Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Celeron J4125 vs Intel Celeron J4115

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Celeron J4125

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4125

The Intel Celeron J4125 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (2019 refresh). Compared to the predecessor, the refresh offers slightly higher clock speeds. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, partial Wi-Fi 5 support, all in a smaller package. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4125 in our database outguns the AMD 3050e just slightly, the latter being a dual-core, Zen-based, entry-level processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that's good for basic day-to-day activities only.

The Beelink GK Mini is one of the fastest systems built around the J4125 that we know of. It can be roughly 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. This is low enough, allowing laptop makers to ditch fans while building a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4125 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N5105Intel Celeron J4125Intel Celeron J4115
CodenameJasper LakeGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 « 2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2000 - 2700 MHz1800 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4125
17.1 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2175 Points (2%)
min: 860     avg: 1203     median: 1186 (1%)     max: 1563 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
618 Points (26%)
min: 392     avg: 425.3     median: 438 (18%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
235 Points (26%)
min: 155     avg: 166.2     median: 170 (19%)     max: 174 Points
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
826 Points (2%)
min: 304     avg: 449.2     median: 430 (1%)     max: 610 Points
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
368 Points (2%)
min: 148     avg: 223.4     median: 243 (2%)     max: 271 Points
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
108.1 Points (30%)
min: 63.1     avg: 72.5     median: 75.3 (21%)     max: 79.1 Points
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.13     avg: 2.8     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.09 Points
3.2 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.92 Points
0.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2070     avg: 2159     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2295 Points
2087 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4102     avg: 6188     median: 7128 (5%)     max: 7335 Points
7426 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 9697     avg: 10201     median: 10201 (7%)     max: 10705 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3669     avg: 3690     median: 3690 (4%)     max: 3711 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 566     avg: 608     median: 603 (7%)     max: 654.159 s
564 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 17.3     avg: 18     median: 17.4 (3%)     max: 19.42 s
19.1 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1019     avg: 1069     median: 1048 (2%)     max: 1140 Points
1203 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
11153 MIPS (6%)
min: 5694     avg: 7248     median: 7494 (4%)     max: 8399 MIPS
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3108 MIPS (37%)
min: 2237     avg: 2358     median: 2369 (28%)     max: 2444 MIPS
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.31     avg: 13.7     median: 13.1 (4%)     max: 16.75 fps
17.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 52.6     avg: 64.3     median: 61.4 (14%)     max: 78.9 fps
76.3 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
min: 0.95     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (3%)     max: 1.61 fps
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.163     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.182 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.196     avg: 0.2     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.266 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.8     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (5%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2940 Seconds (37%)
7856 Seconds (100%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1573 Seconds (11%)
min: 2198     avg: 2772     median: 2391 (17%)     max: 3860 Seconds
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.2 sec (25%)
min: 1.525     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (34%)     max: 1.579 sec
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2373     avg: 3327     median: 3740 (8%)     max: 3869 Points
3683 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 24.57     avg: 31.6     median: 24.6 (5%)     max: 45.52 s
27.4 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 55.9     avg: 68.9     median: 57.4 (2%)     max: 93.4 s
63.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1332.53     avg: 3652     median: 1845 (8%)     max: 7778 s
1472 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3522     avg: 5431     median: 5430.5 (4%)     max: 7339 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4394 Points (11%)
min: 2348     avg: 2705     median: 2706 (7%)     max: 2986 Points
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 10102     avg: 19782     median: 19782 (16%)     max: 29462 Points
27642 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11105     avg: 23313     median: 29231 (24%)     max: 29602 Points
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17507     avg: 26606     median: 26606 (21%)     max: 35705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3869 Points (10%)
min: 1196     avg: 2273     median: 2485 (6%)     max: 2804 Points
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5498 Points (10%)
min: 1602     avg: 3372     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4271 Points
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1643 Points (7%)
min: 876     avg: 994     median: 984 (4%)     max: 1122 Points
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
653 Points (26%)
min: 435     avg: 454.2     median: 455 (18%)     max: 466 Points
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (16%)     max: 410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2080 Points (4%)
min: 1198     avg: 1367     median: 1394 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
min: 451     avg: 455.7     median: 453 (2%)     max: 463 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
min: 1163     avg: 1388     median: 1482 (5%)     max: 1519 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1922     avg: 1948     median: 1924 (19%)     max: 1997 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4246     avg: 5158     median: 5468 (5%)     max: 5761 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1582 ms (2%)
min: 2216     avg: 2258     median: 2276 (3%)     max: 2291 ms
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
96.2 Points (26%)
68.2 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
134.2 Points (24%)
min: 86.2     avg: 89.2     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 93.2 Points
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
531 Points (20%)
340 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
min: 7.87     avg: 12.5     median: 12.4 (2%)     max: 17.4 Watt
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.7 Watt (4%)
min: 9.24     avg: 11     median: 11.4 (2%)     max: 12.3 Watt
12.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)
min: 13     avg: 18.4     median: 19.8 (15%)     max: 22.4 Points per Watt
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4125 → 67% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 66% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 18:23:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12749 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756311836s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:55:59 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12749 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 12749 +0.007s ... 0.028s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#13 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.086s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.086s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)