Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 5300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (not to be confused with the A4-5300, a CPU released in 2012) is a Lucienne family processor designed for use in thin and light laptops. The R3 5300U integrates four cores (quad core) based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.6 (guaranteed base clock) to 3.8 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 8 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the older and similar Ryzen 3 4300U (Renoir), the Ryzen 3 5300U offers SMT and slightly higher clock speeds. The faster Ryzen 3 5400U is based on the newer Zen 3 architecture. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information on the Lucienne / Renoir architecture.

In addition to the four CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 4 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5300U in our database matches the Core i5-11300H, the Core i7-11375H and also the Ryzen 5 4500U in multi-thread performance, making it an outstandingly good chip as far as sub-US$700 laptops go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. By going for the lowest value possible, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the chip, however, most companies will do the opposite to achieve higher performance levels.

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is built with TSMC's 7 nm manufacturing process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Processor N200AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
CodenameAlder Lake-NLucienne-U (Zen 2)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Series: Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000) Lucienne-U (Zen 2)
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U compare1.8 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U « 2.6 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz2600 - 3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 8
TDP6 Watt25 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
SocketFP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 5300U
27.7 pt (46%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (23%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
min: 4772     avg: 5212     median: 5341 (5%)     max: 5522 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N200 +
690 Points (28%)
min: 1102     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (45%)     max: 1129 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
min: 431     avg: 436     median: 436 (47%)     max: 441 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
min: 1883     avg: 2039     median: 2067 (5%)     max: 2138 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
min: 832     avg: 884     median: 906 (6%)     max: 915 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
min: 166     avg: 168.7     median: 170 (47%)     max: 170 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
9.3 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
5118 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
22139 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
35101 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
8723 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
321.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
2551 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
min: 19170     avg: 21836     median: 21971 (13%)     max: 24366 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
min: 3755     avg: 3971     median: 3960 (47%)     max: 4198 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
min: 5.87     avg: 6.4     median: 6.5 (11%)     max: 6.74 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
0.5 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
5.1 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
min: 968     avg: 1069     median: 1069 (14%)     max: 1170 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
min: 524     avg: 562     median: 544 (4%)     max: 617 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
min: 0.654     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.664 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
7931 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
366 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
min: 6183     avg: 7499     median: 7958 (20%)     max: 8356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
min: 7689     avg: 8517     median: 8604 (22%)     max: 9257 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
min: 10839     avg: 11948     median: 12075 (22%)     max: 12929 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
min: 3541     avg: 3683     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 3920 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
N200 +
956 Points (22%)
1435 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
4856 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (31%)
min: 1040     avg: 1063     median: 1070 (36%)     max: 1080 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
min: 3730     avg: 3976     median: 4008 (7%)     max: 4191 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
min: 1049     avg: 1063     median: 1062.5 (5%)     max: 1076 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
min: 4079     avg: 4107     median: 4106.5 (13%)     max: 4134 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
4560 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
16261 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
16771 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4096 Points (53%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
18122 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4432 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 878     avg: 891     median: 890 (1%)     max: 906 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
52372 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 144.3     avg: 147.3     median: 147.3 (38%)     max: 150.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
min: 187.3     avg: 191.9     median: 187.4 (34%)     max: 201 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N200 +
614 Points (23%)
min: 932     avg: 934     median: 933.5 (35%)     max: 935 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
min: 30.2     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (6%)     max: 43 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
min: 33     avg: 40.1     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 46.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
min: 3.11     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.51 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.43     avg: 16.9     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 39.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
min: 19.7     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (17%)     max: 25.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 5300U → 233% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 15:50:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12985 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762354235s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Nov 2025 05:20:59 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12985 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 12985 +0.01s ... 0.03s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.085s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)