Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP5 vs Qualcomm Adreno 302 vs ARM Mali-G76 MP12

ARM Mali-G57 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP5

The ARM Mali-G57 MP5 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 and uses 5 clusters (hence the MC5/MP5 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP5 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 / Remi 10x) is comparable to the Adreno 540 and also the ARM Mali-G57 MP6 (most likely due to higher clock rates).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G57 MP5Qualcomm Adreno 302ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines5 - unified6 - unified10 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesno
technology7 nm28 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020 20.06.2013 31.08.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed400 MHz
APIDirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0OpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Mali-G57 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
38974 Points (4%)
min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (0%)     max: 3678 Points
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (7%)     max: 72022 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (0%)     max: 4482 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5469 Points (24%)
min: 4052     avg: 4561     median: 4618 (20%)     max: 5048 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
5991 Points (13%)
min: 4449     avg: 5066     median: 5083 (11%)     max: 5605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4497 Points (19%)
min: 4529     avg: 4827     median: 4720.5 (20%)     max: 5300 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
4798 Points (12%)
min: 5358     avg: 5606     median: 5394.5 (13%)     max: 6087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
5267 Points (47%)
min: 4015     avg: 4653     median: 4502 (40%)     max: 5186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
5996 Points (36%)
min: 4507     avg: 5329     median: 5303 (32%)     max: 6058 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
4568 Points (22%)
min: 4383     avg: 4639     median: 4528 (22%)     max: 5003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
4769 Points (16%)
min: 5152     avg: 5349     median: 5196 (17%)     max: 5712 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (2%)
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
32 fps (2%)
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (3%)     max: 48 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
29 fps (3%)
min: 21     avg: 35.5     median: 39 (4%)     max: 43 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
52 fps (1%)
min: 47     avg: 58.7     median: 59 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
71 fps (3%)
1.3 fps (0%)
min: 67     avg: 80     median: 85 (4%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP5
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
115 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
min: 50     avg: 103.7     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 143 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
1316 Points (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
3442 Points (8%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
42 fps (1%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (1%)     max: 2780 Points
7354 Points (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
6315 Points (10%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 5% n=3

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 127% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
97%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
98%
Mali-G76 MP12:
39  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
98%
Mali-G76 MP12:
38 39 40 40 ~ 39 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP5:
30  fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 98%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

ARM Mali-G57 MP5Qualcomm Adreno 302ARM Mali-G76 MP12
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile604040583939
Dead Trigger 26060
Asphalt 9: Legends303030
ARM Mali-G57 MP5Qualcomm Adreno 302ARM Mali-G76 MP12
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1


2
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 27. 21:24:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10480 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751052271s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10480 +0.019s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 10480 +0s ... 0.039s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0s ... 0.039s

#12 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.008s ... 0.048s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0s ... 0.048s

#14 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.006s ... 0.054s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.069s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.069s

#18 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.072s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.072s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.092s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.094s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.094s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)