Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Not only does this APU have full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also boasts the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M2AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
SeriesApple Apple M2AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3480 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache2 MB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache20 MB8 MB6 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP20 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Transistors20000 Million
Technology5 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
45.4 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (84%)
102 Points (71%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
902 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
min: 15889     avg: 16963     median: 16963 (16%)     max: 18037 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
min: 1716     avg: 1746     median: 1745.5 (74%)     max: 1775 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
min: 677     avg: 684     median: 683.5 (76%)     max: 690 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
min: 6231     avg: 6629     median: 6628.5 (16%)     max: 7026 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
min: 2555     avg: 2732     median: 2731.5 (17%)     max: 2908 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (67%)     max: 229 Points
min: 274     avg: 277     median: 277 (83%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.3 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7523 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
47332 Points (34%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
170 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
19008 Points (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 65072     avg: 69868     median: 69868 (40%)     max: 74664 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6274     avg: 6423     median: 6422.5 (77%)     max: 6571 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.7     median: 20.7 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
min: 288     avg: 320     median: 320 (4%)     max: 352 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
min: 179     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4383     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4464 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
660 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
21241 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22215 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27660 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10069 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2610     median: 2593 (70%)     max: 2650 Points
min: 2540     avg: 2613     median: 2613 (70%)     max: 2686 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10071     median: 10085 (40%)     max: 10093 Points
min: 12578     avg: 13296     median: 13296 (52%)     max: 14014 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (81%)     max: 1953 Points
min: 1875     avg: 1923     median: 1923 (81%)     max: 1971 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
min: 11802     avg: 12264     median: 12264 (22%)     max: 12726 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 440     avg: 451.2     median: 450.1 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
min: 496     avg: 514     median: 513.5 (1%)     max: 531 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 74555     median: 74746 (67%)     max: 77756 Points
91639 Points (82%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 223     avg: 236.6     median: 227 (65%)     max: 256 Points
min: 247     avg: 255.5     median: 255.5 (73%)     max: 264 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 342     avg: 369.1     median: 377 (79%)     max: 387 Points
min: 295     avg: 300     median: 300 (63%)     max: 305 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (81%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (82%)     max: 301865 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1521     median: 1513.5 (58%)     max: 1585 Points
1852 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
74 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
78.1 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 7.64     avg: 8.8     median: 9.1 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
3.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
6.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)
32.7 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 03. 14:02:07

#0 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.017s ... 0.058s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.018s ... 0.076s

#10 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.012s ... 0.088s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.003s ... 0.091s

#12 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.091s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.114s ... 0.205s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.098s ... 0.302s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.303s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)