Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i3-N305

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095 and the N5095A is that the latter comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database is about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095 has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095 is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N200Intel Celeron N5095Intel Core i3-N305
CodenameAlder Lake-NJasper LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
SocketBGA1338BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
L1 Cache768 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
20.6 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
144%
1 i3-N305 +
65 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
356%
1 i3-N305 +
324 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N200 +
690 Points (29%)
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (25%)     max: 239 Points
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (41%)     max: 380 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (29%)     max: 109 Points
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.29 Points
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (11%)     max: 17278 Points
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (8%)     max: 25.25 fps
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (19%)     max: 56.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
2.5 GB/s (7%)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
2936 Seconds (37%)
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
9081 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
20.5 s (4%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
45.7 s (2%)
36.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
1039 s (5%)
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
305%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (11%)     max: 4439 Points
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (22%)     max: 9111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
55544 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
56367 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N200 +
34749 Points (28%)
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (38%)     max: 48186 Points
61854 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
137%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (33%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
282%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
148%
1 i3-N305 +
1261 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
333%
1 i3-N305 +
4584 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (36%)
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (25%)     max: 659 Points
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (41%)     max: 1083 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (8%)     max: 7968 Points
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (26%)     max: 96.2 Points
176%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (46%)     max: 194 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (22%)     max: 127.2 Points
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (33%)     max: 190.4 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
43 MB/s (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
374.6 MB/s (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (42%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N200 +
614 Points (23%)
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (18%)     max: 495 Points
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (34%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
36.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
4.9 Watt (3%)
161%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
139%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 116% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 218% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 24. 19:53:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756058007s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.01s ... 0.041s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.092s ... 0.133s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.133s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)