Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G71 MP8 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP22

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP8

The ARM Mali-G71 MP8 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 in November 2016 for the first time. Based on initial benchmarks, the GPU performance is slightly better compared to the Adreno 530 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821. It is therefore one of the most powerful graphics units for (Android) devices in the end of 2016.

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
ARM Mali-G71 MP8ARM Mali-G78 MP22
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameMimirValhall
ArchitectureBifrostValhall
Pipelines8 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology16 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement03.06.2016 26.05.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...https://www.arm.com/products/silicon-ip-...
CPU in Mali-G71 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9608 x 2400 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 960s8 x 2100 MHz? MHz900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 32243     avg: 35201     median: 35210 (4%)     max: 38979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1900     avg: 2396     median: 2399 (13%)     max: 2894 Points
11598 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1848     avg: 2494     median: 2463.5 (6%)     max: 3241 Points
16653 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1600     avg: 1994     median: 2011 (12%)     max: 2368 Points
9630 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1511     avg: 1957     median: 1967.5 (7%)     max: 2380 Points
12079 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6399 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1805 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 7 fps
31 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
76 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (2%)     max: 18 fps
64 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 23.3     median: 23 (0%)     max: 28 fps
112 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 33.3     median: 32 (2%)     max: 44 fps
154 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 43     avg: 71.9     median: 73.5 (1%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
232 fps (2%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 31104     avg: 34536     median: 34536 (78%)     max: 37968 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 42176     avg: 42979     median: 42979 (96%)     max: 43782 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
74.4 fps (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10073     avg: 10164     median: 10164 (10%)     max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1909     avg: 1915     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 1921 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 515% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 ~ 44 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 60 ~ 49 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 45 56 60 ~ 48 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-G78 MP22lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile30
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
2









ARM Mali-G78 MP22lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Arena of Valor5959
Shadow Fight 34449
Battle Bay5959
Dead Trigger 248
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4





4


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.25
log 24. 15:27:37

#0 checking url part for id 7648 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:58:40 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.122s ... 0.123s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.123s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.123s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7648 +0.036s ... 0.158s

#8 got single benchmarks 7648 +0.018s ... 0.176s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0.002s ... 0.178s

#10 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.006s ... 0.184s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.184s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.073s ... 0.258s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.258s

#14 Got 29 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.265s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.265s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.268s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.287s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.287s

#19 return log +0.033s ... 0.32s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)