. At a distance of ten meters and through three walls, the signal strength was still half, and although you could tell that the transmission speed was a bit slower, browsing was still perfectly manageable.

When it comes to mobile connectivity, this high-end phone supports all the necessary frequencies to allow you to use LTE and 5G networks worldwide, which makes the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max ideal for travel.

During our spot check tests, the reception was consistently strong and remained sufficient even in challenging locations between tall buildings.

Networking
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X200 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
644 (min: 520) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1561 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼91%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
721 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
748 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø933 (846-1053)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1620 (1407-1748)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (795-1130)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1609 (1520-1739)
Outdoor GPS test
Outdoor GPS test
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Stepping outdoors with the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, we were located quickly with an accuracy of 3 meters. Every major satellite network is available, although SBAS (Sky-Based Assigned Search), which allows for even greater precision, is not supported.

We were keen to test its accuracy in a real-life situation. To achieve this, we went on a bike ride and were accompanied by a Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison purposes.

The Xiaomi phone tracked our route well, and only occasionally placed us slightly off-center on the road, albeit without any major errors. Overall, it's also a very usable navigation device.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Overview
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Overview
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Turning point
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Turning point
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Bridge
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max navigation – Bridge
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 – Overview
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 – Overview
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 – Turning point
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 navigation – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 navigation – Bridge

Telephone functions and voice quality – Good sound

Xiaomi has developed its own easy-to-use phone app. The Carrier Services tab is of little use in Europe, since network providers here don't allow you to use this feature to check your balance. It also advertises phone plans (!) that are only available in China.

Features such as VoLTE and VoWiFi are supported, and you can even call other nearby Xiaomi phones via Bluetooth.

Call quality is good, with our contact person confirming that our voice sounded clear during the test call. In turn, they also sounded very clear. Calls made with the speakerphone and the hands-free microphone work flawlessly.

Cameras – Can you reach the top with a custom sensor?

Front camera image
Front camera image

The cameras use sensors from three different manufacturers: Omnivision sensors are utilized for the front-facing camera and the ultra-wide-angle camera, and a Samsung sensor is used for the telephoto lens and its 5x periscope zoom. The main camera features a rather mysterious sensor, which our system hardware app identified as the STX9500U, although Xiaomi itself refers to it as the Light Hunter 950L. According to Chinese sources, this could be either a SmartSens SC590XS or another Omnivision sensor.

Every camera has a 50-megapixel resolution, but they typically shoot 12.5-megapixel images. The full resolution can, of course, be activated via a special mode. The camera system was developed in cooperation with Leica.

Photos from the main camera appear detailed, offer good dynamic range, and manage to capture challenging situations, such as yellow blossoms in bright light, with a high degree of detail. In low light, the sharpness remains high, and many details are discernible, although the dynamic range in dark areas could be somewhat better.

The wide-angle camera takes good shots, which are slightly distorted at the edges, and at high magnification, fewer details are visible. The front camera takes sharp and detailed selfies.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantEnvironmentLow lightWide-angle
orginal image
click to load images

Videos can be recorded at a maximum resolution of 8K at 30fps, and at 4K at up to 120fps. The recording quality is excellent, autofocus is responsive and almost imperceptible, and exposure correction is also immediate.

Color reproduction can be described as slightly oversaturated, but overall deviates only minimally from the ideal.

ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: 9.02 ∆E min: 1.39 - max: 16.08 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: 9.47 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 16.15 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – Charger included

The box contains a charger, USB cable, SIM tool, and a transparent silicone bumper. Even in Germany, you can find some accessories online, such as smartphone cases. Our device lender, Tradingshenzhen, also includes an adapter for Western power outlets.

Xiaomi provides a 12-month warranty. However, we would suggest using an importer for this, since direct shipping to China is both risky and very expensive.

Input devices and operation – A fast touchscreen

Touchscreen inputs are recognized very accurately thanks to the 300 Hz sampling rate. The 120 Hz screen also responds swiftly, and we also really like the haptic feedback you get from the vibration motor.

The rear AMOLED display is also reliable, although there isn't much you can do with it: Besides the camera viewfinder, clock, and a pedometer, it can currently only display notifications, and apps cannot be launched directly from the screen.

Xiaomi's 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor technology is hidden behind the screen on the front. It works reliably and unlocks the phone very quickly. Facial recognition can also be used via the front camera. This works quite reliably, but it is less secure and more open to manipulation.

Display – The Xiaomi phone has a special subpixel layout

Subpixel arrangement
Subpixel arrangement

The large 6.9-inch AMOLED screen features LTPO technology, which allows it to dynamically adjust the refresh rate between one and 120 frames per second. This saves energy when viewing static content and simultaneously ensures smooth motion tracking of dynamic content.

On paper, the resolution is slightly lower than some other phones, but it offers a unique feature: Our microscope image revealed an unusual subpixel arrangement. This arrangement is designed in such a way that each pixel actually receives a full LED of each of the three primary colors, which Xiaomi claims makes the display more efficient. In our tests, the image quality proved to be just as high as other phones.

With a maximum brightness of nearly 1,100 cd/m²,  the phone isn't quite as bright as some high-end models, but it's still perfectly adequate for full-screen white. The brightness levels of well over 3,000 cd/m² that are also possible on smaller areas guarantee excellent HDR performance.

1086
cd/m²
1076
cd/m²
1069
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1052
cd/m²
1049
cd/m²
1055
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1099 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1067.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.05 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
CCT: 6779 K
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Vivo X200 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Screen
-13%
-45%
19%
7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1099
1054
-4%
1357
23%
1366
24%
1286
17%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1067
1059
-1%
1350
27%
1325
24%
1238
16%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
93
-2%
94
-1%
95
0%
93
-2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.05
1.57
-50%
3.1
-195%
0.88
16%
1.04
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.38
2.8
-18%
4.7
-97%
1.55
35%
2.26
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
2.2
-29%
1.5
12%
1.6
6%
Gamma
2.232 99%
2.32 95%
2 110%
2.303 96%
2.249 98%
CCT
6779 96%
6993 93%
6391 102%
6626 98%
6575 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122.4 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 122.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

A series of measurements with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

You'll have to live with PWM flickering, but it's adapted to the 120 Hz refresh rate and therefore potentially less bothersome. Nevertheless, users sensitive to such issues should try out the screen before pulling the trigger on a purchase.

The display of grayscale and colors is fine-detailed and quite accurate. In "Original Color Pro" mode, no differences from the reference colors are discernible to the naked eye.

CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN color acuracy
CalMAN color acuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN Adobe RGB
CalMAN Adobe RGB
CalMAN DCI P3
CalMAN DCI P3
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 33.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 91.4 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Outdoors, the bright screen is very legible, even on sunny days, and the viewing angle stability from every side is also excellent.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance – Megapower throttled

Equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max possesses one of the fastest Android smartphone processors you can currently get your hands on. In terms of pure processing power, it is indeed very good, with only the current iPhone generation being faster.

However, in the system benchmarks, our review device occasionally faltered and fell slightly behind the Xiaomi 17 Pro. We'll see the reason for this shortly in the emissions tests.

During AI calculations, the phone performed somewhat inconsistently, but all in all, it kept up with the comparison devices.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3883 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3587 - 3831, n=5)
3692 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3640 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3145 Points -14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2976 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1727 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=5)
11255 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10620 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10017 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9722 Points -8%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9284 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5043 Points -53%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2845517 Points +19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2760009 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2390211 - 3269237, n=4)
2692258 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
2629691 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2390211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)
1446031 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (19432 - 28557, n=4)
22175 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19833 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18897 Points -5%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
15938 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)
14720 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1858 - 2495, n=4)
2289 Points +23%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2162 Points +16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1858 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1689 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=131, last 2 years)
1126 Points -39%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (12929 - 14076, n=3)
13663 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12929 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11073 Points -14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8155 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14076, n=148, last 2 years)
7472 Points -42%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18137 - 19244, n=3)
18863 Points +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18137 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
15326 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)
11207 Points -38%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10953 Points -40%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (13505 - 16984, n=3)
15818 Points +17%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13505 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11234 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)
8486 Points -37%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7081 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
384996 Points +623%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (52356 - 53231, n=3)
52655 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -14%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
42332 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
24928 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2143 - 2257, n=3)
2211 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2143 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2095 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)
1675 Points -22%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1477 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (22372 - 23712, n=4)
23071 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22372 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21543 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19738 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12176 Points -46%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
37611 Points +2485%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27075 Points +1761%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2043 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1455 - 2381, n=3)
1875 Points +29%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1455 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
995 Points -32%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5155 Points +884%
Average of class Smartphone
  (81 - 5210, n=45, last 2 years)
906 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=4)
603 Points +15%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
36297 Points +7369%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=45, last 2 years)
4242 Points +773%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=4)
596 Points +23%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
486 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
48828 Points +4913%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=45, last 2 years)
6051 Points +521%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=4)
1240 Points +27%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
974 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)
884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14336 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12567 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22149, n=3)
12528 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=70, last 2 years)
4507 Points -69%

With the Adreno 840, you also get one of the fastest graphics solutions currently available, which supports modern features such as mesh shading and ray tracing.

However, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max can't quite keep pace with other high-end smartphones in the GPU benchmarks. Despite this, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in real-life situations, since there are very few apps or games that can push the graphics chip to its limits.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6743 Points +9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6691 Points +8%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6168 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
5959 Points -3%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points +9%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6722 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6684 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6289 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6033 Points -4%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
26375 Points +14%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25847 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25127 Points +9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
23088 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points +13%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12239 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11973 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
11776 Points +7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10958 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
12447 Points +14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12227 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11983 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10886 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2588 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2571 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2538 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2679 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2589 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2584 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
788 fps +47%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
776 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
748 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +33%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
537 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
487 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +44%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
411 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
410 fps +25%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
327 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +9%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
110 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
344 fps +48%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
324 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
282 fps +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
232 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
85 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
216 fps +71%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
212 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
207 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps +28%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
126 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps -8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -40%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +82%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +65%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
86 fps +32%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +12%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps +64%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
321 fps +58%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
247 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps +17%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
36.4 fps +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps

Using the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max to surf the internet is a very quick and easy experience, with even large pages loading almost instantaneously, and everything running smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
358.295 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +188%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=155, last 2 years)
153.1 Points +40%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
109.286 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 137.4, n=3)
105.6 Points -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
643 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
624 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (593 - 624, n=2)
609 runs/min -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=132, last 2 years)
218 runs/min -65%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
42.8 runs/min +105%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +40%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
22.6 runs/min +8%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
20.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 20.9, n=3)
19.4 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)
14.3 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
306 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
278 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=4)
154 Points -45%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
150 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years)
144.8 Points -48%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
135 Points -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
121337 Points +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
99417 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
91563 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=4)
76542 Points -23%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
59387 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years)
48255 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)
1188 ms * -288%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
612.34 ms * -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=4)
475 ms * -55%
Vivo X200 Ultra
417.65 ms * -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -23%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
305.9 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
256.9 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 storage is responsible for making storage access extremely fast and enabling a significant speed increase even when transferring numerous small files.

Xiaomi 17 Pro MaxSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraOppo Find X8 UltraVivo X200 UltraAverage 1TB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
-19%
-18%
-11%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3971.4
3823.28
-4%
3754.43
-5%
3358.64
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3899.9
3361.24
-14%
3564.22
-9%
2998.87
-23%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
548.4
287.85
-48%
375.9
-31%
462.41
-16%
304 ?(58.8 - 548, n=2)
-45%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
561.3
331.61
-41%
389.28
-31%
459.33
-18%

Games – Gaming primarily at 60fps

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a great gaming phone thanks to both its powerful CPU and GPU. Its long-lasting battery also ensures extended gaming sessions without needing to reach for a charger.

We achieved a consistently stable 60fps in almost every game and mode we tested. We only observed the frame rate dropping to 40fps when playing PUBG Mobile at UltraHD.

We measured these frame rates using the GameBench software. 

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60 (54-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.6 (47-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (45-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (55-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (39-41)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø58.8 (27-61)

Emissions – A hothead with stereo speakers

Temperature

Under load, the phone heats up noticeably, and after a period of time, the frame of the device gets really hot. Subsequently, the phone overloaded twice in our stress test and had to cool down before the benchmark was able to continue.

The recorded case temperatures of over 50°C are quite noticeable and can be significantly higher in warmer environments.

The 3DMark stress tests also revealed significant throttling under sustained load, with the phone losing almost 40% of its performance in the Wild Life test.

This extreme throttling could explain why the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max doesn't quite manage to keep up with other phones in many scenarios.

Max. Load
 48.2 °C
119 F
46.5 °C
116 F
45.5 °C
114 F
 
 49.3 °C
121 F
46.2 °C
115 F
44.3 °C
112 F
 
 50.4 °C
123 F
49.2 °C
121 F
46.5 °C
116 F
 
Maximum: 50.4 °C = 123 F
Average: 47.3 °C = 117 F
46.3 °C
115 F
47.2 °C
117 F
48.2 °C
119 F
44.4 °C
112 F
46.8 °C
116 F
49.8 °C
122 F
45.5 °C
114 F
47.3 °C
117 F
49.9 °C
122 F
Maximum: 49.9 °C = 122 F
Average: 47.3 °C = 117 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
99.8 % +66%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.4 % +35%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
60.3 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88.9 % +36%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
71.8 % +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.2 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % -20%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 % +35%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.8 % +7%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -29%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.6 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
64.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.7 (24.7-37.8)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø93.1 (81.6-135.4)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.3 (25.3-36.3)
Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map rear
Heat map rear

Speakers

The speaker along the bottom edge is supported by the earpiece, and together they enable stereo effects when holding the phone horizontally. Combined, they produce a convincing sound stage that can sometimes appear a bit strained when playing loud music.

Movie soundtracks are generally good and reveal some lower frequencies, but we would suggest turning the volume down a bit to keep the sound cleaner and prevent distortion.

External audio devices can be connected via USB-C or Bluetooth 6.0. Every important Bluetooth audio codec is supported, which means you can easily connect your wireless devices and listen at a good quality.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.539.92543.236.13134.730.84036.535.95044.345.36329.429.98018.830.210021.743.71252152.51602058.620017.660.62501663.531516.967.940013.164.750017.265.663021.166.480021.366.8100018.167.9125016.274.8160017.876.3200016.374.5250012.869.8315012.568.2400011.971.2500012.572.1630012.680.2800012.476.81000012.368.31250012.270.51600011.666.7SPL28.385.8N166.1median 16.2median 67.9Delta3.53.340.85135.541.130.329.837.228.332.63518.22418.325.121.135.918.642.51648.616.254.918.356.217.860.614.258.914.967.118.87320.369.316.87514.874.61778.21479.912.679.31276.811.872.41273.212.1671267.31270.211.863.811.449.327.187.40.967.5median 14.8median 67.538.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 17 Pro MaxVivo X200 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Vivo X200 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtime – A huge battery means long runtimes

Power consumption

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is quite energy-efficient, and similar to the Xiaomi 17, it consumes relatively little power, especially under load. It's in this use case, you may find the handset's performance somewhat limited.

The maximum charging capacity is 100 watts. A charger was included with our review device, and the large battery was fully charged in under an hour, or at least when the boost mode was activated.

Wireless charging is also possible, at a maximum of 50 watts. Other devices can be charged directly from the phone at 22.5 watts using a cable, or you can even charge headphones wirelessly via the handset itself.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 6.5 / 9.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh
Vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-30%
-29%
-154%
-24%
-34%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.6
0.6
-0%
0.55
8%
0.8
-33%
1.6
-167%
0.733 ?(0.6 - 0.83, n=4)
-22%
Idle Average * (Watt)
0.8
1.3
-63%
0.77
4%
1.1
-38%
2.9
-263%
1.433 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=4)
-79%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.4
1.6
-14%
0.91
35%
1.6
-14%
3.7
-164%
1.77 ?(1.4 - 2.18, n=4)
-26%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.5
4.1
37%
13.81
-112%
8.5
-31%
10.6
-63%
5.53 ?(4.2 - 6.5, n=3)
15%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
9.1
11.5
-26%
16.69
-83%
11.8
-30%
19.5
-114%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.23 (0.824-9.13)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.737 (0.638-1.005)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9 (8.87-9.1)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.737 (0.638-1.005)

Battery life

The phone is home to a very large 7,500 mAh battery. Xiaomi uses L-shaped cells, which offer particularly high energy density thanks to having a higher silicon content.

Additional screen optimizations are designed to help the phone save even more energy. That seems to pay off with the 17 Pro Max achieving 33 hours and 46 minutes in our Wi-Fi test. That's even longer than the iPhone 17 Pro Max, which also has very good staying power.

However, this also reveals that Xiaomi is unable to match the Apple phone's efficiency: Possessing a battery of under 5,000 mAh, its battery life is just 15% shorter.

Several days without a power outlet pose no problems for the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, and even under full load, you can game for over 5 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
70h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
33h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
34h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 06min
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh
Vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
Battery runtime
-15%
-26%
-18%
-31%
Reader / Idle (h)
70.2
45.8
-35%
H.264 (h)
34.8
32.3
-7%
33.5
-4%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
33.8
28.6
-15%
22.2
-34%
22.9
-32%
23.3
-31%
Load (h)
5.1
3.7
-27%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a high-quality phone with very long battery life that's relatively inexpensive to import.

However, this comes with some drawbacks, and the phone's main feature, the secondary screen, is currently only usable with a limited number of applications.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review. Review device provided by Trading Shenzhen.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max review. Review device provided by Trading Shenzhen.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max - 11/02/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
97%
Display
92%
Games Performance
40 / 55 → 72%
Application Performance
82 / 85 → 97%
AI Performance
32%
Temperature
80%
Noise
100%
Audio
85 / 90 → 94%
Camera
87%
Average
69%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
93.4%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
75%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.7%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
2. $8.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $9.98
120W USB Type C Fast Chargin...
List Price: 940€
219 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $49.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech...
2. $37.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili...
3. $1,419.00
iPhone 17 Pro Max Deep Blue ...
List Price: 1449 Euro
233 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
460 PPI
OLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,054.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
2. $1,157.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
3. $7.57
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
90.7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $11.02
[1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Ul...
3. $10.89
UYRUREL Screen Protector for...
List Price: 1050€
226 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.3%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $17.24
YQINHHME for Vivo X200 Ultra...
2. $13.92
HGJTFANY [3 Pcs Screen Prote...
3. 
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 890€
229 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi 17 Pro Max smartphone review – Does the giant phone's second display help it step out of Apple's shadow?
Florian Schmitt, 2025-11- 2 (Update: 2025-11- 2)