Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX is top of the mobile graphic cards line from NVIDIA (of the 7000 series) and successor of the 7900 GTX graphics card. It enables the user to play all  games from 2006 fluently in the highest resolutions and options. As a consequence, the heat is correspondingly high. Therefore it can be used only in DTR laptops (17"). At moment, there is nothing better for gamers (except the SLI version with 2 cards).

The performance can be compared partially even with the Desktop 7950 GT video cards (partially a bit better, according NVIDIA). Therefore, the Geforce Go 7950 GTX is able to display actual games like F.E.A.R., Company of Heroes, or Call of Duty 2 fluently in high details and high resolutions.

The chip also features the PureVideo Technology but has less features as the PureVideo engine in the current 8600M GT chip. > Comparison of PureVideo features

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

The AMD Radeon Graphics of the Ryzen 7000 desktop CPUs is an integrated graphics card (iGPU) based on the RDNA 2 architecture. It offers only 2 CUs (128 shader) and is similar to the Radeon 610M. The clock speed in most CPUs ranges between 400 to 2200 MHz. Due to the low amount of shaders, the gaming performance is very low and only suited for low demanding games. The GPU also integrates an AMD Video Coding Engine (VCE) for H.264, H.265 10/8bpc encoding and AV1, VP9, H.265, and H.264 10/8bpc decoding.

show full text
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTXAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
AMD Radeon 600M Series
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI compare 48/16 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI compare 48/16 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7950 GTX 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI compare 40/14 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Radeon 680M compare 768 @ 2.4 GHz
Radeon 660M compare 384 @ 1.9 GHz
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 128 @ 2.2 GHz
Radeon 610M compare 128 @ 0.4 - 2.2 GHz
CodenameG71MRaphael
ArchitectureG7xRDNA 2
Pipelines24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader128 - unified
Core Speed575 MHz2200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption45 Watt
Transistors278 Million3.4 Billion
technology90 nm6 nm
FeaturesHDR, Intellisample 4.0, UltraShadow II, PureVideo, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, Transparency Antialiasing
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement12.10.2006 26.09.2022
Information90nm, 278 Mio transistors, MXM-Module, Drivers are available at nvidia.com
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
TMUs8
ROPs4
Raytracing Cores1
Die Size 122 mm²
CPU in Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X16 x 4500 MHz, 170 W400 MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D16 x 4200 MHz, 120 W400 MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X12 x 4700 MHz, 170 W? MHz? MHz
» show 6 more
min. - max.400 MHz2200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
1 pt (3%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -94%
...
AMD FirePro W5130M
0.961 -8%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
0.968 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
0.988 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
0.991 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
1.002 -4%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
1.006 -3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
1.023 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
1.035 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
1.035 -1%
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
1.042
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.057 1%
AMD FirePro M5100
1.06 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
1.062 2%
NVIDIA Quadro M520
1.067 2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
1.068 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 845M
1.076 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
1.085 4%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
1.102 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
1.107 6%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
21.1 1925%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 3096%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
845 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
725 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
159603 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66294 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
16760 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15247 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2183 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2287 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100802 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3466 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
3026 Points (3%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
11455 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
8837 Points (5%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
32000 Points (33%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21000 Points (11%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9395     avg: 9700     median: 9700 (11%)     max: 10005 Points
38243 Points (42%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
3DMark 06
5214 Points (7%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
3DMark 06
min: 5502     avg: 5659     median: 5659 (7%)     max: 5816 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
21514 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6826     avg: 15026     median: 17745 (13%)     max: 18855 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 198.52     avg: 203     median: 205 (71%)     max: 205.43 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 100     avg: 164.3     median: 101.4 (6%)     max: 359.59 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.9     avg: 98.4     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 99.6 %

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) → 387% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
46.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
18.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
5.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
49.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
18.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
13.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
8.7  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
54  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
17.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
11.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
9  fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
35.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
23  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
20.5  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
19.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
19.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
5.7  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
157.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
61.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
25.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
23.6  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
84  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
12  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
61.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
21.2  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
405  fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
199  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
85  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
189.1  fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
190.7  fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
189.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
176.5  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce Go 7950 GTX:
552  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 202146.318.3155.66
F1 202049.718.713.78.67
Strange Brigade5417.411.49
X-Plane 11.1135.92320.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark19.319.35.74
Dota 2 Reborn157.861.825.723.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
4

1		5

1
6


4








NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTXlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 14048412
Crysis - GPU Benchmark61.921.2
F.E.A.R.40519985
Doom 3189.1190.7189.9176.5
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo552
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
2		1


2

1
2		1


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 20:00:03

#0 checking url part for id 1 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11422 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.079s ... 0.08s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.08s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.08s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1 +0.029s ... 0.109s

#8 got single benchmarks 1 +0.037s ... 0.146s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11422 +0.02s ... 0.166s

#10 got single benchmarks 11422 +0.016s ... 0.182s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.182s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.2s ... 0.383s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.383s

#14 Got 34 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.389s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.389s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.396s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.028s ... 0.424s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.424s

#19 return log +0.071s ... 0.495s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)