Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 530

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 530

The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.

The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.

show full text
ARM Mali-G57 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 530
Adreno 500 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines4 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
technology7 nm14 nm
Date of Announcement03.07.2020 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed624 MHz
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1)
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
UNISOC T8208 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7608 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - 850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHz
min. - max.? MHz624 - 850 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
37882 Points (4%)
min: 24310     avg: 32869     median: 32997 (4%)     max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
min: 2649     avg: 3348     median: 3425 (15%)     max: 3806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
min: 3401     avg: 4503     median: 4661.5 (10%)     max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3410     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (17%)     max: 3557 Points
min: 2252     avg: 2605     median: 2594.5 (13%)     max: 2893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3353     avg: 3361     median: 3360.5 (10%)     max: 3368 Points
min: 2488     avg: 2996     median: 3108 (9%)     max: 3253 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1620     avg: 1631     median: 1630.5 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
8.2 fps (1%)
min: 7.1     avg: 8.4     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
22 fps (2%)
min: 15     avg: 17.7     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
20 fps (2%)
min: 14     avg: 18.3     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 33.8     median: 34 (1%)     max: 37 fps
min: 12     avg: 28.6     median: 31 (1%)     max: 34.02 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (3%)     max: 55 fps
min: 26     avg: 43     median: 44.5 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19     avg: 83.3     median: 88 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (13%)     max: 106975 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 21420     avg: 30602     median: 33028 (75%)     max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 28538     avg: 37215     median: 38353 (85%)     max: 41500 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
34.2 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24573 Points (25%)
min: 4781     avg: 5512     median: 5612.5 (6%)     max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
22448 Points (39%)
min: 1913     avg: 2183     median: 2178.5 (4%)     max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4410 Points (96%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 78% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 30 30 30 30 56 58 59 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 530:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 48 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 530:
60  fps
high
Adreno 530:
35 51 ~ 43 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-G57 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





2
1









Qualcomm Adreno 530lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 243
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
Real Racing 36043
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1



1
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 13. 20:42:10

#0 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.087s ... 0.088s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.088s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.088s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.028s ... 0.116s

#8 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.014s ... 0.13s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0.002s ... 0.132s

#10 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.047s ... 0.179s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.179s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.2s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.205s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.29s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.29s

#16 Got 46 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.303s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.303s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.306s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.319s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.319s

#21 return log +0.077s ... 0.396s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)